Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive and shear bond strengths of grooved AAC blocks and masonry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) is a light-weight cementitious product of sand, water, cement, lime and aluminium powder mix, used globally for brickwork. The AAC blocks in vogue have smooth surfaces, due to which they have less bond strength than that of traditional clay bricks. This work asserts that the shear bond strength of AAC masonry can be enhanced by using grooved AAC blocks. The compressive strength of the grooved AAC block as well as the shear bond and compressive strengths of the masonry have been investigated experimentally and compared with conventional AAC blocks and masonry. The study clearly demonstrated the superiority of grooved AAC blocks to conventional AAC blocks. Simple analytical models have been developed to estimate the masonry compressive and shear bond strengths. Analytical models are capable of obtaining lower, upper and most likely estimates of strengths. Significance tests have been carried out to support the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Uday Vyas CV (2008) Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress–strain characteristics of masonry. Mater Struct 41(10):1697–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Venkatarama Reddy BV, Lal R, Nanjunda Rao KS (2007) Enhancing bond strength and characteristics of soil–cement block masonry. J Mater Civ Eng 19(2):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarangapani G, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (2005) Brick-mortar bond and masonry compressive strength. J Mater Civ Eng 17(2):229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dixit US, Borsaikia AC, Raj A (2018) Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) block unit comprising in built anchorage/frog on surface for enhancement of bonding and lateral/shear strength in masonry wall system. In: India Patent Office Journal no. 36/2018, Application number: 201831028883

  5. Singh SB, Munjal P (2017) Bond strength and compressive stress-strain characteristics of brick masonry. J Build Eng 9:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinha BP (1967) Model studies related to load bearing brickwork. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK

  7. Groot Caspar JWS (1993) Effects of water on mortar brick bond. PhD thesis, University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands

  8. Rao KVM, Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1996) Flexural bond strength of masonry using various blocks and mortars. Mater Struct 29(2):119–124

    Google Scholar 

  9. Małyszko L, Kowalska E, Bilko P (2017) Splitting tensile behavior of autoclaved aerated concrete: comparison of different specimens’ results. Constr Build Mater 157:1190–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferretti D, Michelini E, Rosati G (2015) Cracking in autoclaved aerated concrete: experimental investigation and XFEM modelling. Cem Concr Res 67:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferretti D, Michelini E, Rosati G (2015) Mechanical characterization of autoclaved aerated concrete masonry subjected to in-plane loading: experimental investigation and FE modeling. Constr Build Mater 98:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jasiński R, Drobiec Ł (2016) Comparison research of bed joints construction and bed joints reinforcement on shear parameters of AAC masonry walls. J Civ Eng Archit 10:1329–1343

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mallikarjuna S (2017) Experimental determination of parameters for a micro-modeling based failure criterion for AAC block masonry shear wall. MTech thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, India

  14. Bhosale A, Zade NP, Davis R, Sarkar P (2019) Experimental investigation of autoclaved aerated concrete masonry. J Mater Civ Eng (ASCE) 31(7):04019109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosti A, Penna A, Rota M, Magenes G (2016) In-plane cyclic response of low-density AAC URM walls. Mater Struct 49(11):4785–4798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abed F, Aidan A, Ibrahim T, Hegazi N, Al-Dabagh S (2017) Preparation of a new AAC-concrete sandwich block and its compressive behavior at quasi-static loading. Eng Trans 65(2):371–389

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raj A, Borsaikia AC, Dixit US (2019) Bond strength of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry using various joint materials. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raj A, Borsaikia AC, Dixit US (2018) Manufacturing of autoclaved aerated concrete: present status and future trends. In: Proceedings of 6th international and 27th all india manufacturing technology, design and research conference (AIMTDR-2018), Anna University, Chennai, India

  19. IS: 1077 (1992) Common burnt clay building bricks-specifications. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. IS: 2250 (1995) Indian standard code of practice for preparation and use of masonry mortars. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alecci V, Fagone M, Rotunno T, De Stefano M (2013) Shear strength of brick masonry walls assembled with different types of mortar. Constr Build Mater 40:1038–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. IS: 1905 (1987) Indian standard code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM: E447-97 (2017) Test methods for compressive strength of laboratory constructed masonry prisms. ASTM International, Pennsylvania

  24. ASTM: C1314-16 (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  25. Dixit PM, Dixit US (2008) Modeling of metal forming and machining processes: by finite element and soft computing methods. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is the part of Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, sponsored project entitled “Design and development of proper bonding mechanism for individual AAC block units in wall system of a structure” through grant number DST/TSG/AMT/2015/375. Authors wish to acknowledge DST and industry partner M/s. K D Infra, Guwahati for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uday S. Dixit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3473 kb)

Appendix: Data of compressive load carrying capacity of the blocks

Appendix: Data of compressive load carrying capacity of the blocks

Compressive test result data for AAC block and masonry are presented in Tables 5 and 6. The values in square bracket represent percentage coefficient of variation. A large statistical variation is observed.

Table 5 The compressive strength test results for AAC blocks
Table 6 The compressive strength test results for AAC masonry prisms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raj, A., Borsaikia, A.C. & Dixit, U.S. Compressive and shear bond strengths of grooved AAC blocks and masonry. Mater Struct 52, 116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1428-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1428-8

Keywords

Navigation