Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of neck pain

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain, disability, and range of movement in patients with neck pain. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HILT for neck pain disorders were searched across databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, the PEDro database, and Google Scholar (updated January 7, 2024). The main outcome was pain intensity, with neck disability and cervical range of motion as secondary outcomes. Researchers reviewed article titles and abstracts from different databases using the Rayyan web app. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and evidence-based recommendations were developed using the GRADE approach. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect in terms of mean differences (MD) for the outcomes of interest, along with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Twenty studies met the selection criteria and were potentially eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. At the end of the treatment, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.01) pooled MD of -14.1 mm for pain intensity (17 RCTs) with the VAS (95% CI:-18.4,-9.7), 3.9° (95% CI:1.9,6.7) for cervical extension (9 RCTs), and -8.3% (95% CI:-14.1,-4.1) for disability diminish (12 RCTs) with the neck disability index in favor of HILT. Only the results for pain intensity are in line with the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) reported in the literature. Overall, the evidence was deemed significant but with low certainty, attributed to observed heterogeneity and some risk of bias among the RCTs. HILT demonstrates effectiveness in reducing neck pain and disability while enhancing cervical extension when added to other physical therapy interventions, especially therapeutic exercise, based on a moderate level of evidence. This review highlights that the most favorable results are obtained when HILT is employed to address myofascial pain, cervical radiculopathy and chronic neck pain.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023387394 (Registration date, 14/01/2023).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen SP (2015) Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc 90(2):284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, Sullman MJM et al (2022) Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen SP, Hooten WM (2017) Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ 14(358):j3221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Popescu A, Lee H (2020) Neck pain and lower back pain. Med Clin North Am 104(2):279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fejer R, Hartvigsen J (2008) Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation? Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17(1):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0521-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Price J, Rushton A, Tyros I, Tyros V, Heneghan NR (2020) Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. PLoS ONE 15(6):e0234511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lew J, Kim J, Nair P (2021) Comparison of dry needling and trigger point manual therapy in patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther 29(3):136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2020.1822618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroeling P, Gross A, Graham N, Burnie SJ, Szeto G, Goldsmith CH et al (2013) Electrotherapy for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 26(8):CD004251. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004251.pub5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RAB, Bjordal JM (2009) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Lancet Lond Engl 374(9705):1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross AR, Dziengo S, Boers O, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Lilge L et al (2013) Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. Open Orthop J 7:396–419. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cai P, Wei X, Wang W, Cai C, Li H (2023) High-intensity laser therapy on pain relief in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 36(5):1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-220228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arroyo-Fernández R, Aceituno-Gómez J, Serrano-Muñoz D, Avendaño-Coy J (2023) High-Intensity Laser Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Med 12(4):1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. de la Ortiz HA, B, Cangas SA, Herrera AC, García FO, Velásquez SV (2021) Efficacy of class IV laser in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Physiother Q 29(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5114/pq.2021.105882

  14. Stasinopoulos D, Giannakou K, Lamnisos D (2021) The effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy (HILT) in the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy: a systematic review. J Laser Opt Photonics 08:194. https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-410X.1000194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dundar U, Turkmen U, Toktas H, Solak O, Ulasli AM (2015) Effect of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lasers Med Sci 30(1):325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1671-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alayat MS, Elsodany AM, Miyajan AF, Alzhrani AA, Alzhrani HMS, Maqliyah AM (2019) Changes in local skin temperature after the application of a pulsed Nd:YAG laser to healthy subjects: a prospective crossover controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 34(8):1681–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02769-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Starzec-Proserpio M, Grigol Bardin M, Fradette J, Tu LM, Bérubè-Lauzière Y, Paré J et al (2022) High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) as an emerging treatment for vulvodynia and chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders: A systematic review of treatment efficacy. J Clin Med 11(13):3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ordahan B, Yigit F, Mülkoglu C (2023) Efficacy of low-level laser versus high-intensity laser therapy in the management of adhesive capsulitis: A randomized clinical trial. Saudi J Med Med Sci 11(3):201–207. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_626_22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. de la Barra HA, Parizotto N, Arias M, Liebano R (2023) Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of patients with frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 38(1):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03901-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 29(372):n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sideri S, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T (2018) Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. J Clin Epidemiol 100:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jørgensen L, Paludan-Müller AS, Laursen DRT, Savović J, Boutron I, Sterne JAC et al (2016) Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev 10(5):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0259-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamper SJ (2020) Risk of bias and study quality assessment: Linking evidence to practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 50(5):277–9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.0702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Medica 22(3):276–82. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ioannidis JPA (2008) Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 14(5):951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Austin TM, Richter RR, Sebelski CA (2014) Introduction to the GRADE approach for guideline development: considerations for physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 94(11):1652–9. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Conforti M, Fachinetti GP (2013) High power laser therapy treatment compared to simple segmental physical rehabilitation in whiplash injuries (1° and 2° grade of the Quebec Task Force classification) involving muscles and ligaments. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3(2):106–11. https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2013.3.2.106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Alayat MSM, Mohamed AA, Helal OF, Khaled OA (2016) Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized double-blind placebo-control trial. Lasers Med Sci 31(4):687–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1910-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alayat MS, Elsoudany AM, Ali ME (2017) Efficacy of multiwave locked system laser on pain and function in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Photomed Laser Surg 35(8):450–455. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haładaj R, Pingot M, Topol M (2017) The effectiveness of cervical spondylosis therapy with saunders traction device and high-intensity laser therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 23:335–42. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.899454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Venosa M, Romanini E, Padua R, Cerciello S (2019) Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of ultrasound treatment and transcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with cervical spondylosis: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 34(5):947–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2682-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yilmaz M, Tarakci D, Tarakci E (2020) Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of ultrasound treatment and transcutaneous nerve stimulation on cervical pain associated with cervical disc herniation: A randomized trial. Complement Ther Med 49:102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmed HM, Abu Taleb E, Ameen FH (2020) High intensity laser therapy on pain in patients with myofascial trigger points. Egypt J Phys Ther. 3(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejpt.2020.33415.1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Alayat MS, Battecha KH, ELsodany AM, Ali MI (2020) Pulsed ND:YAG laser combined with progressive pressure release in the treatment of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 32(7):422–7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shady NAE-R, Negm HM, Zitoun ZMY, Abdelhakiem NM (2020) Multimodal intervention of high-intensity laser with neurodynamic mobilization in cervical radiculopathy. Pak J Med Amp Health Sci 14(4)

  37. Parandnia A, Yassin M, Sarrafzadeh J, Salehi R, Navaei F (2020) Comparison of the effects of dry needling and high-intensity laser therapy on pain intensity and pain pressure threshold in females with active trigger points in upper trapezius muscle: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Funct Disabil J 3(1):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kenareh R, Mirmohammadi SJ, Khatibi A, Shamsi F, Mehrparvar AH (2021) The comparison of the efficacy of photobiomodulation and ultrasound in the treatment of chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized single-blind controlled trial. J Lasers Med Sci. 12:e20. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Barassi G, Supplizi M, Prosperi L, Irace G, Younes A, Della Rovere M et al (2021) Dual-wavelength high-power laser therapy and neuromuscular manual therapy in chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 35(2):767–73. https://doi.org/10.23812/21-37-L

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taleb EA, Ahmed HM, Ameen FH, Lasheen YR, Albalawi HF, Eldesoky MT (2022) Effect of high-intensity laser on upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: Single-blinded randomized control trial. Int J Health Sci. 6(3):1227–39. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n3.11987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ashour A (2020) A randomized comparative study between high-intensity laser therapy and ultrasound therapy on chronic neck pain among adult patients. Al-Quds University. https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/7597.  Accessed 24 Jan 2024

  42. Ahi ED, Sirzai H (2022) Comparison of the effectiveness of dry needling and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled study. Lasers Med Sci 38(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03687-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ince S, Eyvaz N, Dündar Ü, Toktaş H, Yeşil H, Eroglu S et al (2023) Clinical efficiency of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a 12-week follow-up, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tajali B, Namvar H, Olyaie G, Bagheri H, Saneie S, Hosienifar M (2023) Effects of high power laser plus manual therapy versus manual therapy alone on muscle activity in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. J Popl Ther Clin Pharmacol 30(1):477–489. https://jptcp.com/index.php/jptcp/article/view/2549. Accessed 24 Jan 2024

  45. Ramadan N, Gawaan A, Ali M, Gammal E, Aboelnour N (2023) Effect of pulsed high intensity laser therapy on cervical myofascial pain syndrome after neck dissection surgeries. Egyptian J Hospital Med 92(1):6217–6222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sherif D, Elgohary A, Shendy W, Darwesh A (2023) Effect of high-power laser therapy on pain and electrophysiological study in cervical radiculopathy patients: a randomized controlled trial. Med J Cairo Univ 9(3):1147–1158

    Google Scholar 

  47. Melsen WG, Bootsma MCJ, Rovers MM, Bonten MJM (2014) The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20(2):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 64(4):383–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE (2001) Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38(6):633–638. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bird SB, Dickson EW (2001) Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38(6):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.118012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mense S (2008) Muscle Pain: Mechanisms and Clinical Significance. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 105(12):214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.11.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Louw S, Makwela S, Manas L, Meyer L, Terblanche D, Brink Y (2017) Effectiveness of exercise in office workers with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. South Afr J Physiother 73(1):392. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v73i1.392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Villanueva-Ruiz I, Falla D, Lascurain-Aguirrebeña I (2022) Effectiveness of specific neck exercise for nonspecific neck pain; usefulness of strategies for patient selection and tailored exercise-a systematic review with meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 102(2):pzab259. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jørgensen R, Ris I, Juhl C, Falla D, Juul-Kristensen B (2017) Responsiveness of clinical tests for people with neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1918-1

  55. Shin HJ, Kim SH, Hahm SC, Cho HY (2020) Thermotherapy plus neck stabilization exercise for chronic nonspecific neck pain in elderly: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(15):5572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155572

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Young IA, Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Cleland JA (2019) Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. Physiother Theory Pract 35(12):1328–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1471763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Paez A (2017) Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews: PAEZ. J Evid Based Med. 10(3):233–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute Andres Bello University; School of Physical Therapy Andres Bello University; Federal University of São Carlos; Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES, Finance code 001, Brazil). Role of funding sources: The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The idea for the research was performed by Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz. All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, Mariana Arias Avila, and Richard Eloin Liebano. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz.

Ethics declarations

Registration of the systematic review

This systematic review was registered with the number CRD42023387394 at the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). Registration date, 14 January 2023.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Barra Ortiz, H.A., Arias, M. & Liebano, R.E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the management of neck pain. Lasers Med Sci 39, 124 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04069-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04069-0

Keywords

Navigation