Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A study on development of alternative biopolymers based proton exchange membrane for microbial fuel cells and effect of blending ratio and ionic crosslinking on bioenergy generation and COD removal

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of biopolymers as alternative proton exchange membranes (PEMs) is receiving significant attention in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) due to their attractive and competitive physico-chemical properties, eco-friendly behavior and biodegradable nature. In this study we developed the biopolymer-based blend PEMs using chitosan (Cs) alginate (Alg) for bioelectricity production and simultaneous wastewater treatment and also investigated the effect of blending ratio of the membrane and ionic crosslinking between the two biopolymers on MFC performance. The membranes of Cs:Alg were fabricated in volume ratio of 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 20:80, and 0:100 via a solution casting and solvent evaporation method followed by crosslinking with phosphoric acid to avoid excess swelling of the hydrophilic polymers and increase the mechanical strength. Among these, the 50:50 ratio membranes exhibited the highest power generation (115 mW/m2) with 1340% water uptake, however the membrane with 40:60 ratio displayed maximum COD removal (78.6%) compared to other membranes. The structure and surface morphology of obtained membranes were examined using Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Sorption and cation exchange capacity, and tensile strength. Sorption, cation exchange capacity and mechanical properties of Cs membranes increased with the addition of Alg with near to stoichiometric ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pant D, Arslan D, Van Bogaert G, Gallego YA, De Wever H, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2013) Integrated conversion of food waste diluted with sewage into volatile fatty acids through fermentation and electricity through a fuel cell. Environ Technol 34:1935–1945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy LV, Kumar SP, Wee YJ (2010) Microbial fuel cells (MFCs)-a novel source of energy for new millennium. Curr Res Technol Educ Top Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol 2:956–964

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pant D, Van Bogaert G, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2010) A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresour Technol 101:1533–1543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Santoro C, Arbizzani C, Erable B, Ieropoulos I (2017) Microbial fuel cells: from fundamentals to applications. A review J Power Sources 356:225–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huggins T, Fallgren PH, Jin S, Ren ZJ (2013) Energy and performance comparison of microbial fuel cell and conventional aeration treating of wastewater. J Microb Biochem Technol S6

  6. Zhang X, Cheng S, Wang X, Huang X, Logan BE (2009) Separator characteristics for increasing performance of microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 43:8456–8461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey P, Shinde VN, Deopurkar RL, Kale SP, Patil SA, Pant D (2016) Recent advances in the use of different substrates in microbial fuel cells toward wastewater treatment and simultaneous energy recovery. Appl Energy 168:706–723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JR, Cheng S, Oh SE, Logan BE (2007) Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41:1004–1009

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim T, Kang S, Sung JH, Kang YK, Kim YH, Jang JK (2016) Characterization of polyester cloth as an alternative separator to Nafion membrane in microbial fuel cells for bioelectricity generation using swine wastewater. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:2171–2178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahgaldi S, Ghasemi M, Daud WRW, Yaakob Z, Sedighi M, Alam J, Ismail AF (2014) Performance enhancement of microbial fuel cell by PVDF/Nafion nanofibre composite proton exchange membrane. Fuel Process Technol 124:290–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Manhel AJ, Al-Hilphy ARS, Niamah AK (2016) Extraction of chitosan, characterization and its use for water purification. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 17:186–190

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chandur VK, Badiger AM, Shambashiva Rao KRS (2011) Characterizing formulations containing derivatized chitosan with polymer blending. Int J Res Pharm Chem 4:950–967

    Google Scholar 

  13. Croisier F, Jérôme C (2013) Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 49:780–792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Hamblin MR (2016) Chitin and chitosan: production and application of versatile biomedical nanomaterials. Int J Adv Res 4:411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mati-Baouche N, Elchinger PH, De Baynast H, Pierre G, Delattre C, Michaud P (2014) Chitosan as an adhesive. Eur Pol J 60:198–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan Y, Creber KA, Peppley B, Bui VT (2003) Synthesis, characterization and ionic conductive properties of phosphorylated chitosan membranes. Macromol Chem Phys 204:850–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cadogan EI, Lee CH, Popuri SR (2015) Facile synthesis of chitosan derivatives and Arthrobacter sp. biomass for the removal of europium (III) ions from aqueous solution through biosorption. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 102:286–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Han YJ, Wang KH, Lai JY, Liu YL (2014) Hydrophilic chitosan-modified polybenzoimidazole membranes for pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol aqueous solutions. J Membr Sci 463:17–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Uragami T, Saito T, Miyata T (2015) Pervaporative dehydration characteristics of an ethanol/water azeotrope through various chitosan membranes. Carbohydr Polym 120:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Padaki M, Isloor AM, Wanichapichart P, Ismail AF (2012) Preparation and characterization of sulfonated polysulfone and N-phthloyl chitosan blend composite cation-exchange membrane for desalination. Desalin 298:42–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bansal V, Sharma PK, Sharma N, Pal OP, Malviya R (2012) Applications of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in drug delivery. Adv Biol Res 5:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chavasit V, Kienzle-Sterzer C, Torres JA (1988) Formation and characterization of an insoluble polyelectrolyte complex: chitosan-polyacrylic acid. Polym Bul1 9:223-230

  23. Harewood AJT, Popuri SR, Cadogan EI, Lee CH, Wang CC (2017) Bioelectricity generation from brewery wastewater in a microbial fuel cell using chitosan/biodegradable copolymer membrane. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1535–1550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Milkova V, Radeva T (2015) Influence of charge density and calcium salt on stiffness of polysaccharides multilayer film. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 481:13–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cabello SP, Takara EA, Marchese J, Ochoa NA (2015) Influence of plasticizers in pectin films: microstructural changes. Mater Chem Phys 162:491–497

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holder SL, Lee CH, Popuri SR, Zhuang MX (2016) Enhanced surface functionality and microbial fuel cell performance of chitosan membranes through phosphorylation. Carbohydr Polym 149:251–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holder SL, Lee CH, Popuri SR (2017) Simultaneous wastewater treatment and bioelectricity production in microbial fuel cells using cross-linked chitosan-graphene oxide mixed-matrix membranes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13782–13796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rhim JW (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. LWT-Food Sci Technol 37:323–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao PS, Sridhar S, Wey MY, Krishnaiah A (2007) Pervaporative separation of ethylene glycol/water mixtures by using cross-linked chitosan membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:2155–2163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater21st edn. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  31. Göktepe F, Çelik SÜ, Bozkurt A (2008) Preparation and the proton conductivity of chitosan/poly (vinyl phosphonic acid) complex polymer electrolytes. J Non-Cryst Solids 354:3637–3642

    Google Scholar 

  32. Feng F, Liu Y, Zhao B, Hu K (2012) Characterization of half N-acetylated chitosan powders and films. Proced Eng 27:718–732

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Acosta N, Sánchez E, Calderón L, Cordoba-Diaz M, Cordoba-Diaz D, Dom S, Heras Á (2015) Physical stability studies of semi-solid formulations from natural compounds loaded with chitosan microspheres. Mar Drugs 13:5901–5919

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Povea MB, Monal WA, Cauich-Rodríguez JV, Pat AM, Rivero NB, Covas CP (2012) Interpenetrated chitosan-poly (acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels. Synthesis, characterization and sustained protein release studies. Mater Sci Appl 2:509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pasparakis G, Bouropoulos N (2006) Swelling studies and in vitro release of verapamil from calcium alginate and calcium alginate–chitosan beads. Int J Pharm 323:34–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vijaya Y, Popuri SR, Boddu VM, Krishnaiah A (2008) Modified chitosan and calcium alginate biopolymer sorbents for removal of nickel (II) through adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 72:261–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu YX, Kim KM, Hanna MA, Nag D (2005) Chitosan–starch composite film: preparation and characterization. Ind Crop Prod 21:185–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Geng J, Jiang Z, Wang JINGTAO, Shi YING, Yang DONG, Xiao LULU (2010) Chitosan/titanate nanotube hybrid membrane with low methanol crossover for direct methanol fuel cells. Chem Eng Technol 33:244–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu M, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Yu C, Cao S (2013) Preparation and structural analysis of chitosan films with and without sorbitol. Food Hydrocoll 33:186–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ke G, Xu W, Yu W (2010) Preparation and properties of drug-loaded chitosan-sodium alginate complex membrane. Int J Pol Mater 59:184–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kulig D, Zimoch-Korzycka A, Jarmoluk A, Marycz K (2016) Study on alginate–chitosan complex formed with different polymers ratio. Pol 8:167

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bai H, Li Y, Zhang H, Chen H, Wu W, Wang J, Liu J (2015) Anhydrous proton exchange membranes comprising of chitosan and phosphorylated graphene oxide for elevated temperature fuel cells. J Membr Sci 495:48–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Smitha B, Devi DA, Sridhar S (2008) Proton-conducting composite membranes of chitosan and sulfonated polysulfone for fuel cell application. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4138–4146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Min B, Kim J, Oh S, Regan JM, Logan BE (2015) Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. Water Res 39:4961–4968

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, 51591, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Ching-Hwa Lee, Narangarav Terbish, Shima L. Holder & Lakshmi P. Nalluri

  2. Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044, Stockholm, Sweden

    Shima L. Holder

  3. Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill, Campus, 11000, Barbados

    Srinivasa R. Popuri

Authors
  1. Ching-Hwa Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Narangarav Terbish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shima L. Holder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Srinivasa R. Popuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lakshmi P. Nalluri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Hwa Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, CH., Terbish, N., Holder, S.L. et al. A study on development of alternative biopolymers based proton exchange membrane for microbial fuel cells and effect of blending ratio and ionic crosslinking on bioenergy generation and COD removal. J Polym Res 26, 285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1957-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1957-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation