Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cortisol total/CRP ratio for the prediction of hospital-acquired pneumonia and initiation of corticosteroid therapy in traumatic brain-injured patients

Critical Care volume 23, Article number: 394 (2019) Cite this article

A Letter to this article was published on 04 March 2020

Abstract

Background

To propose a combination of blood biomarkers for the prediction of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and for the selection of traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients eligible for corticosteroid therapy for the prevention of HAP.

Methods

This was a sub-study of the CORTI-TC trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluating the risk of HAP at day 28 in 336 TBI patients treated or not with corticosteroid therapy. Patients were between 15 and 65 years with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale score ≤ 8 and trauma-associated lesion on brain CT scan) and were enrolled within 24 h of trauma. The blood levels of CRP and cortisoltotal&free, as a surrogate marker of the pro/anti-inflammatory response balance, were measured in samples collected before the treatment initiation. Endpoint was HAP on day 28.

Results

Of the 179 patients with available samples, 89 (49.7%) developed an HAP. Cortisoltotal&free and CRP blood levels upon ICU admission were not significantly different between patients with or without HAP. The cortisoltotal/CRP ratio upon admission was 2.30 [1.25–3.91] in patients without HAP and 3.36 [1.74–5.09] in patients with HAP (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, a cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3, selected upon the best Youden index on the ROC curve, was independently associated with HAP (OR 2.50, CI95% [1.34–4.64] p = 0.004). The HR for HAP with corticosteroid treatment was 0.59 (CI95% [0.34–1.00], p = 0.005) in patients with a cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3, and 0.89 (CI95% [0.49–1.64], p = 0.85) in patients with a ratio < 3.

Conclusion

A cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3 upon admission may predict the development of HAP in severe TBI. Among these patients, corticosteroids reduce the occurrence HAP. We suggest that this ratio may select the patients who may benefit from corticosteroid therapy for the prevention of HAP.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and disability among young patients throughout the world. It is a major health and socioeconomic problem [1, 2]. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), whose incidence ranges from 40 to 60% for severe traumatic brain-injured patients [3], is associated with poor neurologic outcome and death [4]. TBI induces a disturbance of the normally balanced interplay between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms leading to a greater susceptibility to infections including HAP [5].

During the early post-traumatic period, the release of danger-associated molecular pattern by injured cells results in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) which is characterized by increased levels of CRP and cytokines [6,7,8]. Elevated blood concentrations of CRP upon ICU admission are correlated with an increased risk of organ failure and death [9] and persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome is predictive of hospital-acquired infection in trauma patients [10]. To avoid the dramatic consequences of an overwhelming SIRS such as organ failure, an anti-inflammatory response (called "compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome" : CARS) is rapidly triggered by the host, including cortisol secretion by adrenal glands after afferent impulses from the site of injury [11].

It is true that the administration of corticosteroids in a condition that is at risk of secondary infection may seem inappropriate. However, we have shown that low dose of hydrocortisone prevents the occurrence of hospital-acquired pneumonia in multiple trauma patients [12]. The anti-inflammatory properties of corticosteroids reduce lung inflammation secondary to trauma and enhance the functions of immune cells like dendritic cells and thus could limit secondary bacterial pneumonia [13]. The administration of corticosteroids in a context of relative immunosuppression shown after any acute condition is counter intuitive but low-dose corticosteroids may enhance immunity. Indeed, low-dose hydrocortisone improves the phagocytic abilities of neutrophils, decreases the blood concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10, and increases the blood concentrations of interferon-γ and interleukin-12, cytokines involved in the host defense against infections [14, 15].

We aimed to assess the predictive values of the cortisol/CRP ratio (surrogate marker of the CARS/SIRS balance) for the development of HAP in TBI patients. We also evaluated if this ratio may help to select patients who would benefit from corticosteroid therapy to prevent HAP.

