Advances in toughened polymer materials by structured rubber particles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101160Get rights and content

Abstract

Many polymer materials are brittle and hence susceptible to fracture, especially in the presence of notches, scratches, or internal defects. This limits the application of polymer-based materials across a wide range of technological fields. The toughening of polymer materials by developing a two-phase structure with the use of soft rubber as the dispersed phase has gained considerable attention because of their commercial importance. Over the past several decades, homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening and related toughening mechanisms have been extensively investigated. Currently, rubber toughening is being developed considering the design and control of rubber structures for improving the toughness, and realizing the rigidity-toughness balance with minimal loss of heat resistance of polymer materials. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art research progress of polymer materials toughened by structured rubbers. To provide a general understanding on rubber toughening, we first briefly introduce the classification of polymer materials that require toughening, common strategies for improving the interfacial adhesion between rubber particles and polymer matrices, and homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening of polymer materials. Further, four categories of structured rubber toughening are discussed in detail, which includes heterogeneous rubber microparticle toughening, oriented anisotropic rubber microparticle toughening, rubber nanoparticle toughening and bimodal size distributed rubber particle toughening. Furthermore, the relationship between the structure of rubbers and the properties of modified polymer materials, such as toughness, modulus and heat resistance, is discussed. The influence of the interface or interphase on these properties is highlighted. Finally, future research endeavors and possible directions for further progress in this field are outlined.

Graphical abstract

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art research progress of polymer materials toughened by structured rubbers. Various structured rubber toughening are introduced in detail. The relationship between the structure of rubbers and the properties of modified polymer materials, such as toughness, modulus and heat resistance, is discussed. The influence of the interface or interphase on these properties is highlighted. The future research endeavors and possible directions for further progress in this field are outlined.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (124KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The toughening of polymer materials has been extensively studied over the past several decades because of its commercial importance [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. Some techniques have been and are currently being developed for improving the impact toughness of polymer materials to meet the demand of their practical applications. The most widely studied technique involves the development of a two-phase structure with the use of soft rubber as the dispersed phase [7,8]. The impact toughness of rubber-toughened polymer materials is mainly determined by the rubber phase and the interfacial adhesion between rubber and the polymer matrix. Initially, homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening was investigated for various polymer materials. In this process, the rubber toughening mechanism was gradually established. Overall, under loading, rubber microparticles concentrate stress and cavitate, which facilitates the crazing or shear yielding of polymer matrices around the rubber particles [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Currently, the toughening of polymer materials is being studied considering the design and control of rubber structures for improving the toughness or realizing the rigidity-toughness balance with minimal loss of the thermal property of polymer materials.

In this study, to provide a general understanding on rubber toughening, we first briefly introduce the classification of polymer materials that require toughening (Section 2), common strategies to improve the interfacial adhesion between rubber and polymer matrices (Section 3), and homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening (Section 4). Further, we present the latest development in structured rubber toughening in detail. According to their internal structure, spatial arrangement, and size, structured rubbers are divided into four groups: heterogeneous rubber microparticles (Section 5), oriented anisotropic rubber microparticles (Section 6), rubber nanoparticles (Section 7), and bimodal size distributed rubber particles (Section 8; refer Fig. 1). Heterogeneous rubber microparticles are further subdivided into one-matrix-core, multiple-matrix-core, one-filler-core, and multiple-filler-core rubbers; wherein the filler core is additional polymer component different from the matrix material. Oriented anisotropic rubber microparticles are subdivided into oriented rod-shaped and oriented flaky rubbers. Rubber nanoparticles are subdivided into spherical and fibrillar rubber nanoparticles. In each section, we discuss the relationship between structures of these rubbers and properties of modified polymer materials, including toughness, modulus, and heat resistance, with some typical examples. We also highlight the influence of interface or interphase on these properties. Finally, we outline future perspectives and possible novel research directions (Section 9).

Section snippets

Classification of polymer materials to be toughened

Various polymer materials have different chain entanglement density, chain stiffness, molecular weight, cross-linking density, crystalline degree, and crystalline form. These diversities lead to their different microscopic deformation modes (localized crazing, localized shear yielding and extensive shear yielding) and macroscopic mechanical behaviors (brittle fracture and ductile fracture) under impact loading [14,15]. Overall, brittle fracture is characterized by a linear load-deflection curve

Common strategies for improving interface adhesion

In order to toughen polymers successfully, good adhesion between polymer and rubber is essential because the deformation response of polymer matrix to rubber is realized through stress transfer at their interface. In this section, we will brief introduce the common strategies for improving the interfacial adhesion in rubber/polymer blends. Overall, the strategies to improve the interface adhesion are divided into adding compatibilizers [22], using reactive rubbers [[23], [24], [25]], and

Toughening by homogeneous rubber microparticles

Over the past several decades, homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening has been widely investigated for various polymer materials. Many reports focus on investigating the effect of rubber content and size on toughening. In this section, we will briefly introduce homogeneous rubber microparticle toughening, which involves rubber content, size, and the related toughening mechanisms. Generally, an increase in the rubber content would increase the toughness of polymer materials, which is

Toughening by heterogeneous rubber microparticles

Heterogeneous rubber microparticles are composite rubber particles with polymer inclusions. According to the property and number of inclusions, they are divided into four types: one-matrix-core, multiple-matrix-core, one-filler-core, and multiple-filler-core rubbers. The filler core is an additional polymer component different from the matrix material. If interfacial adhesion is good enough, the presence of one or multiple cores refines the size of the formed voids through fibrillation of the

Toughening by oriented rod-shaped rubbers

An oriented rod-shaped rubber is produced from spherical rubber/thermoplastic polymer blends by dynamic packing injection molding (Fig. 12a) [154,155]. Initially, the spherical rubber/thermoplastic polymer blend is melted and injected into a hot mold. Further, two pistons move reversibly with the same frequency, and they force the blend melt to move repeatedly in the mold cavity. The generated oscillatory shear stress promotes spherical rubber microparticles to elongate and orientate along the

Toughening by rubber nanoparticles

It is known that resistance to cavitation in rubber particles increases with the decrease in diameter. At the same time, the decrease in rubber diameter, especially down to nanoscale, dramatically increases their specific surface area (Fig. 14a). A large specific surface area would increase the stress transfer efficiency between the polymer matrix and rubber, and generate non-ignorable volume of interphase. In some cases, the interphase, which has different physical properties from the bulk of

Toughening by bimodal size distributed rubber particles

Bimodal size distributed rubber particles are the mixture of a type of large rubber particle and another type of small rubber particle. They toughen some glassy thermoplastic polymers synergistically, which are superior to the counterparts with large or small rubber alone. For example, Alfarraj et al. [282] blended 0.5ā€ÆĪ¼m homogeneous PB rubber-toughened PS with 1.5ā€ÆĪ¼m salami PB rubber-toughened PS. Its impact toughness was higher than the linear average of two unimodal rubber-toughened PS.

Conclusions and outlook

Developing a two-phase structure with soft rubber as the dispersed phase significantly improves the impact toughness of various polymers, such as glassy thermoplastic polymers, pseudo-ductile thermoplastic polymers, and thermosetting polymers. Essentially, the soft rubber particles concentrate stress and cavitate to generate voids in their interior, which facilitate multiple crazing of glass thermoplastic polymers and promote shear yielding of pseudo-ductile thermoplastic polymers and

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from the High-level Innovative Talent Project in Hunan Province (2018RS3055), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51973054, 51403008), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References (287)

  • L. Lalande et al.

    The influence of matrix modification on fracture mechanisms in rubber toughened polymethylmethacrylate

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • W. Hale et al.

    Compatibilization of PBT/ABS blends by methyl methacrylate-glycidyl methacrylate-ethyl acrylate terpolymers

    Polymer

    (1999)
  • C. Koning et al.

    Strategies for compatibilization of polymer blends

    Prog Polym Sci

    (1998)
  • C.W. Macosko et al.

    Reactions at polymer-polymer interfaces for blend compatibilization

    Prog Polym Sci

    (2005)
  • M. Mathew et al.

    Compatibilisation of heterogeneous acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber/polystyrene blends by the addition of styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer: effect on morphology and mechanical properties

    Polymer

    (2003)
  • Y.J. Li et al.

    Improvement in toughness of poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) through reactive blending with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer (ABS): morphology and properties

    Eur Polym J

    (2009)
  • W.R. Hale et al.

    Effect of compatibilization and ABS type on properties of PBT/ABS blends

    Polymer

    (1999)
  • J.J. Huang et al.

    Elastomer particle morphology in ternary blends of maleated and non-maleated ethylene-based elastomers with polyamides: role of elastomer phase miscibility

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • I. Aravind et al.

    Compatibilizing effect of EPM-g-MA in EPDM/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) incompatible blends

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • J.J. Huang et al.

    Rubber toughening of an amorphous polyamide by functionalized SEBS copolymers: morphology and Izod impact behavior

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • S. Al-Malaika et al.

