Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The energy cost and optimal design for synchronization of coupled molecular oscillators

Abstract

A model of coupled molecular biochemical oscillators is proposed to study non-equilibrium thermodynamics of synchronization. Under general considerations, we find that chemical interactions within an ensemble of autonomous oscillators break detailed balance and thus cost energy. This extra energy cost, in addition to the energy dissipated for driving each individual oscillator, is necessary to power the coupling interactions such as oscillator–oscillator exchange reactions, which are responsible for correcting the phase error in each individual noisy oscillator with respect to the collective oscillation of the whole ensemble. By solving the steady-state distribution of the many-oscillator system analytically and numerically, we show that the system reaches its synchronized state through a non-equilibrium phase transition as energy dissipation increases. The critical energy dissipation per period depends on both the frequency and strength of the exchange reaction, which reveals an optimal (efficient) design for achieving maximum synchronization with a fixed energy budget. We apply our general theory to the Kai system in the cyanobacterial circadian clock and predict a relationship between the KaiC ATPase activity and synchronization of the KaiC hexamers. The theoretical framework established here can be extended to study thermodynamics of collective behaviours in other non-equilibrium active systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Non-equilibrium cycle dynamics of Poisson clock(s).
Fig. 2: Phase diagram and optimal design for synchronization.
Fig. 3: The cost of monomer shuffling for synchronization in the Kai system.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data represented in Figs. 2 and 3 are available with the online version of this paper. All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Code availability

Computer codes used in this work are available on request.

References

  1. Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M. & Kurths, J. Synchronization: a Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences Vol. 12 (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

  2. Strogatz, S. H. Sync: the Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order (Hyperion, 2003).

  3. Josephson, B. Coupled superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 216 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winfree, A. T. Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J. Theor. Biol. 16, 15–42 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glass, L. Synchronization and rhythmic processes in physiology. Nature 410, 277–284 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pazó, D. & Montbrió, E. Low-dimensional dynamics of populations of pulse-coupled oscillators. Phys. Rev. X 4, 011009 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Montbrió, E., Pazó, D. & Roxin, A. Macroscopic description for networks of spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021028 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gregor, T., Fujimoto, K., Masaki, N. & Sawai, S. The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328, 1021–1025 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danino, T., Mondragón-Palomino, O., Tsimring, L. & Hasty, J. A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks. Nature 463, 326–330 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuramoto, Y. in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics (ed. Araki, H.) 420–422 (Springer, 1975).

  11. Kuramoto, Y. Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer Series in Synergetics Vol. 19, Springer, 1984).

  12. Acebrón, J. A., Bonilla, L. L., Vicente, C. J. P., Ritort, F. & Spigler, R. The Kuramoto model: a simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinto, P. D., Penna, A. L. & Oliveira, F. A. Critical behavior of noise-induced phase synchronization. Europhys. Lett. 117, 50009 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao, Y., Wang, H., Ouyang, Q. & Tu, Y. The free-energy cost of accurate biochemical oscillations. Nat. Phys. 11, 772–778 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barato, A. C. & Seifert, U. Cost and precision of Brownian clocks. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041053 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barato, A. C. & Seifert, U. Coherence of biochemical oscillations is bounded by driving force and network topology. Phys. Rev. E 95, 062409 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gingrich, T. R. & Horowitz, J. M. Fundamental bounds on first passage time fluctuations for currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170601 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Fei, C., Cao, Y., Ouyang, Q. & Tu, Y. Design principles for enhancing phase sensitivity and suppressing phase fluctuations simultaneously in biochemical oscillatory systems. Nat. Commun. 9, 1434 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, S., Hyeon, C. & Jo, J. Thermodynamic uncertainty relation of interacting oscillators in synchrony. Phys. Rev. E 98, 032119 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lan, G., Sartori, P., Neumann, S., Sourjik, V. & Tu, Y. The energy-speed-accuracy trade-off in sensory adaptation. Nat. Phys. 8, 422–428 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Herpich, T., Thingna, J. & Esposito, M. Collective power: minimal model for thermodynamics of nonequilibrium phase transitions. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031056 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, B., Seifert, U. & Barato, A. C. Phase transition in thermodynamically consistent biochemical oscillators. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 045101 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakajima, M. et al. Reconstitution of circadian oscillation of cyanobacterial KaiC phosphorylation in vitro. Science 308, 414–415 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rust, M. J., Markson, J. S., Lane, W. S., Fisher, D. S. & O’shea, E. K. Ordered phosphorylation governs oscillation of a three-protein circadian clock. Science 318, 809–812 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Zon, J. S., Lubensky, D. K., Altena, P. R. & ten Wolde, P. R. An allosteric model of circadian KaiC phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7420–7425 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Terauchi, K. et al. ATPase activity of KaiC determines the basic timing for circadian clock of cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16377–16381 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, J., Chew, J., Chockanathan, U. & Rust, M. J. Mixtures of opposing phosphorylations within hexamers precisely time feedback in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3937–E3945 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abe, J. et al. Atomic-scale origins of slowness in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Science 349, 312–316 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang, Y.-G. et al. A protein fold switch joins the circadian oscillator to clock output in cyanobacteria. Science 349, 324–328 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kageyama, H. et al. Cyanobacterial circadian pacemaker: Kai protein complex dynamics in the KaiC phosphorylation cycle in vitro. Mol. Cell 23, 161–171 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Emberly, E. & Wingreen, N. S. Hourglass model for a protein-based circadian oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 038303 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito, H. et al. Autonomous synchronization of the circadian KaiC phosphorylation rhythm. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1084–1088 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mori, T. et al. Elucidating the ticking of an in vitro circadian clockwork. PLoS Biol. 5, e93 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yoda, M., Eguchi, K., Terada, T. P. & Sasai, M. Monomer-shuffling and allosteric transition in KaiC circadian oscillation. PloS ONE 2, e408 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Eguchi, K., Yoda, M., Terada, T. P. & Sasai, M. Mechanism of robust circadian oscillation of KaiC phosphorylation in vitro. Biophys. J. 95, 1773–1784 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mori, T. et al. Circadian clock protein KaiC forms ATP-dependent hexameric rings and binds DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 17203–17208 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Akiyama, S. Structural and dynamic aspects of protein clocks: how can they be so slow and stable? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69, 2147–2160 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Prager, T., Naundorf, B. & Schimansky-Geier, L. Coupled three-state oscillators. Physica A 325, 176–185 (2003).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Wood, K., Van den Broeck, C., Kawai, R. & Lindenberg, K. Continuous and discontinuous phase transitions and partial synchronization in stochastic three-state oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 76, 041132 (2007).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Assis, V. R., Copelli, M. & Dickman, R. An infinite-period phase transition versus nucleation in a stochastic model of collective oscillations. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2011, P09023 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I. & Shochet, O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Toner, J. & Tu, Y. Flocks, herds, and schools: a quantitative theory of flocking. Phys. Rev. E 58, 4828 (1998).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Toner, J. & Tu, Y. Long-range order in a two-dimensional dynamical xy model: how birds fly together. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4326 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Theis for stimulating discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work is partially supported by NSFC (11434001,11774011). The work by Y.T. is partially supported by an NIH grant (R01-GM081747).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.Z. did the simulations and analysed the data; Y.C. did the simulations and analysed the data; Q.O. analysed the data; Y.T. initiated the project, developed the model, found the analytical solution and analysed the data; all wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhai Tu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Physics thanks Andre Cardoso Barato and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Cao, Y., Ouyang, Q. et al. The energy cost and optimal design for synchronization of coupled molecular oscillators. Nat. Phys. 16, 95–100 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0701-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing