Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Isoliquiritigenin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairment through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity

BMC Neuroscience volume 20, Article number: 41 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation are central pathogenic mechanisms common to many neurological diseases. Isoliquiritigenin (ISL) is a flavonoid in licorice with multiple pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory activity, and has demonstrated protective efficacy against acute neural injury. However, potential actions against cognitive impairments have not been examined extensively. We established a rat model of cognitive impairment by intracerebroventricular injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and examined the effects of ISL pretreatment on cognitive function, hippocampal injury, and hippocampal expression of various synaptic proteins, antioxidant enzymes, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and signaling factors controlling anti-oxidant and pro-inflammatory responses.

Results

Rats receiving LPS alone demonstrated spatial learning deficits in the Morris water maze test as evidenced by longer average escape latency, fewer platform crossings, and shorter average time in the target quadrant than untreated controls. ISL pretreatment reversed these deficits as well as LPS-induced decreases in the hippocampal expression levels of synaptophysin, postsynaptic density-95, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and BCL-2. ISL pretreatment also reversed LPS-induced increases in TUNEL-positive (apoptotic) cells, BAX/BCL-2 ratio, and expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and C-C motif chemokine ligand 3. Pretreatment with ISL increased the expression levels of phosphorylated (p)-GSK-3β, nuclear NRF2, HO-1 mRNA, and NQO1 mRNA, and reversed LPS-induced nuclear translocation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB.

Conclusions

ISL protects against LPS-induced cognitive impairment and neuronal injury by promoting or maintaining antioxidant capacity and suppressing neuroinflammation, likely through phosphorylation-dependent inactivation of GSK-3β, enhanced expression of NRF2-responsive antioxidant genes, and suppression of NF-κB-responsive pro-inflammatory genes.

Background

Cognitive impairment is a common feature of both systemic and neurological diseases, such as sepsis, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Parkinson’s disease [1,2,3]. Growing evidence implicates oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and ensuing neuronal loss in the initiation and progression of cognitive impairments [4, 5]. Moreover, oxidative stress and inflammation act synergistically to promote cognitive dysfunction [6]. Many experimental models have been established for the mechanistic investigation of cognitive impairment, such as intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an endotoxin of Gram-negative bacteria. Exposure to LPS triggers a hyperactive immune response with excessive production of inflammatory cytokines, resulting in oxidative stress, deterioration of learning and memory, and other forms of cognitive impairments [7, 8] Hence, LPS-injection is a widely studied model for exploring the molecular basis of cognitive impairments induced by neurological diseases and for testing potential therapeutic strategies.

Isoliquiritigenin (ISL) is a flavanone from Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Chinese licorice) that possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antidiabetic, and antitumor activities [9, 10]. Recently, ISL administration was shown to attenuate early brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by regulating multiple signaling pathways [11]. Learning and memory deficits induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) were also reversed by ISL treatment [12]. In vitro, ISL protected against the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammatory cytokines induced by chemical toxins [12, 13]. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), the master regulator of redox homeostasis, could be a key effector for the pharmacological activities of ISL [14, 15]. In HepG2 cells, ISL increased the expression of NRF2 and its downstream detoxification genes [15]. The activation of NRF2 by ISL may be dependent on glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β, a negative regulator of NRF2 that is overexpressed in the hippocampus of LPS-treated mice [16]. Moreover, inhibition of GSK-3β ameliorated cognitive dysfunction associated with oxidative stress in a mouse model of AD [17].

We speculated that ISL may protect against LPS-induced cognitive impairment by suppressing oxidative stress and inflammation in the hippocampus, and that GSK-3β and NRF2 signaling pathways participate in the therapeutic effects of ISL. To test these hypotheses, we established a rat model of cognitive impairment induced by i.c.v. injection of LPS, and assessed the neuroprotective efficacy of ISL and the possible underlying mechanisms. These results provide a promising strategy for the treatment of cognitive impairment in diseases involving oxidative stress and neuroinflammation.

Results

ISL reverses LPS-induced cognitive impairment

Morris Water Maze (MWM) test was performed to evaluate the effects of ISL pretreatment on LPS-induced cognitive impairment. As shown in Fig. 1a, the escape latency to find the submerged platform improved significantly across the 4-day training session in all groups (Fgroup (3, 144) = 12.79, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.21; Fday (3, 144) = 69.10, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.59; Fgroup × day (9, 144) = 1.57, P = 0.13, ηp2 = 0.09). However, escape latency in the LPS group was significantly longer than that in the normal group on days 4 and 5 after LPS injection (both P < 0.01). Meanwhile, the LPS + ISL group demonstrated a significantly shorter mean escape latency than the LPS group on day 5 (P < 0.05), suggesting that ISL pretreatment partially ameliorated the LPS-induced spatial learning deficit. On day 5 after LPS injection, a probe trial was performed to evaluate spatial memory capacity. Results revealed significant differences among the groups in the number of platform crossings (F(3, 36) = 3.24, P < 0.05, ηp2 = 0.21) and the time spent in the target quadrant (F(3, 36) = 5.23, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.30). Rats in the LPS group showed significantly fewer platform crossings (normal group 4.5 ± 0.65 vs. LPS group 2.3 ± 0.45, P < 0.05) and a shorter time spent in the target quadrant (normal group 32.0 ± 3.50 s vs. LPS group 20.0 ± 2.09 s, P < 0.05) compared to the normal group (Fig. 1b, c), indicating poorer memory for the former platform location. Both the number of platform crossings (vs. LPS + ISL group 3.9 ± 0.43, P < 0.05) and target quadrant time (vs. LPS + ISL group 28.3 ± 7.42 s, P < 0.05) were greater in the LPS + ISL group compared to the LPS group, suggesting improved spatial memory. Further, these effects could not be explained by motor deficits as there were no significant differences in swimming speed (F(3, 36) = 0.37, P = 0.80, ηp2 = 0.03) among the groups (Fig. 1d). In addition, an open field test performed on day 2 after LPS injection revealed no significant differences in the number of line crossings (F(3, 36) = 0.10, P = 0.96, ηp2 = 0.01; Fig. 1e) and rearings (F(3, 36) = 0.42, P = 0.74, ηp2 = 0.03; Fig. 1f) among the groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of ISL on cognitive function and spontaneous locomotor activity. Cognitive function was assessed by MWM test. Representative images show a the escape latency, b the number of platform crossings, c the time spent in the platform quadrant and d the swimming speed in each group. Spontaneous locomotor activity was evaluated by the open field test. Representative images show e the numbers of line crossings and f the numbers of rearings in each group. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 vs. LPS group

Full size image

ISL reverses LPS-induced synaptic dysfunction

Synaptic dysfunction is a primary feature of cognitive decline. Western blotting assays showed that there were significant differences among the groups in the expression of synaptophysin (F(3, 20) = 6.23, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.48), postsynaptic density (PSD)-95 (F(3, 20) = 5.53, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.45) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (F(3, 20) = 8.41, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.56) in the hippocampus (Fig. 2a–d). Expression levels of synaptophysin, PSD-95, and BDNF were significantly reduced in the LPS group compared to the normal group (synaptophysin P < 0.01; PSD-95 P < 0.05; BDNF P < 0.01), and ISL pretreatment significantly reversed these LPS-induced decreases (all P < 0.05). Alternatively, no significant differences were observed in the levels of synaptophysin, PSD-95, and BDNF between normal and ISL-only groups (all P > 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of ISL on LPS-induced synaptic dysfunction. a–d Western blotting and histograms show the protein levels of synaptophysin, PSD-95 and BDNF in the hippocampus of each group. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 vs. LPS group. e Representative images show the immunoreactivities of PSD-95 in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus by IF staining and BDNF in the CA3 subfield by IHC staining. Scale bars = 50 μm

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining was also used to assess the protective effects of ISL on PSD-95 and BDNF expression. As shown in Fig. 2e, the immunoreactivities of PSD-95 and BDNF were significantly lower in the hippocampus of LPS group rats compared to the normal group. Consistent with Western blotting results, ISL pretreatment reversed these decreases in PSD-95 and BDNF immunoexpression. Given the critical importance of PSD-95 and BDNF to synaptic function and plasticity, these results illustrate the protective efficacy of ISL against synaptic dysfunction induced by LPS.

ISL maintains hippocampal antioxidant capacity under LPS-induced oxidative stress

We further investigated the effects of ISL on hippocampal antioxidant capacity by measuring superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) activity, and the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of membrane lipid peroxidation (Fig. 3). There were significant differences among the groups in the activities of SOD (F(3, 20) = 4.63, P < 0.05, ηp2 = 0.41), GSH-PX (F(3, 20) = 3.17, P < 0.05, ηp2 = 0.32) and MDA (F(3, 20) = 5.17, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.44). Both SOD (normal 215.0 ± 20.24 vs. LPS 134.2 ± 14.69, P < 0.01) and GSH-PX (normal 74.0 ± 10.04 vs. LPS 36.2 ± 7.36, P < 0.05) expression levels were significantly reduced by LPS compared to the normal group, while ISL pretreatment significantly reversed these effects (SOD vs. LPS + ISL 189.0 ± 16.30, P < 0.05; GSH-PX vs. LPS + ISL 64.8 ± 9.24, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of SOD (vs. ISL-only 222.1 ± 21.93, P > 0.05) and GSH-PX (vs. ISL-only 70.2 ± 11.49, P > 0.05) between normal and ISL-only groups. Further, MDA content (normal 3.50 ± 0.40 vs. LPS 5.52 ± 0.57, P < 0.05) was significantly elevated in the LPS group compared to controls, an effect abrogated by ISL pretreatment (vs. LPS + ISL 4.07 ± 0.45, P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the MDA content (vs. ISL-only 3.10 ± 0.43, P > 0.05) between normal and ISL-only groups. Thus, ISL appears to sustain hippocampal antioxidant capacity under LPS-induced oxidative stress, possibly accounting for the protective effects against cognitive impairment.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of ISL on hippocampal antioxidant capacity under LPS-induced oxidative stress. Representative images show a SOD activity, b GSH-PX activity and c the content of MDA in each group. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 vs. LPS group

Full size image

ISL protects hippocampal neurons against LPS-induced apoptosis

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed significant differences among the groups in the number of neurons (F(3, 20) = 3.34, P < 0.05, ηp2 = 0.33; Fig. 4a). As expected, neuronal injury was undetectable in the hippocampus of normal rats. Rats in the LPS group exhibited large numbers of neurons with shrunken, fragmented, or punctate shapes. Cell counting analysis revealed that ISL pretreatment significantly attenuated neuronal injury compared to the LPS group (P < 0.05; Fig. 4a, b). Further, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase- (TdT-) mediated dNTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay demonstrated that the number of apoptotic cells differed significantly among the groups (F(3, 20) = 14.88, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.69). The number of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the LPS group than the normal group (P < 0.01), and that ISL pretreatment significantly reduced LPS-induced neuronal apoptosis (P < 0.05; Fig. 4a, c).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of ISL on LPS-induced neuronal apoptosis. a Representative images show neuronal damage in the CA1 subfield and the dentate hilus of hippocampus (HP) using H&E and TUNEL staining. Scale bars = 500 μm (top row), 50 μm (middle and bottom row). b, c Histograms show the relative neuronal densities and the number of TUNEL-positive cells in the hippocampus. d–f Western blotting and histograms show the protein levels of BCL-2 and BAX and the ratio of BAX/BCL-2 in the hippocampus of each group. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 vs. LPS group

Full size image

The results of Western blotting showed that there were significant differences among the groups in the expression level of B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) (F(3, 20) = 5.24, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.44) and the ratio of Bcl-2 associated x (BAX) to BCL-2 (F(3, 20) = 9.11, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.58; Fig. 4d–f). Consistent with TUNEL staining results, BCL-2 expression was significantly reduced in the LPS group compared to the normal group (P < 0.01), an effect reversed by ISL pretreatment (P < 0.05; Fig. 4e). Although there were no significant differences in BAX expression among groups (F(3, 20) = 0.35, P = 0.79, ηp2 = 0.049), the BAX/BCL-2 ratio, a widely recognized marker for early apoptosis, was significantly higher in the LPS group than the normal group (P < 0.01), whereas ISL pretreatment significantly reduced the BAX/BCL-2 ratio compared to the LPS group (P < 0.05; Fig. 4f). Again, there was no significant difference between the normal and ISL-only groups (P > 0.05). Thus, ISL protected hippocampal neurons against LPS-induced apoptosis, likely by enhancing or maintaining the expression of various protective factors such as BDNF, BCL-2, SOD, and GSH-PX.

ISL reduces LPS-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines

The results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed significant differences among the groups in the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (F(3, 20) = 49.63, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.88), interleukin (IL)-1β (F(3, 20) = 49.20, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.88), IL-6 (F(3, 20) = 39.94, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.86), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3) (F(3, 20) = 44.05, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.87) in the hippocampus (Fig. 5a–d). The expression levels of TNF-α (normal 4.05 ± 0.65 vs. LPS 22.47 ± 4.71, P < 0.01), IL-1β (normal 22.25 ± 2.48 vs. LPS 136.39 ± 13.85, P < 0.01), IL-6 (normal 41.50 ± 6.50 vs. LPS 183.40 ± 17.60, P < 0.01), and CCL3 (normal 3.52 ± 0.62 vs. LPS 181.37 ± 23.85, P < 0.01) were significantly upregulated in the LPS group compared to the normal group, and ISL pretreatment significantly reversed each of these LPS-induced pro-inflammatory responses (TNF-α vs. LPS + ISL 12.15 ± 1.32, P < 0.01; IL-1β vs. LPS + ISL 61.77 ± 6.19, P < 0.01; IL-6 vs. LPS + ISL 115.19 ± 8.61, P < 0.05; CCL3 vs. LPS + ISL 75.58 ± 7.90, P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between normal and ISL-only groups in the expression levels of TNF-α (vs. ISL-only 3.92 ± 0.58, P > 0.05), IL-1β (vs. ISL-only 19.74 ± 2.15, P > 0.05), IL-6 (vs. ISL-only 39.85 ± 6.75, P > 0.05), and CCL3 (vs. ISL-only 2.71 ± 0.67, P > 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of ISL on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by LPS. Quantitative analysis by ELISA demonstrates the protein expression level of a TNF-α, b IL-1β, c IL-6 and d CCL3 in the hippocampal homogenates. e Quantitative analysis by qRT-PCR demonstrates the mRNA levels of COX-2 and iNOS in the hippocampal homogenates. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. LPS group

Full size image

Further, there were significant differences among the groups in the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 (F(3, 20) = 38.81, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.85) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (F(3, 20) = 28.32, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.81) mRNAs. As shown in Fig. 5e, quantitative real time (qRT)-PCR revealed upregulation of COX-2 and iNOS mRNAs by LPS (both P < 0.01) and reversal of these increases by ISL pretreatment (both P < 0.01).

ISL pretreatment activates NRF2-dependent transcriptional activity through GSK-3β phosphorylation and suppresses nuclear factor (NF)-κB transcriptional activity

Western blotting and qRT-PCR revealed significant differences among the groups in the expression of nuclear NRF2 (F(3, 20) = 59.96, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.90), total NRF2 (F(3, 20) = 33.33, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.83), nuclear NF-κB (F(3, 20) = 35.20, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.84), and phosphorylated (p)-GSK-3β (F(3, 20) = 6.84, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.51) proteins as well as heme oxygenase (HO)-1 (F(3, 20) = 49.96, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.88) and NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1) (F(3, 20) = 42.97, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.87) mRNAs in the hippocampus (Fig. 6). Nuclear immunoexpression of NRF2 was significantly upregulated in the LPS group compared to the normal group (P < 0.01), and was further increased by ISL pretreatment (P < 0.01; Fig. 6b). The expression level of total NRF2 protein was also enhanced by ISL pretreatment (P < 0.01; Fig. 6c). Accordingly, mRNA expression levels of HO-1 and NQO1, cytokines acting downstream of NRF2, were upregulated in LPS + ISL group rats (HO-1 P < 0.01; NQO1 P < 0.05; Fig. 6f). The nuclear immunoexpression of NF-κB was also significantly upregulated in the LPS group (P < 0.01), while ISL pretreatment inhibited nuclear translocation (P < 0.01; Fig. 6d). No significant differences were observed in total NRF2, nuclear NRF2, or nuclear NF-κB between normal and ISL-only groups (all P > 0.05). Expression of GSK-3β, a negative regulator of NRF2, was also examined by Western blotting. The expression of p-GSK-3β protein was lower in the LPS group than the normal group (P < 0.01), and ISL pretreatment significantly reversed this decrease (P < 0.05). Alternatively, ISL pretreatment alone had no effect on the expression of GSK-3β (P > 0.05; Fig. 6e). Collectively, these results suggest that ISL suppresses the transcriptional activity of NF-κB, thereby reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and inhibits GSK-3β activity through phosphorylation, thereby disinhibiting NRF2 and facilitating the expression of NRF2-controlled anti-oxidant genes.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of ISL on GSK-3β activity, NRF2 and NF- κB signaling. a–e Western blotting and histograms show the protein levels of nuclear NRF2, total NRF2, nuclear NF-κB and the ratio of p-GSK-3β/GSK-3β in the hippocampus of each group. Lamin B and β-actin were used as a loading control. f Quantitative analysis by qRT-PCR demonstrates the mRNA levels of HO-1 and NQO1 in the hippocampal homogenates. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. LPS group

