Elsevier

Progress in Polymer Science

Volume 94, July 2019, Pages 57-116
Progress in Polymer Science

Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as additive manufacturing, permits the fabrication of fully customized objects with a high level of geometrical complexity at reduced fabrication time and cost. Besides metals and ceramics, polymers have become a widely researched class of materials for applications in AM. The synthetic versatility and adaptability, as well as the wide range of properties that can be achieved using polymer materials, have rendered polymers the most widely employed class of materials for AM methodologies. In this review, the basic principles, considering the printing mechanism as well as the advantages and disadvantages, of the most relevant polymer AM technologies are described. The particular features, properties and limitations of currently employed polymer systems in the various AM technology areas are presented and analyzed. Subsequently, 4D printing, that is the fabrication of 3D printed structures that are cabable to change with time, is discussed. A brief description of the polymeric materials and technologies under development for 4D printed structures as well as the different shape changes explored are presented. Finally, based on the characteristics of the polymers employed for each technology illustrative examples of the principal applications are discussed.

Section snippets

Introduction to additive manufacturing (AM)

The ISO/ASTM standards define the term additive manufacturing (AM), colloquially known as 3D printing, as the “process of joining materials to make parts from 3D model data, usually layer upon layer, as opposed to subtractive manufacturing and formative manufacturing methodologies” [1]. It has to be clarified at this stage that there are a number of different subtypes of additive manufacturing including 3D printing, but also rapid prototyping and direct digital manufacturing (DDM). The term

Brief summary of the AM technologies

ASTM International criteria classify polymer AM technologies into seven different categories: (a) material extrusion, (b) powder bed fusion, (c) vat photopolymerization, (d) material jetting, (e) binder jetting, (f) sheet lamination, and (g) directed energy deposition [62,63]. Fig. 9 shows a diagram in which the different additive manufacturing methodologies are organized according to several parameters: state of fusion, material feedstock, material distribution, and the AM principle. While it

Fused deposition modeling (FDM)

As has been mentioned above, FDM is an AM process in which the layers are formed by extrusion of a solid plastic filament which passes through a nozzle/print head that melts and extrudes it [136]. To be used for FDM, the printing material must be able to flow, after fusion, and then solidify. Amorphous thermoplastic polymers are the ideal materials for this application due to their low thermal expansion coefficient, glass transition temperature and melting temperature, properties which can

Polymers for stereolithography (SLA)

As it has been introduced before, SLA is a manufacturing process which consists in the curing or solidification of a photosensitive liquid polymer (resin) by using a UV laser. The photosensitive resin is comprised of three major components:

(a) A photoinitiator, which absorbs the light and generates the active species.

(b) A reactive multifunctional monomer/oligomer. The backbone can vary in structure and weight and is designed to confer specific mechanical, physical or chemical properties of the

Selective laser sintering (SLS): polymer powders and composites

First of all, it is worth mentioning that the 3D printed parts fabricated using SLS can achieve similar mechanical properties as parts prepared by injection molding or similar forming techniques [168,169]. However, probably one of the major advantages of SLS is related to the “a priori” great variety of materials that could be employed, including polymers, metals, and blends (metals and ceramics/polymers) [97,169,170].

Examples of polymers that could be blended are acrylic styrene (AS), PCL or

Polymeric materials employed in 4D printing

As has been elaborated before, a general requirement for 4D printing is the use of one or more than one material with distinct physical properties which enables shape changes. Whereas a wide variety of polymeric materials are available for additive manufacturing (as has been thoroughly revised in the previous sections of this review), there still exist a lot of pending issues which must be fulfilled for the development of 4D materials. In spite of this, recent efforts to achieve complex 4D

Biomedical applications

Polymers are, without doubt, the fastest growing category among all the materials employed for biomedical applications during the last decade [263]. This remarkable growth is related to the advantages in the use of polymers for biomedical purposes in comparison to metals. Among the most important advantages, it is worth mentioning the biocompatibility of several polymers, as well as their elastic properties and bio-inertness.

The large variety of polymeric materials combined with the possibility

Conclusions and remarks

The development of a wide variety of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offers nowadays versatile platforms for tailor-made fabrication of fully-customized products in a decentralized and cost-effective fashion. Besides its initial use limited as a tool for rapid prototyping or eventually for small-scale production of customized items, AM has become an interesting methodology to fabricate components with unusual shapes in a wide variety of applications ranging from architecture to

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support given by FONDECYT Grant N° 1170209. M.A. Sarabia acknowledges the financial support given by CONICYT through the doctoral program Scholarship Grant. J. Rodriguez-Hernandez acknowledges financial support from the Spanish National Science Foundation (CSIC) and the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) (Project MAT2016-78437-R, FONDOS FEDER). Finally, this study was funded by VRAC Grant Number L216-04 of Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana.

References (385)

  • I. Gibson et al.

    Additive manufacturing technologies

    (2015)
  • T. Rayna et al.

    From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: how 3D printing is changing business model innovation

    Technol Forecast Soc Change

    (2016)
  • T.A. Campbell et al.

    Additive manufacturing as a disruptive technology: implications of three-dimensional printing

    Technol Innov

    (2013)
  • Anonymous

    Additive Manufacturing : Opportunities and Constraints

    (2013)
  • A. Toffler

    The third wave

    (1984)
  • R. Jiang et al.

    Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: a Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030

    Technol Forecast Soc Change

    (2017)
  • M. Rehnberg et al.

    From smiling to smirking? 3D printing, upgrading and the restructuring of global value chains

    Glob Netw

    (2017)
  • B. Berman

    3-D printing: the new industrial revolution

    Bus Horiz

    (2012)
  • B. Sedacca

    Hand built by lasers [additive layer manufacturing]

    Eng Technol

    (2011)
  • J. Gausemeier et al.

    Thinking ahead the future of additive manufacturing - analysis of promising industries

    (2012)
  • M.B. Mawale et al.

    Additive layered manufacturing: state-of-the-art applications in product innovation

    Concurr Eng Res Appl

    (2016)
  • J. Choi et al.

    4D printing technology: a review

    3D Print Addit Manuf

    (2015)
  • S. Tibbits

    4D printing: multi-material shape change

    Archit Des

    (2014)
  • Q. Ge et al.

    Active materials by four-dimension printing

    Appl Phys Lett

    (2013)
  • E. Pei

    4D Printing: dawn of an emerging technology cycle

    Assem Autom

    (2014)
  • A.S. Gladman et al.

    Biomimetic 4D printing

    Nat Mater

    (2016)
  • F. Momeni et al.

    A review of 4D printing

    Mater Des

    (2017)
  • S. Tibbits

    Design to self-assembly

    Archit Des

    (2012)
  • S. Tibbits et al.

    4D printing and universal transformation

    Proc 34th Conf Assoc Comp Aid Design Arch

    (2014)
  • T.A. Campbell et al.

    Report: the next wave: 4D printing programming the material world

    (2014)
  • V. Khare et al.

    From 3D to 4D printing - design, material and fabrication for multi-functional multi-materials

    Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol

    (2017)
  • Q. Ge et al.

    Active origami by 4D printing

    Smart Mater Struct

    (2014)
  • Q. Zhang et al.

    Smart three-dimensional lightweight structure triggered from a thin composite sheet via 3D printing technique

    Sci Rep

    (2016)
  • O. Kuksenok et al.

    Stimuli-responsive behavior of composites integrating thermo-responsive gels with photo-responsive fibers

    Mater Horiz

    (2016)
  • D. Raviv et al.

    Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations

    Sci Rep

    (2015)
  • M. Jamal et al.

    Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers

    Adv Healthc Mater

    (2013)
  • S.E. Bakarich et al.

    4D Pr int ing with mechanically robust, thermally actuat ing hydrogels

    Macromol Rapid Commun

    (2015)
  • K. Vidimče et al.

    OpenFab

    ACM Trans Graph

    (2013)
  • J.A. Lewis

    Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials

    Adv Func Mater

    (2006)
  • K. Sun et al.

    3D printing of interdigitated Li-Ion microbattery architectures

    Adv Mater

    (2013)
  • D. Kokkinis et al.

    Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials

    Nat Commun

    (2015)
  • J.O. Hardin et al.

    Microfluidic printheads for multimaterial 3D printing of viscoelastic inks

    Adv Mater

    (2015)
  • Y. Zhou et al.

    From 3D to 4D printing: approaches and typical applications

    J Mech Sci Technol

    (2015)
  • S. Tibbits et al.

    Programmable materials for architectural assembly and automation

    Assem Autom

    (2012)
  • Y.Y. Hu et al.

    Elastic and elastic-plastic analysis of multilayer thin films:closed-form solutions

    J Appl Phys

    (2004)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Buckling of poly(methyl methacrylate) in stimulus-responsive shape recovery

    Appl Phys Lett

    (2011)
  • C.C. Wang et al.

    Chemically induced morphing in polyurethane shape memory polymer micro fibers/springs

    React Funct Polym

    (2012)
  • J.L. Zhang et al.

    Thermo-/chemo-responsive shape memory/change effect in a hydrogel and its composites

    Mater Des

    (2014)
  • W.M. Huang et al.

    Shape memory materials

    Mater Today

    (2010)
  • L. Sun et al.

    Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review

    Mater Des

    (2012)
  • E. Hornbogen

    Comparison of shape memory metals and polymers

    Adv Eng Mater

    (2006)
  • M. Aschwanden et al.

    Polymeric, electrically tunable diffraction grating based on artificial muscles

    Opt Lett

    (2006)
  • J. Naciri, H. Jeon, P. Keller, B. Ratna. Nematic elastomer fiber with mechanical properties of a muscle. US12846069...
  • F. El Feninat et al.

    Shape memory materials for biomedical applications

    Adv Eng Mater

    (2002)
  • I.S. Gunes et al.

    Shape memory polymers and their nanocomposites: a review of science and technology of new multifunctional materials

    J Nanosci Nanotechnol

    (2008)
  • T. Xie et al.

    Facile tailoring of thermal transition temperatures of epoxy shape memory polymers

    Polymer

    (2009)
  • C.M. Yakacki et al.

    Strong, tailored, biocompatible shape-memory polymer networks

    Adv Funct Mater

    (2008)
  • B. Yang et al.

    Effects of moisture on the thermomechanical properties of a polyurethane shape memory polymer

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • W.M. Huang et al.

    Thermo-moisture responsive polyurethane shape-memory polymer and composites: a review

    J Mater Chem

    (2010)
  • J. Leng et al.

    Shape-memory polymers—a class of novel smart materials

    MRS Bull

    (2009)
  • Cited by (367)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text