New research
Time-Dependent Effects of Exposure to Physical and Sexual Violence on Psychopathology Symptoms in Late Childhood: In Search of Sensitive Periods in Development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.022Get rights and content

Objective

Exposure to interpersonal violence is a known risk factor for psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether there are sensitive periods when exposure is most deleterious. We aimed to determine whether there were time periods when physical or sexual violence exposure was associated with greater child psychopathology.

Method

This study (N = 4,580) was embedded in Generation R, a population-based prospective birth cohort. Timing of violence exposure, reported through maternal reports (child age, 10 years) was categorized by age at first exposure, defined as: very early (0−3 years), early (4−5 years), middle (6−7 years), and late (8+ years) childhood. Using Poisson regression, we assessed the association between timing of first exposure and levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms, using the Child Behavior Checklist at age 10 years.

Results

Violence exposure at any age was associated with higher internalizing (physical violence: risk ratio [RR] = 1.46, p < 0.0001; sexual violence: RR = 1.30, p < .0001) and externalizing symptoms (physical violence: RR = 1.52, p < 0.0001; sexual violence: RR = 1.31, p = 0.0005). However, the effects of violence were time dependent: compared to children exposed at older ages, children first exposed during very early childhood had greater externalizing symptoms. Sensitivity analyses suggested that these time-based differences emerged slowly across ages 1.5, 3, 6, and 10 years, showing a latency between onset of violence exposure and emergence of symptoms, and were unlikely to be explained by co-occurring adversities.

Conclusion

Interpersonal violence is harmful to childhood mental health regardless of when it occurs. However, very early childhood may be a particularly sensitive period when exposure results in worse psychopathology outcomes. Results should be replicated in fully prospective designs.

Section snippets

Sample and Procedures

Data came from Generation R, a population-based prospective study of children followed from fetal life onward in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The goal of Generation R was to examine the social, biological, and environmental factors shaping child growth, health, and development. Details about the cohort have been described elsewhere.35, 36, 37, 38 In brief, 9,778 mothers living in Rotterdam at the time of their estimated delivery date (between April 2002 and January 2006) were enrolled during

Results

The mean age of the analytic sample was 9.7 years (SD = 0.3). As shown in Table 1, the analytic sample was approximately half girls (50.7%), and mostly Dutch (65.5%). The sample varied with respect to maternal education (52.0% had mothers with middle-high to high education) and household income level (53.5% had high income), with the majority of mothers reporting either being married (46.8%) or living with a partner (37.9%). Most children (93.3%) were born full term. Maternal psychopathology

Discussion

The main finding from this study is that very early childhood, here defined as the time period from birth to the third birthday, may be a sensitive period when exposure to interpersonal violence is associated with the greatest risk for psychopathology symptoms in later childhood. These results did not appear to be explained by a greater number of exposures to multiple types of adversity. That is, even after controlling for the effects of exposure to other co-occurring early life adversities, we

References (82)

  • A.P. DePrince et al.

    Executive function performance and trauma exposure in a community sample of children

    Child Abuse Negl

    (2009)
  • K. Amone-P'Olak et al.

    Life stressors as mediators of the relation between socioeconomic position and mental health problems in early adolescence: the TRAILS study

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • J.R. Hibbeln et al.

    Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): an observational cohort study

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • S. Holt et al.

    The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: a review of the literature

    Child Abuse Negl

    (2008)
  • H.D. Chilcoat et al.

    Does psychiatric history bias mothers' reports? An application of a new analytic approach

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • A.P. Ringoot et al.

    Parental depression and child well-being: young children's self-reports helped addressing biases in parent reports

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2015)
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    A developmental psychopathology perspective on child abuse and neglect

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • K.A. McLaughlin et al.

    Adverse rearing environments and neural development in children: the development of frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • K.A. McLaughlin et al.

    Delayed maturation in brain electrical activity partially explains the association between early environmental deprivation and symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • J. Brown et al.

    A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child maltreatment: findings of a 17-year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect

    Child Abuse Negl

    (1998)
  • M. Tandon et al.

    Internalizing disorders in early childhood: a review of depressive and anxiety disorders

    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am

    (2009)
  • L. Livianos-Aldana et al.

    Temporal evolution of stress in the year prior to the onset of depressive disorders

    J Affect Disord

    (1999)
  • S.L. Andersen et al.

    Stress, sensitive periods and maturational events in adolescent depression

    Trends Neurosci

    (2008)
  • R. Gilbert et al.

    Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • E. Knudsen

    Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior

    J Cogn Neurosci

    (2004)
  • M.H. Bornstein

    Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations

    Psychol Bull

    (1989)
  • E.C. Dunn et al.

    Developmental timing of child maltreatment and symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation in young adulthood: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

    Depress Anxiety

    (2013)
  • E.C. Dunn et al.

    The impact of exposure to interpersonal violence on gender differences in adolescent-onset major depression: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

    Depress Anxiety

    (2012)
  • K.A. McLaughlin et al.

    Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication II: associations with persistence of DSM-IV disorders

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • C.S. Widom et al.

    A prospective investigation of major depressive disorder and comorbidity in abused and neglected children grown up

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • J.G. Green et al.

    Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication I: associations with first onset of DSM-IV disorders

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • E.B. Duprey et al.

    Childhood neglect, internalizing symptoms and adolescent substance use: does the neighborhood context matter?(clinical report)

    J Youth Adolesc

    (2017)
  • J.B. Kaplow et al.

    Age of onset of child maltreatment predicts long-term mental health outcomes

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2007)
  • M.K. Keiley et al.

    The timing of child physical maltreatment: a cross-domain growth analysis of impact on adolescent externalizing and internalizing problems

    Dev Psychopathol

    (2001)
  • T.P. Thornberry et al.

    The importance of timing: the varying impact of childhood and adolescent maltreatment on multiple problem outcomes

    Dev Psychopathol

    (2001)
  • E.C. Dunn et al.

    What life course theoretical models best explain the relationship between exposure to childhood adversity and psychopathology symptoms: recency, accumulation, or sensitive periods?

    Psychol Med

    (2018)
  • S.R. Jaffee et al.

    Effects of chronic maltreatment and maltreatment timing on children's behavior and cognitive abilities

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • A.J. Oldehinkel et al.

    Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: a matter of both risk and resilience

    Dev Psychopathol

    (2014)
  • N. Slopen et al.

    Cumulative adversity in childhood and emergent risk factors for long-term health

    J Pediatr

    (2014)
  • C.A. Nelson et al.

    The deprived human brain: developmental deficits among institutionalized Romanian children—and later improvements—strengthen the case for individualized care

    Am Scientist

    (2009)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Childhood adversity and vagal regulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Bucharest Early Intervention Project has provided evidence on a potential sensitive period of socio-emotional development during the first two years of life: Youth from orphanages with very poor quality care improved more in cognitive and emotion regulatory functions if placed into foster care before they were two years old, as compared to those who were placed later (McLaughlin et al., 2015b). Some studies on mental health outcomes also implicate early childhood as a sensitive period (Dunn et al., 2020), whereas others point more to middle childhood or adolescence (Gerke et al., 2018; Schalinski et al., 2016; Yoon, 2020). Overall, childhood adversity likely impacts multiple developmental periods, rendering it unlikely that there is only one narrow window during which adversity affects psychobiological processes (Nelson and Gabard-Durnam, 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award no. K01MH102403 (Dunn) and 1R01MH113930 (Dunn). A. Neumann and H. Tiemeier are supported by a grant of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant no. 024.001.003, Consortium on Individual Development). The work of H. Tiemeier is further supported by the Gravitation program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant no. 024.001.003) and NWO-VICI grant (NWO-ZonMW: 016.VICI.170.200). C. Cecil has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 707404.

    The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Center in close collaboration with the Erasmus University Rotterdam, Faculty of Social Sciences, the Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, and the Stichting Trombosedienst and Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR), Rotterdam. The Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

    Garrett Fitzmaurice, ScD, of Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, served as the statistical expert for this research.

    The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of general practitioners, hospitals, midwives, and pharmacies in Rotterdam.

    Disclosure: Drs. Dunn, Cecil, Susser, Tiemeier, Ms. Nishimi, Mr. Neumann, and Ms. Renaud have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

    View full text