Skip to main content
Log in

The Decarburization Kinetics of Metal Droplets in Emulsion Zone

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract:

A mathematical model has been developed to predict the decarburization rate within individual droplets in the emulsion zone. All the chronological events pertaining to the life cycle of a metal droplet in the emulsion zone like oxygen supply (from slag), external and internal decarburization have been modeled dynamically and validated against experimental data available in open literature. The bloating behavior of metal droplets in the emulsion was represented theoretically by incorporating an escape function dependent on internal CO gas generation. The model is able to predict the onset of bloating and the residence time of metal droplets in the emulsion zone. The residence time of droplet containing 2.6 wt pct C and 0.007 wt pct S is in the range of 10 to 13 seconds. The contribution of decarburization rate in the emulsion zone to the overall decarburization rate is studied using the industrial data reported by Cicutti et al. The model predicts 5 to 75 pct of total decarburization takes place in the emulsion zone. It is found that the extent of decarburization of a metal droplet depends on its initial carbon content rather than its oxygen content for slag containing FeO greater than 10 wt pct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( A_{\text{d}} \) :

Surface area of a metal droplet, \( \left( {{\text{m}}^{2} } \right) \)

\( a_{\text{FeO}} \) :

Raoultian activity of FeO in slag \( \left( - \right) \)

\( e_{j}^{i} \) :

First order interaction parameter, of solute \( j \) on \( i \)

\( f_{\text{C}} ,\,f_{\text{O}} , \,f_{\text{S}} \) :

Henrian activity coefficients of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur, respectively

\( h_{\text{C}} ,\,\,h_{\text{O}} , \,h_{\text{S}} \) :

Henrian activities of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur, respectively

\( J_{\text{C}} , \,J_{\text{FeO}} , \,J_{\text{O}} \) :

Flux of carbon, oxygen, and FeO towards metal droplet–slag surface, \( \left(\frac{{\text{moles}}}{{\text{s}}}\right) \)

\( J_{\text{ext}} , \,J_{\text{int}} \) :

External and internal CO generation rates respectively, \(\left(\frac{{\text{moles}}}{{\text{s}}}\right) \)

\( J_{\text{esc}} \) :

Net escaped moles of CO gas at a given time step, \( \left( {\text{moles}} \right) \)

\( J_s \) :

Nucleation rate, \( \left( \frac{\text{nuclei}}{{{\text{m}}^{3} \cdot {\text{s}}}} \right) \)

\( K_{\text{CO}} , K_{\text{FeO}} \) :

Equilibrium constants for CO formation and FeO dissociation reaction

\( K_{\text{O}} , \,K_{\text{S}} \) :

Adsorption coefficients of the oxygen and sulfur \( \left( - \right) \)

\( k_{\text{s}} , k_{\text{m}} \) :

Slag and metal phase mass transfer coefficient, \( \left( \frac{{\text{m}}}{{\text{s}}}\right) \)

\( \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {k} , \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftharpoonup}$}} {k} \) :

Forward and backward reaction constants of FeO dissociation reaction \( \left( - \right) \)

\( m_{\text{d}} \) :

Mass of metal droplet, \( \left( {\text{kg}} \right) \)

\( N_{\text{CO}} \) :

Net retained moles of CO gas within a metal droplet, \( \left( {\text{moles}} \right) \)

\( P_{\text{CO}}^{\text{ext}} , \Delta P_{\text{CO}}^{\text{int}} \) :

Supersaturation pressure for external (droplet surface) and internal CO gas generation (atm)

\( t_{\text{inst}} , \,t_{\text{res}} , \,\Delta t \) :

Instantaneous time, residence time, time step, respectively \( \left( {\text{seconds}} \right) \)

\( \Delta t_{\text{e}} \) :

Time interval during which the emulsion zone decarburization is being evaluated

\( V_{o} \) :

Initial volume of metal droplet, \( \left( {{\text{m}}^{ 3} } \right) \)

\( \theta_{\text{S}} \) :

Fraction of surface area poisoned by sulfur \( \left( - \right) \)

\( \rho_{t} , \rho_{\text{d}} \) :

Apparent and initial density of metal droplet \( \left( \frac{\text{kg}}{{{\text{m}}^{3} }} \right) \)

\( \rho_{\text{g}} , \rho_{\text{s}} ,\rho_{{{\text{s}} - {\text{g}}}} \) :

Densities of gas, slag, and emulsion, respectively \( \left( \frac{\text{kg}}{{{\text{m}}^{3} }} \right) \)

\( \sigma , \sigma_{\text{metal}} \) :

Surface tension of metal, \(\left({\frac{{\text{N}}}{{\text{m}}}}\right) \)

\( \phi_{\text{g}} \) :

Volume fraction of CO gas in the emulsion

\( \psi \) :

Correction factor to the surface tension of the metal \( \left( - \right) \)

r :

Slag–metal interface

s − g :

Emulsion

References

  1. H.W. Meyer, W.F. Porter, G. Smith, and J. Szekely: J. Met., 1968, vol. 20, pp. 35–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Schoop, W. Resch, and G. Mahn: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1978, vol. 2, pp. 72–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.C. Urquhart and W.G. Davenport: Can. Metall. Q., 1973, vol. 12, pp. 507–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Kozakevitch: J. Miner. Met. Metarials Soc., 1969, vol. 22, pp. 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.J. Price: in Process Engineering of Pyrometallurgy Symposium, The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1974, pp. 8–15.

