Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment-Invited
  • Published:

Comment on “Dilemmas of penile prosthesis implantation in healthy homosexual males in heterosexual relationships”

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 32, page 363 (2020)Cite this article

Placement of a penile prosthesis in healthy homosexual men in heterosexual relationships is an interesting dilemma [1]. It would definitely be classified as situational erectile dysfunction (ED), a form of psychologic impotence. In my practice I had two patients with definite psychologic ED referred for penile implant placement by a very good psychologist (sex therapist) when all known medical and relationship therapies had failed. Both men had good erections with masturbation but failed with a female partner. The implant was successful surgically and cemented the relationship with the partner in both cases. I would consider the current dilemma an analogous situation: the patient can achieve a good erection in one circumstance but not in another. Performance with a female spouse is essential to procreation and maintaining the marriage, and I would not hesitate to place a penile implant in this situation.

There are other issues to consider. The main one is informed consent. All the ramifications of placing an implant should be explained to the patient: infection and other complications, device malfunction, expected implant longevity, future loss of spontaneous natural erections, and possible effects on sensation and ejaculation. I would naturally want to include the patient’s male partners and female spouse(s) in the discussion. However, the male partners may be transient relationships, and I’m unaware of Sharia Law and customs and how they apply in the case of the wife. In most Western cultures, if the wife were involved in the discussion, the marriage would likely not last long. In my opinion such a penile implant placement would be considered a necessary procedure to cure a medical problem. The patient cannot perform when he is expected to perform in the marriage. As such it should be covered by the health system financially. Although there may be some religious objections to placing a penile implant in homosexual patients, my feeling is that I can restore a man’s erection with an implant; what he does with his erections is his concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Yaiesh S, Al-Shaiji T. Dilemmas of penile prosthesis implantation in healthy homosexual males in heterosexual relationships. Int J Impot Res. 2018;31:305–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of Alabama, 314 Cliftworth Place, Madison, AL, 35758, USA

    John J. Mulcahy

  2. Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    John J. Mulcahy

Authors
  1. John J. Mulcahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Mulcahy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mulcahy, J.J. Comment on “Dilemmas of penile prosthesis implantation in healthy homosexual males in heterosexual relationships”. Int J Impot Res 32, 363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0182-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0182-3

Search

Advanced search

Quick links