Elsevier

Powder Technology

Volume 363, 1 March 2020, Pages 169-180
Powder Technology

An improved CFD simulation for investigation of the sand particles flow behavior in the sand shooting process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.055Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The EMMS-based drag model is introduced in sand shooting simulation.

  • Validation of simulation by high-speed camera recording experiments is illustrated.

  • Specularity coefficient affects sand particles flow behaviors.

  • EMMS model get a well-prediction for smaller particles and dense flow.

Abstract

The flow behavior of sand particles has been examined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and experimental validations in sand shooting process. To avoid over-estimating the drag force between gas and solid phases, the energy minimization multiscale model(EMMS)has been incorporated. An applicable value of grid size is determined by grid dependency study. Three specularity coefficients are simulated to get an insight into the influence on the flow hydrodynamics of sand particles. The specularity coefficient affects tangential velocity and volume distribution of sand particles. No slip wall boundary condition is in better agreement with experimental data. With validation of sand shooting experiment, agreement is achieved between experiment images and simulation results. A comparison between EMMS drag model and Gidaspow model has been discussed in terms of simulating particles flow behavior with different particle diameters. The EMMS drag model has an accuracy prediction especially for smaller particles and dense flow.

Introduction

The sand shooting process is the most widely used technique in metal casting industry for manufacture of sand cores and has a significant affected on qualities of sand cores [1]. Due to the complexity of sand shooting process, the mechanisms of sand particles flow behavior and the interaction between air and sand particles are not fully understood. Therefore, a further investigation of the instantaneous gas-particle flow behavior is still necessary in the sand shooting process [2].

Nowadays, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a powerful tool to investigate the hydrodynamic behavior of gas-solid flow [3,4]. CFD models for gas-solid flow can be summarized in three models at different scales [5]: direct numerical simulation(DNS) [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10]], discrete particle model(DPM) [[11], [12], [13]],and two-fluid model(TFM). The TFM which is based on Eulerian-Eulerian theory, treats both particles and gas phase as interpenetrating continua are widely used to simulate gas-solid flow [14,15]. For the simulation of large-scale gas-solid fluidized system, a two-fluid model with the kinetic theory of granular flow(KTGF) initiated by Jenkins and Savage [16], Lun et al. [17]and Ding and Gidaspow [18], has become a preferred method due to its high computational efficiency [19] and successfully simulated dilute gas-solid flows [20,21]. At present, multi-size solid particles in real system has been taken into account with kinetic theory for multi-particulate flow [22]. With the coupling of population balance equation, the sub-processes such as collision, attachment and detachment in gas-solid flow have been investigated and achieved reasonable agreement with experiments [23,24]. However, the assumption that the particle-particle interactions are only binary collisions in KTGF model limits its application in dense flows [[25], [26], [27], [28]]. Therefore, the frictional stress is proposed in the solid shear viscosity in dense regions and several frictional models have been successfully used into the dense flow [[29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]].

The interphase momentum model especially the drag model has an important influence on the gas-solid flow simulation [[37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]]. Several average-based drag models such as Wen and Yu [43], Syamlal and O'brien [44] and Gidaspow [15], have been proposed in TFM which based on the assumption of particles distributed homogeneously in computational grids. However, some reports found that the average-based drag models overestimated the drag force [[45], [46], [47], [48]]. Li and Kwauk [49,50]found the strong dependence of the drag coefficient with mesoscale structure. Some researchers suggested that the heterogeneous flow sub-grid microstructure had significant effects on drag force [[51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]]. However, TFM has issues that it requires high grid resolution and small steps to capture the dynamic evolution of particle-fluid mesoscale structures [[57], [58], [59], [60]].

In order to account for the effects of mesoscale structures, the drag model based on the energy minimization multiscale model(EMMS) is incorporated into the two-fluid model to simulate gas-solid flow [61,62]. Lu et al. [[63], [64], [65]] has proven that the EMMS-based approach reaches a mesh-independent solution of the sub-grid structure and has an accurate result in gas-solid dynamic simulation for both Geldart group A, B particles. The EMMS-based drag model has been widely reported to predict gas-solid flows and the results showed a higher accuracy prediction than homogeneous drag model [[66], [67], [68], [69]].