  6. C. Cicutti, M. Valdez, T. Pérez, R. Donayo, and J. Petroni: Lat. Am. Appl. Res., 2002, vol. 32, pp. 237–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E.W. Mulholland, G.S. Hazeldean, and M. Davies: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1973, vol. 211, pp. 632–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Gare and G.S.. Hazeldean: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1981, vol. 4, pp. 169–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Gaye and Riboud.P.V: Metall. Trans. B, 1977, vol. 8, pp. 409–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Min and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Trans. B, 1992, vol. 23, pp. 29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. C.L. Molloseau and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2002, vol. 33, pp. 335–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Chen: Ph.D Thesis, McMaster University, 2011.

  13. E. Chen and K.S. Coley: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2010, vol. 37, pp. 541–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M.D. Pomeroy: MASc Thesis, McMaster University, 2011.

  15. K. Gu, N. Dogan, and K.S. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Gu, N. Dogan, and K.S. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 2343–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K.S. Coley, E. Chen, and M. Pomeroy: in Proceedings of the Extraction and Processing Division Symposium on Pyrometallurgy in Honor of David G.C. Robertson, P.J. Mackey, E.J. Grimsey, R.T. Jones, and G.A. Brooks, eds., 2014, pp. 289–302.

  18. H. Sun and G. Zhang: in 3rd International Congress on Science ans Technology of Steelmaking, 2005, pp. 257–68.

  19. N. Dogan, G.A. Brooks, and M.A. Rhamdhani: ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51, pp. 1093–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Dogan: Ph.D Thesis, Swinburne University, 2011.

  21. R. Sarkar, P. Gupta, S. Basu, and N.B. Ballal: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 46, pp. 961–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Rout, G. Brooks, M.A. Rhamdhani, Z. Li, F.N. Schrama, and J. Sun: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, vol. 49, pp. 537–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. B.K. Rout, G. Brooks, M. Akbar Rhamdhani, Z. Li, F.N.H. Schrama, and A. Overbosch: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, 49, 1022–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Brooks, Y. Pan, and K.S. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2005, 36, 525–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subagyo, G. A. Brooks, K.S. Coley, and G. A. Irons: ISIJ Int., 2003, 43, 983–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. G.R. Belton: Met. Trans. B, 1976, 7, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Kawai and Y. Shiraishi: Handbook of Physico-Chemical Properties at High Temperatures. Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Tokyo 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Hino and K. Ito, eds.: Thermodynamic Data for Steelmaking, Tohoku University Press, Sendai, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G.K. Sigworth and J.F. Elliot: Met. Sci., 1974, vol. 3, pp. 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Shibata, H. Sun, and K. Mori: Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1999, 30, 279–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. L.A. Baker, N.A. Warner, and A.E. Jenkins: Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1967, vol. 239, pp. 857–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. P.A.A. Distin, G.D.D. Hallett, and F. D. Richardson: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1968, 1, 821–33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. El Kaddah and D.G.. Robertson: J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1977, vol. 60, pp. 349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Mor, H. Sun, K. Ga, V. Sahajwalla, and R.D. Pehlke: ISIJ Int., 1999, vol. 39, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Gao, V. Sahajwalla, H. Sun, C. Wheatley, and R. Dry: ISIJ Int., 2000, vol. 40, pp. 301–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. H.S. Levine: Metall. Trans. B, 1973, vol. 4, pp. 777–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P.G. Bowers, K. Bar-eli, and R.M. Noyes: J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1996, vol. 92, pp. 2843–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. S.D. Lubetkin: Langmuir, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 2575–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. A.W. Cramb, and I. Jimbo: Steel Res., 1989, 60, 157–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. W. Cramb, W.R. Graham, and G.R. Belton: Metall. Trans. B. 9, 623–629 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. K. Ogino, S. Hara, T. Miwa, and S. Kimoto: Trans. ISIJ, 1984, vol. 24, pp. 522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Hongbin, M. Suzuk, D.R. Poirier, H. Yin, M. Suzuki, and T. Emi: ISIJ Int., 1998, vol. 38, pp. 229–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Sahoo, T. Debroy, and M.J. McNallan: Metall. Trans. B, 1988, vol. 19, pp. 483–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Y. Chung and A.W. Cramb: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2000, vol. 31, pp. 957–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. F.A. Halden and W.D. Kingery: J. Phys. Chem., 1955, vol. 59, pp. 557–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. K.S. Coley and T.X. Zhu: Private Communication, Hamilton, Ontario, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Subagyo A., and G.A. Brooks: ISIJ Int., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 1182–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. C. Cicutti, M. Valdez, T. Perez, J. Petroni, A. Gomez, R. Donayo, and L. Ferro: in 6th International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts, Stockholm- Helsinki, 2000, p. 367.

