Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell on chitosan/collagen composite scaffold

  • Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vitro tissue engineering requires a progenitor cell source and a porous scaffold providing three dimensional (3D) supports for growth and differentiation to attain tissue architectures. This research focused on fabrication and characterization of 3D porous scaffolds using chitosan (CS), collagen (CG) and chitosan-collagen (CS-CG) composite to investigate their influence on human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. Material dependent variations in porous morphology and mechanical behavior of the fabricated CS, CG and CS-CG scaffold showed significant impact on hMSC adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. The maximum hMSC adhesion and proliferation was reported on CS-CG scaffold among all fabricated scaffold groups. Interconnectivity of pores structure in CS-CG scaffold was considered as preferable attribute for such enhanced growth and distribution throughout the scaffold. Besides, CS scaffold with well interconnected pores showed poor adhesion and proliferation because of inadequate adhesion motifs. In case of CG scaffold, optimum growth and distribution of hMSC occurs only at the surface because of the absence of interconnectivity in their pore structures. Likewise, osteogenic differentiation of hMSC occurs most preferably in CS-CG composite scaffold among all scaffold groups. Such enhanced hMSC proliferation and differentiation in CS-CG scaffold significantly influenced on mechanical behavior of scaffold which is essential for in vivo application of a bone tissue implant. Thus CS-CG composite scaffold holds promise to be a suitable platform for in vitro engineering of bone tissue implant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu J, Wang Y-K, Yang MT, Desai RA, Yu X, Liu Z et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods. 2010;7:733–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Park JS, Huang NF, Kurpinski KT, Patel S, Hsu S, Li S. Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells and their use in cardiovascular repair. Front Biosci. 2007;12:5098–116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014;13:645–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury. 2011;42:S16–S21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arahira T, Todo M. Effects of proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on compressive mechanical behavior of collagen/β-TCP composite scaffold. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;39:218–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sudo K, Kanno M, Miharada K, Ogawa S, Hiroyama T, Saijo K. Mesenchymal progenitors able to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and/or adipogenic cells in vitro are present in most primary fibroblast-like cell populations. Sem Cells. 2007;25:1610–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy WL, McDevitt TC, Engler AJ. Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat Mater. 2014;13:547–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma PX, Zhang R, Xiao G, Franceschi R. Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly(α-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:284–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu XH, Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci. 2012;12:91–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Ma PX. Polymeric Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Annal Biomed Eng. 2004;32:477–86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hench LL. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Cerum Soc 1991;74:1487–510.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CR, Grodzinsky AJ, Spector M. The effects of cross-linking of collagen glycosaminoglycan scaffolds on compressive stiffness, chondrocyte-mediated contraction, proliferation, and biosynthesis. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3145–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma C, Dinda AK, Mishra NC. Synthesis and characterization of glycine modified chitosan-gelatin-alginate composite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Tissue Eng 2012;2:133–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomihata K, Ikada Y. In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials. 1997;18:567–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Molinaro G, Leroux JC, Damas J, Adam A. Biocompatibility of thermo sensitive chitosan-based hydrogels: an in vivo experimental approach to injectable biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2717–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goy RC, de-Britto D, Assis OBG. A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia 2009;19:241–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dutta PK, Dutta J, Tripathi VS. Chitin and chitosan: chemistry, properties and applications. Appl J Sci Ind Res. 2004;63:20–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP. Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34:641–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Glowacki J, Mizuno S. Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biopolymers. 2008;89:338–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang W, Cao Y. Collagen tissue engineering: development of novel biomaterials and applications. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:492–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haugh MG, Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. Novel freeze-drying methods to produce a range of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with tailored mean pore sizes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:887–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:433–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McClay DR, Hertzler PL. Quantitative measurement of cell adhesion using centrifugal force. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb0902s00.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guo J, Chen H, Wang Y, Cao CB, Guan GQ. A novel porcine acellular dermal matrix scaffold used in periodontal regeneration. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5:37–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujita M, Kinoshita Y, Sato E, Maeda H, Ozono S, Negishi H et al. Proliferation and differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells on poly(glycolic acid)-collagen sponge. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1346–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonanomi A, Kojic K, Giger B, Rickenbach Z, Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel L, Berger C et al. Quantitative cytokine gene expression in human tonsils at excision and during histoculture assessed by standardized and calibrated real-time PCR and novel data processing. J Immunol Methods. 2003;283:27–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ikada Y. Challenges in tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface. 2006;3:589–601.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang G, Zhang Y. Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective. Cell Res. 2013;23:49–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kafi MA, El-Said WA, Kim TH, Choi J-W. Cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation on surface functionalized with RGD nanopillar arrays. Biomaterials. 2012;33:731–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kafi MA, Kim T-H, Yea C-H, Kim H, Choi J-W. Effects of nanopatterned RGD peptide layer on electrochemical detection of neural cell chip. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;26:1359–65.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kafi MA, Kim T-H, An JH, Choi J-W. Fabrication of cell chip for detection of cell cycle progression based on electrochemical method. Anal Chem. 2011;83:2104–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tachibana A, Furuta Y, Takeshima H, Tanabe T, Yamauchi K. Fabrication of wool keratin sponge scaffolds for long-term cell cultivation. J Biotechnol. 2002;93:165–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kämmerer PW, Gabriel M, Al-Nawas B, Scholz T, Kirchmaier CM, Klein MO. Early implant healing: promotion of platelet activation and cytokine release by topographical, chemical and biomimetical titanium surface modifications in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:504–10.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Benoit DS, Collins SD, Anseth KS. Multifunctional hydrogels that promote osteogenic hMSC differentiation through stimulation and sequestering of BMP2. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17:2085–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Murphy CM, Matsiko A, Haugh MG, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ. Mesenchymal stem cell fate is regulated by the composition and mechanical properties of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;11:53–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sila-asna M, Bunyaratvej A, Maeda S, Kitaguchi H, Bunyaratvej N. Osteoblast differentiation and bone formation gene expression in strontium-inducing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell kobe. J Med Sci. 2007;53:25–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei L, Cai C, Lin J, Wang L, Zhang X. Degradation controllable biomaterials constructed from lysozyme-loaded Ca-alginate microparticle/chitosan composites. Polymer. 2011;52:5139–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3:1863–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Silvent J, Nassif N, Helary C, Azaïs T, Sire J-Y, Guille MMG et al. Collagen osteoid-like model allows kinetic gene expression studies of non-collagenous proteins in relation with mineral development to understand bone biomineralization. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57344.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hadjipanayi E, Mudera V, Brown RA. Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009;3:77–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) postdoctoral research fellowship for foreign researcher grant (P 12380), and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24•02380.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abdul Kafi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kafi, M.A., Aktar, M.K., Phanny, Y. et al. Adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell on chitosan/collagen composite scaffold. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 30, 131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6341-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6341-8

Navigation