Full size image

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that ISL pretreatment ameliorates cognitive impairments caused by neuroinflammation in LPS-treated rats as evidenced by improved spatial learning and memory in the MWM test. This preservation of cognitive function was associated with maintenance of synaptic function and plasticity as indicated by upregulation of synaptic proteins (synaptophysin and PSD-95) and BDNF, a critical modulator of transmission and plasticity. Further, these protective effects of ISL were associated with suppression of oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, likely mediated by upregulation of NRF2 and inhibition of NF-κB transcriptional activity.

Rats receiving ISL pretreatment prior to LPS injection exhibited shorter average escape latency, a greater number of platform crossings, and long average time spent in the target quadrant of the MWM test. Likewise, a recent study found that ISL improved learning and memory on hippocampus-sensitive tasks in young adult ovariectomized rats [18]. ISL also enhanced cognitive performance in ICH model rats as measured by the modified neurological severity score [11] and in ICR mice fed an HFD by reversing inflammation and insulin resistance [12]. Paralleling with previous reports [19, 20], our data showed that LPS injection failed to alter the number of line crossings and rearings in the open field test. Similarly, locomotor activity was not affected by ISL treatment. Such findings indicate that cognitive impairments in the MWM test are not associated with differences in locomotor or exploratory activity. The present study skipped the thigmotaxis during the spatial navigation, because pretrained but not naive rats exhibited reduced periphery swimming in the spatial navigation, and male rats performed thigmotaxis less than females do [21, 22]. Spatial memory in the MWM is dependent on hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Injection of LPS significantly attenuated the expression levels of synaptophysin, PSD-95, and BDNF proteins in the hippocampus, which may have reduced the synaptoplastic capacity of hippocampal circuits. Indeed, both the spatial learning deficit and reduced expression levels of these proteins were reversed by ISL pretreatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing a beneficial effect of ISL on synaptic proteins, although a previous report found that the ISL isometric precursor liquiritigenin enhanced the recovery of HIV-1 Tat-mediated synaptodendritic injury via the estrogen receptor [23, 24].

Oxidative stress is characterized by an imbalance between the generation and removal ROS [25]. Oxidative stress is a central pathogenic process in the development of cognitive impairments associated with numerous neurological diseases. In accord with previous studies reporting significant alterations in oxidative stress markers following i.c.v injection of LPS [16, 26], we found significant declines in both SOD and GSH-PX expression in the hippocampus 24 h after LPS treatment, and a concomitant rise in MDA, a marker of lipid peroxidation. Further, ISL maintained antioxidant enzyme expression during LPS-induced neuroinflammation. Consistent with these findings, ISL also restored the oxidant–antioxidant balance in rodent models of brain injury induced by cocaine [27], sepsis [28], ICH [11], and middle cerebral artery occlusion [29]. Oxidative stress is a key contributor to neuronal injury and death, and cognitive capacity is reduced by neuronal cell loss. Numerous studies have reported that injection of LPS induces neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampus [16], including the current study. Further, this LPS-induced neuronal apoptosis was blocked by ISL pretreatment as indicated by H&E staining and TUNEL assay, and was associated with reversal of LPS-induced downregulation of BCL-2, a mitochondrial anti-apoptotic factor, and LPS-induced elevation of the BAX/BCL-2 ratio. Similarly, ISL significantly ameliorated cerebral edema and neurological deficits in ICH model mice [11], an effect accompanied by increases in catalase and SOD activities and reductions in ROS and oxidized glutathione, a marker of oxidative stress. In light of these previous studies, we also speculate that the anti-apoptotic efficacy of ISL and reversal of LPS-induced cognitive impairment are due to inhibition of oxidative stress.

Neuroinflammation also results in cognitive impairments, while numerous clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated cognitive improvements by anti-inflammatory treatment [4, 30]. In a recent paper, ISL reduced the number of myeloperoxidase-positive cells in perihematomal brain tissues of an ICH model [11] and blocked elevated glial fibrillary acid protein expression, a marker of reactive gliosis, induced by methamphetamine in the striatum [31]. In the current study, ISL pretreatment significantly attenuated the production of the pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL3 as well as mRNAs encoding COX-2 and iNOS. ISL also inhibited the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL2 in RAW 264.7 macrophages [32, 33]. Oxidative stress triggers the release of inflammatory cytokines, suggesting a synergistic effect of pro-oxidants and pro-inflammatory factors in cognitive impairment. Therefore, the antioxidant properties of ISL may also contribute to its anti-inflammatory properties.

NRF2 is a master regulator of antioxidant defense responses and is widely expressed in the brain. Under normal physiological conditions, it is sequestered in the cytoplasm in an inactive form. However, oxidative stress enables NRF2 translocation to the nucleus, where it binds to the antioxidant response elements (AREs) of genes encoding peroxiredoxin and phase II detoxification enzymes, such as HO-1, NQO1, and SOD [34, 35]. In the current study, nuclear localization of NRF2 was increased in the hippocampus after LPS injection. In addition, total NRF2 protein was increased, a finding not reported previously in response to LPS [36]. ISL pretreatment further increased nuclear NRF2 and mRNA expression of its downstream genes HO-1 and NQO1. Similarly, NRF2 protein expression, nuclear translocation, and both SOD and catalase activities were upregulated by ISL in an ICH mouse model [11]. There is extensive crosstalk between oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling pathways. Recently, a report verified that NRF2 transactivation by ISL treatment not only reduced the production of oxidative stress markers but also inhibited the activation of NF-κB and ensuing production of inflammatory cytokines [37]. Consistent with the results of Zeng et al. [11], ISL pretreatment also suppressed the nuclear translocation of NF-κB and the production of pro-inflammatory mediators. In several in vitro studies, ISL blocked the activation of the NF-κB pathway by LPS, and reduced NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation [38, 39]. Therefore, the protective effects of ISL against cognitive impairment may be mediated by upregulation of NRF2 signaling and suppression of NF-κB signaling.