  49. N. Dogan, G.A. Brooks, and M.A. Rhamdhani: ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51, pp. 1086–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. P. Wei, M. Sano, M. Hirasawa, and K. Mori: ISIJ Int., 1993, vol. 33, pp. 479–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. M. Barati and K.S. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2006, vol. 37, pp. 41–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. M.S. Millman, A. Kapilashrami, M. Bramming, and D. Malmberg: Imphos : Improving Phosphorus Refining. European Union, Luxemborg, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  53. B. Deo and R. Boom: Fundamentals of Steel Making Metallurgy. Pretince Hall International, Upper Saddle River (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  54. B.K. Rout, G. Brooks, M.A. Rhamdhani, and Z. Li: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, 47, 3350–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. K. Koch, J. Falkus, and R. Bruckhaus: Steel Res. Int., 1993, vol. 64, pp. 15–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Kenneth Coley, Dr. Kezhuan Gu, and Mr. Tai Xi Zhu for fruitful discussions related to bloated droplet theory. This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Project Number 20007117 and the McMaster Steel Research Centre (SRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameya Kadrolkar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted March 26, 2019.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Calculation of Interfacial Activities of Metal Droplet Components

The activity coefficients for carbon and oxygen can be calculated by taking into account the interaction parameters of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur.

$$ \log f_{\text{C}}^{r} = e_{\text{C}}^{\text{C}} \left[ {{\text{wt pct}} {\text{C}}} \right]^{r} + e_{\text{C}}^{\text{O}} \left[ {\text{wt pct O}} \right]^{r} + e_{\text{C}}^{\text{S}} \left[ {\text{wt pct S}} \right]^{r} $$
(A1)
$$ \log f_{\text{O}}^{r} = e_{\text{O}}^{\text{C}} \left[ {\text{wt pct C}} \right]^{r} + e_{\text{O}}^{\text{O}} \left[ {\text{wt pct O}} \right]^{r} + e_{\text{O}}^{\text{S}} \left[ {\text{wt pct S}} \right]^{r} $$
(A2)

The Henrian activities of carbon and oxygen are defined by,

$$ h_{\text{C}}^{r} = f_{\text{C}}^{r} \left[ {\text{wt pct C}} \right]^{r} $$
(A3)
$$ h_{\text{O}}^{r} = f_{\text{O}}^{r} \left[ {\text{wt pct O}} \right]^{r} $$
(A4)

Evaluation of Mole Fraction and Activity of (FeO)

The mole fraction of FeO at the droplet–slag interface is defined by the following equation

$$ X_{\text{FeO}}^{r} = \frac{{\left( {\text{wt pct FeO}} \right)^{r} }}{{M_{\text{FeO}} \left( {\frac{{{\text{wt pct FeO}}^{r} }}{{M_{\text{FeO}} }} + \frac{{{\text{wt pct SiO}}_{2}^{r} }}{{M_{{{\text{SiO}}_{ 2} }} }} + \frac{{{\text{wt pct}}\,{\text{MnO}}^{r} }}{{M_{\text{MnO}} }}} \right)}} $$
(A5)

The Raoultian activity of FeO at the interface can be defined by,

$$ a_{\text{FeO}}^{r} = \gamma_{\text{FeO}} X_{\text{FeO}}^{r} $$
(A6)

Balance of Supply and Consumption of Oxygen at the Interface

The equilibrium constant for decarburization reaction is defined as

$$ K_{\text{CO}} = \frac{{P_{\text{CO}}^{\text{ext}} }}{{h_{\text{C}}^{r} h_{\text{O}}^{r} }} $$
(A7)

The value of \( P_{\text{CO}}^{\text{ext}} \) is taken to be equal to 1.5 atm (equal to the pressure of the furnace).

$$ K_{\text{FeO}} = \frac{{a_{\text{FeO}}^{r} }}{{h_{\text{O}}^{r} }} $$
(A8)

The Eqs. [A7] and [A8] can be rearranged in terms of \( h_{\text{O}}^{r} \) and combined to arrive at the following equation

$$ \frac{{K_{\text{FeO}} }}{{a_{\text{FeO}}^{r} }} = \frac{{K_{\text{C}} h_{\text{C}}^{r} }}{{P_{\text{CO}} }} .$$
(A9)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kadrolkar, A., Dogan, N. The Decarburization Kinetics of Metal Droplets in Emulsion Zone. Metall Mater Trans B 50, 2912–2929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01710-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01710-0

Navigation