Abstract
Recent meta-analyses provide clear insights into how service firms can benefit from relationship marketing, whereas investigations of customers’ relational benefits (1) are unclear about the absolute and relative strengths by which different relational benefit dimensions induce different customer responses and (2) have not simultaneously examined the various mediating processes (including perceived value, relationship quality, and switching costs) through which relational benefits reportedly affect customer loyalty. To consolidate extant research on the benefits of relationship marketing for customers, this meta-analysis integrates 1242 effect sizes drawn from 235 independent samples across 224 papers disseminated in the past two decades. The results reveal that all three relational benefits affect loyalty, though confidence benefits and social benefits have the strongest effects. Among the three identified mediation paths through which relational benefits influence customer loyalty, the sequential path through perceived value and relationship quality is the strongest. From a service research perspective, this study provides novel empirical generalizations; managerially, the findings suggest that a primary goal for service managers should be strengthening confidence and social benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Over time, additional relational benefits have emerged, including identity-related benefits (Fournier 1998), respect benefits (Chang and Chen 2007), hedonic benefits (Meyer-Waarden et al. 2013), and quality improvement benefits (Sweeney and Webb 2002). However, these additional benefits have not appeared frequently in empirical studies, so we limit our focus to confidence, social, and special treatment benefits.
The terms “confidence” and “trust” are often used interchangeably. However, confidence explicitly refers to “perceived certainty about satisfactory partner cooperation” (Das and Teng 1998, p. 492) and the belief that the partner will behave in a desired manner (Scheer 2012), so it involves expectations about the partner’s predictable behavior but does not address the underlying reasons. In contrast, “Trust is the belief that one’s partner [a service provider] can be relied upon to fulfill its future obligations and to behave in a manner that will serve the firm’s [customer’s] needs and long-term interests” (Scheer and Stern 1992, p. 134), because the partner is motivated by more than its own immediate, direct self-interest, a motive that should persist in the future. Thus, trust and confidence are not equivalent; confidence may exist, despite a lack of trust. But trust and confidence also can be related, in that trust can generate general confidence in a business partner (Scheer 2012, p. 338).
In several places herein, we refer to this sequential mediation path (relational benefits → perceived value → relationship quality → customer loyalty). Generally, if either perceived value or relationship quality is present, customers perceive them in a positive light, so these factors keep customers in relationships because they want to (cf. switching costs, often viewed in a negative light, such that they keep customers in the relationship because they have to) interact. We use “PV/RQ path” to refer to this sequential mediation path in the remainder of the text.
Over time, firms providing encounter services may learn about the positive effects of relational benefits and move toward a shared industry norm of providing such benefits, tilting the transactional–relational balance more toward a relationship-based setting. Take Starbucks as an example: Buying a cup of coffee once was clearly an encounter service, but Starbucks added relationship elements to its service (e.g., remembering the names and favorite drinks of regular customers). Over time, coffee shops largely adopted these relationship elements, moving the entire industry toward a stronger relationship focus. Still, in the short run and in line with the accessibility–diagnosticity perspective, we predict that confidence, social, and special treatment benefits have stronger relationships with customer outcomes for encounter services than for relationship services.
We are grateful to one of the reviewers for the suggestion to include these additional keywords.
We are grateful to the Associate Editor and a reviewer for their suggestion to include a dummy variable to represent changes in the relationship marketing environment. To define a reasonable time lag between the year of data collection and the year of publication, we calculated the differences between the date a paper was received and the date it was published in the May 2019 volume of Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (average: 1.7 years), then added an extra year to account for the manuscript writing process. Therefore, we anticipate an average time lag of about three years, such that a paper published in 2009 likely reflects data collected in 2006. Our results remain stable if we use two- or four-year time lags instead.
We also coded the means and standard deviations of the three relational benefits reported in the 235 samples and recalibrated them to 0–100 scales. The average levels are 67 (SD = 16) for confidence benefits, 51 (SD = 19) for social benefits, and 49 (SD = 18) for special treatment benefits. The t-tests reveal that these average levels do not differ significantly between B2B and B2C contexts (all p > .10). The average level of confidence benefits also does not differ between encounter and relationship services (p > .10), whereas that of social benefits is significantly higher in relationship services (56) than in encounter services (48; t(77) = 2.404, p < .05). The average level of special treatment benefits is marginally significantly higher in relationship services (55) than in encounter services (47; t(77) = 1.929, p < .06). Web Appendix H provides further detail.
Although not hypothesized, the results reveal that the indirect effect from relational benefits to customer loyalty through perceived value and relationship quality (confidence: .14, p < .001; social: .11, p < .001; special treatment: .02, p < .001) is stronger than the indirect effect from relational benefits to customer loyalty through switching costs (confidence: .02, p < .001; social: .01, p < .001; special treatment: .01, p < .001). Imposing equality constraints on these indirect paths significantly worsens model fit (Δχ2(3) = 2590.71, p < .001).
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 167–299). New York: Academic.
Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., & Torasso, P. (2003). Intrigue: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and hand held devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(8–9), 687–714.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1995). Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 272–277.
Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193–205.
Blut, M., Frennea, C. M., Mittal, V., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015). How procedural, financial, and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(2), 226–229.
Bove, L. L., & Johnson, L. W. (2006). Customer loyalty to one service worker: Should it be discouraged? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 79–91.
Brown, S. P., & Lam, S. K. (2008). A meta-analysis of relationships linking employee satisfaction to customer responses. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 243–255.
Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–127.
Chang, Y.-H., & Chen, F.-Y. (2007). Relational benefits, switching barriers, and loyalty: A study of airline customers in Taiwan. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(2), 104–109.
Chen, P.-T., & Hu, H.-H. (2010). The effect of relational benefits on perceived value in relation to customer loyalty: An empirical study in the Australian coffee outlets industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 405–412.
Chou, S., & Chen, C. W. (2018). The influences of relational benefits on repurchase intention in service contexts: The roles of gratitude, trust and commitment. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(5), 680–692.
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68–81.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G. J., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33–50.
Dilsizian, S. E., & Siegel, E. L. (2014). Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: Harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment. Current Cardiology Reports, 16(1), 441.
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.
Field, A. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 161–180.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–373.
Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70–87.
Geiger, I., Durand, A., Saab, S., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Baxter, R., & Lee, Y. (2012). The bonding effects of relationship value and switching costs in industrial buyer-seller relationships: An investigation into role differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 82–93.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223–248.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519–543.
Gilly, M. C., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1985). The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353–357.
Gil-Saura, I., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., & Arteaga-Moreno, F. (2011). Value, supplier dependence, and long-term orientation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(5), 791–808.
Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2015). Relational benefits research: A synthesis. In R. M. Morgan, J. T. Parish, & G. Deitz (Eds.), Handbook on research in relationship marketing (pp. 32–74). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gummesson, E. (1987). The new marketing – Developing long-term interactive relationships. Long Range Planning, 20(4), 10–20.
Gutek, B. A., Bhappu, A. D., Liao-Troth, M. A., & Cherry, B. (1999). Distinguishing between service relationships and encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 218–233.
Gwinner, K. P., Gremler, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: The customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101–114.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4, 230–247.
Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462.
Hogreve, J., & Gremler, D. D. (2009). Twenty years of service guarantee research: A synthesis. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 322–343.
Hong, Y., Liao, H., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2013). Missing link in the service profit chain: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 237–267.
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
Hult, G. T. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (2012). A tribute to forty years of top-level marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 1–7.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: Measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 441–450.
Kumar, V., & Reinartz, W. (2016). Creating enduring customer value. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 36–68.
Kumar, V., & Reinartz, W. (2018). Customer relationship management: Concept, strategy, and tools (Third ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293–311.