Materials and methods

Study design

This study is a sub-study of the Corti-TC trial [3] (NCT 01093261) a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone in severe traumatic brain injury. Patients admitted in 19 French ICUs were enrolled in the Corti-TC trial from Sept. 1, 2010, to Nov 29, 2012. Prior to enrollment, written informed consent was obtained from a next-of-kin. Retrospective consent was obtained from patients when it was possible.

Patients

In the Corti-TC trial, inclusion criteria were age between 15 and 65 years, severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale score ≤ 8 and trauma-associated lesion on brain CT scan), and enrolment within 24 h of trauma [16, 17]. Exclusion criteria were as follows: treatment with corticosteroids in the previous 6 months, immunosuppression, pregnancy, tetraplegia, or antibiotic treatment at the time of inclusion. In this sub-study of the Corti-TC trial (n = 330 patients), we included the 179 patients with available blood samples.

Corticosteroid therapy

For the purpose of the Corti-TC trial, patients received either hydrocortisone (200 mg per day tapered) and fludrocortisone (50 μg tablet once per day) or double placebo for 10 days. Before receiving study drug, adrenal function was assessed with a short corticotropin test. Treatment was stopped if patients had no adrenal insufficiency which was defined as basal blood cortisol concentration of less than 150 μg/L (413 nmol/L) or a maximum increase of less than 90 μg/L (248 nmol/L) in the 60 min after a short corticotropin test.

Endpoints

In the Corti-TC study, the primary outcome was hospital-acquired pneumonia on day 28 of follow-up in patients with or without corticosteroid therapy. In this sub-study, the primary outcome was also the rate of hospital-acquired pneumonia in severe traumatic brain-injured patients.

Blood samples

Blood samples were collected in the first 24 h after trauma, before any administration of the Corti-TC treatment. Sera were frozen − 80 °C upon dosage. Concentration of CRP and plasma cortisol concentrations (free and total) were investigated in sera collected in patients from the Corti-TC study with available samples.

Measurement of CRP, cortisol, and cortisolemia

All biochemical measurements of CRP, Transcortin, and total and free cortisol were performed at the laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Nantes University Hospital. The laboratory is licensed according to the ISO 15189 accreditation standard for clinical laboratories.

Serum CRP and total cortisol were determined in single measurement with an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (C-Reactive Protein Gen.3 and Elecsys Cortisol II respectively) on the Cobas e602-module of the automated cobas®8000 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The lower limits of detection (LoD) of the CRP and cortisol assays were 0.3 mg/L and 0.54 μg/L respectively. Each CRP and cortisol runs were validated by measuring two levels of quality control material prior to starting the experiment.

Samples for serum-free cortisol determination were prepared by equilibrating 500 μL of serum at 37 °C for 15 min in Centrifree 30,000 molecular weight cut-off Centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore, Tullagreen, Ireland) before centrifugation at 1500g for 30 min at 37 °C. Free cortisol was determined in the ultrafiltrate as previously describe for total cortisol.

Serum Transcortin concentrations were measured in duplicate using Human Corticosteroid Binding Globulin ELISA (BioVendor, Brno, Czech Republic) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each series of assays (1 ELISA plate) was validated by two internal controls. The lower limit of detection (LoD) was 0.01 μg/mL.

Care of patients with severe TBI

All care provided to patients with severe TBI followed the international guidelines in effect at the time of randomization, including respiratory management, temperature management, stress ulcer prophylaxis, nutrition, fluid therapy, glucose management, intracranial pressure monitoring, and management [18] as done in our previous studies on the subject [19, 20].

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) definition

Pneumonia was suspected as diagnosis when at least two of the following signs: body temperature > 38 °C; leukocytosis > 12,000/mL or leukopenia < 4000/mL; purulent pulmonary secretions; were associated with the appearance of a new infiltrate or changes in an existing infiltrate on the chest X-ray. Diagnosis was confirmed by tests on a respiratory tract sample using a quantitative culture with a predefined positive threshold of 104 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) for a broncho-alveolar lavage or nonbronchoscopic sample or 103CFU/mL for a protected specimen brush. Respiratory samples were always obtained before starting any new antibiotic treatment. HAP was defined as pneumonia that occurred 48 h after admission [21]. All HAP recorded in the study where early-onset pneumonia (< 7 days).

Data collection

Overall, patient characteristics, including demographics, injury severity score and abbreviated injury score, fluid infusions, vasopressors, antibiotic prophylaxis, CRP rates, plasma cortisol concentrations (free and total), surgery, infections, organ failures, length of ventilatory support, ICU hospitalization, and 28th day mortality, were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data were described as median [1st–3rd quartiles] and values were compared using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Categorical data were described as N (%) and values were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test.

The cut-off for distinguishing low versus high (cortisoltotal/CRP) ratio was based on logistic regression between HAP and (cortisoltotal/CRP) ratio. The value corresponding to the largest Youden index was selected as the cut-off. Variables that were associated with HAP at the 0.15 level in univariate analysis were included in a multiple logistic regression. Then, variables that were non-significant at the 0.05 level (Wald test) were removed one by one. Multiple logistic regressions were performed in the global sample, in the placebo group and in the corticosteroid group.

Results

Patients

Of the 179 analyzed patients, 89 (49.7%) developed a HAP and 90 (50.3%) did not. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics. All cases of recorded HAP were ventilator-associated pneumonia. There were no differences in the demographics of patients (including severity scores) who developed HAP compared with those who did not develop HAP except for the body temperature > 39 °C (20% vs 5.6% respectively p = 0.004). Patients were equally drawn from the intervention and control arms and they do not differ in other important ways from the original study population in terms of age, sex, severity, and comorbidities (data not shown).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Cortisol function and CRP levels

Despite a trend for higher total and free blood levels of cortisol upon ICU admission, there was no significant difference between patients with or without HAP (p = 0.06 and p = 0.26 respectively, Table 1). The delta of cortisolemia at 60 min was not different between the two groups (98 [30–161] and 84 [33–147]; p = 0.89). The blood level of CRP was 61 [35–98] mg/L in patients without HAP as compared to 53 [33–82] mg/L in patients with HAP (p = 0.20). These results demonstrate that taken separately, blood levels of cortisol and of CRP cannot predict HAP. We thus aimed to investigate the prognostic value of a ratio combining markers of CIRCI and inflammatory response.

Combination of cortisolfree, cortisoltotal, and CRP to predict the development of HAP

The correlation between cortisolfree and cortisoltotal was consistent in spite of low or high CRP blood levels (Fig. 1a) when cortisolfree and cortisoltotal were strongly correlated (Fig. 1b) suggesting that these two values can be used in patients with or without severe inflammatory response. Cortisoltotal was correlated with blood level of transcortine (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Transcortine is the major transport protein for glucocorticoids and approximately 85% of the cortisol in circulation is bound to transcortin. We also decided to use cortisoltotal for subsequent analysis of the risk of HAP also because it is more available easily in clinical practice. The blood level of cortisoltotal increased with CRP (Fig. 1c), and the blood level of CRP alone was not able to discriminate patients at risk to develop HAP (Additional file 1: Figure S2). However, the cortisoltotal/CRP ratio was 2.30 [1.25–3.91] in patients without HAP and 3.36 [1.74–5,09] in patients with HAP (p = 0.021) (Table 1 and see Additional file 1: Figure S3). These results suggest that the combination of cortisoltotal and CRP could help to predict HAP.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Correlations between cortisolfree and cortisoltotal in high (CRP > 50 mg/mL) and low (CRP < 50 mg/mL) inflammatory patients (a), between cortisolfree and cortisoltotal (b), and between cortisoltotal and CRP blood level (c)

