Chemometrics-assisted calibration transfer strategy for determination of three agrochemicals in environmental samples: Solving signal variation and maintaining second-order advantage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103869Get rights and content

Highlights

  • PDS/SWANRF is firstly proposed for transferring EEM signals measured on two instruments.

  • SWANRF method is employed to resolve the highly overlapping fluorescence signals and achieve second-order advantage.

  • PDS is carried out to compensate the signal instability and variation recorded on different instruments.

  • Results from the PDS/SWANRF strategy are well consistent with those from the complete recalibration.

Abstract

This manuscript proposes a chemometrics-assisted calibration transfer strategy to determine three agrochemicals (indole-3-acetic acid, 1-naphthylacetic acid and thiabendazole) in environmental samples by excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence detection. The fluorescence landscapes of target compounds are heavily overlapped with each other and also with the extracts of real samples, making it impractical to be quantified by conventional spectroscopy methods. The second-order calibration methods based on “mathematical separation” are carried out to handle these headaches as its potential capacity to get successful resolution and quantification even in the presence of overlapped peaks and unknown interferences, known as the famous “second-order advantage”. Piecewise direct standardization (PDS) method, one calibration transfer strategy, is applied for updating chemometric multivariate calibration model to compensate for the signal instability and variation in responses recorded on different instruments, which avoids overhead of a full recalibration usually involves considerable effort, cost, and time. Both root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP) and average recoveries calculated from simulated and experimental data are analyzed to validate the feasibility and applicability of this strategy. Result reveals that the number of calibration standard used was reduced from 10 to 3 for later determinations while producing comparable analytical results in terms of RMSEPs and recovery values to those obtained by a full recalibration strategy. The developed strategy takes advantage of less experimental effort and cost, which can be an alternative one for fast screening of agrochemicals and long-term process analysis in environmental samples or related food matrices.

Introduction

Agrochemicals are profusely used in agriculture to increase production and improve the quality of plants and crops. It is necessary to monitor and quantify the levels of their residues in environmental samples as they can accumulate in the environment and show potentially detrimental effects on mammals and plants [1]. Thiabendazole (TBZ), a systemic benzimidazole fungicide, which is commonly used as a fungicide to prevent fruits such as pears, citrus and bananas from mould, rot, blight and stain, thus keeping their freshness before waxing step during storage [2]. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 1-Naphthylacetic acid (NAA) are two of the representatives of auxins widely used as plant growth regulators in agriculture, primarily in many kinds of fruit and vegetables [3,4]. Commonly, two or even more types of agrochemicals are used simultaneously in combination to obtain synergistic effects, requiring effective and sensitive methods for determining their residue levels in fruits and environmental samples including soils and sewage waters.

Methods developed to determine these agrochemical residues are mainly based on chromatographic and luminescent techniques [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. However, chromatographic techniques usually involve large amounts of organic solvents consumption and long analysis time, making it uneconomic and less competitive to some extent. By contrast, luminescent techniques, such as fluorescence spectroscopy, are generally regarded as a green strategy for its simple, cheap, non-destructive and sensitive. Nevertheless, one of the main difficulties in the use of luminescent techniques in quantitative analysis is the resolution of overlapping signals, especially for multi-component mixtures, which require prior separation processes to reach the goal. Meanwhile, some efforts have been made to increase selectivity and achieve successful resolution by using synchronous fluorescence spectrometry (SFS) for qualitative and quantitative analysis [10,11].

Luckily, the combination of suitable chemometric tools along with excitation-emission matrix fluorescence may handle these troubles with good resolution and high selectivity. So far, chemometric multivariate calibration coupled with high order analytical instruments have been successfully applied in many fields, either for quantitative or qualitative purposes [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. In multivariate calibration, the potential interferences in the complex samples can be modeled by chemometric algorithms and pure signals of target analytes can be extracted out accurately. Therefore, quantification can be achieved successfully even in the presence of unknown components, known as the famous “second-order advantage”.

An ideal state in chemometric analysis is that the multivariate models should be made to last a long time and “second-order advantage” can be maintained because much time and effort is necessary to develop them, e.g. a sufficient number of samples should be prepared and analyzed by reference methods [19]. It is particularly useful especially for long-term process analysis and quality control in environment and food analysis. Nevertheless, the signals of instrument may be changed when original instrument is replaced by a new one, or the analytical signals may be changed by using the same instrument but changing over time due to variations in spectrographic components (e.g., aging of xenon lamp) or in experimental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, operator) among others. The most direct way is to recalibrate for the new measurement conditions or to expand the original model for the new situation, which are rather costly and in conflict with principle of the green analytical chemistry.

Calibration transfer strategy may provide good compromise in the costly and analytical accuracy. It applies chemometric tools to find a mathematical transformation that makes the response of samples measured on the secondary conditions corrected to that obtained on the primary conditions so that the response signals collected from two different conditions/instruments resemble each other. One of the most widely used calibration transfer strategies is piecewise direct standardization (PDS) [20], which requires the selection of a subset of calibration samples from the primary situation and measure them on the secondary situation. So far, this strategy has been widely used in combination with NIR [21,22], electrochemical [23,24], Raman [25,26], UV–Vis [27,28] and fluorescence data [[29], [30], [31]]. At the same time, there are also several recent works dealing with the joint use of chemometric multivariate calibration and calibration transfer strategy. Gu et al. [32] firstly applied PDS strategy with ATLD algorithm to compensate for the signal instability of LC-MS data acquired from one instrument with different days. Recently, Montemurro et al. [31] presented a similar strategy that combined PDS with second-order PARAFAC algorithm to overcome the matrix effect and reduce analysis time for the determination of pirimiphos-methyl in maize grains.