Leinbach-Reyhle, N. (2016). Customer loyalty in today’s modern retail world. Forbes, April 20, 2016, Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicoleleinbachreyhle/2016/04/20/customer-loyalty-in-todays-modern-retail-world/. Accessed 27 June 2019.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.
Martin-Ruiz, D., Gremler, D. D., Washburn, J. H., & Carrión, G. C. (2008). Service value revisited: Specifying a higher-order, formative measure. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1278–1291.
McAuley, L., Pham, B., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analysis? The Lancet, 356, 1228–1231.
Meldrum, J. T., & Kaczynski, A. T. (2007). Confidence, social, and special treatment benefits as predictors of relationship strength in recreation settings. Leisure/Loisir, 31(1), 325–345.
Meyer-Waarden, L., Benavent, C., & Castéran, H. (2013). The effects of purchase orientations on perceived loyalty programmes’ benefits and loyalty. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 41(3), 201–225.
Moliner, M. A. (2009). Loyalty, perceived value and relationship quality in healthcare services. Journal of Service Management, 20(1), 76–97.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. B. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.
Palmatier, R. W., Burke Jarvis, C., Bechkoff, J. R., & Kardes, F. R. (2009). The role of customer gratitude in relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 1–18.
Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.
Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). Customer loyalty to whom? Managing the benefits and risks of salesperson-owned loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 185–199.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181.
Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035–1041.
Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2014). Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: A meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(2), 186–204.
Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2016). Customer responses to switching costs: A meta-analytic investigation of the moderating role of culture. Journal of International Marketing, 24(4), 39–60.
Price, L. L., & Arnould, E. J. (1999). Commercial friendships: Service provider-client relationships in context. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 38–56.
Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19–30.
Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., Gil-Saura, I., & Moliner-Velazquez, B. (2015). Relational benefits, value, and satisfaction in the relationships between service companies. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 14(1), 1–15.
Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A. (2007). The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, 7(4), 427–451.
Scheer, L. K. (2012). Trust, distrust, and confidence in B2B relationships. In G. L. Lilien & R. Grewal (Eds.), Handbook on business-to-business marketing (pp. 332–347). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Scheer, L. K., Miao, C. F., & Garrett, J. (2010). The effects of supplier capabilities on industrial customers’ loyalty: The role of dependence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(1), 90–104.
Scheer, L. K., Miao, C. F., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015). Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships: Meta-analytic insights. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(6), 694–712.
Scheer, L. K., & Stern, L. W. (1992). The effect of influence type and performance outcomes on attitude toward the influencer. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 128–142.
Steinhoff, L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2016). Understanding loyalty program effectiveness: Managing target and bystander effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 88–107.
Sweeney, J. C., & Webb, D. (2002). Relationship benefits: An exploration of buyer-supplier dyads. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1(2), 77–92.
Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006). Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 311–327.
Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Hazée, S., & Costers, A. (2018). Customer participation in service recovery: A meta-analysis. Marketing Letters, 29(4), 465–483.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Verma, V., Sharma, D., & Sheth, J. (2016). Does relationship marketing matter in online retailing? A meta-analytic approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 206–217.
Villanueva, J., Yoo, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2008). The impact of marketing-induced versus word-of-mouth customer acquisition on customer equity growth. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 48–59.
Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015). Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(6), 790–825.
Wetzel, H. A., Hammerschmidt, M., & Zablah, A. R. (2014). Gratitude versus entitlement: A dual process model of the profitability implications of customer prioritization. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 1–19.
Zablah, A. R., Franke, G. R., Brown, T. J., & Bartholomew, D. E. (2012). How and when does customer orientation influence frontline employee job outcomes? A meta-analytic evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 76, 21–40.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.
Zinkhan, G. M. (2005). Scientific status and knowledge use: Two perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 251–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mark Houston and John Hulland served as special issue editors for this article.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 121 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gremler, D.D., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Brüggen, E.C. et al. Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 565–583 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00701-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00701-6