Skip to main content
Download PDF

The shift in the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells mediated by glucocorticoid receptor

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 10, Article number: 377 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells capable of differentiating into several tissues, such as bone, cartilage, and fat. Glucocorticoids affect a variety of biological processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of various cell types, including osteoblasts, adipocytes, or chondrocytes. Glucocorticoids exert their function by binding to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Physiological concentrations of glucocorticoids stimulate osteoblast proliferation and promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. However, pharmacological concentrations of glucocorticoids can not only induce apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes but can also reduce proliferation and inhibit the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. Several signaling pathways, including the Wnt, TGFβ/BMP superfamily and Notch signaling pathways, transcription factors, post-transcriptional regulators, and other regulators, regulate osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of MSCs mediated by GR. These signaling pathways target key transcription factors, such as Runx2 and TAZ for osteogenesis and PPARγ and C/EBPs for adipogenesis. Glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis and osteoporosis are caused by various factors including dysfunction of bone marrow MSCs. Transplantation of MSCs is valuable in regenerative medicine for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, and other skeletal disorders. However, the mechanism of inducing MSCs to differentiate toward the osteogenic lineage is the key to an efficient treatment. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind the imbalance between GR-mediated osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of MSCs would not only help us to identify the pathogenic causes of glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis and osteoporosis but also promote future clinical applications for stem cell-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Here, we primarily review the signaling mechanisms involved in adipogenesis and osteogenesis mediated by GR and discuss the factors that control the adipo-osteogenic balance.

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are capable of self-renewal, with the pluripotent potential to differentiate into mesenchymal tissues, including bone, cartilage, fat, muscle, tendon, and marrow stroma [1]. When cultured in vitro, MSCs have a stable phenotype and display a monolayer and can be induced to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, or chondrocytes [2]. Besides, MSCs possess immunomodulatory functions without immunogenicity that make them ideal candidates for use in the repair of tissue damage and treatment of inflammatory diseases [3]. MSCs hold great potential in regenerative medicine for the treatment of degenerative musculoskeletal conditions like osteoarthritis (OA) [4] and other clinical conditions such as osteogenesis imperfecta, osteonecrosis, and osteoporosis [5,6,7].

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are steroid hormones that are essential for life and play a vital role in health and disease. Endogenous GCs are primarily secreted by the adrenal glands and are involved in the modulation of the stress response and circadian rhythm. The pharmacological applications of GCs include use as potent immunosuppressant agents to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as asthma, allergic shock, arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease [8]. The physiological and pharmacological effects of GCs are mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) [9]. GCs act on virtually all types of cells through the GR, mediating important physiological effects via changes in gene expression and signaling. The GR is an intracellular protein that is ubiquitously expressed in almost every cell of the organism and interacts with chromatin to modulate the activity of numerous transcription factors in a cell type-specific manner.

Normal physiological levels of GCs are essential for development, metabolism, normal osteoblast differentiation, and bone formation. However, long-term exposure to GCs at pharmacological dosages is attributed to skeletal side effects, including osteoporosis, fracture, and osteonecrosis [10, 11]. Glucocorticoid-induced fractures occur in 30 to 50% of patients receiving long-term GC therapy, while osteonecrosis occurs in 9 to 40% of the patients [12, 13]. MSCs isolated from patients with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH) display an inherent defect in osteogenesis, which suggests that the osteonecrosis resulted from an insufficient repair mechanism [14]. Also, the in vitro culture of bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) from patients with osteoporosis is more likely to result in adipogenic differentiation rather than osteogenic differentiation [15]. Similar results can be found in dexamethasone (DEX)-induced osteoporotic mouse model that BM-MSCs from Dex-treated mice cultured in vitro are more likely to differentiate into adipocytes instead of osteoblasts than those from control mice [16].

The ability of the GCs to mediate a switch in the fate of MSCs has a significant impact on the skeletal system and is of clinical significance in stem cell-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This review focuses on how GCs regulate the lineage commitment of MSCs through different signaling pathways, transcription factors, and post-transcriptional regulators, among other regulators. This remarkable advance in understanding molecular mechanisms behind the fate of MSCs mediated by GR will provide new insights into mitigating the adverse effects of GCs on bone and joints. Besides, the opinions presented in this review will provide new strategies for stem cell-based bone repair and regeneration in the future.

Source and heterogeneity of MSCs

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were initially isolated from rat bone marrow (BM) and described as colony-forming fibroblasts (CFU-F) in 1976 [17]. These colony-forming cells have since been named “mesenchymal stromal cells” or “mesenchymal stem cells.” After that, other tissue-derived human MSCs have been found, such as human MSCs isolated from the adipose tissue, umbilical cord matrix, periosteum, synovium, tendon, lung, and dental pulp among others [18, 19]. Although the word “stem” has been used in numerous articles, “stemness” is a more strict term for defining MSCs with the ability to repair tissues in vivo [20]. In recent years, the term “tissue stem cells” has been replaced with “skeletal stem cells (SSCs)” as a new term for these cells [21, 22].

Heterogeneity in MSCs occurs not only in the proliferative and differentiation abilities among individual donor tissues but also among MSCs isolated from the same donor tissue. Besides, MSCs derived from different tissues or individual donors exhibit heterogeneity in marker profiles, gene expression patterns, and propensity to differentiate into particular lineages [23]. Contrary to the classical view of differentiation, the findings of transcriptome analysis in mice revealed that osteogenic and adipogenic signatures are not mutually exclusive, and specific subtypes of skeletal progenitors may co-express alternative lineage-specific genes [24]. Although BM-MSCs are widely used for stem cell therapy, these in vitro cultured cells are highly heterogeneous, with the potential to differentiate into many overlapping lineages, such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, fibroblast, endothelial, and stromal cells. These promiscuous cells are likely to form a population including various types of stem cells rather than a homogeneous population of SSCs [25]. The application of single-cell analysis and lineage-tracing technologies in mice and humans revealed that SSCs could differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and stromal cells, but not adipocytes. The report also revealed that perisinusoidal MSCs could give rise to adipocytes [25, 26].

Glucocorticoid receptor

The GR, encoded by the NR3C1 gene, is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcriptional factor. It mediates cellular effects of GCs and is widely expressed in almost all cells of the body [27, 28]. The GR consists of four major domains: the NH2-terminal transactivation domain (NTD) or activation function 1 (AF-1), DNA-binding domain (DBD), hinge region, and ligand-binding domain (LBD) [29]. The multiple domains of the GR are involved in ligand binding, DNA binding, and transcriptional regulation, which constitute the molecular basis of GC actions via the GR [8]. The GR controls transcription and modulates diverse physiological processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Also, GR regulates gene transcription, either positively or negatively, by transactivation or transrepression, respectively [8]. After entering the cell, the ligand (GCs) binds to the receptor as part of large heterocomplexes (Fig. 1). This widely studied complex consists of several proteins, including heat shock proteins (e.g., HSP90 and HSP70), immunophilins such as FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), CyP-40, P23, and perhaps few other proteins [30,31,32]. In the absence of ligand binding, the GR is primarily located in the cytoplasm, combined with immunophilins such as FKBP51 and FKBP52, heat shock/chaperone proteins (like Hsp70, Hsp90, and p23), and other proteins [31,32,33,34]. Hsp70 identifies newly synthesized GR molecules and binds to the LBD of GR [35, 36]. Another essential protein, co-chaperone protein Hsp40, promotes the combination of Hsp70 with GR to form a complex which has a low binding affinity to GCs. This complex allows for combination with the Hsp90 dimer, which enhances the affinity of the GR to the ligand [37]. While entering the cell, the activity and bioavailability of GCs are controlled by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (11β-HSD1, 11β-HSD2), which act in the opposite manner [38]. The 11β-HSD1 converts cortisone (the inactive hormone form) to cortisol (the active hormone form), while 11β-HSD2 oxidizes cortisol to cortisone. The binding of GCs to the LBD of GR activates GR as a result of the complex being disassembled. Subsequently, the “activated” receptor enters the nucleus, where it interacts with critical sites of the regulated genes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Glucocorticoid receptor activation. Upon entering into the cell, GCs are activated by 11β-HSD1 or occasionally inactivated by 11β-HSD2. The activated GCs bind to a cytoplasmic protein complex containing the GR and heat shock proteins. When complexed with Hsp90, the affinity of GR is increased, while when complexed with Hsp70 and Hsp40, its affinity is decreased. Once GR combines with the ligand, the chaperone protein FKBP51 is exchanged for FKBP52, allowing the complex to shuttle into the nucleus and interact with the chromatin

Full size image

Alternative splicing of the pre-mRNA of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) produces the GRα, GRβ, GRγ, GR-A, and GR-P isoforms [39,40,41,42] (Fig. 2). Isoforms GRα and GRβ are generated by alternative splicing of the GR transcript at exon 9 [43] and are 777 and 742 amino acids in length, respectively. Furthermore, isoforms GRα and GRβ are highly homologous in structure with different carboxyl termini. The GRα carboxy-terminus forms the LBD and is composed of 50 amino acids, while GRβ has only 15 carboxy-terminal amino acids and thus cannot bind GCs [44]. The GRα isoform is the most abundant and “classical” GR protein, while the GRβ isoform can regulate the expression of many genes that are not sensitive to regulation by GRα [45,46,47]. Being a ligand-dependent transcription factor, the binding of GRα to GCs can activate specific glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and regulate the expression of glucocorticoid-responsive genes. In contrast, hGRβ plays a dominant-negative role in the transcriptional activity of hGRα by occupying GRE target sites in a dose-dependent manner [39] and may contribute to GC resistance [48]. Real-time PCR and Western blot analysis results by YUN S P et al. showed that treatment with DEX (10−6 M) increases the expression level of hGRα mRNA and protein, but does not change hGRβ expression [49]. The GRγ isoform is produced by the insertion of an additional arginine between the two zinc fingers of the DBD of the GR [50]. Increased in vitro expression of GRγ is associated with GC resistance in initial acute lymphoblastic leukemia [51]. Furthermore, the GRγ isoform regulates genes that are not regulated by GRα, as revealed by expression profiling with GRγ overexpression [52]. In contrast to GRγ, the GR-A and GR-P isoforms are prevalent in some types of cancers, such as myeloma and leukemia, and cannot bind GCs due to exon deletions in their LBD [53, 54].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Domain structure of hGR splice variants and isoforms. The primary transcript of hGR consists of nine exons. Exon 1 constitutes the 5′-untranslated region (5′UTR), whereas the protein-coding region is made up of exons 2 to 9. In this process, the A/B-domain or NH2-terminal transactivation domain (NTD) containing the ligand-independent activation function 1 (AF-1) is encoded primarily by exon 2, the C-domain with the DNA-binding domain (DBD) is encoded by exons 3 and 4, and the D-domain or hinge region involved in nuclear localization is encoded by exon 5, while the other exons (up to exon 9) encode the E-domain including the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a nuclear localization signal, which participates in the dimerization and Hsp90 binding

Full size image

Dose-dependent effect of GCs on the proliferation, osteogenesis, and adipogenesis of MSCs

Physiological levels of GCs stimulate osteoblast proliferation and promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. In contrast, pharmacological doses of GCs can not only induce apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes but also reduce proliferation and inhibit the differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. These effects of GCs are mediated by the GR [8]. It was shown that lower concentrations (10−9 M) of DEX promote the proliferation of rat BM-MSCs, whereas higher levels (10−7 and 10−6 M) inhibit proliferation [55]. Treatment of human BM-MSCs with DEX showed that DEX at the concentration of 10−8 M positively regulates the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation [56]. The inhibitory effect of excess GC on the proliferation of osteoblastic lineage cells leads to GC-induced osteoporosis (GIO). Therefore, GCs have an impact on different mitogenic signaling pathways and attenuate the progression of the osteoblast cell cycle in a developmental stage-specific manner [57]. The Wnt signaling pathway can prevent apoptosis of osteoblasts and accelerate osteoblast cell cycle progression and thereby increase proliferation [58]. In murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells, the inhibition of cell cycle progression by DEX [59] is partly due to abnormal GR activation and subsequent p53 activation [60]. In MC3T3-E1 cells also, attenuation of proliferation is a prerequisite for osteoblast differentiation [59].

Besides, physiological levels of GCs play a positive regulatory role in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, both in vitro and in vivo [61, 62]. A proper concentration of DEX (up to 10−9–10−8 M) is needed to trigger differentiation in human osteoblasts in a specific time-window, partly because it can increase the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) during the early stages of osteoblast development [63]. The Wnt signaling pathway plays an essential role in the lineage commitment of MSCs from an adipogenic lineage into an osteoblastic lineage. The secreted frizzled-related protein 1, an inhibitor of the Wnt pathway, is downregulated by physiological concentrations of GCs [64]. Therefore, basal concentrations of GCs are crucial for the release of Wnt proteins, which then activates the canonical Wnt pathway in a paracrine manner (Fig. 3). Subsequently, β-catenin accumulates in the nucleus, and expression of the critical transcription factor Runx2 for osteoblast differentiation is promoted [8].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of physiological and pharmacological concentrations of GCs on MSCs lineage commitment: excess GC inhibits MSC proliferation and shifts the MSC differentiation commitment toward adipogenic differentiation at the expense of osteogenesis by upregulating specific adipogenic transcription factors (PPARγ, C/EBPα) and prostaglandin receptors (PE2+PE4) and ROS or by inhibiting osteoblastogenic inducers (downregulation of Runx2). On the other hand, physiological GC levels can stimulate MSC proliferation and promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs under certain conditions. Canonical Wnt signaling and GILZ might be implicated in this process

Full size image

The use of excessive GC such as DEX suppresses osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and bone formation [16, 65] and shifts the lineage commitment of MSCs from the osteoblastic lineage to the adipocyte lineage [16, 66]. When the concentration of DEX is higher than 10−8 M, the osteogenic differentiation capacity of MSCs can be attenuated. It was indicated that C3H10T1/2 cells treated with high-dose DEX (10−6–10−7 M) have higher adipogenic differentiation potential, whereas low-dose DEX (10−8–10−9 M) cannot stimulate this potential [16]. The mechanisms underlying the effects of excess GCs or pharmacological dosages of GCs through the GR on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs are discussed in Table 1.

Table 1 Factors involved in the regulation of osteogenesis and adipogenesis by excess GC
Full size table

Major signaling pathways involved in adipo-osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by excess GCs

The differentiation commitment of MSCs is regulated by several signaling pathways which can promote MSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, and stromal cells. Different signaling molecules can also regulate the differentiation commitment of MSCs via a variety of signaling pathways. The various GR-mediated signaling pathways that affect osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of MSCs are represented in Table 1.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling

As an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway, the Wnt signaling pathway has been widely studied and is crucial for renewal, proliferation, and differentiation of stem cells during embryonic development and adult tissue homeostasis [102]. The binding of Wnt ligands, such as secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs), to the frizzled receptor and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5 or LRP6) can stabilize β-catenin by preventing its phosphorylation and activate the Wnt pathway [103]. Accumulating evidence suggests that the activated Wnt signaling promotes osteogenic differentiation [104] and inhibits adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [105]. Glucocorticoids (GCs) affect Wnt signaling through different mechanisms. On the one hand, high doses of GCs attenuate osteoblast differentiation in mice in vitro by reducing the expression of Wnt7b and Wnt10. On the other hand, high GC doses further enhance the expression of inhibitors of the Wnt signaling pathway, such as dickkopf-1 (DKK1) [67, 68], SFRPs [69, 70], Wnt inhibitory factor-1(Wif1), and sclerostin [71]. Accordingly, knocking down DKK1 attenuates the negative effects of GCs on bone mass in rats [72]. Moreover, serum from children who have been treated with high GC doses for long-term express elevated levels of DKK1 [106].

