1 Introduction

The selective catalytic oxidation of glycerol and other polyols is considered a promising approach to valorising the by-products of industrial biodiesel production [1]. However, its high degree of functionalisation makes the development of selective catalysts to produce high value products of fundamental importance. Supported metal nanoparticles have been studied extensively: amongst these, Au nanoparticles have been widely investigated since the pioneering studies of Rossi, Prati [2, 3] and Hutchings [4,5,6,7], who were among the first to demonstrate their higher selectivity and stability [8] compared to Pt and Pd based catalysts which are more prone to deactivation due to oxidation and leaching under basic conditions [9, 10]. The problem can be partially overcome by alloying Au with other metals such as Pd, Pt and supporting on acidic or basic supports, which improve activity under soluble base-free conditions [11,12,13]. These catalysts were shown to be very promising in terms of improvement of catalytic stability, activity and selectivity showing higher selectivity to C3 products compared to monometallic analogues [4, 14,15,16,17].

A large number of studies have investigated the effect of nanoparticle size across a range of catalyst preparation techniques [18,19,20,21]. Generally smaller Au nanoparticles (2–6 nm), with large metal surface area and edge exposure were more active than larger nanoparticles (10–30 nm), but the latter showed an increased selectivity towards glycerate/glyceric acid [22]. Conversely, smaller nanoparticles led to an increased selectivity towards C2 (mainly glycolate/glycolic acid) and C1 products, as a consequence of the increased hydrogen peroxide production and subsequent C–C cleavage, as demonstrated by Davis et al. [21, 23,24,25].

Sol-immobilisation has been one of the most popular methodologies for the synthesis of catalysts for glycerol oxidation [2, 26]. It allows mono and bimetallic nanoparticles to be synthesised in solution with controlled size, shape and morphology prior the deposition onto a support [20, 27]. The main drawback, however, is the presence of stabilising agents such as polymers or surfactants, needed to achieve good control on the nanoparticles size, which could have an influence on the catalytic activity and selectivity [28,29,30]. Therefore, efforts to assess the influence of the different methodologies for polymer removal without changing the nanoparticles morphology include, heat treatment [31], intensive washing [32] and UV-light irradiation under ozone atmosphere [33]. Given the many drawbacks of the presence of stabiliser, we previously proposed a new synthetic methodology for the preparation of Au and AuPd nanoparticle catalysts by sol-immobilisation without the addition of stabilisers [27]. The prepared catalysts showed similar catalytic activity with variation in glycerate to tartronate ratio to the traditional PVA stabilised catalysts for glycerol oxidation but showed lager particle size distributions.

This study aims to elucidate similarities and differences in the reaction pathway for these materials and whether these can be correlated to the presence and nature of the residual polymer stabilisers.

2 Results and Discussion

A range of Au and AuPd nanoparticle catalysts supported on TiO2 were synthesized according to previously reported sol immobilisation methodology using polymeric stabilisers, such as, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). In addition, a material was synthesized by the same methodology in the absence of a polymer stabiliser (denoted as SF—stabiliser free) according to our previously reported method [27]. These materials were tested for glycerol oxidation under basic conditions at 60 °C under 3 bar O2 and all three monometallic Au/TiO2 samples showed comparable levels of glycerol conversion (Fig. 1). However, the presence of the polymer during the preparation seems to have an influence on the selectivity towards the major/primary oxidation products, tartronate (TA) and glycerate (GA). Selectivity to TA appeared to be higher on SF samples prepared without polymer, following the trend SF > PVA > PVP, whereas GA followed the opposite trend, in all cases the products seemed to be relatively stable under the reaction conditions. Similarly (Fig. S1) AuPd/TiO2 prepared with PVA, PVP and without the presence of polymer showed similar activity towards glycerol conversion with a more facile conversion of glyceric acid to tartronate at conversions < 100% in contrast to monometallic catalysts.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the glycerol oxidation activity for 1% wt Au/TiO2 catalysts prepared SF, PVA and PVP. Reaction conditions: glycerol 0.6 M, NaOH 1.2 M, 110 mg catalyst, 3 bar O2, 60 °C, 1200 rpm, Gly/Au = 500, total volume 10 mL. Legend: SF (filled circle), PVA (filled triangle), PVP (filled square); dotted lines—tartronate (TA) selectivity; dashed lines—glycerate (GA) selectivity

