Human exposure to antimicrobial resistance from poultry production: Assessing hygiene and waste-disposal practices in Bangladesh

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.007Get rights and content

Abstract

The unregulated use of antibiotics is linked with intensive poultry farming in developing economies. In low-and middle-income countries, the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has also been attributed to contamination, poor public health infrastructure and inadequate waste disposal practices. There are limited data on hygiene and waste disposal practices in small-scale commercial and household poultry farming and market sales in Bangladesh. Our objective was to explore human exposures, hygiene and waste disposal practices in poultry raising and processing to identify probable pathways for transmission of AMR bacteria.

We employed mixed methods approaches of in-depth interviews and structured observations to assess exposures, hygiene behaviours and waste-disposal practices relating to poultry production in Bangladesh. Interviews (n = 18) were conducted with commercial poultry farmers, backyard poultry owners, and live poultry market workers. Structured observations were conducted for 6-h in five households, five commercial farms and five urban live bird markets to assess the frequency of transmission/exposure events in these settings.

Interviews highlighted existing practices that can contribute to transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria from poultry to humans. In households and farms, untreated poultry waste and carcasses were disposed of on agricultural fields and in water bodies which may contaminate surface water and soil with poultry faeces. Biosecurity precautions were not used, and hands were rarely washed with soap after handling poultry. In urban markets, live poultry slaughter and processing was done on site with bare hands which were subsequently rinsed in water stored in containers without soap. Solid waste from poultry processing was disposed into municipal waste disposal stations and liquid waste was discarded into open drains.

Structured observations revealed that workers in live poultry markets had the highest direct contact with poultry and poultry waste, almost tenfold higher than those working in poultry farms or with domestic poultry (59 vs 544 observed direct poultry exposure events) placing them at particularly high risk of exposure to faecal bacteria. Biosecurity measures were limited; in some cases, workers in commercial farms and urban markets had gloves and masks but often did not use them. In 88% (606/689) of exposure events no handwashing took place. Eating and drinking after handling poultry and without washing hands was observed in all three settings. These data suggest effective intervention strategies to reduce environmental contamination and to decrease risks of transmission should be prioritized. Data on prevalence of risk behaviours and AMR transmission to humans along environmental pathways can inform policy and intervention strategies.

Section snippets

Background

The requirement for animal-sourced protein for human consumption is increasing globally at an unprecedented rate (Van Boeckel et al., 2015). To meet this demand, production techniques for livestock and poultry rearing strives for increasing cost-effectiveness (Silva et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2013). In Bangladesh, the poultry sector accounts for 14% of the total value of livestock output. Poultry meat alone contributes 37% of the total meat production in Bangladesh (World's Poultry Science

Methods

To determine poultry raising practices, poultry handling and waste disposal practices, we selected three groups with differing human-poultry interactions in order to assess the potential routes of AMR bacteria transmission in each setting: 1) rural villages where they use traditional animal husbandry, who usually raise less than 20 poultry (Chowdhury, 2013), 2) small and medium-size commercial poultry farms in peri-urban sites around Dhaka (small farms typically have 500–1000 poultry; medium

Backyard poultry

Respondents were all female, aged 21–40 years and had been rearing poultry for the last 4–30 years. Poultry, especially chickens were predominantly reared for eggs and occasionally for meat. Chickens were not kept in pens or sheds during the day but roamed around the households and courtyards. Participants, when asked whether they handled poultry during day to day care reported that usually direct poultry handling was only required when slaughtering or separating ill birds from the rest of the

Discussion

Rural poultry owners, workers in small to medium scale commercial poultry farms, and workers and waste collectors in urban live bird markets demonstrated behaviours leading to direct exposure to poultry faeces through handling, slaughtering and processing without the use of protective equipment.

Our structured observation revealed that rural households had the lowest frequency of direct exposure to poultry, commercial farmers had intermediate frequency of exposure, and market live poultry

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use structured observations to compare relative frequency of potential AMR bacterial transmission and exposure events between humans and poultry in resource-poor settings. We have not seen any previous study that has related known animal exposures to likelihood of transmission of resistant bacteria from poultry to humans, but this is a first step in identifying the key behaviours and understanding exposures. A further strength of the study is taking

Author's contribution

Mahbub-Ul Alam, MPH, Mahbubur Rahman, MSPH, Abdullah-Al-Masud, MPH, Mohammad Aminul Islam, PhD, Md. Muhammad Asaduzzaman, MPhil, Supta Sarker, MSc, Emily Rousham, PhD, Leanne Unicomb, PhD.

Contributors: ER, MAI, and LU conceived and designed the original protocol. All authors were involved in designing the data collection instrument, and selection of field sites. Data entry, cleaning and analysis was carried out by AAM, SS, and MA. ER, LU, and MAI provided advice on data interpretation and

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council, UK, under the Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative supported by the seven UK research councils (Award number: NE/N019555/1). icddr,b is thankful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden and the UK for providing core/unrestricted support. Authors would like to thank participants and data collectors of the study.