Hence, the aim of this work was to develop a chemometric second-order calibration strategy named self-weighted alternating normalized residue fitting (SWANRF) for simultaneous determination of IAA, NAA and TBZ in complex environmental samples by using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence. Moreover, piecewise direct standardization (PDS) method was applied to compensate for the variations in the instrument responses on two process EEM fluorescence spectrophotometers of the same manufacturer. They are produced to be alike, but due to differences in the optical fibers used and inherent, small differences in the filters e.g. due to aging/bleaching, there is a clear distinction between the spectra the two spectrometers record [29]. The applicability of the proposed strategy was first verified using one set of simulated EEM fluorescence data that contains three components of interest and one uncalibrated interference, and one set of real EEM fluorescence data produced by three agrochemicals in soil and sewage samples. Both analytical figures of merit and statistical parameters including average recoveries and root-mean-square error of prediction were calculated to investigate the quantitative results obtained from the proposed strategy and that from the complete recalibration. To the best of knowledge, it is the first time that PDS and SWANRF are combined together for transferring and resolving EEM fluorescence signals measured on two instruments. A schematization of the global chemometric analysis flow is shown in Fig. 1.

Section snippets

Trilinear component model

For the type of EEM fluorescence data, a two-way matrix with the size of I excitation wavelength points and J emission wavelength points can be acquired for each analytical sample. Given K samples containing calibration and prediction samples, a three-way data array X (I × J × K) could be obtained by stacking them along the sample dimension. According to the theory of trilinear component model, the three-way array X can be expressed as:xijk=n=1Nainbjnckn+eijk;fori=1,,I;j=1,,J;k=1,,Khere xijk

Simulated EEM fluorescence data

A set of EEM fluorescence data containing 23 samples with four components was simulated to evaluate the performance of the developed strategy. Both excitation and emission profiles were generated by the Gaussian equation. The first 15 samples were used as a calibration set containing only three components of interest. The remaining 8 samples, served as a prediction set, contained three components of interest and an uncalibrated interference component. The simulated fluorescence peaks of four

Simulated EEM fluorescence data

Herein, the calibration transfer has been carried out from situation A to B, which simulates a calibration transfer of signal responses from different instruments. The objective of the standardization strategy is to get satisfactory analytical results with the significant reduction of experimental efforts, cost, and time for a full recalibration. To investigate the feasibility of the proposed strategy, two kinds of simulated EEM fluorescence data sets were created and divided into four possible

Conclusion

This work presented a chemometrics-assisted calibration transfer strategy to determine three agrochemicals in environmental samples by excitation-emission matrix fluorescence detection. With the aid of prominent “second-order advantage” provided by the SWANRF method, successful resolution together with satisfactory quantification results can be achieved, regardless of highly overlapped fluorescence signals of analytes and unknown interferences. Moreover, a standardization approach named PDS was

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 21575039 and no. 21775039) and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of NSFC (Grant no. 21521063) for financial supports.

References (37)

Cited by (13)

  • Piecewise direct standardization assisted with second-order calibration methods to solve signal instability in high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection systems

    2022, Journal of Chromatography A
    Citation Excerpt :

    In PDS, transfer parameters are calculated piecewise in a multivariate way by regressing the signal at each variable in the primary condition with signals of neighboring variables in a moving window on the other conditions, which can solve the problem of time shifts and signal intensity variances by using the moving window and the mathematical transfer formula [15]. According to relevant literatures, multivariate calibration transfer methods are often combined with different instruments such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), electrochemical, UV-visible spectrophotometry, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [17,22–30]. Zhang et al. proposed a parameter-free framework for calibration enhancement of NIR based on correlation constraint method, which solve the problem of NIR spectroscopy inconsistency in different environments and improve the predictive ability of the calibration model [22].

  • Quantitative analysis of carbaryl and thiabendazole in complex matrices using excitation-emission fluorescence matrices with second-order calibration methods

    2022, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Meanwhile, other methods generally require complex pretreatments of the actual sample, which may result in the quality loss of target substances. By reading the relevant literatures, it is really that the excitation-emission fluorescence matrices combined with the second-order calibration method has not yet been used to simultaneously determine the concentrations of CAR and TBZ in fruit and environment samples [14,20–23]. This method can cleverly take advantage of the “second-order advantage” of the second-order calibration method to solve the aforementioned problems [24–26].

  • Deltamethrin determination in natural water samples via photochemically-induced fluorescence coupled to third-order multivariate calibration

    2020, Microchemical Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    For this reason, the coupling of this spectroscopic technique with modern chemometric tools, such as multivariate calibration, offers a powerful alternative for the determination of various chemicals. This approach has been used to satisfactorily determine pesticides [16,17], agrochemicals [18], and pharmaceuticals [19] in different biological and environmental matrices. In accordance with the modelled data type, different calibration strategies can be proposed, where the second-order/three-way calibration allows the analyte information (e.g., analyte concentration) to be obtained from an unselective instrumental signal (e.g., analyte signal overlapped with the responses of unexpected interferences), a property known as a second-order advantage [20].

  • Recent applications of multiway calibration methods in environmental analytical chemistry: A review

    2020, Microchemical Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Lozano et al. carried out the simultaneous determination of isoproturon, linuron, monuron and rimsulfuron in underground, tap water, and soil samples by using EEMs combined with U-PLS/RBL [135]. Sun et al. developed a second-order calibration method assisted EEMs strategy for simultaneous quantification of thiabendazole, indole-3-acetic acid and 1-naphthylacetic acid in complex soil and sewage samples [136]. In this work, the second-order calibration method effectively addressed the headaches of overlapping peaks and unknown interference and achieved successful resolution and acceptable quantitative results.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text