GSK-3β is a multifunctional kinase implicated in several neuropathological diseases. It is highly active in resting cells and usually inhibits downstream pathways. Phosphorylation within the amino-terminal domain of GSK-3β (Ser 9) causes inactivation [40]. A recent study verified that GSK-3β downregulates expression of NRF2 protein and genes downstream of NRF2/ARE in brain ischemia–reperfusion injury [41], suggesting that GSK-3β is a negative regulatory of NRF2 and the associated antioxidant response. In our study, ISL pretreatment significantly enhanced the level of p-GSK-3β (Ser 9) in the hippocampus, indicating GSK-3β inactivation, and this effect was associated with upregulation of nuclear NRF2. Moreover, it was previously demonstrated that GSK-3β inhibition improves cognition in an AD mouse model [17]. Hence, we speculate that suppression of GSK-3β and ensuing activation of the NRF2-dependent antioxidant response is a critical mechanism underlying the protective effect of ISL against LPS-induced cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that ISL pretreatment can ameliorate cognitive impairments induced by i.c.v. injection of LPS in rats. The protective effects of ISL are associated with strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, upregulation of proteins related to synaptic function and plasticity, and the attenuation of neuronal apoptosis. At the molecular level, these activities appear to be mediated by inactivation of GSK-3β, ensuing upregulation of NRF2 transcriptional activity and suppression of NF-κB transcriptional activity. These results suggest that ISL is a promising candidate therapy for cognitive impairment due to neurological diseases involving neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Nonetheless, considering the confounding factors in the MWM test, further studies would give us better insights into the underlying mechanisms of cognitive impairments assessed through more than one memory test.

Methods

Animal models

Male wistar rats (aged 8 weeks, weighing 180–200 g) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Shandong University, and housed in standardized environment condition with freely access to water and food and a 12 h alternating light and dark. Animal model was constructed by i.c.v. injection of LPS as described in our previous report [42]. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.) and treated with buprenorphine (0.04 mg/kg, s.c.) for postsurgical analgesia, and mounted on stereotaxic instrument (Northwest Photoelectric Instruments Plant, Xian, China). After the bregma being exposed, rats were i.c.v. injected with LPS (0.2 mg/kg BW, Escherichia coli serotype 055:B5, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a concentration of 50 mg/ml through a Hamilton microsyringe. The stereotaxic coordinates were 1.2 mm posterior, 1.6 mm right, and 2.5 mm deep relative to the bregma. All rats were randomly assigned into the subsequent experiments.

Experimental protocols

All animals were separated into four groups: normal group, ISL-only group, LPS group, and LPS + ISL group. ISL (20 mg/kg, Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ZSGB‐BIO, Beijing, China) solution (25 mg/ml) was intraperitoneally administered at 30 min, 12 h and 24 h prior to LPS injection. The same volume of vehicle (DMSO) was also administrated three times in LPS group. The rats of ISL-only group were injected by ISL alone. The dose of ISL was established by the results of preliminary experiments and published reports [11, 29]. All rats, except those in behavioral tests, were anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.) and sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg, i.p.), and sacrificed at 24 h and 48 h after LPS injection for molecular experiments and histochemical experiments, respectively.

Tissue collection and preparation

For Western blotting, ELISA and qRT-PCR (n = 6 per group for each experiment), rats were anesthetized by i.p. injection of 10% chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg) and sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg), brains were rapidly removed from the skull. The hippocampus was quickly dissected on ice and stored at − 80 °C for later analysis. For histochemical experiments (n = 6 per group), rats were perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde and brain tissues were removed and post-fixed overnight at 4 °C. Tissue samples were embedded with optimal cutting temperature compound. Coronal sections were obtained at the bregma level from − 2.5 to − 3.8 mm, cut at a thickness of 20 μm (1‐in‐6 series, 120 μm apart from each other) with a sliding microtome (Leica Instruments, Germany), and stored at − 20 °C.

MWM test

MWM test (n = 10 per group) was performed to evaluate the spatial learning and memory ability as described previously [29], with slight modification. The instrumentation was obtained from Institute of Material Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China. The test consisted of a place navigation test and a spatial probe test. The test was performed in a circular pool (120 cm diameter and 50 cm deep) filled with water at 25 ± 1 °C. The pool was divided into four equal quadrants, and an escape platform (10 cm diameter and 1.0 cm beneath the surface of the water) was placed at the center of one quadrant. A digital video camera was mounted above the pool, and swimming activity of the rats was recorded via video tracking software. In the place navigation test, rats were subjected to four trials per day for 4 consecutive days at onset of day 2 after LPS injection. Each rat was placed into the water, facing the pool wall, and given 60 s to locate the hidden platform, if the mice failed to find the platform within 60 s, it would be gently guided to the platform and allowed to remain there for 15 s. On the day 5 after LPS injection, the platform was removed for the probe test. Each rat was allowed to look for the platform in the pool for 60 s. The swimming speed, the number of crossing platforms and the time spent in the target quadrant were recorded for further analysis.

Open field test

To assess the effect of spontaneous activity of rats in the MWM test, the open field test was performed on the day 2 after LPS injection. Each rat was placed into the corner of a plastic box (90 cm × 90 cm × 40 cm) with the 25 equal sectors on the bottom. A video tracking system (Shanghai Xinruan Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to record the locomotion of rat for 5 min. The open field was cleaned with 5% ethyl alcohol and allowed to dry between tests. The number of line crossings (with all four paws placed into a new square) and the number of rearings (with both front paws raised from the floor) were analyzed.

Western blotting analysis

Hippocampal tissues were homogenized with a tissue homogenizer in cold lysis buffer. Supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 4 °C (15,000g × 15 min). Protein concentrations were measured by using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China). Proteins (30 μg per lane) were separated in SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST for 2 h, the membranes were incubated with indicated primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used were as follows: rabbit anti-synaptophysin (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), PSD-95 (1:1000, Abcam), BDNF (1:1000, Abcam), BCL-2 (1:1000, Abcam), BAX (1:2000, Abcam), NRF2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), NF-κB (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), p-GSK-3β (Ser9) (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), GSK-3β (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies, and mouse anti-Lamin B (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and β-Actin (1:5000, Abcam) antibodies. After three washes, the membranes were treated with species-specific peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Immunoreactivities were detected by an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore) and images were analyzed using an image analyzer (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA). Values were normalized to the amount of β-actin or Lamin B in the same samples.

Immunofluorescence (IF), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and histology analysis

IF and IHC were used to detect the immunoreactivities of PSD-95 and BDNF, respectively. Serial slides were rinsed in PBS and blocked in 5% BSA for 1 h, and reacted with rabbit anti- PSD-95 (1:250, Abcam) or BDNF (1:100, Abcam) antibody overnight at 4 °C. For the immunoreactivity of PSD-95, slides were incubated with Alexa 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h and observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For the immunoreactivity of BDNF, slides were incubated with a biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (1:500) for 1 h and avidin-conjugated peroxidase complex (1:200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min. Positive reaction was visualized using diaminobenzidine tablet sets (ZSGB-BIO) and observed under the light microscope (Olympus).

H&E staining and TUNEL assay were used for the examination of neuronal damage. H&E staining was performed following the standard procedure. TUNEL assay were performed using the In Situ Cell Death Kit, POD (Solarbio, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Images were observed under the light microscope (Olympus). Quantitative analysis of cells was performed by a blinded manner as described in our previous report [43]. In brief, six brain sections per animal were used for counting at a 200× magnification. The number of target cells was counted twice on two differently visual fields of each subfield of hippocampus, including the hilus of dentate gyrus, cornu ammonis 3 (CA3) subfield and CA1 subfield. The value was expressed as the ratio of mean outcome in experimental group to that in the normal group.

Measurements of SOD activity, GSH-PX activity and MDA content

Hippocampal tissues were homogenized in PBS and supernatants were obtained after centrifugation at 4 °C (15,000g × 30 min). The activities of SOD and GSH-PX and the content of MDA were examined according to the manufacturer’s instructions of total SOD assay kit (Hydroxylamine method), GSH-PX assay kit (Colorimetric method) and MDA assay kit (TBA method). All kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China.

ELISA

The hippocampal tissues were treated as mentioned above. The levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL3 were quantified by ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 from Invitrogen; CCL3 from Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Results are described as pictogram per milligram total protein.

qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from dissected hippocampus using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA concentration was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. First-strand cDNA was generated using the Reverse Transcription System (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The qPCR was performed using Maxima SYBR Green dye (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD, USA) in an Eppendorf thermocycler (Hamburg, Germany). The qPCR reaction mixture comprised 10 μl of Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix, 2 μl of cDNA, and 0.4 μl of 10 μmol/l forward and reverse primers, made up to a final volume of 20 μl with ultrapure water. The qPCR primers used were as follows: COX-2 forward, GGTTCACCCGAGGACTGGGC, and reverse, CGCAGGTGCTCAGGGACGTG; iNOS forward, CCAACCTGCAGGTCTTCGATG, and reverse, GTCGATGCACAACTGGGTGAAC; HO-1 forward, TGCTCGCATGAACACTCTGGAGAT, and reverse, ATGGCATAAATTCCCACTGCCACG; NQO1 forward, GTGAGAAGAGCCCTGATTGT, and reverse, CCTGTGATGTCGTTTCTGGA; and GAPDH forward, CCCTTCATTGACCTCAACTACA, and reverse, GCCAGTAGACTCCACGACATA. The standard PCR conditions were 95 °C 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C 15 s, 60 °C 30 s, and 72 °C 30 s. Each sample was run in triplicate. The expression of the target genes was normalized to GAPDH as an internal control. Gene expression was analyzed using the 2(−Delta Delta ct) method [44].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and all data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). For the escape latency data in MWM test, statistical comparisons were conducted using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (group and trial time) with repeated measures (trial days). All other data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Post hoc analyses were performed using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test or Dunnett’s T3 test to compare groups. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets and material used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

AREs:

antioxidant response elements

Bax:

Bcl-2 associated x

BCL-2:

B cell lymphoma-2

BDNF:

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

CA3:

cornu ammonis 3

CCL3:

C-C motif chemokine ligand 3

COX:

cyclooxygenase

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

GSH-PX:

glutathione peroxidase

GSK:

glycogen synthase kinase

H&E:

hematoxylin and eosin

HFD:

high-fat diet

HO:

heme oxygenase

i.c.v.:

intracerebroventricular

ICH:

intracerebral hemorrhage

IF:

immunofluorescence

IHC:

immunohistochemistry

IL:

interleukin

iNOS:

inducible nitric oxide synthase

ISL:

isoliquiritigenin

LPS:

lipopolysaccharide

LSD:

least significant difference

MDA:

malondialdehyde

MWM:

Morris Water Maze

NF:

nuclear factor

NQO1:

NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1

NRF2:

nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

p-:

phosphorylated

PSD:

postsynaptic density

qRT:

quantitative real time

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

SEM:

standard error of mean

SOD:

superoxide dismutase

TNF:

tumor necrosis factor

TUNEL:

terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase- (TdT-) mediated dNTP nick end labeling

References

  1. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;304(16):1787–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cotter J, Granger K, Backx R, Hobbs M, Looi CY, Barnett JH. Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: a systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;84:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nackaerts E, Michely J, Heremans E, Swinnen S, Smits-Engelsman B, Vandenberghe W, Grefkes C, Nieuwboer A. Being on target: visual information during writing affects effective connectivity in parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2018;371:484–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allison DJ, Ditor DS. The common inflammatory etiology of depression and cognitive impairment: a therapeutic target. J Neuroinflamm. 2014;11:151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nickels KC, Zaccariello MJ, Hamiwka LD, Wirrell EC. Cognitive and neurodevelopmental comorbidities in paediatric epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):465–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao L, An R, Yang Y, Yang X, Liu H, Yue L, Li X, Lin Y, Reiter RJ, Qu Y. Melatonin alleviates brain injury in mice subjected to cecal ligation and puncture via attenuating inflammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress: the role of SIRT1 signaling. J Pineal Res. 2015;59(2):230–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Shaul V, Lomnitski L, Nyska A, Zurovsky Y, Bergman M, Grossman S. The effect of natural antioxidants, NAO, and apocynin, on oxidative stress in the rat heart following LPS challenge. Toxicol Lett. 2001;123(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong QH, Wang Q, Pan LL, Liu XH, Huang H, Zhu YZ. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairment: a pro-inflammatory pathway in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;96(1):52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeon JP, Buono RJ, Han BG, Jang EY, Kim SC, Yang CH, Hwang MV. Proteomic and behavioral analysis of response to isoliquiritigenin in brains of acute cocaine treated rats. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(12):5094–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng F, Du Q, Peng C, Wang N, Tang H, Xie X, Shen J, Chen J. A review: the pharmacology of isoliquiritigenin. Phytother Res. 2015;29(7):969–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng J, Chen Y, Ding R, Feng L, Fu Z, Yang S, Deng X, Xie Z, Zheng S. Isoliquiritigenin alleviates early brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage via suppressing ROS- and/or NF-κB-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation by promoting Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. J Neuroinflamm. 2017;14(1):119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma X, Fang F, Song M, Ma S. The effect of isoliquiritigenin on learning and memory impairments induced by high-fat diet via inhibiting TNF-alpha/JNK/IRS signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(4):1090–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang CK, Chun HS. Isoliquiritigenin isolated from licorice Glycyrrhiza uralensis prevents 6-hydroxydopamine-induced apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76(3):536–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Denzer I, Munch G, Friedland K. Modulation of mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases via activation of nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 by food-derived compounds. Pharmacol Res. 2016;103:80–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gong H, Zhang BK, Yan M, Fang PF, Li HD, Hu CP, Yang Y, Cao P, Jiang P, Fan XR. A protective mechanism of licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis): isoliquiritigenin stimulates detoxification system via Nrf2 activation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;162:134–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao WX, Zhang JH, Cao JB, Wang W, Wang DX, Zhang XY, Yu J, Zhang YY, Zhang YZ, Mi WD. Acetaminophen attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairment through antioxidant activity. J Neuroinflamm. 2017;14(1):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farr SA, Ripley JL, Sultana R, Zhang Z, Niehoff ML, Platt TL, Murphy MP, Morley JE, Kumar V, Butterfield DA. Antisense oligonucleotide against GSK-3β in brain of SAMP8 mice improves learning and memory and decreases oxidative stress: involvement of transcription factor Nrf2 and implications for Alzheimer disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;67:387–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kundu P, Korol DL, Bandara S, Monaikul S, Ondera CE, Helferich WG, Khan IA, Doerge DR, Schantz SL. Licorice root components mimic estrogens in an object location task but not an object recognition task. Horm Behav. 2018;103:97–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tripathi A, Paliwal P, Krishnamurthy S. Piracetam attenuates LPS-induced neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment in rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2017;37(8):1373–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vojtechova I, Petrasek T, Maleninska K, Brozka H, Tejkalova H, Horacek J, Stuchlik A, Vales K. Neonatal immune activation by lipopolysaccharide causes inadequate emotional responses to novel situations but no changes in anxiety or cognitive behavior in Wistar rats. Behav Brain Res. 2018;349:42–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perrot-Sinal TS, Kostenuik MA, Ossenkopp KP, Kavaliers M. Sex differences in performance in the Morris water maze and the effects of initial nonstationary hidden platform training. Behav Neurosci. 1996;110(6):1309–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beiko J, Lander R, Hampson E, Boon F, Cain DP. Contribution of sex differences in the acute stress response to sex differences in water maze performance in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2004;151(1–2):239–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jayaprakasam B, Doddaga S, Wang R, Holmes D, Goldfarb J, Li XM. Licorice flavonoids inhibit Eotaxin-1 secretion by human fetal lung fibroblasts in vitro. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(3):820–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertrand SJ, Mactutus CF, Aksenova MV, Espensen-Sturges TD, Booze RM. Synaptodendritic recovery following HIV-1 Tat exposure: neurorestoration by phytoestrogens. J Neurochem. 