Review
Chromatin dynamics underlying the precise regeneration of a vertebrate limb – Epigenetic regulation and cellular memory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.04.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Amphibians and fish can regenerate an organ (limb, tail, or fin) after amputation.

  • The proper regulation of chromatin dynamics is required for organ regeneration.

  • The precise inheritance of cellular memory is essential for organ regeneration ability.

  • Epigenetic regulation may form the basis for cellular memory in organ regeneration.

  • The manipulation of chromatin dynamics may be critical to improve organ regeneration.

Abstract

Wound healing, tissue regeneration, and organ regrowth are all regeneration phenomena observed in vertebrates after an injury. However, the ability to regenerate differs greatly among species. Mammals can undergo wound healing and tissue regeneration, but cannot regenerate an organ; for example, they cannot regrow an amputated limb. In contrast, amphibians and fish have much higher capabilities for organ-level regeneration. In addition to medical studies and those in conventional mammalian models such as mice, studies in amphibians and fish have revealed essential factors for and mechanisms of regeneration, including the regrowth of a limb, tail, or fin. However, the molecular nature of the cellular memory needed to precisely generate a new appendage from an amputation site is not fully understood. Recent reports have indicated that organ regeneration is closely related to epigenetic regulation. For example, the methylation status of genomic DNA is related to the expression of regeneration-related genes, and histone-modification enzymes are required to control the chromatin dynamics for regeneration. A proposed mechanism of cellular memory involving an inheritable system of epigenetic modification led us to hypothesize that epigenetic regulation forms the basis for cellular memory in organ regeneration. Here we summarize the current understanding of the role of epigenetic regulation in organ regeneration and discuss the relationship between organ regeneration and epigenetic memory.

Section snippets

Introduction organ regeneration

Regeneration is a fundamental mechanism used to maintain multicellular organisms throughout their lifetime. Multicellular organisms are constantly at risk of accidental injury, so their ability to regenerate injured tissues or organs is important for their survival. Vertebrates vary in their regenerative ability [1], [2]. In amniotes including mammals, which have low regenerative abilities, physical trauma usually only results in wound healing. On the other hand, urodeles and fish have high

Requirement of epigenome regulation in organ regeneration

Several reports have indicated that epigenome regulators are required for organ regeneration [see Gilbert, [28], for review]. Among the histone modifications, H3K27ac is a marker of active enhancer elements (Fig. 1A). H3K4me3 is often located in the gene body, especially around TSSs and is associated with active gene expression (Fig. 1B). H3K27me3 is often located in silent enhancers and inactive gene bodies (Fig. 1C). In addition, DNA methylation is related to gene silencing. Numerous histone

Maintenance of cellular memory

Cellular memory in organ regeneration, including positional memory and lineage memory, may provide a clue for breaking the barrier between regenerative and non-regenerative animals. For example, although intercalary regeneration was discovered by artificial implant experiments and never happens in nature, it indicates that limb regeneration after an accidental injury uses positional information to determine the site from which the limb must be regenerated. Mice form a cartilaginous callus like

Attempts to ameliorate the regeneration potential through the epigenome

The development of epigenetic therapies, in which epigenome regulation is used to restore functional tissues/organs, is a subject of great interest. Several attempts to restore tissues/organs have been reported. For muscular dystrophy, in which excessive apoptosis/necrosis and regeneration result in muscle degeneration, pharmacological treatments have achieved partial rescue. TSA treatment restores muscle function in the mdx mouse, a muscular dystrophy model [103]. Three pharmacological drugs,

Funding sources

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 17H06905] to SH; Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation to SH; JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 16H04790] to HY; Hirosaki University Institutional Research Grant for Young investigators to HY; Grant for Basic Science Research Projects from The Sumitomo Foundation to HY; and the Takeda Science Foundation to HY.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. David Stocum for critical reading of the manuscript.

References (119)

  • H. Yokoyama et al.

    Mesenchyme with fgf-10 expression is responsible for regenerative capacity in Xenopus limb buds

    Dev. Biol.

    (2000)
  • C.W. Beck et al.

    Temporal requirement for bone morphogenetic proteins in regeneration of the tail and limb of Xenopus tadpoles

    Mech. Dev.

    (2006)
  • H. Yokoyama et al.

    FGF-10 stimulates limb regeneration ability in Xenopus laevis

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • N. Yakushiji et al.

    Correlation between Shh expression and DNA methylation status of the limb-specific Shh enhancer region during limb regeneration in amphibians

    Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • A.J. Taylor et al.

    Histone deacetylases are required for amphibian tail and limb regeneration but not development

    Mech. Dev.

    (2012)
  • R.A. Varier et al.

    Histone lysine methylation and demethylation pathways in cancer

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2011)
  • S. Hayashi et al.

    Epigenetic modification maintains intrinsic limb-cell identity in Xenopus limb bud regeneration

    Dev. Biol.

    (2015)
  • R.D. Riddle et al.

    Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA

    Cell

    (1993)
  • B.D. Harfe et al.

    Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities

    Cell

    (2004)
  • S.M. Cannata et al.

    Nerve-independence of limb regeneration in larval Xenopus laevis is correlated to the level of fgf-2 mRNA expression in limb tissues

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • S. Hayashi et al.

