Elsevier

Antiviral Research

Volume 174, February 2020, 104693
Antiviral Research

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pradefovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104693Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pradefovir was associated with reduced serum PMEA levels compared to ADV.

  • The antiviral activity of pradefovir was greater after pradefovir than ADV, and it was similar to that of TDF.

  • Pradefovir demonstrated a favorable safety profile and excellent anti-HBV activity.

  • Pradefovir could be a promising anti-HBV drug.

Abstract

Background & aims

Pradefovir is a liver targeted novel prodrug of adefovir (PMEA) developed to provide higher antiviral activity with reduced systemic toxicities. This study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of pradefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection.

Methods

Non-cirrhotic, treatment-naïve subjects with CHB were divided into five groups (10 patients each) and randomized within each group in a ratio of 6:2:2 to receive an ascending dose of 30, 60, 75, 90, or 120 mg pradefovir, 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), or 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) once a day for 28 days.

Results

A total of 51 subjects were randomized and 49 subjects completed the study. The groups were well matched and included 39 males, of whom 71% were hepatitis B e-antigen-negative with a mean hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of 6.4–7.16 log10 IU/mL. No subject experienced a serious adverse event or nephrotoxicity. The most frequently reported adverse event was asymptomatic reduction in blood cholinesterase levels in the pradefovir group which recovered without any treatment about 13 ± 7 days after drug discontinuation. This adverse event was not observed in the ADV and TDF groups.

The mean changes in serum HBV DNA were −2.78, −2.77, −3.08, −3.18, −3.44, −2.34, and −3.07 log10 IU/mL at 30, 60, 75, 90, and 120 mg pradefovir, 10 mg ADV and 300 mg TDF, respectively, with plateau levels reached with 60 mg pradefovir. Pradefovir and its metabolite PMEA showed linear pharmacokinetics proportional to the dose. The half-life of PMEA in the pradefovir group was 11.47–17.63 h.

Conclusions

Short-term use of pradefovir was well tolerated. A decline in HBV DNA levels was superior to TDF at higher doses of pradefovir. 30–60 mg pradefovir is recommended for CHB treatment.

Clinical trial number

CTR20150224.

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection affects more than 350 million individuals worldwide, with a high prevalence in Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries (Ott et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2019). Persistent viral replication is an independent risk factor for the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality (Chen et al., 2006, 2010; European Association For The Study Of The Liver, 2012; Liaw et al., 2012). Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), a diester prodrug of the active moiety adefovir (PMEA) is effective in lamivudine-resistant CHB patients (Murakami et al., 2014; Marcellin et al., 2008). Long-term ADV use helps achieve and maintain viral suppression, regression of fibrosis, and reversal of cirrhosis in most patients (Wang et al., 2014), However, PMEA is actively transported into the renal proximal tubules and causes nephrotoxicity at ADV doses of 30–120 mg/day (Lee et al., 2010). Hence, ADV, is used at submaximal dose of 10 mg because of its renal toxicity.

Pradefovir, a hepatic targeted novel prodrug of PMEA developed by utilizing the HepDirectTM patented technology, enhances the delivery of PMEA to the liver. Different from ADV, the majority of pradefovir is metabolized to PMEA in the hepatocytes; it remains unchanged until penetration in to the hepatocytes, after which it is converted to PMEA by cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 (Dando and Plosker, 2003; Qaqish et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2006a). This selectively liver-activated prodrug enhances liver levels of the active metabolite adefovir diphosphate (ADV-DP) and decreases serum and renal concentrations. These features lead to a high PMEA concentration in the liver and very low concentration in the serum which reduces the renal and bone toxicities associated with ADV (Agarwal et al., 2018). The molecular weight of pradefovir is similar to that of ADV.

The well-tolerated oral single dose of pradefovir varies between 10 and 120 mg and does not cause significant kidney impairment in healthy subjects and the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0–48 h (AUC0–48) of serum PMEA ranges from 18 to 312 ng/mL and 72–1095 ng*h/mL, respectively (Ding et al., 2017). The clinical trials with pradefovir are currently on going. This phase Ib study is the first study conducted in China evaluating the efficacy and safety of pradefovir in CHB subjects.

Section snippets

Study design

This study was a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 1b trial (Chinese Drug Trial Identifier: CTR20150224), and was conducted at the Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University (Jilin, China) between April 2015 and February 2017. A total of 50 CHB subjects were randomized (6:2:2) to receive pradefovir of 30, 60, 75, 90, or 120 mg respectively, 300 mg TDF or 10 mg ADV under fasting condition in an open labeled fashion. 10 subjects each group was in each

Results

A total of 51 subjects were enrolled and randomized in this study. Two subjects withdrew from the study due to the personal reasons and fracture (not related to the study drug) in the 60 mg pradefovir and TDF group respectively and the subject in the 60 mg pradefovir group was replaced. Subject no. 44 in TDF group had a road traffic accident with fracture on the 15th day during the clinical trial and was withdrawn from the clinical trial. Ultimately, 49 subjects completed the study. The flow

Discussion

In this phase 1b trial, we found that pradefovir was as effective as TDF in the short-term period, and 4–4.5 fold reduced systemic levels of PMEA with better antiviral activity in the pradefovir group compared to the ADV group (Peters et al., 2004; Perrillo et al., 2004). The log10 change in serum HBV DNA levels (primary endpoint) revealed a consistent antiviral effect across the pradefovir treatment groups (Fig. 1). On day 29, the mean change in HBV DNA was approximately −3.09–3.30 log10

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drug Development during the Thirteenth Five-Year PlanPeriod of China (Project: 2017ZX09304004, 2017ZX09101001-002-004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project: 81602897) and Xi'an Xintong research Co Ltd.,

Authors’ contributions

Yanhua Ding, JunqiNiu and Hong zhang contributed to the conception and design of the study, data acquisition, and data analysis and interpretation. Hong Chen, Xiaojiao Li, Xiaoxue Zhu and Min Wu contributed to the data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation. Hong Zhang, Weili Jin, Cuiyun Li, Jingrui Liu, Dengke Zhang and Chengjiao Liu contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. All authors made critical revisions to the draft versions of the manuscript and approved the final

Ethical approval

The study was performed in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki principles for ethical research. The study protocol was approved by the independent central ethics committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Chinese Drug Trial Identifier: CTR20150224. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Compliance with ethical standards.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients in this study.

References (30)

  • C.J. Chen et al.

    Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2006)
  • J.D. Chen et al.

    Risk evaluation of viral load elevation and associated liver disease/cancer in HBV (REVEAL-HBV) study Group.Carriers of inactive hepatitis B virus are still at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death

    Gastroenterology

    (2010)
  • T. Dando et al.

    Adefovir dipivoxil: a review of its use in chronic hepatitis B

    Drugs

    (2003)
  • Y. Ding et al.

    Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of a single ascending dose of pradefovir, a novel liver-targeting, anti-hepatitis B virus drug, in healthy Chinese subjects

    Hepatol. Int.

    (2017)
  • FDA Advisory Committee Briefing Document

    Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. NDA 21-449 Gilead Sciences, Foster City, Calif

    (July 2002)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text