TGFβ/BMP superfamily

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signaling pathway plays dual roles in regulating osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [107]. The TGF-β superfamily only exists in mammals and can be divided into three closely related subtypes: TGF-β1–TGF-β3, and BMPs. The BMPs, which represent the largest subgroup of this superfamily, belong to the TGFβ1 family [108]. By binding to transmembrane serine-threonine kinase receptors (termed type I and type II), TGFβ/BMP ligands activate the canonical Smad-dependent signaling pathways (TGFβ/BMP ligands, receptors, Smads) and the non-canonical Smad-independent signaling pathway such as p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [109]. Following TGFβ/BMP induction, either the Smad or p38 MAPK pathway can regulate the expression of the runt-related gene 2 (Runx2) [108] and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) [107]. Also, the osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of MSCs is directly controlled by alteration in the expression levels of lineage-specific transcription factors such as Runx2 or PPARγ. In vitro, treatment with BMP-2, a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation, enhances osteoblast differentiation by increasing the expression of Runx2 gene and ALP in several types of MSCs, such as human marrow stromal cell line [110] and human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) [111]. Glucocorticoids (GCs) suppress the expression of BMP2 gene, which can antagonize the GC-induced inhibitory effects of differentiation depending on the differentiation stage in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells culture model [73]. In MC3T3-E1 cells also, GCs increase the mRNA expression of follistatin and Dan, which antagonize BMP2 [74].

Notch signaling

Notch signaling functions as a molecular gate and is closely correlated with binary cell fate decisions during embryonic development and homeostatic maintenance of adults [112,113,114,115]. Mammals have five classic Notch ligands (Jagged-1 and Jagged-2, Delta-like 1, 3, and 4) and four transmembrane notch receptors (Notch1–4) [116]. Notch ligands are single-pass transmembrane proteins and play the dual roles of activating and repressing Notch signaling [117]. The trans-interaction of a Notch ligand-receptor results in receptor activation, whereas a cis-interaction in the same cell inhibits Notch signaling [118]. The Notch signaling pathway is activated by an interaction between a membranous Notch receptor and the membrane-bound ligand of adjacent cells, which lead to proteolytic cleavage of the Notch receptor. After that, the Notch intracellular domain is released and translocates into the nucleus to regulate the expression of related genes. The role of Notch signaling in the lineage decision of MSCs is essential and complicated. As revealed in the 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte model, for instance, Notch signaling plays dual roles in adipogenic differentiation [119]. Similar to the dual roles in adipogenesis, the interaction between Notch1 and BMP-2, a TGFβ ligand, enhances osteogenic differentiation and ectopic bone formation of MC3T3-E1 cells in vivo [120]. However, the overexpression of Notch1 inhibits osteogenesis of mice BM ST-2 cells by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin [121]. The findings of a genome-wide association study indicate that the JAG1 gene, which encodes the Notch ligand Jagged-1, is associated with bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures [122]. Although GCs can inhibit osteoblast differentiation by stimulating mRNA expression of Notch1 and Notch 2, GCs do not regulate the expression of Notch ligands in MC3T3-E1 cells [75]. Additionally, in vivo administration of GCs inhibits the expression of Notch target genes such as Hey1, Hey2, and HeyL in osteoblasts [76].

Transcription factors and post-transcriptional regulators involved in adipo-osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by excess GCs

The lineage commitment of MSCs is also modulated by transcription factors or post-transcriptional regulators, which can directly or indirectly act on target genes of various signaling pathways, thus initiating and promoting osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. Glucocorticoids (GCs) can positively or negatively regulate the expression of multiple transcription factors (e.g., PPARγ, Runx2) and post-transcriptional regulators (e.g., miRNAs, lncRNAs), as shown in Table 1, thereby affecting the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts or adipocytes (Fig. 3).

Runx2

Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2/Cbfa1) is an essential differentiation factor and a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation in mammals [123,124,125]. The critical function of Runx2 in osteogenesis was elucidated in mice with a homozygous Runx2 mutation. The Runx2−/− mice died soon after birth and exhibited an incompletely ossified skeleton [126]. According to a study, GCs can rapidly inhibit the expression of functional Runx2 in nuclear extracts from the GC-treated primary osteoblast cultures of fetal rat [77]. In another study, DEX-activated GR exerts various degrees of antagonistic effects on Runx2 during osteoblast differentiation in cultures of BM-derived ST2 pluripotent mesenchymal cells [78]. Besides, the over-expression of Runx2 can antagonize the effect of GC-induced adipogenic differentiation on primary cultured rat BM-MSCs [79].

PPARγ and C/EBPs

The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs) are transcription factors involved in the regulation of adipogenesis [80, 127,128,129]. Glucocorticoids (GCs) induce the expression of PPARγ and C/EBP members (C/EBPα, β, and δ), leading to enhanced adipogenic differentiation and decreased osteoblastogenesis in BM-MSCs [16, 81, 82]. Meanwhile, the binding of DEX to endocellular GR can activate the expression of C/EBPδ [80]. The expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα is upregulated during the entire adipogenesis process of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, while the expression of C/EBPβ is downregulated in the later stage of the process [80].

TAZ

The transcriptional co-activator with PDZ binding motif (TAZ) is a transcriptional co-activator that regulates the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts or adipocytes [125]. The expression of TAZ promotes osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by coactivating Runx2-dependent gene transcription and blocks adipogenic differentiation of MSCs by inhibiting PPARγ-dependent gene transcription [130,131,132]. The expression of TAZ and ALP were enhanced by treatment with DEX at a concentration of 10−8 M during osteoblastic differentiation of rat BM-MSCs, whereas a higher concentration (10−7 M) of DEX strongly suppressed the expression of TAZ and ALP [83]. The expression of TAZ is inhibited by a high concentration of DEX at the transcriptional level during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. Furthermore, overexpression of TAZ suppresses adipogenesis and trans-differentiates 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into osteocytes [84].

Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper

Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ), one of the GC-induced genes [133], belongs to the leucine zipper protein family and mediates the anti-inflammatory effect of GCs [134,135,136]. Classic GCs activate GR and transactivate the anti-inflammatory protein GILZ [85]. Overexpression of GILZ promotes osteogenic differentiation of mice BM-MSCs [86] and enhances bone acquisition in GILZ transgenic mice [87]. In contrast, inhibition of the expression of PPARγ2 and C/EBPα reduces the adipogenic differentiation capacity of mice BM-MSCs over-expressing GILZ [86]. Another study reported similar results that over-expression of GILZ blocks the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into adipocytes, and GILZ inhibits the expression of PPAR-γ2 mediated by C/EBP-δ [88].

Prostaglandin E2

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a potent lipid mediator and a pro-inflammatory mediator, plays a vital role in skeletal metabolism and bone cell differentiation [137, 138]. Due to the induction of prostaglandin receptors (mainly PE2 and PE4 receptor subtypes) in human BM-MSCs, DEX enables these cells to respond to PGE2 which then shift the lineage commitment of BM-MSCs from osteogenic to adipogenic differentiation [89].

