1
The role of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) determination for identification and surgical strategy of sporadic multiglandular disease in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.101310Get rights and content

Intraoperative PTH monitoring (IOPTH) made minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in patients with primary HPT possible. However, with the increasing accuracy of preoperative localization studies there is a growing discussion if IOPTH is necessary in patients with localized single gland disease (concordant preoperative localization studies). Different interpretation criteria have been developed – each with their particular advantages and disadvantages, but the “perfect” criterion is still missing.

Despite several pitfalls, which can be recognized intraoperatively and do not necessarily lead to a more extensive surgery, IOPTH seems to be a useful adjunct in surgery for PHPT. However, according to current guidelines, selected patients may be operated without IOPTH but need to be informed about the possibly increased risk of recurrent disease.

Introduction

Before the introduction of intraoperative PTH (IOPTH) monitoring, bilateral neck exploration with visualization of at least four parathyroid glands was the standard surgical procedure. It was therefore possible to directly detect all macroscopically enlarged parathyroid glands and thus to remove them. In 1991, Irvine et al. described the technique of IOPTH determination using a PTH assay with a reduced turnover time [1]. The IOPTH- values were available to the surgeon intraoperatively and, due to the short half-life of PTH, the curve of the PTH decay was analyzed almost in “real-time”. This made the intraoperative prediction of cure possible or, otherwise, the recognition of multiple gland disease which was the prerequisite for minimally invasive techniques. In the last 20 years, the IOPTH- assays have been enhanced, new interpretation models developed and endoscopic techniques (like video assisted, transoral endoscopic and/or robotic surgery) established. However, the technique and the underlying concept has not been changed much but the accuracy of preoperative localization studies using modern techniques like PET-CT have been improved enormously. Consequently, there is an emerging discussion about the value of IOPTH monitoring. This article aims to clarify if, according to the latest literature, IOPTH- monitoring is still of value for patients with PHPT to detect multiple gland disease intraoperatively.

Section snippets

Technical aspects of IOPTH- determination

Blood samples are regularly drawn after induction of anesthesia, right after excision of the enlarged gland, 5 min and 10 min later. Different assays are reported to be comparable and have a turnover time of 15–45 min [2]. A promising new assay based on a handheld system with results within 10 min has, unfortunately, never been commercially available [3]. Besides the assay turnover time, the lab is not next to the OR in most institutions and additional transportation time has to be taken into

Criteria for interpretation

The intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) determination is highly valuable in surgery of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) as it rules out the presence of a multiple-gland disease. The macroscopic presentation of all parathyroid glands is generally waived in minimally invasive surgical procedures and unilateral explorations for which IOPTH is particularly important. Although, IOPTH enables to reflect the current biochemical picture intraoperatively, it is unable to make long-term

Guidelines

The ideal situation in surgery is, when the surgeon is able to remove an image-identified abnormal gland without an additional dissection. In image-guided surgery, positive preoperative localization study directs where to start exploration and the results of IOPTH monitoring, which relies on real-time assessment of gland function, help to determine the success. However, such focused operations preceded by solely imaging studies without IOPTH determination might miss multiglandular disease in up

Renal insufficiency

PTH is degenerated in the liver to fragment of different sizes c- and n-terminal which are subsequently excreted renally. In patients with renal insufficiency, particular c-terminal fragments cannot be excreted, accumulate and cross-react with the commercially available IOPTH- assays. Thus, the PTH- decay is prolonged and the results have to be interpreted with caution [42]. Nevertheless, IOPTH seems to be a useful adjunct even in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal impairment [43],

Conclusions

Preoperative 99mTc-Sestamibi-scintigraphy and ultrasound are the widely used standard localization studies and correctly identify the enlarged gland concordantly in 66% [54]. Multiple gland disease, however, can often not be correctly identified. Methionine- or 18F-Cholin-PET/CT are promising new modalities but cannot be performed in all patients by standard. Nevertheless, due to modern ultrasound-technique and SPECT-CT, the widely used localization studies are of increasing accuracy.

References (58)

  • G.L. Irvin et al.

    Operative monitoring of parathyroid gland hyperfunction

    Am J Surg

    (1991)
  • C. Bieglmayer et al.

