Elsevier

Cellular Immunology

Volume 350, April 2020, 103926
Cellular Immunology

Review article
Imaging: Gear up for mechano-immunology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2019.103926Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Immune cells have mechanosensing capability.

  • Technologies for biophysical measurements have been used for immune cell studies.

  • Imaging methods boost mechanical sensing studies in immune cells.

Abstract

Immune cells including B and T lymphocytes have a remarkable ability to sense the physical perturbations through their surface expressed receptors. At the advent of modern imaging technologies paired with biophysical methods, we have gained the understanding of mechanical forces exerted by immune cells to perform their functions. This review will go over the imaging techniques already being used to study mechanical forces in immune cells. We will also discuss the dire need for new modern technologies for future work.

Introduction

Cells have remarkable abilities to sense and respond to the mechanical properties of their environment [1]. In recent decades, immune cells were also found to be sensitive to the mechanical properties of their microenvironment, which can regulate the immune response in diverse processes, such as immune cell activation, pathogen clearance, antigen presentation, cytokine and antibody secretion, and memory responses [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Cells of the immune system get activated when their membrane receptors bind to irritant antigens on the surface of antigen presenting cells (APCs). Both T and B lymphocyte signaling has been shown to be responsive to physical forces and mechanical cues and further regulate these immune cells to exert forces. Numerous studies have focused on how mechanical cues, such as the stiffness properties from the antigen presenting microenvironment, can regulate immune cell responses, and how immune cells can exert mechanical forces to accomplish specific immune functions, such as affinity discrimination, antigen extraction, migration, morphology changes, DNA regulation and target cell killing [2].

Mechanical forces regulate immune responses across a range of dimensions, from organs to molecules, from outside-in to inside-out, in the functions from passive response to mechanical cues to active response towards applying forces. At the organ level, mechanical force significantly modulates both inflammation and pain in a systematic way. For example, during the wound recovery process, mechanical stimulation through the incision region on the skin can transduce to T cells and induce T-cell-dependent Th2 cytokine production and chemokine signaling and further recruit systemic inflammatory cells, such as macrophages or monocytic fibroblast precursors, in response to mechanical loading [8]. Some studies of tumor growth and immune cell infiltration have found that the mechanical microenvironment changed dramatically during different stages of tumor progressions. Thus, changes in mechanical features could lead to a shortcoming of immune therapeutics by directly regulating immune cell responses or indirectly influencing inherent processes. For example, during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition process, enhancing cell survival through autophagy will in turn effect immune responses [9]. At the cell level, mechanical force studies in immune cells focus on 1) how the external mechanical information regulates the whole cell responses, such as activation, signaling transduction, cell motility, and gene profiles; 2) how the immune cell uses mechanical force from inside, for the cell adhesion, substrate discrimination, antigen uptake and internalization eventually to kill target cells [10]; 3) how immune cells react as a network to control the immune responses by transducing mechanical information through cell-cell interactions. At the molecular level, a mechanism for mechanical cues in immune cells is less established when it comes to the membrane-bound receptors, motor proteins, scaffold proteins and cytoskeleton. In T cells, T cell receptors (TCRs) mediate both recognition and T cell activation via their dimeric alpha beta, CD3 epsilon gamma, CD3 epsilon delta, and CD3 zeta subunits, of which the alpha beta chain is an anisotropic mechanosensor responsible for force responses [11], [12]. The actin cytoskeleton is essential for cell mechanics and has increasingly been implicated in the regulation of cell signaling. Cytoskeletal forces exerted by cells are likely mediated through mechanical modulation. The process of how the actin cytoskeleton couples to the activation of immune cells, in particular, B cells, was recently discussed by Pavel [13]. A better understanding of how mechanical cues regulate immune cells can benefit the design of vaccines for many diseases, like HIV [14]. Huse and Upadhyaya have recently reviewed the current understanding of how mechanical forces regulate membrane-bound receptor activation, cell migration, intracellular signaling, intercellular communication, tissue rearrangement, cell differentiation and immune responses, highlighting the biological ramifications of these effects in various immune cell types [2], [15]. All these studies employed fluorescent microscopy-based imaging techniques and methods geared towards measuring force associated profiles and molecular sensor systems. Moreover, multiple techniques can be combined to enhance the study of mechanical forces. For example, the biophysical techniques of micropipette, and micropillar-based traction force microscopy were used to reveal a striking correlation between the magnitude of force exertion across the synapse and the speed of perforin pore formation on the target cell, implying that force potentiates cytotoxicity by enhancing perforin activity [10]. Our review will focus on the imaging techniques used to elucidate mechanical force interactions in immune cells.

Section snippets

Imaging techniques for mechanical force studies in immune cells

Cells control mechanical forces and integrate these forces into tissues to form the final shape of an organism through a process called mechanotransduction, which ultimately affects morphology, migration, proliferation and apoptosis [16]. In the 1950s, mechanotransduction was first shown to affect cellular processes in a study where the cancer cells showed anchorage-independent growth on soft agar while non-cancer cells did not [17], [18]. This peculiar phenomenon of mechanosensing was

Fluorescent-microscopy-associated techniques for mechanical force studies in immune cells

The mechanical force associated profiles can be monitored by the techniques mentioned above, however, more information needs to be recorded and explored simultaneously in biological applications, such as the morphology changes, the size and tightness of adhesion, the activation of receptors, the signaling transductions and the location of molecules. Imaging studies have shown that the temporal and spatial information of the molecule of interests is valuable to interpret the molecular

Biophysical features of ligands regulate immune cell activations

Biophysical studies on immune cells include but not limited to the techniques mentioned above. Some other systems, do not directly measure or exert forces, but theoretically, they are associated with mechanical force studies.

Future work

Real-time imaging techniques at the micro and Nano-level are one of the breakthroughs of modern technology in this era. Nowadays, it facilitates not only the tissue-level visibility but also the detailed visualization of the single cell. With the advent of these modern technologies along with the biophysical methods mentioned here, we have made substantial progress in the immune cell studies. To further our understanding of complex immune studies, we need to continue developing new techniques

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730043, 81422020 and 81621002), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2014CB542500-03).

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest.

References (148)

  • S. Hoffmann et al.

    Single cell force spectroscopy of T cells recognizing a myelin-derived peptide on antigen presenting cells

    Immunol. Lett.

    (2011)
  • S. Cazaux et al.

    Synchronizing atomic force microscopy force mode and fluorescence microscopy in real time for immune cell stimulation and activation studies

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2016)
  • C.T. Lim et al.

    Mechanical models for living cells – a review

    J. Biomech.

    (2006)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling

    Cell

    (2014)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Force-activatable biosensor enables single platelet force mapping directly by fluorescence imaging

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2018)
  • G. Fabrikant et al.

    Model of T-cell nuclear deformation by the cortical actin layer

    Biophys. J.

    (2013)
  • Mark S. Lee et al.

    A mechanical switch couples T cell receptor triggering to the cytoplasmic juxtamembrane regions of CD3ζζ

    Immunity

    (2015)
  • E. Judokusumo et al.

    Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation

    Biophys. J.

    (2012)
  • M.J. Rosenbluth et al.

    Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability

    Biophys. J.

    (2006)
  • N. Bufi et al.

    Human primary immune cells exhibit distinct mechanical properties that are modified by inflammation

    Biophys. J.

    (2015)
  • C. Ketchum et al.

    Ligand mobility regulates B cell receptor clustering and signaling activation

    Biophys. J.

    (2014)
  • D.A. Fletcher et al.

    Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton

    Nature

    (2010)
  • M. Huse

    Mechanical forces in the immune system

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2017)
  • M.I. Yuseff et al.

    How B cells capture, process and present antigens: a crucial role for cell polarity

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2013)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Molecular force spectroscopy on cells

    Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.

    (2015)
  • M.-I. Yuseff et al.

    B cells use conserved polarity cues to regulate their antigen processing and presentation functions

    Front. Immunol.

    (2015)
  • R. Basu et al.

    Mechanical communication at the immunological synapse

    Trends Cell Biol.

    (2016)
  • V.W. Wong et al.

    Mechanical force prolongs acute inflammation via T-cell-dependent pathways during scar formation

    FASEB J.

    (2011)
  • D.K. Das et al.

    Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor β-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. U.S.A.

    (2015)
  • P. Tolar

    Cytoskeletal control of B cell responses to antigens

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2017)
  • R.W. Sanders et al.

    Native-like Env trimers as a platform for HIV-1 vaccine design

    Immunol. Rev.

    (2017)
  • T. Iskratsch et al.

    Appreciating force and shape-the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2014)
  • K.K. Sanford et al.

    The development of variations in transplantability and morphology within a clone of mouse fibroblasts transformed to sarcoma-producing cells in vitro

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1954)
  • M.P. Sheetz et al.

    Biological membranes as bilayer couples. A molecular mechanism of drug-erythrocyte interactions

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1974)
  • N.C. Gauthier et al.

    Temporary increase in plasma membrane tension coordinates the activation of exocytosis and contraction during cell spreading

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2011)
  • P. Roca-Cusachs et al.

    Quantifying forces in cell biology

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2017)
  • A.S. Curtis

    The mechanism of adhesion of cells to glass. A study by interference reflection microscopy

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1964)
  • C.S. Izzard et al.

    Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique

    J. Cell Sci.

    (1976)
  • A.K. Harris et al.

    Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion

    Science

    (1980)
  • T. Oliver et al.

    Traction forces in locomoting cells

    Cell Motil Cytoskeleton

    (1995)
  • R.J. Pelham et al.

    Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1997)
  • H. Xu et al.

    Follicular T-helper cell recruitment governed by bystander B cells and ICOS-driven motility

    Nature

    (2013)
  • M.L. Dustin

    The immunological synapse

    Cancer Immunol. Res.

    (2014)
  • K.L. Hui et al.

    Cytoskeletal forces during signaling activation in Jurkat T-cells

    Mol. Biol. Cell

    (2015)
  • K.L. Hui et al.

    Dynamic microtubules regulate cellular contractility during T-cell activation

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2017)
  • W. Jin et al.

    Probing synaptic biomechanics using micropillar arrays

    Immune Synapse: Methods Protoc.

    (2017)
  • K.T. Bashour et al.

    CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2014)
  • F. Tamzalit et al.

    Interfacial actin protrusions mechanically enhance killing by cytotoxic T cells

    Sci. Immunol.

    (2019)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Profiling the origin, dynamics, and function of traction force in B cell activation

    Sci. Signal.

    (2018)
  • Y.F. Dufrêne et al.

    Imaging modes of atomic force microscopy for application in molecular and cell biology

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text