MicroRNAs

MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) are 18–25-nt long small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of particular target mRNAs [139, 140]. The binding of miRNAs to target mRNAs results in the degradation of target mRNAs or inhibition of mRNA translation, hence gene silencing [141]. In human BM-MSCs, the silencing of either Dicer or Drosha, two key enzymes involved in the biogenesis of miRNA, inhibits differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts and adipocytes [142]. Accumulating evidence reveals that miRNAs are essential regulators of MSC differentiation and fate decisions [143] (Table 2). For example, miR-29a promotes osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs in vitro by targeting HDAC4, a negative regulator of osteoblast differentiation [90]. In the human mesenchymal precursor cell line hFOB1.19, canonical Wnt signaling promotes transcription of miR-29a, which can potentiate Wnt signaling by inhibiting key Wnt signaling antagonists such as Dkk1 and Kremen2 [91]. The microRNA-29a promotes osteogenic differentiation by inhibiting GC-induced blockage of Wnt signaling in GC-treated rats, and thus, modulating miR-29a signaling is a promising strategy for alleviating GC-induced bone loss [92]. Using miRNA microarrays and RT-PCR, Li et al. [93] identified nine upregulated miRNAs and seven downregulated miRNAs involved in osteogenic differentiation of DEX-induced human BM-MSCs. Target genes of the upregulated DEX-induced miRNAs include RUNX2, SMAD1, SMAD5, and BMPR2, which promote osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs. Similarly, target genes of the downregulated miRNAs induced by DEX treatment include Sox4, BMP3, HDAC4, and TGF-β1, and these inhibit osteogenic differentiation. In another study, miR-216a can reverse the inhibitory effect of DEX on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived MSCs in vitro and enhance ectopic bone formation in vivo, by suppressing the expression of c-Cbl [94]. In contrast, miR-708 can promote steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH) and inhibit the osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs in vitro by targeting SMAD3 [95].

Table 2 MiRNAs involved in osteogenesis and adipogenesis of GC-treated MSCs
Full size table

Long non-coding RNAs

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-protein coding RNAs with a length of more than 200 nucleotides [144]. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that lncRNAs participate in diverse critical biological processes such as growth and differentiation of various cell types [145, 146]. Similar to microRNAs, lncRNAs play a critical role in the adipo-osteogenic lineage commitment of MSCs [147,148,149]. For instance, the lncRNA TCONS_00041960 promotes osteogenic differentiation and suppresses adipogenic differentiation of GC-treated rat BM-MSCs, by directly sponging miR-204-5p and miR125a-3p [96]. In another study, the expression of the lncRNA RP11-154D6 was reduced in human BM-MSCs of patients with SONFH, and its overexpression enhanced osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation [97]. However, more lncRNAs involved in osteogenesis and adipogenesis via GR need to be identified and studied.

Other regulators controlling the balance between osteogenesis and adipogenesis of MSCs

Oxidative stress

Oxidative stress represents an unbalanced situation in which the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) overwhelms the cell’s antioxidant systems, causing tissue damage. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) typically have low levels of intracellular ROS and high levels of glutathione, an important antioxidant [150]. As living organisms age, ROS and oxidative stress levels increase, and the two play important roles in age-related bone loss and conversion of adipo-osteogenic differentiation through Wnt, PPARγ, and Forkhead box O (FoxO) [151,152,153]. Increasing evidence indicates that changes in metabolic processes, such as mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative stress, affect osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [154, 155]. For example, increased ROS generation inhibits the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat BM-MSCs [156]. Low levels of ROS facilitate osteogenesis, whereas high levels of ROS promote adipogenic differentiation of MSCs [150]. Besides, the administration of GCs to mice increases ROS in bone, and GCs suppress Wnt-induced proliferation and osteoblast differentiation of the mice osteoblastic cell line [98] (Fig. 3). Oxidative stress-induced by DEX (10−7, 10−6, 10−5 M) decreases the Cbfa1 mRNA expression and inhibits differentiation of rat osteoblasts, whereas the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) can mitigate the damaging effects of DEX-induced oxidative stress [99].

FilGAP-filamin A

Darling et al. found that human MSC-derived osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes exhibit distinct mechanical properties, with osteoblasts being stiffer than chondrocytes, and both being stiffer than adipocytes [157]. This exciting phenomenon demonstrates that cellular differentiation and mechanical properties are correlated. The study also showed that the presence of an appropriate mechanical stimulus could promote osteogenic differentiation and inhibit adipogenic differentiation of rat BM-MSCs [158]. Filamin A (FLNA), a cytoskeletal gene, is a member of the high-molecular-mass cytoskeletal family of proteins that cross-link actin filaments and link actin networks to cell membranes [159,160,161]. The FLNA gene is induced by mechanical forces applied through β1 integrins [162, 163]. The Rac GTPase-activating protein (GAP) FilGAP regulates cellular activity such as actin assembly [164] and targets sites of FLNA force transfer [165]. Concomitant upregulation of FLNA and c-Tubulin with cellular elastic modulus indicated that FLNA and c-Tubulin play an essential role in mechanical regulation during adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs [100]. On the other hand, mechanical stimuli protect against apoptosis of osteocytes and osteoblasts by activating the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) [166]. Meanwhile, GCs antagonize these survival signals by the activation of pro-apoptotic kinases Pyk2 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [167]. An antagonistic effect, therefore, exists between mechanical forces and GC, governed by FAK/Pyk2 signaling that acts on the Wnt pathway and regulates apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes [101]. The interaction between FilGAP and FLNA in response to mechanical stimuli plays a mechano-protective role in preventing cells from force-induced apoptosis [165].

Conclusion and perspective

The findings of various studies have demonstrated that GCs can exert a significant effect via several signaling pathways on the shift between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. These signaling pathways eventually converge at several transcription factors. For osteogenic differentiation, the pathways converge at Runx2 and TAZ and PPARγ and C/EBPs for adipogenic differentiation of MSCs, participating in a series of tightly controlled transcription events [168, 169]. Other transcription factors and post-transcriptional regulators, such as GILZ, PGE2, miRNAs, and lncRNAs, also affect the delicate balance between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. Besides, other regulators, such as oxidative stress and FilGAP-filamin A, are also involved in osteogenesis and adipogenesis of MSCs.

Based on its function and role in osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of MSCs, GR may modify MSC lineage decisions. To reduce the adverse side effects of GC on the skeletal system, such as bone loss, fractures, and osteonecrosis, new and effective therapies that enhance bone formation by stimulating osteoblast differentiation should be developed. Notably, selective GR modulators such as compound A (CpdA) have been proposed. CpdA, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory compound, does not induce GR dimerization or transcriptional activation nor does it interfere with osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo [170]. Furthermore, this GR-modulating agent has a bone-sparing effect in mice [171]. We anticipate that leveraging on cell-based screening methods may lead to the development of additional bone-sparing GR ligands. Secondly, agents that activate bone cell-protective effects by modulating GR-mediated pathways could be effective alternatives. Sclerostin, secreted by osteocytes, is an inhibitor of the Wnt signaling which attenuates osteoblast function and differentiation. Excessive GC has been shown to stimulate sclerostin secretion from osteocytes. Neutralizing antibodies against sclerostin, such as romosozumab, can promote Wnt signaling and improve osteoblast function [172]. Elsewhere, it has been reported that miR-29a can suppress the side effects of excessive GCs on osteoblast differentiation in vitro and restore Wnt signaling by regulating β-catenin acetylation [173]. To prevent the production of excessive ROS levels following GC administration and redirect the MSC fates, effective pharmaceutical strategies such as the use of antioxidants, extracts from natural products, and gene modifications have been proposed to potentiate the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs [174]. In addition, tissue-specific or cell type-specific delivery systems for GCs may minimize the systemic distribution of pharmacological GCs and thus reduce the adverse effects of GCs on skeletal system.