2014;128(1):140–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yatin SM, Varadarajan S, Butterfield DA. Vitamin E prevents Alzheimer’s amyloid beta-peptide (1-42)-induced neuronal protein oxidation and reactive oxygen species production. J Alzheimers Dis. 2000;2(2):123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Han YG, Qin X, Zhang T, Lei M, Sun FY, Sun JJ, Yuan WF. Electroacupuncture prevents cognitive impairment induced by lipopolysaccharide via inhibition of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Neurosci Lett. 2018;683:190–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jang EY, Choe ES, Hwang M, Kim SC, Lee JR, Kim SG, Jeon JP, Buono RJ, Yang CH. Isoliquiritigenin suppresses cocaine-induced extracellular dopamine release in rat brain through GABA(B) receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;587(1–3):124–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zou P, Ji HM, Zhao JW, Ding XM, Zhen ZG, Zhang X, Nie XQ, Xue LX. Protective effect of isoliquiritigenin against cerebral injury in septic mice via attenuation of NF-κB. Inflammopharmacology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-018-0503-z (Epub ahead of print).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhan C, Yang J. Protective effects of isoliquiritigenin in transient middle cerebral artery occlusion-induced focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Pharmacol Res. 2006;53(3):303–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castro OW, Upadhya D, Kodali M, Shetty AK. Resveratrol for easing status epilepticus induced brain injury, inflammation, epileptogenesis, and cognitive and memory dysfunction-are we there yet? Front Neurol. 2017;8:603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee MJ, Yang CH, Jeon JP, Hwang M. Protective effects of isoliquiritigenin against methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in mice. J Pharmacol Sci. 2009;111(2):216–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee SH, Kim JY, Seo GS, Kim YC, Sohn DH. Isoliquiritigenin, from Dalbergia odorifera, up-regulates anti-inflammatory heme oxygenase-1 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages. Inflamm Res. 2009;58(5):257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thiyagarajan P, Chandrasekaran CV, Deepak HB, Agarwal A. Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced pro-inflammatory mediators by an extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra and its phytoconstituents. Inflammopharmacology. 2011;19(4):235–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Calkins MJ, Johnson DA, Townsend JA, Vargas MR, Dowell JA, Williamson TP, Kraft AD, Lee JM, Li J, Johnson JA. The Nrf2/ARE pathway as a potential therapeutic target in neurodegenerative disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(3):497–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Denzer I, Munch G, Pischetsrieder M, Friedland K. S-Allyl-l-cysteine and isoliquiritigenin improve mitochondrial function in cellular models of oxidative and nitrosative stress. Food Chem. 2016;194:843–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mirahmadi SM, Shahmohammadi A, Rousta AM, Azadi MR, Fahanik-Babaei J, Baluchnejadmojarad T, Roghani M. Soy isoflavone genistein attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairments in the rat via exerting anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. Cytokine. 2018;104:151–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao B, Ren B, Guo R, Zhang W, Ma S, Yao Y, Yuan T, Liu Z, Liu X. Supplementation of lycopene attenuates oxidative stress induced neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment via Nrf2/NF-κB transcriptional pathway. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;109(Pt 1):505–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Honda H, Nagai Y, Matsunaga T, Saitoh S, Akashi-Takamura S, Hayashi H, Fujii I, Miyake K, Muraguchi A, Takatsu K. Glycyrrhizin and isoliquiritigenin suppress the LPS sensor toll-like receptor 4/MD-2 complex signaling in a different manner. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;91(6):967–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Y, Chen X, Ge X, Xia H, Wang Y, Su S, Li W, Yang T, Wei M, Zhang H, Gou L, Li J, Jiang X, Yang J. Isoliquiritigenin prevents the progression of psoriasis-like symptoms by inhibiting NF-kappaB and proinflammatory cytokines. J Mol Med. 2016;94(2):195–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Juhaszova M, Zorov DB, Yaniv Y, Nuss HB, Wang S, Sollott SJ. Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cardioprotection. Circ Res. 2009;104(11):1240–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen X, Liu Y, Zhu J, Lei S, Dong Y, Li L, Jiang B, Tan L, Wu J, Yu S, Zhao Y. GSK-3β downregulates Nrf2 in cultured cortical neurons and in a rat model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu X, Wei D, Chen O, Zhang Z, Xue J, Huang S, Zhu W, Wang Y. Upregulation of CCL3/MIP-1alpha regulated by MAPKs and NF-kappaB mediates microglial inflammatory response in LPS-induced brain injury. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2016;76(4):304–17.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu XB, Wang YB, Chen O, Zhang DQ, Zhang ZH, Cao AH, Huang SY, Sun RP. Characterization of the expression of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR43) after kainic acid-induced status epilepticus (SE) in juvenile rats. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012;38(6):602–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Research for Natural Science Project of Shandong University (No. 2015TS014); and China Scholarship Council (No. 201706225013). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, #247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, 250033, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaobo Zhu, Shaojie Chen, Jiang Xue, Yibiao Wang & Ou Chen

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, the Second People’s Hospital of Jinan City, Jinan, 250000, China

    Jiankun Liu

  3. The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Shanying Huang

  4. Nursing School, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China

    Ou Chen

Authors
  1. Xiaobo Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiankun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaojie Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiang Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shanying Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yibiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ou Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XZ conceived the idea, performed and analyzed experiments, interpreted results and drafted the manuscript. JL constructed the animal model, performed behavioral experiments, collected the tissue and drafted the manuscript. SC, JX and SH performed molecular experiments and histochemical experiments, interpreted results and revised the manuscript. YW analyzed experiments, interpreted results and revised the manuscript. OC conceived the idea, interpreted results and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ou Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and the legal requirements in China. All animal protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments of the Second Hospital of Shandong University (No. KYLL-2014LW01). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Liu, J., Chen, S. et al. Isoliquiritigenin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced cognitive impairment through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. BMC Neurosci 20, 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-019-0520-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-019-0520-x

Keywords

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us