The monometallic Au catalysts prepared with polymer stabiliser and stabiliser free were characterised by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 2) to determine the particle size distribution of the Au nanoparticles. As expected the samples prepared with polymer stabilisers had narrower Au particle size distributions and smaller average Au particle sizes (PVA: 2.7 ± 0.6 nm; PVP: 3.5 ± 1 nm, SF: 5.4 ± 1.6 nm). However, this trend in particle size does not correlate with the observed trends in the selectivity of glycerate and tartronate. These results suggest that other factors influence the reaction pathways, specifically the selectivity towards primary products.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Particle size distributions derived from bright field TEM images of more than 100 monometallic Au particles prepared stabilizer free, or with PVA and PVP ligands present

The selectivity towards C3 products glycerate (GA) and tratronate (TA) for all the catalysts tested reached 70–80%. Analysis of the distribution of minor oxidation products can also contain important information to identify differing reaction pathways. Minor products comprised oxalate (OXA), lactate (LA), glycolate (GLY), formate (FA), pyruvate (PA) and acetate (ACA) for both the mono and bimetallic catalysts, as displayed in Figs. 3 and 4. In the monometallic case, the catalysts prepared by polymer addition showed higher selectivity towards LA: the highest value observed in the case of PVP suggesting that it is also dependent on the nature of the polymer. Among the minor oxidation products the SF 1 wt% Au/TiO2 catalyst produced ACA in highest selectivity suggesting that the SF catalyst is less selective to C3 products and could more readily cleave C–C bonds of C3 products. This difference shows a different or accelerated reaction pathway due to the absence of the stabiliser or to the larger nanoparticle size resulting from the absence of polymer in the preparation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Time on line selectivity profile to minor oxidation products for the monometallic catalysts synthesized SF, PVA and PVP. Legend: Filled circle Oxalate (OXA), filled triangle Lactate (LA), open circle Glycolate (GLYA), filled circle Pyruvate (PA), inverted filled triangle Formate (FA), x Acetate (ACA)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Time on line selectivity profile to minor oxidation products for the bimetallic catalysts synthesized SF, PVA and PVP. Legend: Filled circle Oxalate (OXA), filled triangle Lactate (LA), open circle Glycolate (GLYA), filled circle Pyruvate (PA), inverted filled triangle Formate (FA), x Acetate (ACA)

Previous studies on glycerol oxidation found that larger nanoparticle size was related to an increase in the selectivity towards C3 products (such as glycerate) [18, 34, 35], while others observed the same trend with decreasing particle size [36]. There is no general consensus about the size influence on the selectivity of glycerol oxidation in this class of material suggesting that size effects alone are not good descriptors of activity and selectivity [1, 24]. The TEM derived nanoparticle size of the monometallic Au catalysts (PVA: 2.7 ± 0.6 nm; PVP: 3.5 ± 1.0 nm, SF: 5.4 ± 1.6 nm) [37], show the influence of the presence and nature of the polymer stabiliser must be taken into consideration when considering activity and selectivity as no general trend with particle size and performance was observed [34]. The same outcome was not observed in the case of bimetallic samples (Fig. 4), where all three catalysts showed similar values of selectivity to minor products, the bimetallic SF catalyst showed highest selectivity (of minor products) to LA, a similar trend to the PVA and PVP samples suggesting that polymer stabilisers have a larger effect on monometallic Au catalysts which have lower reaction rates than the bimetallic AuPd catalyst.

According to many proposed reaction pathways, TA should be obtained via secondary oxidation of glycerate. We have observed (Fig. 1) that samples prepared in the absence of stabiliser have a significantly higher selectivity to TA (1 wt% Au/TiO2 (SF) ~ 20% vs 1 wt% Au/TiO2 (PVA) ~ 10%). To further understand if the presence of the polymer additives effects the reaction pathways, primarily towards the primary products GA and TA, reactions were carried out at low conversion and also using glycerate as a starting material. Experiments using GA as starting material were performed on the monometallic SF and on the bimetallic SF and PVA catalysts. Figure 5 presents the GA conversion profile and the relative selectivity to products as a function of time for the monometallic sample prepared SF.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Glyceric acid oxidation conversion and selectivity based on liquid products for the 1% wt Au/TiO2-SF catalyst. Reaction conditions: 110 mg catalyst, 60 °C, 3 bar O2, 1200 rpm, GA/metal(s) = 500:1(mol), NaOH/GA = 2:1 (mol), total volume 10 mL. Legend: Open square GA, filled diamond TA (bold line); filled circle Glycolate (GLYA), filled square Oxalate (OXA), filled triangle Formate (FA) (dotted lines)

These experiments show that GA oxidation was much slower (Table 1) than glycerol oxidation using the same catalyst: for the monometallic 1 wt% Au/TiO2 (SF) after 4 h reaction glycerol conversion reached 100%, whereas GA conversion reached only 30% with the major product being TA. Glycolate (GLYA) is also produced at higher amounts from the beginning, in addition to oxalate (OXA) and small amounts of formate (FA).

Table 1 Reaction rates ([M]/gcat∙h) calculated for the glycerol (GLY) and glyceric acid (GA) oxidation reactions

This might indicate that the relative stability of GA and TA during the glycerol oxidation reaction is due either to lower relative reaction rates or to competitive adsorption of glycerol and GA. In a similar experiment performed by Ketchie et al. it was proposed that the lower reaction rate observed for GA oxidation is due to the difficulty in generating the alkoxide, which represents the starting point of the oxidation process [24]. The deprotonation of the alcohol group of the GA is disfavoured because of the presence of the carboxylic acid group. Similar trends, even though less pronounced, can be observed in the case of the bimetallic catalysts prepared SF and PVA (Fig. S2). The bimetallic samples reached higher conversion than the monometallic SF, reaching 45% and 30% GA conversion respectively for the SF and PVA catalysts after 4 h reaction. These results are consistent with the results observed during glycerol oxidation, where further GA oxidation did clearly occur when 100% glycerol conversion was reached, with the 1% wt AuPd/TiO2-SF catalyst having a higher GA oxidation activity than the 1% wt AuPd/TiO2-PVA but does not explain the presence of TA when glycerol conversion is less than 100%. During GA oxidation, the main product is TA, nevertheless, comparing the oxidation rates of glycerol and GA to the TA selectivity (or yield) the latter cannot be an exclusive product from GA oxidation during glycerol oxidation. Many reaction schemes show TA as a secondary oxidation product from the GA. However, the results obtained in this experiment, together with those obtained from glycerol oxidation, suggest that TA could be a primary product in addition to being a secondary oxidation product. Evidence of this was also reported in a reaction modelling study by Demirel et al. using gold catalysts [38]. Moreover, it is clear from the glycerol oxidation experiments that the GA conversion to TA only starts when the glycerol has been consumed on monometallic samples.

To further investigate the reaction pathway, the same samples were tested at short reaction times (5–20 min) to keep conversion low (10–15%). The results obtained for the 1% wt Au/TiO2 catalyst prepared SF show that both TA and GA are produced from the start of the reaction. After 5 min of reaction, the selectivity towards TA reaches 28%, and is stable throughout the reaction. This result supports the hypothesis that TA can be produced as a primary reaction product and not only through the subsequent oxidation of GA and that higher amounts of TA observed for the SF catalysts are not a result of faster over oxidation of GA (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Glycerol oxidation on 1% wt Au/TiO2 prepared SF. Reaction conditions: 110 mg catalyst, 60 °C, 3 bar O2, 1200 rpm, GA/metal(s) = 500:1(mol), NaOH/GA = 2:1 (mol), total volume 10 mL. Legend: Grey filled square bars—TA Selectivity, open square bars—GA Selectivity, black filled square Glycerol Conversion

Results for GA oxidation using the bimetallic samples prepared SF and with PVA at iso-conversion (Table 2) after 10 min of reaction, show that the selectivity to TA is almost the double for the SF sample compared to the PVA despite the samples showing similar particle size and glycerol conversion activity suggesting the production of higher amounts of TA as a primary product in catalysts prepared without polymer stabiliser.

Table 2 GA/TA ratio at iso-conversion for the mono and bimetallic catalysts prepared SF and PVA

The results obtained from these experiments using mono and bimetallic catalysts suggest that the absence of the polymer seems to affect the glycerol oxidation pathways and can drive the selectivity to TA at very early stages of the reaction. To investigate if the observed results were directly related to the presence of polymer on the catalyst surface aliquots of PVA and PVP solutions (0.1 g/10 mL) were added during glycerol oxidation experiments using the 1% wt Au/TiO2–SF catalyst which had been prepared in the absence of polymer. The aim was to obtain more information about the influence of the polymers during the reaction and whether and how they affect the conversion rate and drive the selectivity.

