Skip to main content
Log in

In Vitro Effects of 2-{4-[Methylthio(methylsulfonyl)]phenyl}-3-substitutedthiazolidin-4-ones on the Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Rat Brain and Lymphocytes: Isoform Selectivity, Kinetic Analysis, and Molecular Docking

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurochemical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work evaluated the in vitro effect of thiazolidin-4-ones on the activity of AChE (total and isoforms) isolated from the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and lymphocytes. Kinetic parameters were evaluated and molecular docking was performed. Our results showed that thiazolidinones derived from 4-(methylthio)benzaldehyde (1) and from 4-(methylsulfonyl)benzaldehyde (2) were capable of inhibiting the AChE activity in vitro. Three compounds, two with a propylpiperidine (1b and 2b) moiety and one with a 3-(diethylamino)propyl (1c) moiety showed IC50 values of 13.81 μM, and 3.13 μM (1b), 55.36 μM and 44.33 μM (1c) for cerebral cortex and hippocampus, respectively, and 3.11 μM for both (2b). Enzyme kinetics revealed that the type of AChE inhibition was mixed. Compound 1b inhibited the G1 and G4 AChE isoforms, while compounds 1c and 2b selectively inhibited the G4 isoform. Molecular docking showed a possible three-dimensional fit into the enzyme. Our findings showed that these thiazolidin-4-ones, especially those containing the propylpiperidine core, have a potential cholinesterase inhibitory activity and can be considered good candidates for future Alzheimer’s therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Gold P (2003) Acetylcholine modulation of neural systems involved in learning and memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:194–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deiana S, Platt B, Riedel G (2011) The cholinergic system and spatial learning. Behav Brain Res 10:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haam J, Yakel J (2017) Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J Neurochem 142:111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dvir H, Silman I, Harel M, Rosenberry T, Sussman J (2010) Acetylcholinesterase: from 3d structure to function. Chem Biol Interact 187:10–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rakonczay Z, Horath Z, Juhász A, Kálmán J (2005) Peripheral cholinergic disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease. Chem Biol Interact 157–158:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sussan JL, Harel M, Silman I (1993) Three-dimensional structure of acetylcholinesterase and of its complexes with anticholinesterase drugs. Chem Biol Interact 87:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das A, Dikshi M, Nath C (2005) Role of molecular isoforms of acetylcholinesterase in learning and memory functions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 81:89–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mufson E, Counts S, Perez S, Ginsberg S (2008) Cholinergic system during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease: therapeutic implications. Expert Rev Neurother 8:1703–1718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira-Vieira T, Guimaraes I, Silva F, Ribeiro F (2016) Alzheimer’s disease: targeting the cholinergic system. Curr Neuropharmacol 14:101–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammad D, Chan P, Bradley J, Lancot K, Herrmann N (2017) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for treating dementia symptoms—a safety evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Saf 16:1009–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Du X, Wang X, Geng M (2018) Alzheimer’s disease hypothesis and related therapies. Transl Neurodegener 30:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar D, Gupta S, Ganeshpurkar A, Gutti G, Krishnamurthy S, Modi G, Singh S (2018) Development of piperazinediones as dual inhibitor for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Med Chem 150:87–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manjal SK, Kaur R, Bathia R, Kumar K, Singh V, Shankar R, Kaur R, Rawal RK (2017) Synthetic and medicinal perspective of thiazolidinones: a review. Bioorg Chem 75:406–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva DS, Silva CHE, Soares MSP, Azambuja JH, Carvalho T, Zimmer G, Frizzo CP, Braganhol E, Spanevello RM, Cunico W (2016) Thiazolidin-4-ones from 4-(methylthio)benzaldehyde and 4-(methylsulfonyl)benzaldehyde: synthesis, antiglioma activity and cytotoxicity. Eur J Med Chem 124:574–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berwaldt GA, Gouvêa DP, Silva DS, Neves AM, Soares MSP, Azambuja JH, Siqueira GM, Spanevello RM, Cunico W (2019) Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzothiazin-4-ones: a possible new class of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Enzym Inhibit Med Chem 34:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganellin C (2011) Personal reflections on Sir James Black (1924–2010) and histamine. Inflamm Res 60:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stapleton MP (1997) Sir james black and propranolol: the role of the basic sciences in the history of cardiovascular pharmacology. Tex Heart Inst J 24:336–342

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker MJ (2011) The major impacts of James Black’s drug discoveries on medicine and pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 32:183–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellman G, Courtney D, Andres V, Featherstone R (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Böyum A (1968) Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 97:77–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzgerald B, Costa L (1993) Modulation of muscarinic receptors an acetylcholinesterase activity in lymphocytes and brain areas following repeated organophosphate exposure in rats. Fund Appl Toxicol 20:210–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanchuk V, Tanin V, Vovk A, Poda G (2016) New improved hybrid scoring function for molecular docking and scoring based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina. Chem Biol Drug Des 87:618–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew R, Goodsell D, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785–2791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seus V, Silva JL, Gomes G, Silva PE, Werhli A, Machado K (2016) A framework for virtual screening. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 31–36

  26. Preston A, Eihenbaum H (2013) Interplay of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in memory. Curr Biol 23:764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snape MF, Misra A, Murray TK, De Souza RJ, Williams JL, Cross AJ, Green AR (1999) A comparative study in rats of the in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors tacrine, donepezil and NXX-066. Neuropharmacol 38:181–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Siek G, Katz LS, Fishman EB, Korosi TS, Marquis JK (1990) Molecular forms of acetylcholinesterase in subcortical areas of normal and Alzheimer disease brain. Biol Psychol 27:573–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstock M (1999) Selectivity of cholinesterase inhibition. CNS Drug 12:307–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rakonczay Z (2003) Potencies and selectivities of inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and its molecular forms in normal and Alzheimer’s disease brain. Acta Biol Hung 54:183–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao Q, Tang XC (2002) Effects of huperzine A on acetylcholinesterase isoforms in vitro: comparison with tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine and physostigmine. Eur J Pharmacol 29:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Polanka M (2014) Inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase meet immunity. Int J Mol Sci 15:9809–9825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nizri E, Hamra-Amitay Y, Sicsic C, Lavon L, Brenner T (2006) Anti-inflammatory properties of cholinergic up-regulation: a new role of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Neuropharmacology 50:540–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Iyer P, Bolla J, Kumar V, Gill MS, Sobhia ME (2015) In silico identification of targets for a novel scaffold, 2-thiazolylimino-5-benzylidin-thiazolidin-4-one. Mol Divers 19:855–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS - PRONEM processo: 16/2551-0000 2452). This study was financed in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES)—Finance code 001. W.C. and R.M.S are recipients of CNPq fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Roselia Maria Spanevello or Wilson Cunico.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, D.S., Soares, M.S.P., Martini, F. et al. In Vitro Effects of 2-{4-[Methylthio(methylsulfonyl)]phenyl}-3-substitutedthiazolidin-4-ones on the Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Rat Brain and Lymphocytes: Isoform Selectivity, Kinetic Analysis, and Molecular Docking. Neurochem Res 45, 241–253 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02929-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02929-8

Keywords

Navigation