Elsevier

Trends in Food Science & Technology

Volume 96, February 2020, Pages 222-232
Trends in Food Science & Technology

Bitterness in alcoholic beverages: The profiles of perception, constituents, and contributors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The bitterness profile in alcoholic beverages was described.

  • Polyphenols, iso-α-acids, higher alcohols, and bitter peptides are the major bitter compounds.

  • Raw materials and microbial metabolism were the major contributor to bitterness.

  • Improvement on bio-electronic sensor to identify bitter components was suggested.

  • The bitterness metabolic mechanism is needed further microbial exploration.

Abstract

Background

Bitterness is a basic flavor in alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, liquor, and rice wine) and has physiological significance, although excessive and disharmonious bitterness is unpleasant. Current research on flavor in alcoholic beverages is primarily focused on volatile constituents and distinctive flavor compounds. However, studies on the recognition, identification, and metabolic mechanism of bitter substances are still in the preliminary phase.

Scope and approach

This review provides an integrated account of the signal transduction and recognition, composition and sensory properties of bitterness in alcoholic beverages. Abiotic and biotic factors within fermentation systems that may influence the bitterness of the fermented beverages are summarized. Future research on the molecular characteristics, taste attributes, and metabolic pathways of bitterness are discussed herein.

Key findings and conclusions

Polyphenol and iso-α-acid extracted from grapes and hops are the typical bitter substances in wine and beer. Microbial metabolites, including bitter peptides and higher alcohols, are the primary contributors to bitterness in liquor and rice wine. These compounds can activate one or more specific bitter taste receptors. Manufacturing processes and sensory interactions also influence the perception of bitterness. Establishing normative bitterness scoring methods and distinguishing acceptable and unacceptable bitterness based on sensory physiology will continue to be the goals of bitterness research. Further elucidation of the metabolic mechanism underlying bitterness through a combination of omics and synthetic microbiology will allow for taste characteristics of alcoholic beverages to be manipulated.

Introduction

Alcoholic beverages are hedonic goods that have been consumed in societies for a long time and may also have an important role on diets by providing polyphenols and bioactive peptides (Cai et al., 2019; Jin, Zhu, & Xu, 2017). Wine, beer, liquor, and rice wine are alcoholic beverages that are popular worldwide and whose global prevalence has increased over thousands of years due to their excellent aroma and taste (de Freitas, 2019; H.; Liu & Sun, 2018; S.; Soares, Brandao, Mateus, & de Freitas, 2017). The effect of consumption preferences on sensory interactions indicates that unpleasant flavors are a significant barrier to product acceptance (Prescott, 2015). To be successful in the modern alcoholic beverage marketplace, a producer must have a comprehensive understanding of the science underlying the choices of customers. Bitterness perception is considered a defense mechanism against toxicants that activates central warning signals to regulate food intake (Peng et al., 2015). Differences in physiological mechanisms among individuals, various environmental factors, and the interaction of functional groups between substances affect bitter perception (Spence, 2015). Additionally, short periods of repeated intake of alcoholic beverages will enhance the bitter sensation and may have a negative impact on the acceptance of a product.

In recent decades, the flavor chemistry of alcoholic beverages has primarily focused on volatile components and the compounds, i.e. dried fruit (raisins), red berries, honey, chocolate, and vanilla, that significantly contribute to their distinctive sensory properties (Maarse, 2017), with some research on bitterness having also been conducted. It is generally accepted that phenols are the primary bitter irritants in wine, and the chemical structural characteristics of phenols, including the degree of polymerization, galloylation, B-ring trihydroxylation and stereochemistry of the subunits results in different bitter sensations (Ma et al., 2014). Analogously, the specific bitterness qualities that hop acid isomers impart to beer have been described as ‘harsh’, ‘instant’, and ‘rounded’ (Oladokun et al., 2016). Little information on bitterness in liquor is available, while the bitter peptides of rice wine have been previously described (Maeda et al., 2011). However, the receptor-binding mechanism of bitter agonists in alcoholic beverages remains unclear.

The time to reach maximum intensity in the mouth is greater for bitterness than for other basic tastes. There are many types of bitter substances, which mostly contain groups of –NO2, =N-, –SH, -S-, –SO3H, -S-S, =C = S, etc. (Jaggupilli, Howard, Upadhyaya, Bhullar, & Chelikani, 2016). These compounds are used as ligands to form signal molecules with bitter taste receptors or hydrophobic compounds to directly activate the messenger system to participate in bitterness conduction (Devillier, Naline, & Grassin-Delyle, 2015). The Bitter Database (BitterDB) has gathered information regarding the chemical characteristics, receptors, and identifiers of more than 1000 bitter compounds (Dagan-Wiener et al., 2019). Despite recent advances in decoding bitter sensation, the structural diversity of compounds and polymorphisms of human bitter receptors make the identification and screening of natural and synthetic bitter compounds in alcoholic beverages an arduous task (Carleton, Accolla, & Simon, 2010). Moreover, there are technical limitations to the definition of bitter characteristics through the use of electronic tongue (ET) sensors.

The construction of bitter taste perception is a highly complex process that depends on individual bitterness receptors, the existence of an independent bitter component and interactions between flavor components. Research on the structures, characteristics, and mechanisms of bitterness in alcoholic beverages has been insufficient. In the present review, the transduction and evaluation of bitterness in alcoholic beverages is described, followed by a discussion on the aspects of the chemical composition, sensory characteristics, as well as biotic and abiotic factors that may affect bitterness formation. The goal of this review is to elucidate possible challenges to identifying bitterness characteristics in alcoholic beverages and provide an outlook concerning the further research to regulate the bitterness characteristics and improve flavor of alcoholic beverages.

Section snippets

Physiology of bitterness

The physiology underlying bitterness includes signaling, transmission, and reception, as shown in Fig. 1. Bitter, sweet, and umami employ G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) and second messenger signals for transduction, while salt and sour utilize apically located ion channels (Taruno et al., 2013). Taste buds are the transducing end organs of gustation and are composed of 40–150 receptor cells. The bitter receptor is a group of cells that is situated at the root of the tongue, which is

Bitterness molecular components in alcoholic beverages

Each alcoholic beverage has typical bitter chemicals that manifest dissimilar bitter characteristics (threshold shown in Table 2). Polyphenols, iso-α-acids, peptides, and higher alcohols are the main bitter substances, and different compound structures alter bitter perception (Fig. 3). Grapes and hops are used as raw materials for wine and beer brewing, resulting in the bitterness primarily coming from the polyphenols and α-acids in the plants, while the contributors of bitterness in liquor and

Factors influencing bitterness

The quality, safety, and sensory characteristics of alcoholic beverages are a result of systematic integration in temporal and spatial biochemical reactions. The resulting compounds are responsible for the aroma, taste, mouth-feel, and appearance of alcoholic beverages. Therefore, bitterness properties of alcoholic beverages primarily result from the various raw materials, microbial metabolism during fermentation, unique techniques, and interactions of various flavor compounds, as shown in Fig.

Final considerations and perspectives

The consumer perception of taste is a key factor in food acceptability and success. A moderate amount of bitterness can enrich flavor and confer physiological functions such as antioxidant activity to alcoholic beverages. Nevertheless, inappropriate bitterness can be considered as one of the barriers that limits the long-term development of an excellent product. Polyphenols, iso-α-acids, higher alcohols, and bitter peptides are considered to be the major bitter agonists in alcoholic beverages.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (2017YFC1600401), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP51734B), the 111 Project (No. 111-2-06), the Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province and the National First-class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering (LITE2018-14). This work was also supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972064), and National Key Research and Development Plan (2018YFC1604106).

References (99)

  • S.C. Frost et al.

    Analysis of temporal dominance of sensation data using correspondence analysis on Merlot wine with differing maceration and cap management regimes

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2018)
  • G. Garai-Ibabe et al.

    Glycerol metabolism and bitterness producing lactic acid bacteria in cidermaking

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2008)
  • A.L. Girard et al.

    Sorghum polyphenols and other bioactive components as functional and health promoting food ingredients

    Journal of Cereal Science

    (2018)
  • M.R. Gonzalez-Centeno et al.

    Use of oak wood during malolactic fermentation and ageing: Impact on chardonnay wine character

    Food Chemistry

    (2019)
  • L. Gougeon et al.

    (1)H NMR metabolomics applied to Bordeaux red wines

    Food Chemistry

    (2019)
  • S. Grassi et al.

    Beer fermentation: Monitoring of process parameters by FT-NIR and multivariate data analysis

    Food Chemistry

    (2014)
  • J.M. Gutiérrez et al.

    Hybrid electronic tongue based on multisensor data fusion for discrimination of beers

    Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical

    (2013)
  • D. Ha et al.

    Recent achievements in electronic tongue and bioelectronic tongue as taste sensors

    Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical

    (2015)
  • R.L. Heiniö et al.

    Sensory characteristics of wholegrain and bran-rich cereal foods – a review

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2016)
  • P. Herrero et al.

    Study of Chardonnay and Sauvignon blanc wines from D.O.Ca Rioja (Spain) aged in different French oak wood barrels: Chemical and aroma quality aspects

    Food Research International

    (2016)
  • I. Ifie et al.

    The effect of ageing temperature on the physicochemical properties, phytochemical profile and alpha-glucosidase inhibition of Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle) wine

    Food Chemistry

    (2018)
  • T. Ito et al.

    Identification of enzymes from genus Trichoderma that can accelerate formation of ferulic acid and ethyl ferulate in collaboration with rice koji enzyme in sake mash

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2019)
  • A. Jaggupilli et al.

    Bitter taste receptors: Novel insights into the biochemistry and pharmacology

    The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology

    (2016)
  • G. Jin et al.

    Mystery behind Chinese liquor fermentation

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2017)
  • N.H. Kim et al.

    Microbial diversities and potential hazards of Korean turbid rice wines (makgeolli): Multivariate analyses

    Food Microbiology

    (2018)
  • J.S. Lee et al.

    Bio-artificial tongue with tongue extracellular matrix and primary taste cells

    Biomaterials

    (2018)
  • S. Liu et al.

    A metagenomic analysis of the relationship between microorganisms and flavor development in Shaoxing mechanized huangjiu fermentation mashes

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2019)
  • J.C. Machado et al.

    Modeling of alpha-acids and xanthohumol extraction in dry-hopped beers

    Food Chemistry

    (2019)
  • Y. Maeda et al.

    Analyses of peptides in sake mash: Forming a profile of bitter-tasting peptides

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2011)
  • W. Ma et al.

    A review on astringency and bitterness perception of tannins in wine

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2014)
  • A. Masek et al.

    Characteristics of compounds in hops using cyclic voltammetry, UV-VIS, FTIR and GC-MS analysis

    Food Chemistry

    (2014)
  • N. Mimura et al.

    Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry based component profiling and quality prediction for Japanese sake

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2014)
  • O. Oladokun et al.

    Perceived bitterness character of beer in relation to hop variety and the impact of hop aroma

    Food Chemistry

    (2017)
  • O. Oladokun et al.

    The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer

    Food Chemistry

    (2016)
  • D. Parker

    Beer: Production, sensory characteristics and sensory analysis

  • J.R. Piggott

    Whisky

  • E. Polshin et al.

    Electronic tongue as a screening tool for rapid analysis of beer

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • J. Prescott

    Multisensory processes in flavour perception and their influence on food choice

    Current Opinion in Food Science

    (2015)
  • D. Saison et al.

    Contribution of staling compounds to the aged flavour of lager beer by studying their flavour thresholds

    Food Chemistry

    (2009)
  • E. Sanchez-Palomo et al.

    Aroma profile of malbec red wines from La Mancha region: Chemical and sensory characterization

    Food Research International

    (2017)
  • P. Schlich

    Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS): A new deal for temporal sensory analysis

    Current Opinion in Food Science

    (2017)
  • M. Sokolowsky et al.

    Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis

    Analytica Chimica Acta

    (2012)
  • C. Spence

    Multisensory flavor perception

    Cell

    (2015)
  • B. Steenackers et al.

    Chemical transformations of characteristic hop secondary metabolites in relation to beer properties and the brewing process: A review

    Food Chemistry

    (2015)
  • J.A. Suárez-Lepe et al.

    New trends in yeast selection for winemaking

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2012)
  • K. Takahashi et al.

    Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry reveals the correlation between chemical compounds in Japanese sake and its organoleptic properties

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2016)
  • C.J. Zhao et al.

    Formation of taste-active amino acids, amino acid derivatives and peptides in food fermentations - a review

    Food Research International

    (2016)
  • A.L. Allen et al.

    Polymorphisms in TRPV1 and TAS2Rs associate with sensations from sampled ethanol

    Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

    (2014)
  • R. Bauer et al.

    Acrolein in wine: Importance of 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde and derivatives in production and detection

    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

    (2010)
  • Cited by (42)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text