Elsevier

Computers & Fluids

Volume 199, 15 March 2020, 104422
Computers & Fluids

Calculation of the unit normal vector for wall shear stress in the lattice Boltzmann model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104422Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A method for the calculation of unit normal vector needed in wall shear stress analysis is proposed for lattice Boltzmann model.

  • This method can be completely incorporated in the voxelization process of computational domain.

  • This method requires fewer input parameters and has a higher computational efficiency than the existing methods.

Abstract

The pathology of aortic diseases is related to wall shear stress, which in the lattice Boltzmann method can be easily calculated using information for the unit normal vector of computational geometry. This paper proposes a method to calculate the unit normal vector. In comparison with the existing method, this approach requires a smaller number of input parameters and significantly reduces the computational cost. Tests on several geometries indicate that this method is a better choice from the viewpoint of accuracy and operability. Finally, the distribution of wall shear stress in a realistic aortic arch is obtained and found to agree with the conclusions of a previous study.

Introduction

Aortic aneurysm and dissection have high morbidity and mortality rates [1,2]. Their pathologies are thought to be related to vessel morphology, vessel mechanical properties, and hemodynamic forces [3]. Among the hemodynamic forces, wall shear stress (WSS) is a research emphasis. This stress affects the endothelium function, and a large WSS will induce the initiation of aortic aneurysm and dissection [4], [5], [6], [7]. The in vivo measurement of WSS is relatively difficult owing to the complexity of vessel geometry and the disturbance of other organs [8,9]. However, the distribution of WSS can be obtained by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) [10], [11], [12].

In traditional CFD methods such as the finite element and the finite volume methods, mesh generation for a given computational geometry is a time-consuming task [8,[13], [14], [15]. In the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), the computational geometry is discretized to equal size voxels; thus, mesh generation can be completed entirely automatically. Easy implementation of the bounce-back boundary condition allows LBM to handle complex geometries, and the parallel nature of LBM makes it possible to solve flow problems at relatively large scales. Besides, WSS in LBM can be computed locally and does require calculation of the velocity gradient.

In LBM, the main problem in the calculation of WSS is obtaining the unit normal vector of computational geometry. Stahl et al. recommended calculating the unit normal vector as the vector that is perpendicular to the local velocity near wall [16]; this method has been adopted widely [17], [18], [19]. However, the capacity of this method in turbulent flow is questionable; moreover, its calculation procedure is relatively complex and does not provide the direction of the unit normal vector [15]. To address these problems, Matyka et al. proposed a further method in which the unit normal vector is calculated using only computational geometry information and is ‘geometric normal’ [15].

Herein, we propose a method to calculate the unit normal vector using a lower number of input parameters and significantly reduced computational costs. In the following, a brief introduction to the LBM and WSS is given in Section 2. An introduction to the proposed method, together with its comparison with the geometric normal in simple geometries, is given in Section 3. Numerical simulations for a realistic aortic arch are given Section 4. Discussion and conclusions are given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Lattice Boltzmann method

The LBM is used to solve the discrete Boltzmann equation, which can be retrieved from the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations at a small Mach number. The time and space domains in the LBM model are discretized into equal time intervals and a regular mesh lattice with time step δt and space step δx. δt and δx are usually set as 1.0 in lattice units, which can be transformed to physical units. Herein, the physical variables are transferred in the lattice unit system if they are not in their

Unit normal vector

This section gives the proposed method for the unit normal vector and tests this method in a simple geometry.

Wall shear stress calculation

In this section, the accuracies of the geometric normal and STL normal are compared in a realistic hemodynamic geometry. The WSS distribution is also calculated.

Aortic aneurysms and dissections have high morbidity rates because of an abnormal WSS distribution, which is induced by complex geometries such as artery twists and branch vessels. Herein, a realistic geometry of an aortic arch is reconstructed from computed tomography medical images and the surface mesh is exported using Mimics

Discussion and conclusion

In hemodynamic research, WSS is critical to the diagnosis and/or cure of an aneurysm. In LBM, the calculation of WSS is very simple; however, it requires the unit normal vector of computational geometry. A method for the STL normal is proposed herein, the accuracy of which is compared with that of the geometric normal. In the simple geometries of a sphere and a donut, the geometric normal exhibits better accuracy as the extra input parameters are set to recommended values. The accuracy of the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Li Min: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - original draft. Huang Jingcong: Data curation. Zhang Yang: Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Wang Yuan: Supervision. Wu Changsong: Formal analysis. Qu Lefeng: Resources.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11402190) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M552443).

References (26)

  • K. Rajagopal et al.

    Biomech Model Mechanobiol

    (2007)
  • R.R. Davies et al.

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2002)
  • J.S. Milner et al.

    Surg

    (1998)
  • M. Matyka et al.

    Comput Fluids

    (2013)
  • B. Stahl et al.

    Comput Fluids

    (2010)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Comput Math Appl

    (2016)
  • H.E. Morrison et al.

    Comput Fluids

    (2018)
  • X.Y. Kang

    Comput Fluids

    (2014)
  • M. Alimohammadi et al.

    Med Eng Phys

    (2014)
  • R.D. Sayers et al.

    Coll Surg Engl

    (2002)
  • R.H. Wagner et al.

    Ger Med Sci

    (2006)
  • S. Kondo et al.

    Stroke

    (1997)
  • F. Gao et al.

    Biomed Eng Online

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text