Full size image

The cortisoltotal/CRP ratio is an independent risk factor for HAP

In an attempt to simplify the use of the results in clinical practice, the cortisoltotal/CRP ratio was dichotomized in two categories (above or below a threshold). The cut-offs of cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3 was selected because it provides the best sensitivity/specificity balance (ROC curves; Additional file 1: Figure S4) and the best calibration of the multivariate analysis (Hosmer–Lemeshow test p value > 0.05). The positive likelihood ratio was 1.66 for a cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3. In the entire population, patients with a ratio total cortisol/CRP > 3 (n = 88) developed more HAP than those with a ratio < 3 [50 (62.50%) vs 39 (39.39%) respectively p = 0.002] (Table 3). The Kaplan-Meier estimator for HAP at day 28 was 41.5% in the low ratio group (< 3) and 60.5% in the high ratio group (> 3), HR = 0.55 [(95% CI 0.36 to 0.84)] p = 0.005 (Fig. 2a). In multivariate analysis, a ratio cortisoltotal/CRP > 3 was independently associated with HAP (OR 2.50, 95% CI (1.34–4.64) p = 0.004) (Table 2). In the entire population, there was no difference in terms of mean duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, or in-ICU mortality between the corticosteroid-treated patient group and the placebo group (Table 3). However, this ratio also discriminates the number of antibiotic-free days with a higher “antibiotics free days at day 28” in the “low ratio” group: (21d [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] vs 18.5d [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21] p = 0.007).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for hospital-acquired pneumonia for the entire population (a), in patients with high risk of HAP (ratio cortisoltotal/CRP > 3) (b), and in patients with low risk of HAP (ratio cortisoltotal/CRP < 3) (c)

Full size image
Table 2 Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with of hospital-acquired pneumonia (N = 179)
Full size table
Table 3 Comparison of outcomes of patients with high or low (cortisoltotal/CRP) ratio
Full size table

The cortisoltotal/CRP ratio may predict the patients who will benefit from corticosteroid therapy

Finally, we tested the hypothesis that the ratio cortisoltotal/CRP has the potential to select patients who will benefit from corticosteroid therapy, and those whose risk of HAP will not be decreased by the treatment. We thus compared the relative risk of HAP in the low and the high ratio groups, according to the treatment received (placebo or corticosteroid therapy). In high-risk patients (ratio > 3), the probability of HAP at day 28 was higher in the placebo group vs corticoid group (68.6% vs 51.4% respectively, p = 0.04) with an hazard ratio of 0.59 (CI95% [0.34–1.00], p = 0.005) (Fig. 2b). Patients with a ratio > 3 were comparable on key demographic characteristics in the corticosteroid and placebo groups (Additional file 1: Figure S5). In patients with low cortisoltotal/CRP (< 3), there was no difference between placebo and treatment groups for the development of HAP (HR = 0.89 (CI95% [0.49–1.64], p = 0.85)) (Fig. 2c). We conclude that the protective effect of corticosteroid in TBI patients for the risk of HAP was found mainly in the subgroup of patients with a cortisoltotal/CRP ratio > 3.

Discussion

In this sub-study of Corti-TC trial [3], we aimed to establish a correlation between the ratio “inflammatory response”/CARS and the occurrence of HAP in head trauma patients. After a TBI, pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion is a physiologic process which aims to induce damaged tissues healing and anti-bacterial activity by activating both innate and adaptive immunity. In order to balance an excessive pro-inflammatory response, the CNS induces an important anti-inflammatory response leading to increased susceptibility to infections [5]. This anti-inflammatory response is mediated by the sympathetic nervous system [22], parasympathetic nervous system [23], and the hypothalamic-pituitary system via glucocorticoid secretion. In critically ill patients, reduced cortisol breakdown contributes to abnormal blood cortisol levels [24]. This phenomenon, called Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI), corresponds to the impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) during critical illness resulting from inadequate anti-inflammatory response for the severity of a given patient [25].