Figure 7 shows the comparison of catalytic activity after 1 and 4 h reactions for the 1% wt Au/TiO2 catalysts prepared SF and with PVA and the SF sample in presence of aliquots of PVA (0.1 g/10 mL) corresponding to selected PVA/Au mass ratios typically added to catalyst preparations (0.3, 0.65 and 1.3). After 1 h reaction, the presence of PVA reduces the glycerol conversion of the catalyst prepared without stabiliser by about 10% with respect to the two extremes. The extent to which the PVA is affecting the conversion seems to be independent from its amount, which could suggest saturation of absorption at relatively low polymer amounts. A key observation is that on addition of the even low amounts of PVA the selectivity to TA is significantly reduced in favour of GA—confirming that the presence of polymer can change reaction selectivity—in this case preventing the formation of tartronic acid in favour of glyceric acid explaining the enhanced selectivity towards TA in catalysts prepared without the addition of polymers.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Glycerol conversion and selectivity after 1 h and 4 h reaction for the 1% wt Au/TiO2-SF in presence of different aliquots of PVA, compared with the 1% wt Au/TiO2–SF and 1% wt Au/TiO2-PVA. Reaction conditions: 110 mg catalyst, 60 °C, 3 bar O2, 1200 rpm, GA/metal = 500:1(mol), NaOH/GA = 2:1 (mol), total volume 10 mL. Legend: Large filled square TA, open square GA, small filled square Glycerol

Figure 8 reports analogous experiments carried out using different amounts of PVP, after 1 h and 4 h reaction compared to the two “extreme” cases. In this case, the PVP seems not to have a large effect on the conversion after 1 h, which reaches ~ 40% for all samples. However, it does have a marked effect on the selectivity, with values for TA and GA very similar to those obtained when the Au/TiO2—PVP catalyst. The presence of the stabilising agent seems to drive the selectivity to GA rather than to TA. This can be explained with the hypothesis that the polymers are covering the nanoparticle and blocking specific surface sites, favouring the end-on absorption and oxidation of glycerol to GA rather than allowing the molecules to adsorb side-on which could result in oxidation at both terminal groups. The same trend is observed after 4 h reaction: by contrast with the PVA addition, the PVP does not have any effect on the conversion. Moreover, selectivity towards TA and GA seems to be stable over time independent of the stabiliser amount, suggesting that either the PVP is not competing with glycerol for the active sites on the catalyst, or its presence is slowing GA oxidation.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Glycerol conversion and selectivity after 1 h and 4 h reaction for the 1% wt Au/TiO2-SF in presence of different aliquots of PVP, compared with the 1% wt Au/TiO2–SF and 1% wt Au/TiO2-PVP. Reaction conditions: 110 mg catalyst, 60 °C, 3 bar O2, 1200 rpm, GA/metal = 500:1(mol), NaOH/GA = 2:1 (mol), total volume 10 mL. Legend: Grey filled square bars—TA Selectivity, open square bars—GA Selectivity, small filled square Glycerol Conversion

On the basis of the results obtained from the aforementioned experiments Scheme 1 is proposed as a slight revision to the reaction schemes that consider tartronic acid only as sequential oxidation product. The scheme accounts for the primary nature of the TA and GA, and for the over-oxidation of the latter due to the presence of the H2O2 or of the faster rate of O2 dissociation. The former is also responsible of the C–C cleavage of the molecules, leading to higher selectivity to C2 products.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Proposed reaction mechanism for glycerol oxidation on mono and bimetallic catalysts prepared SF, PVA and PVP

3 Conclusions

We have investigated the catalytic oxidation pathways of monometallic and bimetallic catalysts prepared by sol-immobilisation via SF, PVA and PVP (typical stabilisers for the synthesis of colloidal metal nanoparticles) and rationalised the results with the presence and nature of residual polymer stabiliser. It can be concluded that different oxidation pathways occur on the SF and PVA modified Au surfaces. Polymer addition studies on SF catalysts evidenced that the PVA influences both the selectivity and the conversion of glycerol oxidation. Conversely, PVP addition influenced the selectivity but not the conversion, independent of the amount. Both these results suggest a different oxidation pathway in presence of polymer. We conclude that the polymer additive has a significant effect on the reaction pathway and that these systems should be considered as a metal surface—polymer catalytic system and properties should not be rationalised solely based on nanoparticle properties such as nanoparticle size. We envisage that these results could form the basis for extensive further study into the nature and design of these metal-polymer interfaces.

