Elsevier

Surface Science

Volume 693, March 2020, 121528
Surface Science

One-dimensional island size distribution: From non-equilibrium to equilibrium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2019.121528Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A critical view of the analysis of experimental one-dimensional island size distribution.

  • Time-dependent evolution of one-dimensional island size distribution.

  • The change in one-dimensional island size distribution during cooling or annealing.

Abstract

We present a critical view of the analysis of experimental one-dimensional island size distribution as a function of time. We study the processes of island growth using large-scale kinetic Monte Carlo simulations with diffusion barriers calculated within the framework of the density functional theory. We have shown that one-dimensional island size distribution depends significantly on the time of the experiment. Our model predicts that during annealing or cooling, the transition from one state of thermodynamical equilibrium to another occurs through a non-equilibrium state. This transition consists of Ostwald ripening and decay of one-dimensional islands. The results of our work demonstrate that considering experimental one-dimensional island size distribution as an equilibrium is a big misconception.

Introduction

One-dimensional nanostructures may be used to create a new generation of microelectronic devices because their properties usually differ considerably from those of the corresponding two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructures. Properties of one-dimensional nanostructures that are attractive for nanotechnology include quantized conductance [1], [2], [3], electronic ‘end’ states [4], charge/spin density waves [5], potential non-Fermi liquid behavior [6], [7], and giant Rashba split bands [8]. From the point of view of microelectronic devices, it would be desirable that one-dimensional nanostructures were of similar length and well-ordered. The self-assembly of well-ordered one-dimensional structures of various lengths is observed in some epitaxial systems [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Knowledge of the mechanisms which define sizes of one-dimensional nanostructures is necessary to develop techniques of their controlled growth. Therefore, the problem of characterization of island-size distribution in epitaxial growth has become one of the central problems in one-dimensional physics.

Gambardella et al. [14] were among the first who compared experimental data with analytical expression for the size distribution of monoatomic chains in the framework of a one-dimensional lattice gas model at thermodynamic equilibrium. This expression can be written as [16]ql=q2n1(1qn1)l1,where q — number of chains, n1 — number of occupied sites, l — length of a chain. However, satisfactory agreement between experiment and theory was found only for long chains (see Fig. 1 (a)). It was suggested that the disagreement between theory and experiment in the short-chain limit may be due to the presence of the epitaxial strain that was not accounted for in one-dimensional lattice gas model. Later it was shown that if additional interactions that the model does not account for introduce a sufficiently large positive curvature of the chain energy, the size distribution in thermodynamic equilibrium can be fitted to the experimental data with high accuracy [17]. Another work claims [18] that presence of defects may change the island size distribution from monomodal to monotonically decreasing in the case of the irreversible model.

Despite continuing efforts, most of theoretical descriptions describe only growth of one-dimensional islands which occurs during the deposition process [13], [14], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Of course, to create a realistic theoretical model, it is necessary to take into account all interactions and the presence of defects, as well as the phenomena of decay and coarsening. All these factors make the growth process extremely intricate, therefore theoretical description is a very important and nontrivial problem even in the one-dimensional case. In addition, it is incredible that none of the works took into account one important detail of the experiment. On the one hand, the distribution of lengths of one-dimensional structures is obtained by analyzing STM images at low temperatures. On the other hand, theoretical models use high temperature, at which one-dimensional structures were formed. Nobody before us paid attention to this simple and seemingly obvious fact.

Here we perform large-scale kinetic Monte Carlo simulations to determine equilibrium distribution of one-dimensional island sizes. We simulate the growth of one-dimensional islands and their further evolution. We focus on Ag chains on Pt(997) because of the availability of experimental data [14] that can be used for comparison. Strikingly, the average length of one-dimensional islands varies significantly with time. Our findings shed light on the understanding of the difference between non-equilibrium and equilibrium distribution of one-dimensional island sizes, and propose a new approach for analyzing experimental data.

Section snippets

Computational method

To simulate the growth of Ag on Pt(997), we apply the two-dimensional kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model using diffusion barriers for many atomic events calculated by the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) code [22], [23]. The details of our VASP calculations are similar to those reported in Refs. [24], [25]. The kMC model describes the elementary stochastic processes (deposition and atomic diffusion) in terms of reaction rates to avoid unnecessary calculations of potentially unsuccessful

Results

First, we analyze the experimental distributions of atomic chain lengths. For this we postulated the following statements: (i) a large number of experiments have been done to plot the distribution; (ii) if the conditions of each experiment are the same, then the average number of chain growth centers is constant, and as a result the average chain length is constant; (iii) the step edges have a very small number of defects, and the terrace widths have a Gaussian distribution with an average of 8

Conclusion

The simulation of one-dimensional growth allows controversies that exist in the field to be resolved. For instance, it has shown that in most cases the experimental distribution is not equilibrium. This is explained by the fact that the length distribution is obtained at a low temperature and the time of the experiment is short. The time of transition from one state of thermodynamical equilibrium to another depends on the lifetime of one-dimensional islands. The lifetime, in its turn, depends

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. I. D. Milyutin for helpful discussions. The research was carried out using the equipment of the shared research facilities of HPC computing resources at Lomonosov Moscow State University. The work was supported by the program 0082-2014-008, #AAAA-A17-117040310008-5 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”.

References (29)

  • N.S. Kabanov et al.

    Atomic structure of self-organizing iridium induced nanowires on ge(001)

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2017)
  • G. Kresse et al.

    Ab initiomolecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1993)
  • A.G. Syromyatnikov et al.

    Distributions of atomic wire lengths

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2018)
  • H. Ohnishi et al.

    Quantized conductance through individual rows of suspended gold atoms

    Nature

    (1998)
  • R. Requist et al.

    Metallic, magnetic and molecular nanocontacts

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2016)
  • A.L. Klavsyuk et al.

    Formation and properties of metallic atomic contacts

    Phys. Usp.

    (2015)
  • J.N. Crain et al.

    End states in one-dimensional atom chains

    Science

    (2005)
  • S.C. Erwin et al.

    Intrinsic magnetism at silicon surfaces

    Nat. Commun.

    (2010)
  • P.C. Snijders et al.

    Colloquium: electronic instabilities in self-assembled atom wires

    Rev. Mod. Phys.

    (2010)
  • C. Blumenstein et al.

    Atomically controlled quantum chains hosting a tomonaga–luttinger liquid

    Nat Phys

    (2011)
  • J. Park et al.

    Self-assembled nanowires with giant rashba split bands

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • H. Röder et al.

    Building one- and two-dimensional nanostructures by diffusion-controlled aggregation at surfaces

    Nature

    (1993)
  • A.A. Stekolnikov et al.

    Atomic nanowires on the pt/ge(001) surface: buried pt-ge versus top pt-pt chains

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2008)
  • T.F. Mocking et al.

    Electronically stabilized nanowire growth

    Nat. Commun.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text