Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of Anionic–Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures for Enhanced Oil Recovery

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been one of the favorable methods in improving oil recovery and extending the production time. One of the techniques used in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is gas flooding, because of the gases sweeping ability to displace the oil into the production well. Unfortunately, the gas injection method causes severe gas fingering because of the higher mobility and lower viscosity and density of the gas, compared to oil, which creates uneven fluid dispersion (fingering). Thus, a stabilized surfactant foam is introduced to control the injected gas mobility. This paper aims to characterize how the blends of non-anionic and anionic surfactants could act as foam stabilizing agents and to provide a brief exploration on their ability to improve the gas flooding process. The foamability and foam stability of single and mixed surfactant were tested at ambient and elevated temperature; additionally, a salt tolerance study was performed to identify the capability of the foam to withstand real reservoir conditions. Two anionic surfactants: sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS) and one non-ionic surfactant, octyl phenol ethoxylate (TX-100), were used in the study. Each single surfactant was tested for its viscosity and surface tension at the air/water interface under ambient conditions and compared with the mixed surfactants. Data has shown that blending of anionic and non-ionic surfactants has contributed to lower IFT compared to the individual surfactants and to increase viscosity, which is an early indicator of good foam stabilizer for foam flooding, which may lead to oil recovery improvement. The mixture of non-ionic and anionic surfactants, particularly TX-100 and AOS, showed better foamability and foam stability at elevated temperature than the individual pure surfactants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lake, L.W.: Enhanced oil recovery. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, S., Kam, S.I.: Enhanced oil recovery by using CO2 foams: fundamentals and field applications. In: Enhanced oil recovery field case Studies. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blunt, M., Fayers, F.J., Orr Jr., F.M.: Carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery. Energy Convers. Manage. 34, 1197–1204 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, R.F., Yan, W., Liu, S., Hirasaki, G., Miller, C.A.: Foam mobility control for surfactant enhanced oil recovery. SPE J. 15, 934–948 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Conn, C.A., Ma, K., Hirasaki, G., Biswal, S.L.: Visualizing oil displacement with foam in a microfluidic device with permeability contrast. Lab Chip 14, 3968–3977 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yekeen, N., Manan, M.A., Idris, A.K., Padmanabhan, E., Junin, R., Samin, A.M., Gbadamosi, A.O., Oguamah, I.: A comprehensive review of experimental studies of nanoparticles-stabilized foam for enhanced oil recovery. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 164, 43–74 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Talebian, S.H., Masoudi, R., Tan, I.M., Zitha, P.L.J.: Foam assisted CO2-EOR: a review of concept, challenges, and future prospects. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 120, 202–215 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Negin, C., Ali, S., Xie, Q.: Application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery—a review. Petroleum 2, 324–333 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Negin, C., Ali, S., Xie, Q.: Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery. Petroleum 3, 197–211 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, S., Mandal, A.: Investigation on stabilization of CO2 foam by ionic and nonionic surfactants in presence of different additives for application in enhanced oil recovery. Appl. Surf. Sci. 420, 9–20 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, F., Aryana, S.: An experimental investigation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam used in enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 186, 430–442 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muherei, M.A., Junin, R., Bin Merdhah, A.B.: Adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate, Triton X100 and their mixtures to shale and sandstone: a comparative study. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 67, 149–154 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Muherei, M.A., Junin, R.: Investigating synergism in critical micelle concentration of anionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures: surface versus interfacial tension techniques. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2, 115–127 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kareem, S.H., Ali, I.H., Jalhoom, M.Q.: Kinetic and thermodynamic study of triton X-100 removal from aqueous solution of functionalized mesoporous silica. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 21, 293–308 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sagisaka, M., Fujii, T., Koike, D., Yoda, S., Takebayashi, Y., Furuya, T., Yoshizawa, A., Sakai, H., Abe, M., Otake, K.: Surfactant-mixing effects on the interfacial tension and the microemulsion formation in water/supercritical CO2 system. Langmuir 23, 2369–2375 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandal, A., Kar, S., Kumar, S.: The synergistic effect of a mixed surfactant (Tween 80 and SDBS) on wettability alteration of the oil wet quartz surface. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 37, 1268–1276 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khalafi, E., Hashemi, A., Zallaghi, M., Kharrat, R.: An experimental investigation of nanoparticles assisted surfactant flooding for improving oil recovery in a micromodel system. J. Petrol. Env. Biotechnol. 9, 1–6 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yekeen, N., Manan, M.A., Idris, A.K., Samin, A.M.: Influence of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations on surfactant adsorption and foaming characteristics. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 149, 612–622 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc.: Brookfield KF10 and KF20 falling ball viscometer operating instructions. Middleborough, MA, United States

  20. Ahmed, A., Shuker, M.T., Rehman, K., Bahrami, H., Memon, M.K.: Reducing mechanical formation damage by minimizing interfacial tension and capillary pressure in tight gas. IOP Conf. Ser. 50, 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bera, A., Mandal, A., Belhaj, H., Kumar, T.: Enhanced oil recovery by nonionic surfactants considering micellization, surface, and foaming properties. Petrol. Sci. 14, 362–371 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schramm, L.L.: Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Kutay, S.M., Schramm, L.L.: Structure/performance relationships for surfactant and polymer stabilized foams in porous media. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 43, 19–28 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mingzheng, Z., Guodong, X., Jian, L., Lei, C., Lijun, Z.: Analysis of factors influencing thermal conductivity and viscosity in different kinds of surfactant solutions. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 36, 22–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi, B., Wang, Z., Wen, H.: Research on the strengths of electrostatic and van der Waals interactions in ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 241, 486–488 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh, R., Mohanty, K.K.: Synergistic stabilization of foams by a mixture of nanoparticles and surfactants. SPE-DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium Proceedings 3, 1379–1391 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Elraies, K.A., Alta’ee, A.F., Ibrahim, A.A., Saaid, I.M.: An experimental study on chemical flooding using in situ precipitation inhibitor. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference Proceedings 1, 677–682 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zargartalebi, M., Barati, N., Kharrat, R.: Influences of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silica nanoparticles on anionic surfactant properties: interfacial and adsorption behaviors. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 119, 36–43 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Babamahmoudi, S., Riahi, S.: Application of nano particle for enhancement of foam stability in the presence of crude oil: experimental investigation. J. Mol. Liq. 264, 499–509 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marucci, G., Nicodemo, L., Acierno, D.: Cocurrent gas–liquid flow. Plenum Press, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yaminsky, V.V., Ohnishi, S., Vogler, E.A., Horn, R.G.: Stability of aqueous films between bubbles part 2. Effects of trace impurities and evaporation. Langmuir 26, 8075–8080 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. AlYousef, Z.A., Almobarky, M.A., Schechter, D.S.: The effect of nanoparticle aggregation on surfactant foam stability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 511, 365–373 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Drenckhan, W., Saint-Jalmes, A.: The science of foaming. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 222, 228–259 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farajzadeh, R., Krastev, R., Zitha, P.L.J.: Foam films stabilized with alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS). Colloids Surf. A 324, 35–40 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Simjoo, M., Dong, Y., Andrianov, A., Talanana, M., Zitha, P.L.J.: Novel insight into foam mobility control. SPE J. 18, 416–427 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Simjoo, M., Rezaei, T., Andrianov, A., Zitha, P.L.J.: Foam stability in the presence of oil: effect of surfactant concentration and oil type. Colloids Surf. A 438, 148–158 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Funding was provided by Yayasan Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY) (Grant No. 0153AA-H14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Petroleum Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia

    U. A. Aziz, N. Adnan, M. Z. R. Sohri, D. F. Mohshim, A. K. Idris & M. A. Azman

Authors
  1. U. A. Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Adnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Z. R. Sohri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. F. Mohshim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. K. Idris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. A. Azman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. F. Mohshim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz, U.A., Adnan, N., Sohri, M.Z.R. et al. Characterization of Anionic–Nonionic Surfactant Mixtures for Enhanced Oil Recovery. J Solution Chem 48, 1617–1637 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-019-00902-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-019-00902-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation