Unexpected cleavage of ether bonds of 1,3-dimethoxypropane in Grignard–Wurtz synthesis of a MgCl2–donor adduct

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2015.12.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • 1,3-Dimethoxypropane was cleaved in Grignard–Wurtz synthesis of MgCl2–donor adduct.

  • A Grignard reagent, BuMgCl most likely causes the cleavage reaction.

  • Final product of the reaction is methoxymagnesium chloride.

  • There seem to be at least two reaction paths occurring in parallel.

  • 1-Heptene and propene are formed as by-products in the cleavage reaction.

Abstract

Diethers are an important group of electron donors in Ziegler–Natta catalysts. A simple diether, 1,3-dimethoxypropane was studied as an electron donor in Grignard–Wurtz synthesis of a MgCl2–donor adduct. 1,3-Dimethoxypropane was unexpectedly found to undergo a cleavage reaction during the synthesis producing methoxy groups (OCH3). Each mole of 1,3-dimethoxypropane produced approximately 2 moles of methoxy groups, which are probably bound to magnesium chloride as methoxymagnesium chloride. A Grignard reagent, BuMgCl formed in the Grignard–Wurtz reaction most likely causes the cleavage of the ether bonds in 1,3-dimethoxypropane and there seem to be at least two parallel reaction paths taking place and producing at least two different by-products. The first step in the cleavage of 1,3-dimethoxypropane is a Grignard reagent (BuMgCl) induced elimination of OCH3, which gives 3-methoxy-1-propene. This intermediate product reacts further in a substitution reaction caused by the Grignard reagent producing 1-heptene as the by-product. The cleavage of the ether bond in 3-methoxy-1-propene and formation of OCH3 can also occur through another reaction path, which produces propene as the by-product.

Introduction

MgCl2 has become a widely studied and commercially important compound after it was discovered to be a suitable support material for Ziegler–Natta catalysts [1]. In order to have useful properties in the catalysis, MgCl2 has to be highly disordered. This activated MgCl2 (or δ-MgCl2) can be prepared in several ways. Methods include mechanical and chemical activation or their combination [2], [3]. In mechanical activation, ordered α-MgCl2 is grinded in a ball mill [4]. Chemical activation methods enable better control over the morphology, the size and size distribution of particles and have thus widely replaced traditional mechanical activation methods [2]. In the most common chemical method, adducts of MgCl2 and Lewis bases are first formed. Afterwards, the Lewis base is removed and δ-MgCl2 is obtained [5], [6]. Activated MgCl2 can also be prepared with so called Grignard–Wurtz reaction, which is an easy one-step chemical method [3], [7], [8]. In Grignard–Wurtz reaction, magnesium metal reacts with n-alkyl chloride producing δ-MgCl2. The reaction can be described using four reaction equations:Mg + RClRMgCl2 RMgClMgCl2+MgR2Mg + 2 RClMgCl2+ R2RMgCl + RClMgCl2+ R2

The first step of the reaction is formation of Grignard reagent (Eq. (1)) [9], [10]. In solutions of Grignard reagents, an equilibrium (Schlenk equilibrium) between alkyl magnesium chloride and the products, magnesium dialkyl and magnesium chloride, is reached (Eq. (2)) [9], [11]. Alkyl chloride can also react with Mg or RMgCl forming magnesium chloride in Wurtz coupling reactions (Eq. (3) and (4)) [12].

Lewis bases acting as electron donors can coordinatively bind to unsaturated magnesium atoms of MgCl2. Two types of electron donors (internal and external) are used in Ziegler–Natta catalysts. Internal electron donors are added during the preparation of precatalyst, whereas external electron donors are added to the precatalyst with the co-catalyst in the polymerization [2]. Internal electron donors have a significant role in formation of δ-MgCl2 [13], [14]. It has been shown that these donors affect relative stabilities of different catalytically relevant surfaces (namely (104) and (110)) and thus the structure of MgCl2 [15]. Both internal and external electron donors also have a great influence on the properties of Ziegler–Natta catalysts and polymers produced. The productivity and hydrogen response of the catalyst as well as the stereoregularity, molar mass and molar mass distribution of the polymers formed are affected by the electron donors [2], [15]. Electron donors regulate the content and distribution of active species by competing from the same surface sites and also affect the stereospesificity of active sites due to steric effects [13], [16], [17]. Typical electron donors in Ziegler–Natta catalysts are e.g. aromatic esters, phthalates, diethers and succinates [18]. Diethers are perhaps the most interesting group of electron donors due to their ability to produce highly isotactic polypropylene with a very high productivity without the presence of an external electron donor [19].

In our studies, MgCl2 supports have been synthesized with Grignard–Wurtz reaction in the presence of different ethers as electron donors [20], [21], [22]. In the case of diethers, we have observed a cleavage of the Csingle bondO bond during the Grignard–Wurtz synthesis. The cleavage reaction is undesired if the aim is the synthesis of MgCl2 supports containing diethers as electron donors. The cleavage reaction can also be adverse if it takes place during the other steps of catalyst preparation (e.g. addition of TiCl4) or even during polymerization. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the cleavage reaction of diethers, especially 1,3-dimethoxypropane, which is the simplest of 1,3-diethers. The cleavage reactions of simple ethers have been studied [23], [24], [25] in the past decades, but according to our knowledge no reports on the cleavage of diethers in the Grignard–Wurtz synthesis have been published.

Section snippets

Materials

Octane (reagent grade, 98%), 1-chlorobutane (ReagentPlus, 99%), 3-methoxy-1-propene (97%) and butylmagnesium chloride (2.0 M solution in diethyl ether) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and 1,3-dimethoxypropane (98%) from CHEMOS GmbH. Ethers, 1-chlorobutane and octane were dried and stored over activated 3 Å molecular sieves. Magnesium turnings (99.9+%) were purchased from Acros Organics and dried in an oven at 110 °C for two days prior to the synthesis. All reactions and handling of products were

Grignard–Wurtz synthesis with 1,3-dimethoxypropane as an electron donor

Grignard–Wurtz synthesis was performed in the presence of 1,3-dimethoxypropane as an electron donor in an autoclave using magnesium and 1-chlorobutane as starting materials and octane as a solvent. The molar ratio of 1,3-dimethoxypropane to magnesium was 1:2. The powder X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the solid product formed was highly disordered. The diffractogram of the product differed notably from that of δ-MgCl2 (the diffractograms are presented in Fig. SA1 in Supplementary

Conclusions

Almost a complete cleavage of the ether bonds in 1,3-dimethoxypropane during a Grignard–Wurtz synthesis of a MgCl2–diether adduct was observed. The cleavage reaction results in formation of methoxy groups which exist as methoxymagnesium chloride. Butylmagnesium chloride is most likely responsible for this cleavage reaction. There are at least two parallel reaction paths, which produce different by-products (1-heptene and propene). Probable reaction paths to 1-heptene and propene by-products

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge a financial support from the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and European Union/European Regional Development Fund (grant 70054/09).

References (32)

  • M.C. Forte et al.

    Eur. Polym. J.

    (1996)
  • P. Buchacher et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (1997)
  • T. Taniike et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2012)
  • S. Pirinen et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2014)
  • S. Pirinen et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2015)
  • N. Ya. Turova et al.

    J. Organometal. Chem.

    (1972)
  • N. Kashiwa

    J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem.

    (2004)
  • N. Pasquini

    Polypropylene Handbook

    (2005)
  • V. Di Noto et al.

    Macromol. Chem. Phys.

    (1996)
  • J.C.J. Bart

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.C.J. Bart et al.

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1995)
  • V. Di Noto et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1998)
  • C. Elschenbroich et al.

    Organometallics: A Concise Introduction

    (1992)
  • G.P.M. van Klink et al.

    Organometallics

    (2002)
  • Z. Rappoport et al.

    The Chemistry of Organomagnesium Compounds Part 1

    (2008)
  • S.V. Vitt et al.

    Russ. Chem. Bull.

    (1969)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Revisiting the identity of δ-MgCl<inf>2</inf>: Part II. Morphology and exposed surfaces studied by vibrational spectroscopies and DFT calculation

      2020, Journal of Catalysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      The structural and surface properties of MgCl2 strongly depend on its pre-treatment, a sort of activation that allows moving from the two crystalline polymorphs of MgCl2 (α and β phases) to a high-surface-area material actually suitable for catalytic applications (δ-MgCl2) [5]. Such a pre-treatment can vary from a mechanical grinding of the crystalline forms of MgCl2 (in absence or in presence of the other ingredients) [16–21] to the in situ conversion of a precursor (such as MgCl2 in alcohol solution [22–25], adducts between MgCl2 and Lewis bases [26–33], Mg(OR)2 [25,34–37], MgRX [38], and so on) into MgCl2 in the course of the catalyst synthesis. The activation process is remarkably relevant because it influences the structure and the morphology of the MgCl2 primary particles, which are then retained during the successive synthetic steps of the catalyst formation.

    View full text