    Transcriptional regulators in the Hippo signaling pathway control organ growth in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration

    Dev. Biol.

    (2014)
  • G.N. Wheeler et al.

    Inducible gene expression in transgenic Xenopus embryos

    Curr. Biol.

    (2000)
  • X. Sun et al.

    Suppression of the SWI/SNF component Arid1a promotes mammalian regeneration

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2016)
  • H. Yokoyama et al.

    Prx-1 expression in Xenopus laevis scarless skin-wound healing and its resemblance to epimorphic regeneration

    J. Invest. Dermatol.

    (2011)
  • N. Yakushiji et al.

    Repatterning in amphibian limb regeneration: a model for study of genetic and epigenetic control of organ regeneration

    Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2009)
  • R.C. Akkers et al.

    A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos

    Dev. Cell

    (2009)
  • A. Satoh et al.

    Neurotrophic regulation of fibroblast dedifferentiation during limb skeletal regeneration in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum)

    Dev. Biol.

    (2010)
  • M. Namenwirth

    The inheritance of cell differentiation during limb regeneration in the axolotl

    Dev. Biol.

    (1974)
  • W.S. Kim et al.

    Retinoic acid modifies positional memory in the anteroposterior axis of regenerating axolotl limbs

    Dev. Biol.

    (1986)
  • D.C. Ludolph et al.

    The effect of retinoic acid on positional memory in the dorsoventral axis of regenerating axolotl limbs

    Dev. Biol.

    (1990)
  • M. Maden et al.

    The structure of 180 degrees supernumerary limbs and a hypothesis of their formation

    Dev. Biol.

    (1982)
  • S. Strano et al.

    The transcriptional coactivator Yes-associated protein drives p73 gene-target specificity in response to DNA damage

    Mol. Cell

    (2005)
  • S. Hata et al.

    A novel acetylation cycle of transcription co-activator Yes-associated protein that is downstream of Hippo pathway is triggered in response to SN2 alkylating agents

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2012)
  • M. Okamoto

    Simultaneous demonstration of lens regeneration from dorsal iris and tumour production from ventral iris in the same newt eye after carcinogen administration

    Differentiation

    (1997)
  • K. Agata et al.

    Survey of the differences between regenerative and non-regenerative animals

    Dev. Growth Differ.

    (2012)
  • L. Bonfanti

    From hydra regeneration to human brain structural plasticity: a long trip through narrowing roads

    ScientificWorldJournal

    (2011)
  • J.P. Brockes

    Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure

    Science

    (1997)
  • E.M. Tanaka et al.

    Considering the evolution of regeneration in the central nervous system

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • J.N. Dent

    Limb regeneration in larvae and metamorphosing individuals of the South African clawed toad

    J. Morphol.

    (1962)
  • S.V. Bryant et al.

    Vertebrate limb regeneration and the origin of limb stem cells

    Int. J. Dev. Biol.

    (2002)
  • H. Yokoyama

    Initiation of limb regeneration: the critical steps for regenerative capacity

    Dev. Growth Differ.

    (2008)
  • K. Tamura et al.

    Limb blastema cell: a stem cell for morphological regeneration

    Dev. Growth Differ.

    (2010)
  • M.J. Han et al.

    Expression patterns of Fgf-8 during development and limb regeneration of the axolotl

    Dev. Dyn.

    (2001)
  • H. Yokoyama et al.

    Different requirement for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in limb regeneration of larval and adult Xenopus

    PLOS ONE

    (2011)
  • T. Endo et al.

    Shh expression in developing and regenerating limb buds of Xenopus laevis

    Dev. Dyn.

    (1997)
  • A.W. Neff et al.

    Expression of Xenopus XlSALL4 during limb development and regeneration

    Dev. Dyn.

    (2005)
  • M. Suzuki et al.

    Limb regeneration in Xenopus laevis froglet

    ScientificWorldJournal

    (2006)
  • F.S. Gilbert

    Differential Gene Expression in Development

    Developmental Biology

    (2014)
  • A.S. Tseng et al.

    HDAC activity is required during Xenopus tail regeneration

    PLOS ONE

    (2011)
  • S. Stewart et al.

    A histone demethylase is necessary for regeneration in zebrafish

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Insights regarding skin regeneration in non-amniote vertebrates: Skin regeneration without scar formation and potential step-up to a higher level of regeneration

      2020, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As the genomic sequence upstream of the X. tropicalis prrx1 gene (which corresponds to the mouse prrx1 limb-specific enhancer sequence) leads to the same localization of the reporter gene product in blastema-like cells after skin excision on the back as well as developing limb buds in Tg X. laevis, localization of the reporter gene product seems to reflect the endogenous activation pattern of the prrx1 limb-specific enhancer [92]. In contrast to Xenopus froglet skin, no reporter activity was detected in healing back skin after full-thickness skin excision in adult Tg mice harboring the reporter gene under control of the 2.4-kb prrx1 limb-specific enhancer ([12]; reviewed in [93]). As an adult mouse cannot regenerate skin after excision but instead forms a scar, blastema-like cells exhibiting activation of the prrx1 limb-specific enhancer seem to correlate with skin regeneration capability.

    • Parallel repair mechanisms in plants and animals

      2023, DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms
    • Evi5 is required for Xenopus limb and tail regeneration

      2022, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text