Original articleClinical endoscopyLinked color imaging versus narrow-band imaging for colorectal polyp detection: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study
Introduction
Early detection of colorectal polyps and their subsequent removal by polypectomy are the cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention.1 Colonoscopy is therefore generally considered as the criterion standard for the detection and treatment of colorectal polyps. However, several studies have found that up to 32% of adenomas can be missed during colonoscopy.2, 3, 4 Missed adenomas are of great concern and are believed to be an important cause of the development of interval colorectal cancer, that is, cancer detected before the expected surveillance interval.
Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has been used frequently in clinical practice for polyp detection and characterization. Among the various IEE modalities, narrow-band imaging (NBI) is one of the most widely used. However, there are conflicting data on whether NBI can actually increase the adenoma detection rate based on the results of the 3 previous meta-analyses published in 2015.5, 6, 7 With improvements in the light source and image resolution, the new generation of NBI can achieve brighter and sharper endoscopic images. We have previously shown that the use of the new generation of NBI had a significantly higher adenoma detection rate than conventional white-light colonoscopy.8
Linked color imaging (LCI) is a new mode of IEE, produced by Fujifilm (Tokyo, Japan), with a different mode of wavelength optimization using all 3 primary colors (red, blue, and green). It is designed to detect subtle color differences in the red GI mucosa, enhancing the contrast of hemoglobin for detection of the mucosal vascular pattern. Further signal processing enhances the red color and makes the white color whiter (Fig. 1). In a recent study,9 the adenoma miss rate of LCI was 8%, which was significantly lower than that of white-light endoscopy. Other studies have also suggested that LCI increases the detection rate of sessile serrated polyps10 and proximal colonic polyps11 compared with white-light colonoscopy. However, there is as yet no direct head-to-head comparison of LCI and other imaging modalities for colorectal polyp detection. In this prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study, we aimed to compare the polyp detection rates of the newly available LCI with the NBI, a commonly used IEE system.
Section snippets
Study design
This was a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study conducted in the Integrated Endoscopy Centre of the Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong, which is a major regional hospital as well as a university teaching hospital. This study was initiated by the investigators and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03336359).
Study participants
Consecutive adult patients, aged between 40 and 80 years, undergoing colonoscopy in the Queen Mary Hospital were invited to participate in this study. The indications for
Patients
Between October 2017 and June 2018, 547 patients were screened for eligibility. After excluding illegible patients, 272 patients were enrolled with 136 patients in each arm (Fig. 2). The baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients are shown in Table 1. The indications for colonoscopy were for work-up of bowel symptoms in 72.8%, whereas screening and surveillance colonoscopy accounted for 11.4% and 15.8%, respectively. There were more symptomatic patients in the LCI group than in the NBI
Discussion
This is the first prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study that directly compares the newly available LCI with NBI for detection of colorectal polyps. Although LCI aims to enhance the red color of the mucosa and facilitate polyp detection, we found that the polyp detection rate, serrated lesion detection rate, and the median number of polyps detected on the first colonoscopy were all significantly lower in the LCI group than in the NBI group. There was also a borderline trend of a higher
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all patients and endoscopy nurses at the Queen Mary Hospital for their contribution to this study.
References (24)
- et al.
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies
Gastroenterology
(1997) - et al.
Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection
Gastrointest Endosc
(2012) - et al.
Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial
Gastrointest Endosc
(2017) - et al.
The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research
Gastrointest Endosc
(2009) - et al.
New technologies improve adenoma detection rate, adenoma miss rate, and polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gastrointest Endosc
(2018) - et al.
A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory
Gastrointest Endosc
(2012) - et al.
Narrow-band imaging for detection of neoplasia at colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials
Gastroenterology
(2019) - et al.
Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths
N Engl J Med
(2012) - et al.
Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study
Endoscopy
(2012) - et al.
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review
Am J Gastroenterol
(2006)
Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis
Am J Gastroenterol
Cited by (30)
Blue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study
2023, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVariability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyDetection of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Linked Color Imaging: A Prospective, Randomized, Tandem Colonoscopy Trial
2021, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyCitation Excerpt :Finally, we chose WLI, the standard modality for screening colonoscopy, as the reference to examine the efficacy of LCI in this study. Leung et al26 compared next-generation NBI with LCI and its findings indicated that NBI had a higher ADR than LCI. However, data remain insufficient.
GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2019
2020, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCitation Excerpt :LCI identified more colorectal adenomas than HDWL imaging (56.9% vs 43.2%, P = .03) but was not significantly better than BLI (56.9% vs 54%, not significant).60 A prospective randomized tandem study comparing LCI with NBI demonstrated the polyp detection rate was significantly higher in the NBI group than the LCI group (71.3% vs 55.9%, P = 0.008).61 No studies to date have compared BLI and NBI for detection and evaluation of colon polyps.
Role of image-enhanced endoscopy: how to improve colorectal polyp detection rates in the coming decade
2020, Gastrointestinal EndoscopySmall gastric polyp detection based on the improved YOLOv5
2024, Multimedia Tools and Applications
DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
See CME section; p. 162.
If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Leung at [email protected].