The two-fluid model has been applied for sand shooting process and there are some publications on it. Winartomo et al. [70]proposed the multiphase model for simulation of core shooting process and a qualitatively validation was made by experiments. Wu et al. [[71], [72], [73]] applied the TFM with KTGF for the core shooting simulation. Their simulation results were coincident with the testing results. Bakhtiyarov and Overfelt [1] investigated the rheological properties of resin-bonded sand/air mixture with TFM and Ostwald model. With the numerical predictions and experimental measurements, pressure variation and flow rate were presented in the cold box core molding process. Pelzer et al. [74] took viscosity, momentum exchange and solid pressure into consideration. With special emphasis of these items on the common two-fluid model, a sufficient agreement was achieved between numerical results and experimental observations. Ni et al. [[75], [76], [77]] applied TFM with a kinetic-frictional constitutive correlation to simulate flow dynamics of core shooting process and found that the vents and sand properties have a significant influence on flow behavior of particles. Tong et al. [78] investigated the influence of restitution on the sand flow behavior by TFM and found that restitution leads to a difference of sand particles distribution and velocity. However, the sand shooting process is a dynamic transformation process with dilute, dense and gas-particle interaction phase in sand box. The heterogeneous flow sub-grid microstructure is needed to investigate in sand shooting process.

In this paper, the EMMS-based drag model which has a widely used in fluidized bed is incorporated into the TFM to investigate the sand shooting process. A grid dependency study is made to validate the grid independence of the model. Several wall boundary conditions (free-slip, partial-slip and no-slip) were introduced to investigate the effect of specularity coefficient on sand flow behavior. Experiments with transparent core box and computer controlled high-speed camera were used to study flow dynamic behavior in the sand shooting process with simulation results.

In order to study the influence of heterogeneous microstructure on flow behaviors, a comparison between EMMS-based and Gidaspow drag model was made.

Section snippets

Mathematical model

The two-fluid model (TFM) is based on the kinetic theory of granular flow, both phases are treated as a continuum and the conservation equations of mass and momentum are solved for each phase respectively. In present literatures, the laminar model and turbulence model predict nearly the same flow behavior of sand particles which is agreement with the reports that there is no strong turbulent behavior in dense gas-solid flow [2,79,80]. Therefore, a laminar model is applied for sand shooting

Experimental setup

Fig. 1 shows a sketch of experimental setup of the sand shooting process. A computer-controlled high-speed camera (IDT MotionPro Y4) was used to record the flow behavior of sand particles through the transparent front wall made of plexiglas. A highlight LED lamp was placed on the front of the sand shooting machine to illuminate the sand box. During the sand shooting process, photographs were recorded and transferred to computer directly. The camera collection frequency was set to 400 HZ which

Grid dependency study

The EMMS model is a sub-grid scale model which can capture a mesoscale structure of multi-phase. A grid dependency study was conducted to ensure that simulation of sand shooting process is independent of the grid size. Five different grid sizes 1.5 mm, 2 mm, 2.5 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm were considered. The diameter of nozzle is 15 mm that is the same as experimental condition and no-slip boundary condition was selected in our simulations. Fig. 3 shows the sand volume fraction at shooting time t

Conclusions

A two-fluid model, incorporated with EMMS-based drag model is applied to investigate the flow behavior of gas and particle phases in the sand shooting process. A grid dependency study and the influence of wall boundary conditions have been investigated. Agreement was achieved between experimental and simulation results in the simulation of morphology and location of sand flows. Finally, a comparison between EMMS and Gidaspow drag model was made. The following conclusions can be drawn:

  • (1)

    The

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This research was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (no. 51775205 and No. 51605174).

References (95)

  • M.F. Rahaman et al.

    Kinetic theory for multi-particulate flow: description of granular flow with rotary movement of particles

    Powder Technol.

    (2020)
  • A.R. Sarhan et al.

    CFD analysis of solid particles properties effect in three-phase flotation column

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2017)
  • Y.T. Makkawi et al.

    The effect of friction and inter-particle cohesive forces on the hydrodynamics of gas–solid flow: a comparative analysis of theoretical predictions and experiments

    Powder Technol.

    (2006)
  • Y. Makkawi et al.

    A model for gas–solid flow in a horizontal duct with a smooth merge of rapid–intermediate–dense flows

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2006)
  • W. Pu et al.

    Numerical simulation on dense phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal in horizontal pipe at high pressure

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2010)
  • X. Qiu et al.

    A simplified two-fluid model coupled with EMMS drag for gas-solid flows

    Powder Technol.