In order to correct the post-traumatic immunosuppression, many therapies have been tested in recent years. They aimed either to limit the initial SIRS (and thus the CARS) in particular by the use of low-dose glucocorticoids [3, 12] or to restore the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by the use of IFN-γ, GM-CSF [26], or interleukin 12 [27]. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Torres et al. showed that among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high initial inflammatory response (CRP > 150 mg/L), methylprednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/12 h) compared with placebo decreased treatment failure [28]. In major trauma patients, CIRCI occurs frequently and is associated with uncontrolled inflammatory response, longer vasopressors infusion and poor outcomes [29]. In a large randomized trial in multiple trauma patients, we found that hydrocortisone therapy prevented the development of hospital-acquired pneumonia by day 28 in patients with CIRCI (defined by a change in baseline cortisol at 60 min of < 9 μg/dl after ACTH (250 μg) administration) [12]. However, in head trauma patients, we found no interaction between response to corticosteroid therapy and CIRCI status (using the same definition as previously described) [3]. The actualized recommendations for the diagnosis of CIRCI provide that ACTH stimulation test was not superior to random cortisol for the routine diagnosis of CIRCI [30]. Moreover, measuring plasma-free cortisol level over plasma total cortisol level was not recommended in patients with suspected CIRCI [30]. Here, the total and free cortisol blood levels were strongly correlated independently of the inflammatory status of the patient, explaining why we choose to focus on total cortisolemia.

In our study, the correlation between total cortisol and CRP levels could be explained by the early secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) following trauma. Indeed, IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine known to have HPA-activating activity independent of ACTH. Thus, human IL-6 increases plasma concentrations cortisol in mice [31] and during immune system activation, such as post-traumatic inflammation or septic shock. In head-injured children, serum IL-6 and CRP levels are elevated and correlated to the severity of head trauma [32] and increased levels of IL-6 in the early phase of severe acute traumatic brain injury is associated with the high inflammatory response such as development of ARDS [33].

In association with appropriate antibiotherapy, methylprednisolone administration was also associated with a faster reduction in blood IL-6 and CRP levels in the first 24 h of treatment of community-acquired pneumonia [34]. Before initiation of glucocorticoid therapy, basal cortisol level is positively correlated with IL-6. Corticosteroids reduce the production of IL-6 and the migration of inflammatory cells into the alveolar space leading to avoid an overwhelming inflammatory response. In patients with systemic autoimmune disease, which leads to an inflammatory state, the introduction of glucocorticoid reduced the IL-6 level and contribute to the apparent suppression of the HPA axis [35]. Among patients with traumatic brain injury, IL-6 is correlated with inflammatory states, high CRP rates, and the occurrence of HAP [36].

A recent meta-analysis of corticosteroids in pneumonia found that hydrocortisone was not useful in this context, and only prednisone or methyl prednisolone was beneficial [37]. However, this meta-analysis considered community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) rather than HAP or ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP). The micro-organisms involved in each entity are different; in CAP, they are frequently virulent and transmitted by inhaled aerosols. Moreover, respiratory physiology and immunity is severely impaired in patients suffering from HAP or VAP and admitted in ICU. Indeed, mechanical ventilation promotes a specific histological pattern of pneumonia [38, 39]. Furthermore, comparative analysis of the host response to CAP and to HAP in patients with critical illness has revealed distinct transcriptional and plasma protein responses [40] showing the functional alterations of the immune response in patients admitted to hospital.

