Disentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100732Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Subjects combine reinforcement learning (RL) and working memory (WM) to learn.

  • Computational modeling shows RL learning rates grew with age during adolescence.

  • When load was beyond WM capacity, weaker RL compensated less in younger adolescents.

  • WM parameters showed subtler and more puberty-related changes.

  • WM reliance, maintenance, and capacity had separable developmental trajectories.

  • Underscores importance of RL processes in developmental changes in learning.

Abstract

Multiple neurocognitive systems contribute simultaneously to learning. For example, dopamine and basal ganglia (BG) systems are thought to support reinforcement learning (RL) by incrementally updating the value of choices, while the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes different computations, such as actively maintaining precise information in working memory (WM). It is commonly thought that WM and PFC show more protracted development than RL and BG systems, yet their contributions are rarely assessed in tandem. Here, we used a simple learning task to test how RL and WM contribute to changes in learning across adolescence. We tested 187 subjects ages 8 to 17 and 53 adults (25-30). Participants learned stimulus-action associations from feedback; the learning load was varied to be within or exceed WM capacity. Participants age 8-12 learned slower than participants age 13-17, and were more sensitive to load. We used computational modeling to estimate subjects’ use of WM and RL processes. Surprisingly, we found more protracted changes in RL than WM during development. RL learning rate increased with age until age 18 and WM parameters showed more subtle, gender- and puberty-dependent changes early in adolescence. These results can inform education and intervention strategies based on the developmental science of learning.

Keywords

Development
Reinforcement learning
Working memory
Computational modeling
Adolescence

Cited by (0)