References (51)

  • S.D. Chowdhury

    Family poultry production in Bangladesh: is it meaningful or an aimless journey?

    World's Poult. Sci. J.

    (2013)
  • P.M. Costa et al.

    Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated in wastewater and sludge from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater plants

    J. Environ. Health

    (2008)
  • V. Curtis et al.

    Structured observations of hygiene behaviours in Burkina Faso: validity, variability, and utility

    Bull. World Health Organ.

    (1993)
  • P.N. Dinh et al.

    Risk factors for human infection with avian influenza A H5N1, Vietnam, 2004

    Emerg. Infect. Dis.

    (2006)
  • E.S. Donkor et al.

    Epidemiological aspects of non-human antibiotic usage and resistance: implications for the control of antibiotic resistance in Ghana

    Trop. Med. Int. Health

    (2012)
  • A. Ercumen et al.

    Animal feces contribute to domestic fecal contamination: evidence from E-coli measured in water, hands, food, flies, and soil in Bangladesh

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2017)
  • R.J. Fair et al.

    Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century

    Perspect. Med. Chem.

    (2014)
  • David W. Graham et al.

    Strategic Approach for Prioritising Local and Regional Sanitation Interventions for Reducing Global Antibiotic Resistance

    Water

    (2019)
  • A.K. Halder et al.

    Observed hand cleanliness and other measures of handwashing behavior in rural Bangladesh

    BMC Public Health

    (2010)
  • B. Hasan et al.

    High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli from large- and small-scale poultry farms in Bangladesh

    Avian Dis.

    (2011)
  • M.A. Hudson et al.

    Dynamics and genetics of a disease-driven species decline to near extinction: lessons for conservation

    Sci. Rep.

    (2016)
  • J.C. Joardar et al.

    Poultry feather waste management and effects on plant growth

    Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric.

    (2018)
  • T.F. Landers et al.

    A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential

    Public Health Rep.

    (2012)
  • S.P. Luby et al.

    The effect of handwashing at recommended times with water alone and with soap on child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh: an observational study

    PLoS Med.

    (2011)
  • M. ManunEbo et al.

    Measuring hygiene practices: a comparison of questionnaires with direct observations in rural Zaire

    Trop. Med. Int. Health

    (1997)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Liquid desiccant systems for cooling applications in broilers farms in humid subtropical climates

      2022, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
      Citation Excerpt :

      A basic requirement for healthy and productive poultry is a climate that meets the requirements of the poultry. At the same time, the internal environment is also essential for the people working in the poultry house and to protect the building structure, which is directly affected by temperature and humidity levels [8,9]. Broilers require special microclimatic conditions to overcome the harsh climatic conditions and achieve the required quality standards for poultry [10,11].

    • Backyard poultry flocks in France: A diversity of owners and biosecurity practices

      2021, Preventive Veterinary Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, risky practices were identified in urban flocks: disposing dead birds in municipal waste and washing eggs before consumption. Disposing dead animals in household waste is forbidden in France (Loi n° 96-1139 du 26 décembre 1996 relative à la collecte et à l’élimination des cadavres d’animaux et des déchets d’abattoirs et modifiant le code rural, 1996Loi, 1996Loi n° 96-1139 du 26 décembre 1996 relative à la collecte et à l’élimination des cadavres d’animaux et des déchets d’abattoirs et modifiant le code rural, 1996) and can lead to epidemic outbreaks and/or human exposure to antimicrobial resistance (Alam et al., 2019; Pollock et al., 2012; Walz et al., 2018). Washing eggs after collection increases the risk of foodborne outbreaks, especially Salmonella infections (Hutchison et al., 2003).

    • On-site hygiene and biosecurity assessment: A new tool to assess live bird stalls in wet markets

      2021, Food Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although majority wore aprons and boots, slightly less than half of the workers wore face masks and most do not use gloves when handling live animals. One of the main reasons documented by Alam et al. (2019) was that the high temperature and humidity in wet markets discourage workers from wearing protective equipment. Toilet facilities were lacking in half of the wet market stalls and the remaining stalls with access to such facilities were found to be inadequate (dirty, no running water, no soap or hand drying facilities).

    • Dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) via integrons in Escherichia coli: A risk to human health

      2020, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, swine meat covered 30% of meat consumption, worldwide (Soare and Chiurciu, 2017). Such an expansion in the industry has resulted to contaminate the environment through feces and farm waste materials, which leads to the mounting risk of infections to the general public (Headey and Hirvonen, 2016; Alam et al., 2019). Due to be influenced by several bacteria within the Enterobacteriaceae, several studies have indicated meat as a reservoir of ARGs and a potential source of the environmental contamination (Hasan et al., 2016; Dandachi et al., 2019; Poudel et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Contributed equally to the first author.

    View full text