Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a pharmacogenomically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer

Abstract

Mucinous colorectal cancer is a unique histological subtype that is known to respond poorly to cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There are a number of genes known to be associated with resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. The aim of this study was to compare the somatic mutation frequency and copy number variation (CNV) in these genes between mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed was performed to identify papers investigating drug resistance in colorectal cancer. From this review, a list of 26 drug-resistance-associated genes was compiled. Using patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the somatic mutation rate and CNV was compared between patients with mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad PRISM® version 5.00. Data were available on 531 patients (464 non-mucinous, 67 mucinous). A statistically significant difference in the somatic mutation rate between the two cohorts was identified in the TYMP (p = 0.0179), ATP7B (p = 0.0465), SRPK1 (p = 0.0135), ABCB1 (p = 0.0423), and ABCG2 (p = 0.0102) genes. A statistically significant difference in CNV was identified between the two cohorts in the GSTP1 (p = 0.0405), CCS (p = 0.0063), and TOP1 (p = 0.0048) genes. Differences in somatic mutation rate and CNV in genes associated with resistance to 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan may partly account for the pattern of resistance observed in mucinous colorectal cancers. These genetic alterations may prove useful when deciding on a personalized approach to chemotherapy and may also represent potential therapeutic targets going forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang H, O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Sack J, Ko CY. A 10-year outcomes evaluation of mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. You YN, Xing Y, Feig BW, Chang GJ, Cormier JN. Young-onset colorectal cancer: is it time to pay attention? Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:287–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000.

  4. McCawley N, Clancy C, O'Neill BD, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Burke JP. Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:1200–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Debunne H, Ceelen W. Mucinous differentiation in colorectal cancer: molecular, histological and clinical aspects. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2013;113:385–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynolds IS, Furney SJ, Kay EW, McNamara DA, Prehn JHM, Burke JP. Meta-analysis of the molecular associations of mucinous colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2019;106:682–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glasgow SC, Yu J, Carvalho LP, Shannon WD, Fleshman JW, McLeod HL. Unfavourable expression of pharmacologic markers in mucinous colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan D, Tu L, Yuan H, Fang J, Cheng L, Zheng X, et al. WBSCR22 confers oxaliplatin resistance in human colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoo BK, Gredler R, Vozhilla N, Su ZZ, Chen D, Forcier T, et al. Identification of genes conferring resistance to 5-fluorouracil. PNAS. 2009;106:12938–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez-Balibrea E, Martinez-Cardus A, Gines A, Ruiz de Porras V, Moutinho C, Layos L, et al. Tumor-related molecular mechanisms of oxaliplatin resistance. Mol Cancer Therapeutics. 2015;14:1767–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sui X, Kong N, Wang X, Fang Y, Hu X, Xu Y, et al. JNK confers 5-fluorouracil resistance in p53-deficient and mutant p53-expressing colon cancer cells by inducing survival autophagy. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saleh EM, El-Awady RA, Anis N. Predictive markers for the response to 5-fluorouracil therapy in cancer cells: constant-field gel electrophoresis as a tool for prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:321–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Plasencia C, Martinez-Balibrea E, Martinez-Cardus A, Quinn DI, Abad A, Neamati N. Expression analysis of genes involved in oxaliplatin response and development of oxaliplatin-resistant HT29 colon cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2006;29:225–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ab Mutalib NS, Md Yusof NF, Abdul SN, Jamal R. Pharmacogenomics DNA biomarkers in colorectal cancer: current update. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2012;23:2479–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker WB, Cheng YC. Metabolism and mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil. Pharmacol Therapeutics. 1990;48:381–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Longley DB, Latif T, Boyer J, Allen WL, Maxwell PJ, Johnston PG. The interaction of thymidylate synthase expression with p53-regulated signaling pathways in tumor cells. Semin Oncol. 2003;30(3 Suppl 6):3–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. An Q, Robins P, Lindahl T, Barnes DE. 5-Fluorouracil incorporated into DNA is excised by the Smug1 DNA glycosylase to reduce drug cytotoxicity. Cancer Res 2007;67:940–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:330–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Evrard A, Cuq P, Ciccolini J, Vian L, Cano JP. Increased cytotoxicity and bystander effect of 5-fluorouracil and 5-deoxy-5-fluorouridine in human colorectal cancer cells transfected with thymidine phosphorylase. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1726–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Burger H, Loos WJ, Eechoute K, Verweij J, Mathijssen RH, Wiemer EA. Drug transporters of platinum-based anticancer agents and their clinical significance. Drug Resistance Updates. 2011;14:22–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Graham MA, Lockwood GF, Greenslade D, Brienza S, Bayssas M, Gamelin E. Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin: a critical review. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:1205–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woynarowski JM, Faivre S, Herzig MC, Arnett B, Chapman WG, Trevino AV, et al. Oxaliplatin-induced damage of cellular DNA. Mol Pharm. 2000;58:920–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Howell SB, Safaei R, Larson CA, Sailor MJ. Copper transporters and the cellular pharmacology of the platinum-containing cancer drugs. Mol Pharm. 2010;77:887–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samimi G, Katano K, Holzer AK, Safaei R, Howell SB. Modulation of the cellular pharmacology of cisplatin and its analogs by the copper exporters ATP7A and ATP7B. Mol Pharm. 2004;66:25–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsuchida S, Sato K. Glutathione transferases and cancer. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;27:337–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeakley JM, Tronchere H, Olesen J, Dyck JA, Wang HY, Fu XD. Phosphorylation regulates in vivo interaction and molecular targeting of serine/arginine-rich pre-mRNA splicing factors. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:447–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schenk PW, Stoop H, Bokemeyer C, Mayer F, Stoter G, Oosterhuis JW, et al. Resistance to platinum-containing chemotherapy in testicular germ cell tumors is associated with downregulation of the protein kinase SRPK1. Neoplasia. 2004;6:297–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu MH, Yan B, Humerickhouse R, Dolan ME. Irinotecan activation by human carboxylesterases in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for. Cancer Res. 2002;8:2696–700.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Braun MS, Richman SD, Quirke P, Daly C, Adlard JW, Elliott F, et al. Predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: results from the UK MRC FOCUS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2690–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu Y, Villalona-Calero MA. Irinotecan: mechanisms of tumor resistance and novel strategies for modulating its activity. Ann Oncol 2002;13:1841–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patel J, Mitra AK. Strategies to overcome simultaneous P-glycoprotein mediated efflux and CYP3A4 mediated metabolism of drugs. Pharmacogenomics. 2001;2:401–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE. Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:48–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wierdl M, Wall A, Morton CL, Sampath J, Danks MK, Schuetz JD, et al. Carboxylesterase-mediated sensitization of human tumor cells to CPT-11 cannot override ABCG2-mediated drug resistance. Mol Pharm. 2003;64:279–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Study concept and design—DAM, JPB, JHMP. Study Materials—ISR, EO. Data Collection—ISR, SJF. Data Analysis—ISR, SJF, JPB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Funding for this project was provided by the Beaumont Hospital Colorectal Research Fund & Science Foundation Ireland (15/ERACSM/3268).

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Simon J. Furney or John P. Burke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynolds, I.S., O’Connell, E., Fichtner, M. et al. Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a pharmacogenomically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 20, 524–532 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-019-0137-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-019-0137-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links