BM-MSCs have been extensively studied and applied in tissue regeneration and stem cell-based therapies, but the numbers of MSCs in BM are relatively low [175, 176]. In contrast, adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are easily obtainable and expandable to provide sufficient numbers for therapeutic applications. Megestrol acetate (MA) imparts mitogenic effects on ASCs and increases the proliferation of ASCs via GR phosphorylation [177]. Future studies should compare in vitro results with in vivo preclinical findings and establish stem cell banks based on the heterogeneity of MSC subpopulations. Furthermore, stem cell therapy based on different MSC subgroups with some advantages (e.g., osteogenesis, adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and hematopoiesis support) should be applied to selectively treat various diseases. Although remarkable advancements in the field of stem cell therapy have expanded our understanding of the role played by GC on MSC phenotypes in vitro, the effects of GCs on mesenchymal precursor cells in vivo remains unknown. In vivo studies are, therefore, required to explore the mechanisms of GR on lineage decisions of MSCs to generate ideas that can be used to develop novel therapies that suppress the negative effects of GCs on the skeletal system, and to improve the clinical application of MSCs in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AF-1:

Activation function 1

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ASCs:

Adipose-derived stem cells

BM:

Bone marrow

BM-MSCs:

Bone marrow-derived MSCs

BMP:

Bone morphogenic protein

C/EBPs:

CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins

DBD:

DNA-binding domain

DEX:

Dexamethasone

DKK1:

Dickkopf-1

ERKs:

Extracellular signals regulated kinases

FAK:

Focal adhesion kinase

FKBPs:

FK506-binding proteins

FLNA:

Filamin A

FoxO:

Forkhead box O

GAP:

GTPase-activating protein

GC(s):

Glucocorticoid(s)

GILZ:

Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper

GIO:

GC-induced osteoporosis

GR:

Glucocorticoid receptor

GRE:

Glucocorticoid response element

HSD:

Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases

HSP:

Heat shock protein

JNK:

Jun N-terminal kinase

LBD:

Ligand-binding domain

LncRNAs:

Long non-coding RNAs

LRP:

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein

MA:

Megestrol acetate

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MiRNAs:

MicroRNAs

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

NAC:

N-Acetylcysteine

NTD:

NH2-terminal transactivation domain

OA:

Osteoarthritis

PGE:

Prostaglandin E

PPARγ:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

Runx2:

Runt-related transcription factor 2

SFRPs:

Secreted frizzled-related proteins

SONFH:

Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head

SSCs:

Skeletal stem cells

TGFβ:

Transforming growth factor-beta

UTR:

Untranslated region

Wif1:

Wnt inhibitory factor-1

References

  1. da Silva ML, Chagastelles PC, Nardi NB. Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 11):2204–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MF P, AM M, SC B, RK J, R D, JD M, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MacFarlane RJ, Graham SM, Davies PS, Korres N, Tsouchnica H, Heliotis M, et al. Anti-inflammatory role and immunomodulation of mesenchymal stem cells in systemic joint diseases: potential for treatment. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17(3):243–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry F, Murphy M. Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(10):584–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horwitz EM, Prockop DJ, Fitzpatrick LA, Koo WW, Gordon PL, Neel M, et al. Transplantability and therapeutic effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med. 1999;5(3):309–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Collins MS, Howe BM, Terzic A, Behfar A, et al. Stem cells combined with platelet-rich plasma effectively treat corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the hip: a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(2):388–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aghebati-Maleki L, Dolati S, Zandi R, Fotouhi A, Ahmadi M, Aghebati A, et al. Prospect of mesenchymal stem cells in therapy of osteoporosis: a review. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):8570–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann K, Koenen M, Schauer S, Wittig-Blaich S, Ahmad M, Baschant U, et al. Molecular actions of glucocorticoids in cartilage and bone during health, disease, and steroid therapy. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(2):409–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oakley RH, Cidlowski JA. The biology of the glucocorticoid receptor: new signaling mechanisms in health and disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1033–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollet AJ, Black R, Bunim JJ. Major undesirable side-effects resulting from prednisolone and prednisone. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;158(6):459–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heimann WG, Freiberger RH. Avascular necrosis of the femoral and humeral heads after high-dosage corticosteroid therapy. N Engl J Med. 1960;263:672–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein RS. Clinical practice. Glucocorticoid-induced bone disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(1):62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein RS. Glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis. Endocrine. 2012;41(2):183–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Packard BD, Terzic A, Behfar A, Sierra RJ. Decreased osteogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(4):893–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez JP, Montecinos L, Rios S, Reyes P, Martinez J. Mesenchymal stem cells from osteoporotic patients produce a type I collagen-deficient extracellular matrix favoring adipogenic differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2000;79(4):557–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Zhang N, Huang X, Xu J, Fernandes JC, Dai K, et al. Dexamethasone shifts bone marrow stromal cells from osteoblasts to adipocytes by C/EBPalpha promoter methylation. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedenstein AJ, Gorskaja JF, Kulagina NN. Fibroblast precursors in normal and irradiated mouse hematopoietic organs. Exp Hematol. 1976;4(5):267–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. da Silva ML, Caplan AI, Nardi NB. In search of the in vivo identity of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(9):2287–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sacchetti B. Post-natal “mesenchymal” stem cells: the assayable skeletal potency. J Stem Cells Regenerative Med. 2019;15(1):12–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elahi KC, Klein G, Avci-Adali M, Sievert KD, MacNeil S, Aicher WK. Human mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources diverge in their expression of cell surface proteins and display distinct differentiation patterns. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:5646384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kassem M, Bianco P. Skeletal stem cells in space and time. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):17–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuznetsov SA, Mankani MH, Gronthos S, Satomura K, Bianco P, Robey PG. Circulating skeletal stem cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153(5):1133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson A, Webster A, Genever P. Nomenclature and heterogeneity: consequences for the use of mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine. Regenerative Med. 2019;14(6):595–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rostovskaya M, Donsante S, Sacchetti B, Alexopoulou D, Klemroth S, Dahl A, et al. Clonal analysis delineates transcriptional programs of osteogenic and adipogenic lineages of adult mouse skeletal progenitors. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;11(1):212–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chan CKF, Gulati GS, Sinha R, Tompkins JV, Lopez M, Carter AC, et al. Identification of the human skeletal stem cell. Cell. 2018;175(1):43–56 e21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan CK, Seo EY, Chen JY, Lo D, McArdle A, Sinha R, et al. Identification and specification of the mouse skeletal stem cell. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):285–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans RM. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science. 1988;240(4854):889–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schutz G, Umesono K, et al. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell. 1995;83(6):835–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar R, Thompson EB. Gene regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor: structure:function relationship. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;94(5):383–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morishima Y, Kanelakis KC, Murphy PJ, Lowe ER, Jenkins GJ, Osawa Y, et al. The hsp90 cochaperone p23 is the limiting component of the multiprotein hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone system in vivo where it acts to stabilize the client protein: hsp90 complex. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(49):48754–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pratt WB, Toft DO. Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. Endocrine Rev. 1997;18(3):306–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pratt WB, Toft DO. Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003;228(2):111–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grad I, Picard D. The glucocorticoid responses are shaped by molecular chaperones. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;275(1–2):2–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pratt WB. The role of heat shock proteins in regulating the function, folding, and trafficking of the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(29):21455–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith DF, Toft DO. Steroid receptors and their associated proteins. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore). 1993;7(1):4–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Scherrer LC, Picard D, Massa E, Harmon JM, Simons SS Jr, Yamamoto KR, et al. Evidence that the hormone binding domain of steroid receptors confers hormonal control on chimeric proteins by determining their hormone-regulated binding to heat-shock protein 90. Biochemistry. 1993;32(20):5381–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rexin M, Busch W, Gehring U. Protein components of the nonactivated glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(36):24601–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Seckl JR. 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: changing glucocorticoid action. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004;4(6):597–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bamberger CM, Bamberger AM, de Castro M, Chrousos GP. Glucocorticoid receptor beta, a potential endogenous inhibitor of glucocorticoid action in humans. J Clin Investig. 1995;95(6):2435–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ray DW, Davis JR, White A, Clark AJ. Glucocorticoid receptor structure and function in glucocorticoid-resistant small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56(14):3276–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Oakley RH, Sar M, Cidlowski JA. The human glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform. Expression, biochemical properties, and putative function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(16):9550–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nicolaides NC, Galata Z, Kino T, Chrousos GP, Charmandari E. The human glucocorticoid receptor: molecular basis of biologic function. Steroids. 2010;75(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Encio IJ, Detera-Wadleigh SD. The genomic structure of the human glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(11):7182–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hollenberg SM, Weinberger C, Ong ES, Cerelli G, Oro A, Lebo R, et al. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature. 1985;318(6047):635–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kelly A, Bowen H, Jee YK, Mahfiche N, Soh C, Lee T, et al. The glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform can mediate transcriptional repression by recruiting histone deacetylases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(1):203–8.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim SH, Kim DH, Lavender P, Seo JH, Kim YS, Park JS, et al. Repression of TNF-alpha-induced IL-8 expression by the glucocorticoid receptor-beta involves inhibition of histone H4 acetylation. Exp Mol Med. 2009;41(5):297–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li LB, Leung DY, Martin RJ, Goleva E. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 2 expression by elevated glucocorticoid receptor beta in steroid-resistant asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(7):877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lewis-Tuffin LJ, Cidlowski JA. The physiology of human glucocorticoid receptor beta (hGRbeta) and glucocorticoid resistance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1069:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yun SP, Ryu JM, Han HJ. Involvement of beta1-integrin via PIP complex and FAK/paxillin in dexamethasone-induced human mesenchymal stem cells migration. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(3):683–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rivers C, Levy A, Hancock J, Lightman S, Norman M. Insertion of an amino acid in the DNA-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor as a result of alternative splicing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):4283–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Haarman EG, Kaspers GJ, Pieters R, Rottier MM, Veerman AJ. Glucocorticoid receptor alpha, beta and gamma expression vs in vitro glucocorticod resistance in childhood leukemia. Leukemia. 2004;18(3):530–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schiller BJ, Chodankar R, Watson LC, Stallcup MR, Yamamoto KR. Glucocorticoid receptor binds half sites as a monomer and regulates specific target genes. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Moalli PA, Pillay S, Krett NL, Rosen ST. Alternatively spliced glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNAs in glucocorticoid-resistant human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 1993;53(17):3877–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. de Lange P, Segeren CM, Koper JW, Wiemer E, Sonneveld P, Brinkmann AO, et al. Expression in hematological malignancies of a glucocorticoid receptor splice variant that augments glucocorticoid receptor-mediated effects in transfected cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61(10):3937–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Song M, Zhao D, Wei S, Liu C, Liu Y, Wang B, et al. The effect of electromagnetic fields on the proliferation and the osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells modulated by dexamethasone. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35(7):479–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Xiao Y, Peperzak V, van Rijn L, Borst J, de Bruijn JD. Dexamethasone treatment during the expansion phase maintains stemness of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010;4(5):374–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gabet Y, Noh T, Lee C, Frenkel B. Developmentally regulated inhibition of cell cycle progression by glucocorticoids through repression of cyclin a transcription in primary osteoblast cultures. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(4):991–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Monroe DG, McGee-Lawrence ME, Oursler MJ, Westendorf JJ. Update on Wnt signaling in bone cell biology and bone disease. Gene. 2012;492(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith E, Redman RA, Logg CR, Coetzee GA, Kasahara N, Frenkel B. Glucocorticoids inhibit developmental stage-specific osteoblast cell cycle. Dissociation of cyclin A-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 from E2F4-p130 complexes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(26):19992–20001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li H, Qian W, Weng X, Wu Z, Li H, Zhuang Q, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor and sequential P53 activation by dexamethasone mediates apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Azuma K, Urano T, Ouchi Y, Inoue S. Glucocorticoid-induced gene tripartite motif-containing 63 (TRIM63) promotes differentiation of osteoblastic cells. Endocr J. 2010;57(5):455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kalak R, Zhou H, Street J, Day RE, Modzelewski JR, Spies CM, et al. Endogenous glucocorticoid signalling in osteoblasts is necessary to maintain normal bone structure in mice. Bone. 2009;45(1):61–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Eijken M, Koedam M, van Driel M, Buurman CJ, Pols HA, van Leeuwen JP. The essential role of glucocorticoids for proper human osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;248(1–2):87–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou H, Mak W, Zheng Y, Dunstan CR, Seibel MJ. Osteoblasts directly control lineage commitment of mesenchymal progenitor cells through Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(4):1936–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. O'Brien CA, Jia D, Plotkin LI, Bellido T, Powers CC, Stewart SA, et al. Glucocorticoids act directly on osteoblasts and osteocytes to induce their apoptosis and reduce bone formation and strength. Endocrinology. 2004;145(4):1835–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Grigoriadis AE, Heersche JN, Aubin JE. Differentiation of muscle, fat, cartilage, and bone from progenitor cells present in a bone-derived clonal cell population: effect of dexamethasone. J Cell Biol. 1988;106(6):2139–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Butler JS, Queally JM, Devitt BM, Murray DW, Doran PP, O'Byrne JM. Silencing Dkk1 expression rescues dexamethasone-induced suppression of primary human osteoblast differentiation. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2010;11:210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ohnaka K, Tanabe M, Kawate H, Nawata H, Takayanagi R. Glucocorticoid suppresses the canonical Wnt signal in cultured human osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329(1):177–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mak W, Shao X, Dunstan CR, Seibel MJ, Zhou H. Biphasic glucocorticoid-dependent regulation of Wnt expression and its inhibitors in mature osteoblastic cells. Calcified Tissue Int. 2009;85(6):538–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang FS, Lin CL, Chen YJ, Wang CJ, Yang KD, Huang YT, et al. Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 modulates glucocorticoid attenuation of osteogenic activities and bone mass. Endocrinology. 2005;146(5):2415–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yao W, Cheng Z, Busse C, Pham A, Nakamura MC, Lane NE. Glucocorticoid excess in mice results in early activation of osteoclastogenesis and adipogenesis and prolonged suppression of osteogenesis: a longitudinal study of gene expression in bone tissue from glucocorticoid-treated mice. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2008;58(6):1674–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang FS, Ko JY, Yeh DW, Ke HC, Wu HL. Modulation of Dickkopf-1 attenuates glucocorticoid induction of osteoblast apoptosis, adipocytic differentiation, and bone mass loss. Endocrinology. 