    (2017)
  • D.G. Schaeffer

    Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow

    J. Differ. Equ.

    (1987)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Gas-solid flow behaviour prediction for sand in bypass pneumatic conveying with conventional frictional-kinetic model

    Appl. Math. Model.

    (2016)
  • E. Ghadirian et al.

    Numerical analysis of frictional behavior of dense gas-solid systems

    Particuology

    (2017)
  • M. Farzaneh et al.

    The crucial role of frictional stress models for simulation of bubbling fluidized beds

    Powder Technol.

    (2015)
  • S. Cloete et al.

    The effect of frictional pressure, geometry and wall friction on the modelling of a pseudo-2D bubbling fluidised bed reactor

    Powder Technol.

    (2015)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Modification of kinetic theory of granular flow for frictional spheres, part I: two-fluid model derivation and numerical implementation

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2016)
  • J. Chen et al.

    A structure-based drag model for the simulation of Geldart A and B particles in turbulent fluidized beds

    Powder Technol.

    (2015)
  • X.X. Liu et al.

    Two-fluid modeling of Geldart A particles in gas-solid micro-fluidized beds

    Particuology

    (2015)
  • Z.Q. Huang et al.

    Effects of granular temperature on inter-phase drag in gas-solid flows

    Powder Technol.

    (2017)
  • A. Bakshi et al.

    Eulerian-Eulerian simulation of dense solid-gas cylindrical fluidized beds: impact of wall boundary condition and drag model on fluidization

    Powder Technol.

    (2015)
  • N. Yang et al.

    CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas–solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2003)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    Effects of gas-solid drag model on Eulerian-Eulerian CFD simulation of coal combustion in a circulating fluidized bed

    Powder Technol.

    (2018)
  • Q. Zhou et al.

    CFD study of mixing and segregation in CFB risers: extension of EMMS drag model to binary gas-solid flow

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L.T. Zhu et al.

    A material-property-dependent sub-grid drag model for coarse-grained simulation of 3D large-scale CFB risers

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2019)
  • W.M. Liu et al.

    A new structural parameters model based on drag coefficient for simulation of circulating fluidized beds

    Powder Technol.

    (2015)
  • J.H. Li et al.

    Dissipative structure in concurrent-up gas-solid flow

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1998)
  • J. Li et al.

    Exploring complex systems in chemical engineering—the multi-scale methodology

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2003)
  • Y.J. Tian et al.

    Structure-dependent analysis of energy dissipation in gas-solid flows: beyond nonequilibrium thermodynamics

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2017)
  • F.F. Song et al.

    A sub-grid EMMS drag for multiphase particle-in-cell simulation of fluidization

    Powder Technol.

    (2018)
  • C.F. Liu et al.

    Structure-dependent multi-fluid model for mass transfer and reactions in gas-solid fluidized beds

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2015)
  • X.Z. Chen et al.

    Mesoscale-structure-based dynamic multiscale method for gas-solid flow

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2018)
  • C.M.R. Luna et al.

    A comparative assessment of empirical and lattice Boltzmann method-based drag models for simulation of gas-solid flow hydrodynamics in a bubbling fluidized bed

    Particuology

    (2017)
  • S. Chen et al.

    CFD simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow and mixing in a FCC riser with feedstock injection

    Powder Technol.

    (2016)
  • K. Hong et al.

    Fine-grid two-fluid modeling of fluidization of Geldart A particles

    Powder Technol.

    (2016)
  • D.Z. Zhang et al.

    High-resolution three-dimensional numerical simulation of a circulating fluidized bed

    Powder Technol.

    (2001)
  • M.T. Shah et al.

    Hydrodynamics of an FCC riser using energy minimization multiscale drag model

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach—of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2007)
  • B. Lu et al.

    Searching for a mesh-independent sub-grid model for CFD simulation of gas–solid riser flows

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2009)
  • B. Lu et al.

    Eulerian simulation of gas–solid flows with particles of Geldart groups A, B and D using EMMS-based meso-scale model

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2011)
  • B. Lu et al.

    Multi-scale CFD simulation of gas–solid flow in MIP reactors with a structure-dependent drag model

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2007)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Bubble behavior in gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds based on EMMS model: comparison of 2D, Q2D, and 3D simulations

    Chem. Eng. Res. Des.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (2)

    View full text