    Kinetic analyses of parathyroid hormone clearance as measured by three rapid immunoassays during parathyroidectomy

    Clin Chem

    (2002)
  • V. Jarrige et al.

    A fast intraoperative PTH point-of-care assay on the Philips handheld magnotech system

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2011)
  • K. Lorenz et al.

    Intraoperative parathyroid hormone determination for primary hyperparathyroidism

    Chirurg

    (2010 Jul)
  • D.M. Carneiro et al.

    Comparison of intraoperative iPTH assay (QPTH) criteria in guiding parathyroidectomy: which criterion is the most accurate?

    Surgery

    (2003)
  • R. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel et al.

    Novel criteria for parathyroid hormone levels in parathyroid hormone-guided parathyroid surgery

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2007)
  • B.J. Harrison et al.

    Intraoperative adjuncts in surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2009)
  • G.L. Irvin et al.

    Quick intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay: surgical adjunct to allow limited parathyroidectomy, improve success rate, and predict outcome

    World J Surg

    (2004)
  • G.L. Irvin et al.

    Improved success rate in reoperative parathyroidectomy with intraoperative PTH assay

    Ann Surg

    (1999)
  • W.S. Duke et al.

    Baseline intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone levels in parathyroid surgery

    Head Neck

    (2019)
  • P. Riss et al.

    A “defined baseline” in PTH monitoring increases surgical success in patients with multiple gland disease

    Surgery

    (2007)
  • P. Riss et al.

    PTH spikes during parathyroid exploration--a possible pitfall during PTH monitoring?

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2007)
  • A. Agha et al.

    Effectiveness of parathyroid-hormone measurement in detecting patients with multiple gland disease causing primary hyperparathyroidism

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2007)
  • G.C. Karakousis et al.

    Interpretation of intra-operative PTH changes in patients with multi-glandular primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT)

    Surgery

    (2007)
  • P.K. Pellitteri

    The role of intraoperative measurement of parathyroid hormone in parathyroid surgery

    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec

    (2008)
  • A.B. Carter et al.

    Intraoperative testing for parathyroid hormone: a comprehensive review of the use of the assay and the relevant literature

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2003)
  • F. Ito et al.

    The utility of intraoperative bilateral internal jugular venous sampling with rapid parathyroid hormone testing

    Ann Surg

    (2007)
  • L.S. Lee et al.

    Intraoperative jugular venous sampling AIDS detection of an undescended parathyroid adenoma

    World J Surg

    (2006)
  • C.P. Lombardi et al.

    Intraoperative PTH monitoring during parathyroidectomy: the need for stricter criteria to detect multiglandular disease

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2008)
  • K. Lorenz et al.

    Diversification of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy and minimally invasive open videoscopically magnified parathyroidectomy with local anesthesia

    World J Surg

    (2002)
  • R. Mihai et al.

    Surgical strategy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism an evidence-based approach to surgical strategy, patient selection, surgical access, and reoperations

    Langenbeck's Arch Surg

    (2009)
  • A. Alhefdhi et al.

    Intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels at 5 min can identify multigland disease

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2017)
  • P. Riss et al.

    Applicability of a shortened interpretation model for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in an endemic goiter region

    Eur Surg

    (2018)
  • P. Riss et al.

    Evaluating a shortened interpretation criterion for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: 5-minutes criterion in primary hyperparathyroidism and intraoperative algorithm

    Head Neck

    (2018)
  • D.C. Cron et al.

    Predictors of operative failure in parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism

    Am J Surg

    (2017)
  • L. Rolighed et al.

    Primary hyperparathyroidism: intraoperative PTH-measurements

    Scand J Surg – SJS – Offic Organ Fin Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc

    (2004)
  • S.M. Wilhelm et al.

    The American association of endocrine surgeons guidelines for definitive management of primary hyperparathyroidism

    JAMA Surg

    (2016)
  • R. Udelsman et al.

    The superiority of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy based on 1650 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

    Ann Surg

    (2011)
  • M.L. Richards et al.

    An optimal algorithm for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring

    Arch Surg

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text