2008;149(4):1793–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Luppen CA, Smith E, Spevak L, Boskey AL, Frenkel B. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 restores mineralization in glucocorticoid-inhibited MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(7):1186–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hayashi K, Yamaguchi T, Yano S, Kanazawa I, Yamauchi M, Yamamoto M, et al. BMP/Wnt antagonists are upregulated by dexamethasone in osteoblasts and reversed by alendronate and PTH: potential therapeutic targets for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;379(2):261–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pereira RM, Delany AM, Durant D, Canalis E. Cortisol regulates the expression of notch in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2002;85(2):252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zanotti S, Yu J, Adhikari S, Canalis E. Glucocorticoids inhibit notch target gene expression in osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(7):6016–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Chang DJ, Ji C, Kim KK, Casinghino S, McCarthy TL, Centrella M. Reduction in transforming growth factor beta receptor I expression and transcription factor CBFa1 on bone cells by glucocorticoid. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(9):4892–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Koromila T, Baniwal SK, Song YS, Martin A, Xiong J, Frenkel B. Glucocorticoids antagonize RUNX2 during osteoblast differentiation in cultures of ST2 pluripotent mesenchymal cells. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115(1):27–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Lin L, Dai SD, Fan GY. Glucocorticoid-induced differentiation of primary cultured bone marrow mesenchymal cells into adipocytes is antagonized by exogenous Runx2. APMIS. 2010;118(8):595–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cao Z, Umek RM, McKnight SL. Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells. Genes Dev. 1991;5(9):1538–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Carcamo-Orive I, Gaztelumendi A, Delgado J, Tejados N, Dorronsoro A, Fernandez-Rueda J, et al. Regulation of human bone marrow stromal cell proliferation and differentiation capacity by glucocorticoid receptor and AP-1 crosstalk. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(10):2115–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pereira RC, Delany AM, Canalis E. Effects of cortisol and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on stromal cell differentiation: correlation with CCAAT-enhancer binding protein expression. Bone. 2002;30(5):685–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hong D, Chen HX, Xue Y, Li DM, Wan XC, Ge R, et al. Osteoblastogenic effects of dexamethasone through upregulation of TAZ expression in rat mesenchymal stem cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;116(1–2):86–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. He Q, Huang HY, Zhang YY, Li X, Qian SW, Tang QQ. TAZ is downregulated by dexamethasone during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;419(3):573–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ayroldi E, Macchiarulo A, Riccardi C. Targeting glucocorticoid side effects: selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator or glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper? A perspective. FASEB J. 2014;28(12):5055–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang W, Yang N, Shi XM. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation by glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ). J Biol Chem. 2008;283(8):4723–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Pan G, Cao J, Yang N, Ding K, Fan C, Xiong WC, et al. Role of glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) in bone acquisition. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(28):19373–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Shi X, Shi W, Li Q, Song B, Wan M, Bai S, et al. A glucocorticoid-induced leucine-zipper protein, GILZ, inhibits adipogenesis of mesenchymal cells. EMBO Rep. 2003;4(4):374–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Noack C, Hempel U, Preissler C, Dieter P. Prostaglandin E2 impairs osteogenic and facilitates adipogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2015;94:91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Tan K, Peng YT, Guo P. MiR-29a promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via targeting HDAC4. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(11):3318–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kapinas K, Kessler C, Ricks T, Gronowicz G, Delany AM. miR-29 modulates Wnt signaling in human osteoblasts through a positive feedback loop. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(33):25221–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Wang FS, Chuang PC, Lin CL, Chen MW, Ke HJ, Chang YH, et al. MicroRNA-29a protects against glucocorticoid-induced bone loss and fragility in rats by orchestrating bone acquisition and resorption. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2013;65(6):1530–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Li T, Li H, Li T, Fan J, Zhao RC, Weng X. MicroRNA expression profile of dexamethasone-induced human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115(10):1683–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Li H, Li T, Fan J, Li T, Fan L, Wang S, et al. miR-216a rescues dexamethasone suppression of osteogenesis, promotes osteoblast differentiation and enhances bone formation, by regulating c-Cbl-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(12):1935–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Hao C, Yang S, Xu W, Shen JK, Ye S, Liu X, et al. MiR-708 promotes steroid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head, suppresses osteogenic differentiation by targeting SMAD3. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Shang G, Wang Y, Xu Y, Zhang S, Sun X, Guan H, et al. Long non-coding RNA TCONS_00041960 enhances osteogenesis and inhibits adipogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell by targeting miR-204-5p and miR-125a-3p. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(8):6041–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Xiang S, Li Z, Weng X. The role of lncRNA RP11-154D6 in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head through BMSC regulation. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(10):18435–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Almeida M, Han L, Ambrogini E, Weinstein RS, Manolagas SC. Glucocorticoids and tumor necrosis factor alpha increase oxidative stress and suppress Wnt protein signaling in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(52):44326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Feng YL, Tang XL. Effect of glucocorticoid-induced oxidative stress on the expression of Cbfa1. Chem Biol Interact. 2014;207:26–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Yu H, Tay CY, Leong WS, Tan SC, Liao K, Tan LP. Mechanical behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells during adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393(1):150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bellido T. Antagonistic interplay between mechanical forces and glucocorticoids in bone: a tale of kinases. J Cell Biochem. 2010;111(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Muruganandan S, Roman AA, Sinal CJ. Adipocyte differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: cross talk with the osteoblastogenic program. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(2):236–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Park HW, Kim YC, Yu B, Moroishi T, Mo JS, Plouffe SW, et al. Alternative Wnt signaling activates YAP/TAZ. Cell. 2015;162(4):780–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Yuan Z, Li Q, Luo S, Liu Z, Luo D, Zhang B, et al. PPARgamma and Wnt signaling in adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;11(3):216–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Brunetti G, Faienza MF, Piacente L, Ventura A, Oranger A, Carbone C, et al. High dickkopf-1 levels in sera and leukocytes from children with 21-hydroxylase deficiency on chronic glucocorticoid treatment. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;304(5):E546–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kang Q, Song WX, Luo Q, Tang N, Luo J, Luo X, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the dual roles of BMPs in regulating adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18(4):545–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Chen G, Deng C, Li YP. TGF-beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(2):272–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Deng ZL, Sharff KA, Tang N, Song WX, Luo J, Luo X, et al. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation during skeletal development. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2001–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Gori F, Thomas T, Hicok KC, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL. Differentiation of human marrow stromal precursor cells: bone morphogenetic protein-2 increases OSF2/CBFA1, enhances osteoblast commitment, and inhibits late adipocyte maturation. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(9):1522–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Otsuki Y, Ii M, Moriwaki K, Okada M, Ueda K, Asahi M. W9 peptide enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):904–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Matsuno K, Fortini ME. Notch signaling. Science. 1995;268(5208):225–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ehebauer M, Hayward P, Arias AM. Notch, a universal arbiter of cell fate decisions. Science. 2006;314(5804):1414–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Ehebauer M, Hayward P, Martinez-Arias A. Notch signaling pathway. Sci STKE. 2006;2006(364):cm7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Chiba S. Notch signaling in stem cell systems. Stem Cells. 2006;24(11):2437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch signaling and the skeleton. Endocrine Rev. 2016;37(3):223–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. D'Souza B, Meloty-Kapella L, Weinmaster G. Canonical and non-canonical notch ligands. Curr Topics Dev Biol. 2010;92:73–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Siebel C, Lendahl U. Notch signaling in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(4):1235–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Ross DA, Rao PK, Kadesch T. Dual roles for the notch target gene Hes-1 in the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(8):3505–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Nobta M, Tsukazaki T, Shibata Y, Xin C, Moriishi T, Sakano S, et al. Critical regulation of bone morphogenetic protein-induced osteoblastic differentiation by Delta1/Jagged1-activated Notch1 signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(16):15842–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Deregowski V, Gazzerro E, Priest L, Rydziel S, Canalis E. Notch 1 overexpression inhibits osteoblastogenesis by suppressing Wnt/beta-catenin but not bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(10):6203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Kung AW, Xiao SM, Cherny S, Li GH, Gao Y, Tso G, et al. Association of JAG1 with bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures: a genome-wide association study and follow-up replication studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(2):229–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Ducy P, Starbuck M, Priemel M, Shen J, Pinero G, Geoffroy V, et al. A Cbfa1-dependent genetic pathway controls bone formation beyond embryonic development. Genes Dev. 1999;13(8):1025–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Karsenty G. Role of Cbfa1 in osteoblast differentiation and function. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2000;11(5):343–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Komori T. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by transcription factors. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99(5):1233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell. 1997;89(5):755–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Lefterova MI, Zhang Y, Steger DJ, Schupp M, Schug J, Cristancho A, et al. PPARgamma and C/EBP factors orchestrate adipocyte biology via adjacent binding on a genome-wide scale. Genes Dev. 2008;22(21):2941–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Kushwaha P, Khedgikar V, Gautam J, Dixit P, Chillara R, Verma A, et al. A novel therapeutic approach with Caviunin-based isoflavonoid that en routes bone marrow cells to bone formation via BMP2/Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Kim J, Ko J. A novel PPARgamma2 modulator sLZIP controls the balance between adipogenesis and osteogenesis during mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(10):1642–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Hong JH, Hwang ES, McManus MT, Amsterdam A, Tian Y, Kalmukova R, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309(5737):1074–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Hong JH, Yaffe MB. TAZ: a beta-catenin-like molecule that regulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Cell Cycle. 2006;5(2):176–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Kanai F, Marignani PA, Sarbassova D, Yagi R, Hall RA, Donowitz M, et al. TAZ: a novel transcriptional co-activator regulated by interactions with 14-3-3 and PDZ domain proteins. EMBO J. 2000;19(24):6778–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. D'Adamio F, Zollo O, Moraca R, Ayroldi E, Bruscoli S, Bartoli A, et al. A new dexamethasone-induced gene of the leucine zipper family protects T lymphocytes from TCR/CD3-activated cell death. Immunity. 1997;7(6):803–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Eddleston J, Herschbach J, Wagelie-Steffen AL, Christiansen SC, Zuraw BL. The anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids is mediated by glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper in epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119(1):115–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Yang N, Zhang W, Shi XM. Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) mediates glucocorticoid action and inhibits inflammatory cytokine-induced COX-2 expression. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103(6):1760–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Beaulieu E, Ngo D, Santos L, Yang YH, Smith M, Jorgensen C, et al. Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper is an endogenous antiinflammatory mediator in arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2010;62(9):2651–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Blackwell KA, Raisz LG, Pilbeam CC. Prostaglandins in bone: bad cop, good cop? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(5):294–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Legler DF, Bruckner M, Uetz-von Allmen E, Krause P. Prostaglandin E2 at new glance: novel insights in functional diversity offer therapeutic chances. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42(2):198–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Mourelatos Z. Small RNAs: the seeds of silence. Nature. 2008;455(7209):44–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Rodriguez A, Griffiths-Jones S, Ashurst JL, Bradley A. Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res. 2004;14(10a):1902–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Erson AE, Petty EM. MicroRNAs in development and disease. Clin Genet. 2008;74(4):296–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Oskowitz AZ, Lu J, Penfornis P, Ylostalo J, McBride J, Flemington EK, et al. Human multipotent stromal cells from bone marrow and microRNA: regulation of differentiation and leukemia inhibitory factor expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18372–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Ivey KN, Srivastava D. MicroRNAs as regulators of differentiation and cell fate decisions. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7(1):36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Kashi K, Henderson L, Bonetti A, Carninci P. Discovery and functional analysis of lncRNAs: methodologies to investigate an uncharacterized transcriptome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859(1):3–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Wapinski O, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21(6):354–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Guttman M, Rinn JL. Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature. 2012;482(7385):339–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Yoshioka H, Yoshiko Y. The Roles of Long Non-Protein-Coding RNAs in Osteo-Adipogenic Lineage Commitment. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):14.

  148. Chen C, Cui Q, Zhang X, Luo X, Liu Y, Zuo J, et al. Long non-coding RNAs regulation in adipogenesis and lipid metabolism: emerging insights in obesity. Cell Signal. 2018;51:47–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Zhang J, Hao X, Yin M, Xu T, Guo F. Long non-coding RNA in osteogenesis: a new world to be explored. Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(2):73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Atashi F, Modarressi A, Pepper MS. The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(10):1150–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Stolzing A, Jones E, McGonagle D, Scutt A. Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies. Mecha Ageing Dev. 2008;129(3):163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Almeida M, Ambrogini E, Han L, Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Increased lipid oxidation causes oxidative stress, increased peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression, and diminished pro-osteogenic Wnt signaling in the skeleton. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(40):27438–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Kousteni S. FoxO1, the transcriptional chief of staff of energy metabolism. Bone. 2012;50(2):437–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Zhang Y, Marsboom G, Toth PT, Rehman J. Mitochondrial respiration regulates adipogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Qiu X, Wang X, Qiu J, Zhu Y, Liang T, Gao B, et al. Melatonin rescued reactive oxygen species-impaired osteogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the presence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:6403967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Sun N, Yang L, Li Y, Zhang H, Chen H, Liu D, et al. Effect of advanced oxidation protein products on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Med. 2013;32(2):485–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Darling EM, Topel M, Zauscher S, Vail TP, Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J Biomechanics. 2008;41(2):454–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Li R, Liang L, Dou Y, Huang Z, Mo H, Wang Y, et al. Mechanical strain regulates osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:873251.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Cunningham CC, Gorlin JB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Hartwig JH, Janmey PA, Byers HR, et al. Actin-binding protein requirement for cortical stability and efficient locomotion. Science. 1992;255(5042):325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Stossel TP, Condeelis J, Cooley L, Hartwig JH, Noegel A, Schleicher M, et al. Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(2):138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. van der Flier A, Sonnenberg A. Structural and functional aspects of filamins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1538(2–3):99–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. D'Addario M, Arora PD, Fan J, Ganss B, Ellen RP, McCulloch CA. Cytoprotection against mechanical forces delivered through beta 1 integrins requires induction of filamin A. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(34):31969–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. D'Addario M, Arora PD, Ellen RP, McCulloch CA. Interaction of p38 and Sp1 in a mechanical force-induced, beta 1 integrin-mediated transcriptional circuit that regulates the actin-binding protein filamin-A. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(49):47541–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Ohta Y, Hartwig JH, Stossel TP. FilGAP, a Rho- and ROCK-regulated GAP for Rac binds filamin A to control actin remodelling. Nature Cell Biol. 2006;8(8):803–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Shifrin Y, Arora PD, Ohta Y, Calderwood DA, McCulloch CA. The role of FilGAP-filamin A interactions in mechanoprotection. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(5):1269–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Plotkin LI, Mathov I, Aguirre JI, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC, Bellido T. Mechanical stimulation prevents osteocyte apoptosis: requirement of integrins, Src kinases, and ERKs. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;289(3):C633–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Plotkin LI, Manolagas SC, Bellido T. Glucocorticoids induce osteocyte apoptosis by blocking focal adhesion kinase-mediated survival. Evidence for inside-out signaling leading to anoikis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(33):24120–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Tang QQ, Lane MD. Adipogenesis: from stem cell to adipocyte. An Rev Biochem. 2012;81:715–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C, Jiang M, Cao G, Yang Q, et al. Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(7):1128–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Rauch A, Gossye V, Bracke D, Gevaert E, Jacques P, Van Beneden K, et al. An anti-inflammatory selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator preserves osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2011;25(4):1323–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Thiele S, Ziegler N, Tsourdi E, De Bosscher K, Tuckermann JP, Hofbauer LC, et al. Selective glucocorticoid receptor modulation maintains bone mineral density in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(11):2242–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Reid IR. Targeting Sclerostin in postmenopausal osteoporosis: focus on Romosozumab and Blosozumab. BioDrugs. 2017;31(4):289–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Ko JY, Chuang PC, Chen MW, Ke HC, Wu SL, Chang YH, et al. MicroRNA-29a ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced suppression of osteoblast differentiation by regulating beta-catenin acetylation. Bone. 2013;57(2):468–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Hu C, Zhao L, Peng C, Li L. Regulation of the mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: strategies to control mesenchymal stem cell fates ex vivo and in vivo. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(11):5196–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Alhadlaq A, Mao JJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation and therapeutics. Stem Cells Dev. 2004;13(4):436–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Samsonraj RM, Raghunath M, Nurcombe V, Hui JH, van Wijnen AJ, Cool SM. Concise review: multifaceted characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells for use in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(12):2173–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Sung JH, An HS, Jeong JH, Shin S, Song SY. Megestrol acetate increases the proliferation, migration, and adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells via glucocorticoid receptor. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4(7):789–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the researchers and study participants for their contributions.

Funding

This study was supported by grants 81672155 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Lizhi Han, Ruoyu Wang, Song Gong, Guo Chen & Weihua Xu

  2. Department of Rehabilitation, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Bo Wang

Authors
  1. Lizhi Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruoyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Song Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weihua Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WX and LH conceived the study. LH wrote the manuscript and designed the tables. BW designed the figures. RW, SG, and GC contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors and participants reviewed the paper and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weihua Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, L., Wang, B., Wang, R. et al. The shift in the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells mediated by glucocorticoid receptor. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 377 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1498-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1498-0

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512