Here, taken separately, pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and cortisol respectively) failed to predict the development of HAP. However, patients with high cortisoltotal/CRP ratio (> 3) have a higher susceptibility to develop HAP and for these patients, the introduction of low dose of corticosteroids is able to reduce this susceptibility. This effect of corticosteroid therapy is not found in patients with a ratio < 3. There are two means by which low-dose corticosteroids could decrease the rate of secondary pneumonia. Firstly, through an anti-inflammatory effect (patients with a low cortisol/CRP ratio) that decrease the excessive inflammatory response and therefore the compensatory CARS response (immunosuppression). The initiation of corticosteroid therapy may for example reduce IL-6-dependent HPA stimulation, limiting the anti-inflammatory response and thus the prevalence of HAP in highly inflammatory patients. Secondly, corticosteroids may also directly enhance immunity (patients with a high cortisol/CRP ratio). Indeed, low-dose hydrocortisone improves the phagocytic abilities of neutrophils, decreases the blood concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-10, and increases the blood concentrations of interferon γ and interleukin-12, cytokines enhancing immunity and involved in the host defense against infections [14]. Glucocorticoids modulate dendritic cells during and after inflammation [13] allowing less tissue damage and therefore less sensitivity to bacterial infections. In septic shock or in viral pneumonia, glucocorticoids restore major histocompatibility complex class II expression on myeloid cells, suggesting a better antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells during treatment [41, 42]. We and other groups have shown that hydrocortisone enhances immunity in the context of any acute immunosuppressive condition like severe trauma or sepsis [14, 15]. More specifically, we have demonstrated that trauma-induced immunosuppression is characterized by an interleukin-10-dependent elimination of dendritic cell by natural killer cells and that hydrocortisone improves outcome by limiting this immunosuppressive feedback loop [15].

The main strength of this ancillary study is the data from a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, controlled trial. This is the first study discriminating head injured patients at risk for developing pneumonia by using an easy-to-use anti- and pro-inflammatory factor ratio in common practice. Another strength of our study is the safety of low-dose corticosteroid use in trauma patients. Indeed, by closely monitoring patients’ natremia and glycemia, there are no serious adverse events recorded in the two large randomized trials we have conducted on the field [3, 12]. The use of low-dose corticosteroids therefore seems to us to be safe in patients suffering from severe TBI. However, high-dose corticosteroids are not recommended in this context because they provide serious safety issues [43]. Some limitations must be noted; first, it is impossible to know whether the effect of hydrocortisone is due to the restoration of post-inflammation homeostasis or the correction of the initial CIRCI although the use of a combination of a pro- and anti-inflammatory factor suggests that this effect is due to the correction of the post-inflammation disorder. However, the dosage of other more specific factors, such as IL-6 or IL-10, may help to refine the diagnosis of patients at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. Second, this ratio could be refined by adding other factors such as the trauma severity score (Glasgow score) or other objective variables (gender, age, medical history), but more patients are needed to implement such a score. Third, to be validated, this ratio must be the subject of a randomized controlled trial comparing management of HAP prevention by corticosteroid therapy in patients at risk (ratio > 3). Finally, our study also suffers from insufficient evidence on secondary outcomes (duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay…). This is probably due to the size of the samples understudy and this issue could be improved by conducting a specific prospective study to validate the ratio.

Conclusion

A cortisoltotal/CRP > 3 ratio upon admission may predict the development of HAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. In high-risk patients (ratio > 3), the administration of corticosteroid therapy reduces the occurrence of HAP. This ratio could be used to select patients eligible for corticosteroid therapy in prevention of HAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Take home message

In severe traumatic brain-injured patients, the imbalance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms leads to increased susceptibility to hospital-acquired pneumonia. We show here that cortisol and CRP blood levels together as surrogate markers of the CARS/SIRS balance upon ICU admission can accurately predict the development of hospital-acquired pneumonia and define the subgroup of patients who may benefit most from “low-dose” corticosteroid therapy.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material are available in the manuscript or are available from the corresponding author on request with justification.

Abbreviations

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

CAP:

Community-acquired pneumonia

CARS:

Compensatory anti-inflammatory response

CFU:

Colony-forming units

CI:

Confidence interval

CIRCI:

Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency

CNS:

Central nervous system

CRP:

C-reactive protein

GM-CSF:

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

HAP:

Hospital-acquired pneumonia

HPA:

Hypothalamic-pituitary axis

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IL-6:

Interleukin 6

IL-10 :

Interleukin 10

IFN- γ:

Interferon γ

LoD:

Limit of detection

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

VAP:

Ventilatory-acquired pneumonia

References

  1. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:155–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:728–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asehnoune K, Seguin P, Allary J, et al. Hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone for prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Corti-TC): a double-blind, multicentre phase 3, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:706–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn JM, Caldwell EC, Deem S, et al. Acute lung injury in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:196–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meisel C, Schwab JM, Prass K, et al. Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:775–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meisner M, Adina H, Schmidt J. Correlation of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to inflammation, complications, and outcome during the intensive care unit course of multiple-trauma patients. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2006;10:R1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin C, Boisson C, Haccoun M, et al. Patterns of cytokine evolution (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6) after septic shock, hemorrhagic shock, and severe trauma. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1813–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mimoz O, Benoist JF, Edouard AR, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during the early posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:185–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lobo SMA, Lobo FRM, Bota DP, et al. C-reactive protein levels correlate with mortality and organ failure in critically ill patients. Chest. 2003;123:2043–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoover L, Bochicchio GV, Napolitano LM, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and nosocomial infection in trauma. J Trauma. 2006;61:310–6 discussion 316-317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meisel C, Meisel A. Suppressing immunosuppression after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2134–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roquilly A, Mahe PJ, Seguin P, et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with multiple trauma: the randomized controlled HYPOLYTE study. JAMA. 2011;305:1201–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouras M, Asehnoune K, Roquilly A. Contribution of dendritic cell responses to sepsis-induced immunosuppression and to susceptibility to secondary pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2590.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Keh D, Boehnke T, Weber-Cartens S, et al. Immunologic and hemodynamic effects of “low-dose” hydrocortisone in septic shock: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:512–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roquilly A, Broquet A, Jacqueline C, et al. Hydrocortisone prevents immunosuppression by interleukin-10+ natural killer cells after trauma-hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:e752–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:6–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asehnoune K, Roquilly A, Sebille V, et al. Corticotherapy for traumatic brain-injured patients--the Corti-TC trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:228.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S1–106.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asehnoune K, Mrozek S, Perrigault PF, et al. A multi-faceted strategy to reduce ventilation-associated mortality in brain-injured patients. The BI-VILI project: a nationwide quality improvement project. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:957–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cinotti R, Bouras M, Roquilly A, et al. Management and weaning from mechanical ventilation in neurologic patients. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:381.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. Management of Adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e61–e111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Engel O, Akyüz L, da Costa Goncalves AC, et al. Cholinergic pathway suppresses pulmonary innate immunity facilitating pneumonia after stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:3232–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature. 2003;421:384–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boonen E, Vervenne H, Meersseman P, et al. Reduced cortisol metabolism during critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1477–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Marik PE, Pastores SM, Annane D, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1937–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spruijt NE, Visser T, Leenen LP. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials exploring the effect of immunomodulative interventions on infection, organ failure, and mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2010;14:R150.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roquilly A, McWilliam HEG, Jacqueline C, et al. Local modulation of antigen-presenting cell development after resolution of pneumonia induces long-term susceptibility to secondary infections. Immunity. 2017;47:135–47 e5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:677.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoen S, Asehnoune K, Brailly-Tabard S, et al. Cortisol response to corticotropin stimulation in trauma patients: influence of hemorrhagic shock. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:807–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients (part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1751–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mastorakos G, Chrousos GP, Weber JS. Recombinant interleukin-6 activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:1690–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalabalikis P, Papazoglou K, Gouriotis D, et al. Correlation between serum IL-6 and CRP levels and severity of head injury in children. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:288–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aisiku IP, Yamal J-M, Doshi P, et al. Plasma cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 are associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2016;20:288.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fernández-Serrano S, Dorca J, Garcia-Vidal C, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on the clinical course of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2011;15:R96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fujio N, Masuoka S, Shikano K, et al. Apparent hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression via reduction of interleukin-6 by glucocorticoid therapy in systemic autoimmune diseases. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167854.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Woiciechowsky C, Schöning B, Cobanov J, et al. Early IL-6 plasma concentrations correlate with severity of brain injury and pneumonia in brain-injured patients. J Trauma. 2002;52:339–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang J, Guo J, Li H, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids therapy for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e14636.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fabregas N, Torres A, El-Ebiary M, et al. Histopathologic and microbiologic aspects of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 1996;84:760–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Alcón A, Fàbregas N, Torres A. Pathophysiology of pneumonia. Clin Chest Med. 2005;26:39–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van Vught LA, Scicluna BP, Wiewel MA, et al. Comparative analysis of the host response to community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:1366–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Caulfield, Fernandez, Sousa, et al. Regulation of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens on human alveolar macrophages by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the presence of glucocorticoids. Immunology. 1999;98:104–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jamieson AM, Yu S, Annicelli CH, et al. Influenza virus-induced glucocorticoids compromise innate host defense against a secondary bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7:103–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, et al. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2004;364:1321–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Biological Resource Centre for biobanking (CHU Nantes, Hôtel Dieu, Centre de ressources biologiques [CRB], Nantes, F-44093, France [BRIF: BB-0033-00040], the French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive care (SFAR). We thank all the families and patients who participated in the study; the clinical and research staff at all the trial sites, and Delphine Flattres Duchaussoy, Cécilia Le Bel without whose assistance the study would never have been completed.