    Reactive processing of polymers: effect of in situ compatibilisation on characteristics of blends of polyethylene terephthalate and ethylene-propylene rubber

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • A.R. Bhattacharyya et al.

    Reactively compatibilised polyamide6/ethylene-co-vinyl acetate blends: mechanical properties and morphology

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • Y.C. Ahn et al.

    Rubber toughening of nylon 6 nanocomposites

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • H.I. Oyama

    Super-tough poly(lactic acid) materials: reactive blending with ethylene copolymer

    Polymer

    (2009)
  • G. Guerrica-Echevarria et al.

    Influence of compatibilization on the mechanical behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene-octene) blends

    Eur Polym J

    (2007)
  • R.J.M. Borggreve et al.

    Impact behaviour of nylon-rubber blends: 4. Effect of the coupling agent, maleic anhydride

    Polymer

    (1989)
  • A. Arostegui et al.

    Toughened poly(butylene terephthalate) by blending with a metallocenic poly(ethylene-octene) copolymer

    Polymer

    (2001)
  • W. Loyens et al.

    Ultimate mechanical properties of rubber toughened semicrystalline PET at room temperature

    Polymer

    (2002)
  • S. Al-Malaika et al.

    Reactive processing of polymers: functionalisation of ethylene-propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) in the presence and absence of a co-agent and effect of functionalised EPDM on compatibilisation of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/EPDM blends

    Polym Degrad Stab

    (2005)
  • M. Imanaka et al.

    Crack-growth behavior of epoxy adhesives modified with liquid rubber and cross-linked rubber particles under mode I loading

    Int J Adhes Adhes

    (2009)
  • R. Thomas et al.

    Cure kinetics, morphology and miscibility of modified DGEBA-based epoxy resin - Effects of a liquid rubber inclusion

    Polymer

    (2007)
  • R. Thomas et al.

    Miscibility, morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties of a DGEBA based epoxy resin toughened with a liquid rubber

    Polymer

    (2008)
  • H. Yahyaie et al.

    Toughening mechanisms of rubber modified thin film epoxy resins

    Prog Org Coat

    (2013)
  • N. Chikhi et al.

    Modification of epoxy resin using reactive liquid (ATBN) rubber

    Eur Polym J

    (2002)
  • J. Chen et al.

    The mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of an epoxy polymer modified with polysiloxane-based core-shell particles

    Polymer

    (2013)
  • S.L. Sun et al.

    Toughening of poly(butylene terephthalate) with epoxy-functionalized acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • G.F. Wu et al.

    The influence of core-shell structured modifiers on the toughness of poly (vinyl chloride)

    Eur Polym J

    (2004)
  • A. Hassan et al.

    Impact properties of acrylate rubber-modified PVC: influence of temperature

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2006)
  • S.G. Turley et al.

    Effect of rubber-phase volume fraction in impact polystyrene on mechanical behaviour

    Polymer

    (1980)
  • A. van der Wal et al.

    Polypropyleneā€“rubber blends: 2. The effect of the rubber content on the deformation and impact behaviour

    Polymer

    (1999)
  • D. Quan et al.

    Effect of core-shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer

    Polymer

    (2015)
  • D. Dompas et al.

    Toughening behavior of rubber-modified thermoplastic polymer involving very small rubber particles: 1. A criterion for internal rubber cavitation

    Polymer

    (1994)
  • S. Wu

    Phase structure and adhesion in polymer blends: a criterion for rubber toughening

    Polymer

    (1985)
  • O.K. Muratoglu et al.

    Toughening mechanism of rubber-modified polyamides

    Polymer

    (1995)
  • R.J.M. Borggreve et al.

    Brittle-tough transition in nylon-rubber blends: effect of rubber concentration and particle size

    Polymer

    (1987)
  • R.J.M. Borggreve et al.

    Impact behaviour of nylon-rubber blends: 5. Influence of the mechanical properties of the elastomer

    Polymer

    (1989)
  • W. Jiang et al.

    Effect of Ī³-irradiation on brittle-tough transition of PBT/EPDM blends

    Polymer

    (1997)
  • M.C.M. van der Sanden et al.

    Deformation and toughness of polymeric systems: 7. Influence of dispersed rubbery phase

    Polymer

    (1994)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Comparison of fracture behavior of nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide toughened with maleated poly(ethylene-1-octene) elastomers

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • J.J. Huang et al.

    Comparison of the toughening behavior of nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide using various maleated elastomers

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • Cited by (115)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text