Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pradefovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection
Introduction
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection affects more than 350 million individuals worldwide, with a high prevalence in Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries (Ott et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2019). Persistent viral replication is an independent risk factor for the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality (Chen et al., 2006, 2010; European Association For The Study Of The Liver, 2012; Liaw et al., 2012). Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), a diester prodrug of the active moiety adefovir (PMEA) is effective in lamivudine-resistant CHB patients (Murakami et al., 2014; Marcellin et al., 2008). Long-term ADV use helps achieve and maintain viral suppression, regression of fibrosis, and reversal of cirrhosis in most patients (Wang et al., 2014), However, PMEA is actively transported into the renal proximal tubules and causes nephrotoxicity at ADV doses of 30–120 mg/day (Lee et al., 2010). Hence, ADV, is used at submaximal dose of 10 mg because of its renal toxicity.
Pradefovir, a hepatic targeted novel prodrug of PMEA developed by utilizing the HepDirectTM patented technology, enhances the delivery of PMEA to the liver. Different from ADV, the majority of pradefovir is metabolized to PMEA in the hepatocytes; it remains unchanged until penetration in to the hepatocytes, after which it is converted to PMEA by cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 (Dando and Plosker, 2003; Qaqish et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2006a). This selectively liver-activated prodrug enhances liver levels of the active metabolite adefovir diphosphate (ADV-DP) and decreases serum and renal concentrations. These features lead to a high PMEA concentration in the liver and very low concentration in the serum which reduces the renal and bone toxicities associated with ADV (Agarwal et al., 2018). The molecular weight of pradefovir is similar to that of ADV.
The well-tolerated oral single dose of pradefovir varies between 10 and 120 mg and does not cause significant kidney impairment in healthy subjects and the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0–48 h (AUC0–48) of serum PMEA ranges from 18 to 312 ng/mL and 72–1095 ng*h/mL, respectively (Ding et al., 2017). The clinical trials with pradefovir are currently on going. This phase Ib study is the first study conducted in China evaluating the efficacy and safety of pradefovir in CHB subjects.
Section snippets
Study design
This study was a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 1b trial (Chinese Drug Trial Identifier: CTR20150224), and was conducted at the Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University (Jilin, China) between April 2015 and February 2017. A total of 50 CHB subjects were randomized (6:2:2) to receive pradefovir of 30, 60, 75, 90, or 120 mg respectively, 300 mg TDF or 10 mg ADV under fasting condition in an open labeled fashion. 10 subjects each group was in each
Results
A total of 51 subjects were enrolled and randomized in this study. Two subjects withdrew from the study due to the personal reasons and fracture (not related to the study drug) in the 60 mg pradefovir and TDF group respectively and the subject in the 60 mg pradefovir group was replaced. Subject no. 44 in TDF group had a road traffic accident with fracture on the 15th day during the clinical trial and was withdrawn from the clinical trial. Ultimately, 49 subjects completed the study. The flow
Discussion
In this phase 1b trial, we found that pradefovir was as effective as TDF in the short-term period, and 4–4.5 fold reduced systemic levels of PMEA with better antiviral activity in the pradefovir group compared to the ADV group (Peters et al., 2004; Perrillo et al., 2004). The log10 change in serum HBV DNA levels (primary endpoint) revealed a consistent antiviral effect across the pradefovir treatment groups (Fig. 1). On day 29, the mean change in HBV DNA was approximately −3.09–3.30 log10
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drug Development during the Thirteenth Five-Year PlanPeriod of China (Project: 2017ZX09304004, 2017ZX09101001-002-004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project: 81602897) and Xi'an Xintong research Co Ltd.,
Authors’ contributions
Yanhua Ding, JunqiNiu and Hong zhang contributed to the conception and design of the study, data acquisition, and data analysis and interpretation. Hong Chen, Xiaojiao Li, Xiaoxue Zhu and Min Wu contributed to the data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation. Hong Zhang, Weili Jin, Cuiyun Li, Jingrui Liu, Dengke Zhang and Chengjiao Liu contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. All authors made critical revisions to the draft versions of the manuscript and approved the final
Ethical approval
The study was performed in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki principles for ethical research. The study protocol was approved by the independent central ethics committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Chinese Drug Trial Identifier: CTR20150224. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
Compliance with ethical standards.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the patients in this study.
References (30)
- et al.
Twenty-eight day safety, antiviral activity, and pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection
J. Hepatol.
(2015) - et al.
Buti M2, Chan HLY. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection
J. Hepatol.
(2018) - et al.
Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.
(2016) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection
J. Hepatol.
(2012)- et al.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity
Vaccine
(2012) - et al.
Adefovir dipivoxil added to ongoing lamivudine in chronic hepatitis B with YMDD mutant hepatitis B virus
Gastroenterology
(2004) - et al.
Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B
Gastroenterology
(2004) - et al.
Adefovir dipivoxil: a new antiviral agent for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection
Clin. Ther.
(2003) - et al.
Efficacy of 2years of entecavir plus adefovir therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B who had failed on prior nucleos(t)ide analog treatment
Antivir. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Correlation between tenofovir drug levels and the renal biomarkers RBP-4 and ß2M in the ION-4 study cohort
Open Forum Infect. Dis.
(2019)
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
Risk evaluation of viral load elevation and associated liver disease/cancer in HBV (REVEAL-HBV) study Group.Carriers of inactive hepatitis B virus are still at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death
Gastroenterology
Adefovir dipivoxil: a review of its use in chronic hepatitis B
Drugs
Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of a single ascending dose of pradefovir, a novel liver-targeting, anti-hepatitis B virus drug, in healthy Chinese subjects
Hepatol. Int.
Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. NDA 21-449 Gilead Sciences, Foster City, Calif
Cited by (11)
HBV replication inhibitors
2020, Antiviral ResearchCitation Excerpt :Its antiviral activity was similar to TDF as exemplified by the change in HBV DNA in the 60–120 mg PDV group, compared to the 300 mg TDF group. Moreover, PDV mesylate was associated with 4- to 4.5-fold reduced circulating serum PMEA levels compared to ADV (Zhang et al., 2020). Based on these findings, a dose close to 45 mg was selected for a phase II clinical trial.
A novel strategy against hepatitis B virus: Glycyrrhetnic acid conjugated multi-component synergistic nano-drug delivery system for targeted therapy
2023, Journal of Biomaterials ApplicationsPhosphonates and Phosphonate Prodrugs in Medicinal Chemistry: Past Successes and Future Prospects
2022, Frontiers in ChemistryReview article: hepatitis B—current and emerging therapies
2022, Alimentary Pharmacology and TherapeuticsProdrug Therapies for Infectious and Neurodegenerative Diseases
2022, Pharmaceutics