Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Overvaluing individual consent ignores risks to tribal participants

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 20, pages 497–498 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Genomic studies often rely on individual-based consent approaches for tribal members residing outside of their communities. This consent model fails to acknowledge the risks to small groups such as tribes, which can implicate the community as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Claw, K. G. et al. A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities. Nat. Commun. 9, 2957 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reardon, J. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics 99–125 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).

  3. Kaiser, J. Million-person U. S. study of genes and health stumbles over including Native American groups. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2081 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Norris, T., Vines, P. L. & Hoeffel, E. M. Report number C2010BR-10: the American Indian and Alaska Native population: 2010. United States Census Bureau https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2012/dec/c2010br-10.html (2012).

  5. Juengst, E. et al. From “personalized” to “precision” medicine: the ethical and social implications of rhetorical reform in genomic medicine. Hastings Cent. Rep. 46, 21–33 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Krystal S. Tsosie

  2. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Joseph M. Yracheta

  3. University of London, London, UK

    Donna Dickenson

Authors
  1. Krystal S. Tsosie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph M. Yracheta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donna Dickenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystal S. Tsosie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.S.T. and J.M.Y. serve as voluntary board members of a non-profit 501(c)3 Indigenous biobank initiative in the United States. D.D. declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsosie, K.S., Yracheta, J.M. & Dickenson, D. Overvaluing individual consent ignores risks to tribal participants. Nat Rev Genet 20, 497–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0161-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0161-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing