Elsevier

Science Bulletin

Volume 65, Issue 4, 26 February 2020, Pages 286-292
Science Bulletin

Article
Reconstruction of quantum channel via convex optimization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Quantum process tomography is often used to completely characterize an unknown quantum process. However, it may lead to an unphysical process matrix, which will cause the loss of information with respect to the tomography result. Convex optimization, widely used in machine learning, is able to generate a global optimum that best fits the raw data while keeping the process tomography in a legitimate region. Only by correctly revealing the original action of the process can we seek deeper into its properties like its phase transition and its Hamiltonian. Here, we reconstruct the seawater channel using convex optimization and further test it on the seven fundamental gates. We compare our method to the standard-inversion and norm-optimization approaches using the cost function value and our proposed state deviation. The advantages convince that our method enables a more precise and robust estimation of the elements of the process matrix with less demands on preliminary resources. In addition, we examine on a set of non-unitary channels and the reconstructions reach up to 99.5% accuracy. Our method offers a more universal tool for further analyses on the components of the quantum channels and we believe that the crossover between quantum process tomography and convex optimization may help us move forward to machine learning of quantum channels.

Introduction

Quantum technologies have obtained great advances in recent years, including quantum computation [1], [2], [3] and quantum simulation [4], as well as quantum communication [5], [6], [7]. Either in quantum computation or in quantum communication, a primary task is to give a mathematical characterization of the physical system. Generally, there are two difficulties for this mission, that is, decoherence of quantum states and loss of information in states manipulation. In order to delve deeper into the evolution mechanism of the system, a reveal of the real quantum process is of paramount importance.

In the realm of quantum information science [1], such kind of quantum system characterization is commonly known as quantum tomography, like quantum detector tomography (QDT) [8], [9], [10], quantum state tomography (QST) [11], [12] and quantum process tomography (QPT) [13]. For the process estimation, QST and QPT are two mainly used techniques. QST is an indispensable method in QPT and the information that lies in the process can be transformed into a mathematical mapping, that is the process matrix, between the input and output sides in QPT. These techniques are widely employed in state estimation [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], process reconstruction [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] and Hamiltonian estimation [29], [30] of various systems.

The procedure of QPT requires well preparation of input states, control over the interaction of qubits and following the projection measurement of output states. A systematical resource analysis [13] is investigated using different kinds of tomography ways, like standard quantum process tomography, ancilla-assisted quantum process tomography, etc. Through these methods, we can rebuild the quantum process of systems for different quantum tasks, for example, quantum communication channels, giving it a complete characterization.

Quantum communication, which harnesses the non-cloning theorem, is regarded as an approach for unconditional communication security. Experimental efforts have been made in free-space [5], fiber [6] and underwater [7] channels. The key rate and the security rely on the error in channels, which can be caused by decoherence and/or man-made eavesdropping, thus we need to have a full knowledge of the channel. However, standard reconstruction of the channel will lead to an unphysical matrix (Fig. 1a) [1], [11], like non-completely-positive and trace-increasing, which means the inversion is not the optimal fitting of the raw tomography result. If the reconstruction does not lie in a correct and physical region, it will result in a misjudgement on the channels. What’s worse, in terms of multipartite communication scheme which requires a participation of many channels, such kind of errors will accumulate exponentially. Even for a standard point-to-point quantum communication channel (Fig. 2b), we find that the unphysical issue is nonnegligible, which forces us to derive an approach to reconstruct the actual channel in a physical fashion.

We resort to some modern-information-processing technologies, like convex optimization [31], one of the kernels in machine learning whose task is to find the parameters in the model that best fits the prior information. The general optimization in machine learning will lead to a local optimum while the convex optimization generates a global optimum. By applying the convex optimization, we will be able to extract the full and correct information from our measurement result. In addition, the combination of convex optimization and quantum information may arouse some interesting applications such as neural-network quantum state tomography [32] and quantum state classifier [33].

In this article, we first reconstruct our seawater channel via standard inversion and find it unphysical. Then we propose the convex-optimization-based QPT by formulating the reconstruction as a least square optimization problem [31]. Solving the optimization problem of a convex function leads to the global yet physical optima, which means we can accurately determine the true action of the seawater channel. Further, we test the advantages of our method on reconstructing the seven fundamental gates. We compare our method to the standard reconstruction [1] and the norm optimization [25], [34] via cost function values and state deviations, convincing that our method is able to estimate the elements of the process matrices more precisely with less demand on preliminary resources. At last, we discuss the constraints on the process and measure them on a set of non-unitary channels, the accuracy of which reaches up to 99.5%, showing that our method can be applied to a general quantum process including unitary and non-unitary ones.