4 Experimental

4.1 Catalyst Preparation

Monometallic (1% wt Au/TiO2) and bimetallic (1% wt Au–Pd/TiO2 (molar ratio Au:Pd 1:1)) samples were prepared by sol-immobilisation using PVA and PVP as stabilizing polymer ligands, as well as without any addition of stabilizer (the latter being denoted SF). In a typical synthesis of 1 g of monometallic sample, an aqueous solution of HAuCl4·3H2O (0.8 mL, 12.5 mg Au/mL Sigma Aldrich, ≥ 49.0%) was added to 400 mL of deionised water under vigorous stirring conditions, followed by the addition of a polymer stabilizer (polymer/Au wt/wt = 0.65). This was either a 1 wt % aqueous solution of PVA (average molecular weight MW = 9000–10,000 g mol−1, 80% hydrolysed), or a 1 wt% aqueous solution of PVP (Sigma Aldrich, average molecular weight MW = 10,000 g mol−1). Subsequently, a 0.1 M freshly prepared solution of NaBH4 (≥ 99.99%, Aldrich) was added (mol NaBH4/mol Au = 5) to form a red sol. After 30 min of sol generation, the colloid was immobilised by adding 0.99 g of TiO2 (P25 Aeroxide®, Evonik) and 8 drops of concentrated H2SO4. After 1 h of continuous stirring, the slurry was filtered, the catalyst washed thoroughly with deionised water and dried at 110 °C for 16 h. Syntheses for the bimetallic Au–Pd sample proceeded in the same way, but with the further addition of PdCl2 (Sigma Aldrich, Reagent Plus® 99%) in aqueous solution (6 mg Pd/mL). In this case, the stabilizer-to-metals ratio was 1.2 (wt/wt). The immobilisation steps were carried out in the same manner as previously described. For the stabilizer free (SF) variants, both monometallic and bimetallic analogues were prepared as described above but the addition of stabilizer to the preparation was omitted. The SF sample was immobilised on TiO2 after 30 min of sol generation. It was observed that the SF colloids start to collapse between 24 and 36 h after reduction.

4.2 Glycerol Oxidation

Glycerol oxidation under basic conditions was performed in a glass reactor (Colaver®) positioned in a thermostatically controlled oil bath at 60 °C and at 3 bar O2 pressure, under continuous stirring (1200 rpm). Glycerol (5 mL, 0.6 M, Sigma Aldrich, anhydrous, > 99.5%) and NaOH (5 mL, 1.2 M, Sigma Aldrich BioXtra > 98%, pellets, anhydrous) were added to the reactor to give a total reaction volume of 10 mL. The glycerol/metal(s) mole ratio was 500:1. The total reaction time employed was 4 h, with sampling performed after 30, 60, 120 and 240 min of reaction. Samples were quenched and diluted 1:10 in deionised water before analysis by HPLC. Product analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC with a Metacarb 67H column with a 0.1% wt solution of phosphoric acid as mobile phase. Identical conditions were used for the glyceric acid oxidation tests.

4.2.1 Polymer Influence

Experiments to investigate the effect of polymer presence (PVA and PVP) were performed using the monometallic SF sample in the presence of PVA or PVP in defined weight ratios with respect to the Au mass (0.3, 0.65, 1.3), starting from solutions 0.1 g/10 mL. Experiments were carried out at the same conditions as standard glycerol oxidation. Each reactor was charged with the Au/TiO2 SF catalyst, glycerol and NaOH and a certain aliquots of PVA or PVP solution, correspondent to stabiliser/Au (weight ratio) 0.325, 0.65 and 1.3 respectively. The required amount of PVA and PVP solutions (0.1 g/10 mL) were 38.4 µL, 76.8 µL and 0.154 mL respectively. The weight ratios were determined considering stabiliser/Au ratio 0.65 which is used in the standard catalyst synthesis, with 0.325 and 1.3 being respectively the half and the double of this quantity.

4.3 Catalyst Characterisation

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL 2100 microscope with a LaB6 filament operating at 200 kV. Samples were prepared by dispersing the powder catalyst in ethanol and allowing a drop of the suspension to evaporate on a lacey carbon film supported over a 300 mesh copper TEM grid. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) was carried out using an aberration corrected JEM ARM-200CF microscope operating at 200 kV. This instrument was also equipped with a JEOL Centurio silicon drift detector for X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS). Particle size distributions were determined by measuring 100 particles per sample using imageJ software.