Abstract presented at the French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive care (SFAR) congress in September 2018 in Paris.

Funding

The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive care (SFAR) and institutional funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hotel-Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, 44093, Nantes, France

    Marwan Bouras, Antoine Roquilly, Pierre-Joachim Mahé, Raphaël Cinotti, Mickaël Vourc’h & Karim Asehnoune

  2. EA3826 Therapeutiques Anti-Infectieuses, Institut de Recherche en Sante 2 Nantes Biotech, Medical University of Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France

    Marwan Bouras, Antoine Roquilly, Mickaël Vourc’h & Karim Asehnoune

  3. UMR_S 1246 Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, Nantes University, 44000, Nantes, France

    Bastien Perrot

  4. Biochemistry Laboratory, UMR INSERM 1235, University Hospital of Nantes, 44093, Nantes, France

    Kalyane Bach-Ngohou & Damien Masson

  5. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôtel Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 9, France

    Karim Asehnoune

Authors
  1. Marwan Bouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antoine Roquilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre-Joachim Mahé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raphaël Cinotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mickaël Vourc’h
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bastien Perrot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kalyane Bach-Ngohou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Damien Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Karim Asehnoune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MB, KA, and AR wrote the draft. KA, PJM, and AR designed the Corti-TC trial. BP performed statistical analysis. All of the authors participated in data collection and acquisition. MB, KA, and AR did the data analysis and interpretation. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for its important intellectual content. All the authors approved the manuscript before the submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Asehnoune.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a sub-study of the Corti-TC trial (NCT 01093261). For the RCT trial, the independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) looked over the ethics in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, monitors patient safety, and reviews safety issues as the study progresses. Serious adverse events and unexpected related or possibly related serious events were reported blinded to the DSMB within respectively 24 h or 7 days.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. KA declares personal fees from LSB, Fresenius and Baxter, outside the submitted work. MV declares personal fees from MSD, Pfizer, Baxter, Grants from Fisher Paykel, outside the submitted work. AR declares personal fees from Biomerieux and MSD, outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Correlations between transcortine blood level and cortisoltotal blood level in the entire population. Figure S2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of the risk of Hospital Acquired Pneumonia in the entire population for the CRP blood levels. Figure S3. Comparison of the cortisoltotal/CRP ratio in the entire population. Results are given in median +/- SD. Figure S4. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of the risk of Hospital Acquired Pneumonia in the entire population for the cortisol/CRP ratios. Figure S5. Main characteristics of patients treated with corticosteroids compared to those treated with placebo amongst the subset with ratio >3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouras, M., Roquilly, A., Mahé, PJ. et al. Cortisol total/CRP ratio for the prediction of hospital-acquired pneumonia and initiation of corticosteroid therapy in traumatic brain-injured patients. Crit Care 23, 394 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2680-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2680-6

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535