Section snippets

Convex-optimization quantum process tomography

The purpose of QPT [1], [13] is to determine the unknown process E, which can be expressed in the operator-sum representation, such that, E(ρ)=iEiρEi, where {Ei} are the operator elements of the process operation E. During the procedure of QPT, it needs to prepare the quantum system in a set of quantum states and subject them respectively to the channel we need to characterize. After that, QST is performed to measure the output states and then the operation E is fully characterized by a

Experiments and results

As is shown in Fig. 1b, we reconstruct a seawater channel of 3.3 meters by applying standard inversion QPT [1] which was also used in Ref. [7]. By using a blue-violet coherent light at 405 nm, the needed four input states in single-photon level are prepared with the polarization beam splitter, the half-wave plate and the quarter-wave plate. Before mapping into the channel, we do a state tomography to determine the input state, which will be used in the convex optimization procedure rather than

Conclusion

In summary, we reconstruct the true seawater channel whose action comprises different operations by using convex-optimization QPT. Further, we test our method on these different operations, i.e., the seven fundamental gates. We employ the cost function value and state deviation, to compare our method with the standard inversion and norm optimization. As denoted by these metrics, our method outperforms previous methods in terms of precision and robustness. Previous methods also require more

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0308700, 2017YFA0303700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61734005, 11761141014, and 11690033), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (15QA1402200, 16JC1400405, and 17JC1400403), and the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (16SG09 and 2017-01-07-00-02-E00049). X.-M.J. acknowledges additional support from a Shanghai Talent Program. The authors thank Jian-Wei Pan for helpful

Author contributions

Xian-Min Jin conceived and supervised the project. Xuan-Lun Huang and Xian-Min Jin designed the experiment. Xuan-Lun Huang, Zhi-Qiang Jiao, Zeng-Quan Yan, Zhe-Yong Zhang, Dan-Yang Chen, Xi Zhang and Ling Ji performed the experiment. Xuan-Lun Huang and Xian-Min Jin analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Xuan-Lun Huang is a master student at the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He received his bachelor degree in South China University of Technology. His research interests include quantum tomography, Anderson localization and artificial intelligence.

References (47)

  • M.A. Nielsen et al.

    Quantum computation and quantum information

    (2010)
  • P. Kok et al.

    Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits

    Rev Mod Phys

    (2007)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Experimental two-dimensional quantum walk on a photonic chip

    Sci Adv

    (2018)
  • A. Aspuruguzik et al.

    Photonic quantum simulators

    Nat Phys

    (2012)
  • XM Jin et al.

    Experimental free-space quantum teleportation

    Nat Photonics

    (2010)
  • B Korzh et al.

    Provably secure and practical quantum key distribution over 307 km of optical fibre

    Nat Photonics

    (2015)
  • L. Ji et al.

    Towards quantum communications in free-space seawater

    Opt Express

    (2017)
  • J.S. Lundeen et al.

    Tomography of quantum detectors

    Nat Phys

    (2009)
  • G. Brida et al.

    Ancilla-assisted calibration of a measuring apparatus

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2012)
  • G. Brida et al.

    Quantum characterization of superconducting photon counters

    New J Phys

    (2012)
  • D.F.V. James et al.

    Measurement of qubits

    Phys Rev A

    (2001)
  • M. Paris et al.

    Quantum state estimation

    (2004)
  • M. Mohseni et al.

    Quantum process tomography: resource analysis of different strategies

    Phys Rev A

    (2008)
  • M. Cramer et al.

    Efficient quantum state tomography

    Nat Commun

    (2010)
  • T.L. Scholten et al.

    Behavior of the maximum likelihood in quantum state tomography

    New J Phys

    (2018)
  • H.J. Zhu

    Quantum state estimation with informationally overcomplete measurements

    Phys Rev A

    (2014)
  • E Bolduc et al.

    Projected gradient descent algorithms for quantum state tomography

    Npj Quantum Inf

    (2017)
  • Y.I. Bogdanov et al.

    Statistical estimation of the efficiency of quantum state tomography protocols

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2010)
  • A.I. Lvovsky et al.

    Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography

    Rev Mod Phys

    (2009)
  • J. Yuenzhou et al.

    Quantum state and process tomography of energy transfer systems via ultrafast spectroscopy

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2011)
  • M. Lobino et al.

    Complete characterization of quantum-optical processes

    Science

    (2008)
  • M. Howard et al.

    Quantum process tomography and linblad estimation of a solid-state qubit

    New J Phys

    (2006)
  • J.L. Obrien et al.

    Quantum process tomography of a controlled-not gate

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2004)
  • Cited by (23)

    • TensorFlow solver for quantum PageRank in large-scale networks

      2021, Science Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides, the method of using TensorFlow GPU parallel computing to reduce the time is a powerful approach with strongly growing popularity. It is highly suggested to combine this emerging powerful tool with advanced numerical methods to together contribute to various complicated quantum tasks [47]. Such multidisciplinary research would always be helpful for the research of quantum information sciences.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Xuan-Lun Huang is a master student at the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He received his bachelor degree in South China University of Technology. His research interests include quantum tomography, Anderson localization and artificial intelligence.

    Xian-Min Jin is currently a professor at the School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU). He received his Ph.D. degree at University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) in 2008. After two-year postdoctoral research in Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, he joined the Clarendon Laboratory and University of Oxford as a research associate, and became Marie Curie Fellow in 2012. He started establishing the Laboratory of Integrated Photonics and Quantum Information in SJTU in 2012 and was promoted as a full professor in 2019. His interests cover a broad spectrum ranging from quantum computing, quantum communication and quantum metrology with special focus on the subject of building large-scale quantum systems, via integrated photonics and quantum memory.

    View full text