Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship between serum levels of epidermal growth factor and β-human chorionic gonadotropin and the type and prognosis of ectopic pregnancy

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This work aimed to explore the relationship between epidermal growth factor (EGF) and β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and ectopic pregnancy types and impact on prognosis.

Methods

Twenty women with normal pregnancies (NPs) were recruited as control group, and twenty women each with tubal pregnancy (TP) and cervical pregnancy (CP) were recruited. Blood samples were collected to detect EGF and β-HCG. Data on length of hospital stay and incidence of complications were collected. The differences in serum EGF and β-HCG levels were compared among groups and within various types of ectopic pregnancy using analysis of variance and Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

Serum EGF and β-HCG were notably lower in TP and CP group vs. controls (P < 0.05). In subgroup analysis within the types of ectopic pregnancy, serum EGF levels were drastically higher in TP group vs. CP group (P < 0.05). Serum EGF levels were negatively correlated with pregnancy outcomes and incidence of complications (P < 0.05). In patients with TP and CP, serum EGF and β-HCG recovery time and hospital stay differed drastically (P < 0.05). Serum EGF and β-HCG levels showed optimal cutoff values identified at 2.65 μg/L and 11,745.35 IU/L, respectively. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.885 and 0.841.

Conclusion

Elevated levels of EGF may be associated with the occurrence of ectopic pregnancy and may impact the type of ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and the incidence of complications. Further clinical research is warranted to investigate these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendriks E, Rosenberg R, Prine L (2020) Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 101(10):599–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leziak M, Żak K, Frankowska K et al (2022) Future perspectives of ectopic pregnancy treatment-review of possible pharmacological methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(21):14230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Scibetta EW, Han CS (2019) Ultrasound in early pregnancy: viability, unknown locations, and ectopic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 46(4):783–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun XY, Liang Z (2021) Effect of drug therapy on pregnancy rate, sex hormone levels and adverse reactions after laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometriosis and infertility. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 35(1):191–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moussa B, Serge TAE, David L et al (2022) Ectopic pregnancy: epidemiological, clinical, therapeutical, anatomopathological aspects and prognosis at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Teaching Hospital Souro Sanou of Bobo-Dioulasso: about 79 cases and literature review. Open J Obstet Gynecol 12(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hengrui L (2020) The role of transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) in cell viability: a potential target to suppress breast cancer cell cycle. J Cancers. 12(1):131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma SSS (2020) The prevalence and epidemiology of ectopic pregnancies in SMGS: a tertiary health care hospital in Jammu, India. Int J Reprod Med Gynecol 6(1):025–030

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hengrui L (2022) A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) in glioma. J Gene 822:146325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Q, Xing X, Liu S et al (2019) Intramural ectopic pregnancy following pelvic adhesion: case report and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(6):1507–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozcan MCH, Wilson JR, Frishman GN (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with salpingectomy versus salpingostomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(3):656–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison PT, Vyse S, Huang PH (2020) Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 61:167–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcella F (2012) Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number in colorectal adenoma-carcinoma progression. J Cancer genetics 205(12):630–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinelli E, Ciardiello D, Martini G et al (2020) Implementing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: challenges and future perspectives. Ann Oncol 31(1):30–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosomi Y, Morita S, Sugawara S et al (2020) Gefitinib alone vs. gefitinib plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: NEJ009 study. J Clin Oncol 38(2):115–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gelatti ACZ, Drilon A, Santini FC (2019) Optimizing the sequencing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 137:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonja M (2022) Analysis of polymorphisms in EGF, EGFR and HER2 genes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). J Cancer Genet 266–267:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sabbioni L, Carossino E, Severi FM, Luisi S (2019) From β-hCG values to counseling in tubal pregnancy: what do women want? Gynecol Endocrinol 35(12):1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Li Z, Ren B et al (2022) Diagnostic value of a single β-hCG test in predicting reproductive outcomes in women undergoing cleavage embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis from a single center. Reprod Health 19(1):145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu W, Gao H, Li X et al (2019) β-hCG promotes epithelial ovarian cancer metastasis through ERK/MMP2 signaling pathway. Cell Cycle 18(1):46–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Gan L et al (2020) Predictors and clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) therapy for ectopic pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20(1):654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Besharati R, Lashkardoost H, Hamedi A et al (2020) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with ELISA method and its related factors in women with a history of abortion referred to Bental-Hoda hospital. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infert 23(8):30–36

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ma L, Li Z, Xi S et al (2020) Tubal ectopic pregnancy occurrence is associated with high expressions of prokineticin receptors and aberrant secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Am J Transl Res 12(9):5741–5751

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X, Qu P, Bai H et al (2019) Endometrial thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in 1125 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a matched case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(6):1797–1803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai X, Liu J, Cao S, Wang L (2019) Mechanisms of endometrial fibrosis and the potential application of stem cell therapy. Discov Med 27(150):267–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang L, Zeng L, Liu H et al (2022) Effects of oocyte cytoplasmic central granulation on embryonic development, blastocyst formation, and pregnancy outcome in assisted reproductive technology and its mechanism. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 68(5):161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zahraasgari FT, Hosseini R, Tavoli Z et al (2019) Ovarian reserve after laparoscopic salpingectomy compared with laparoscopic salpingotomy in patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy. Acta Medica 35:967

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hendriks E, MacNaughton H, MacKenzie MC (2019) First trimester bleeding: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician 99(3):166–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parker AL, CRNFA C (2022) Assessment and management of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. Women’s Healthc: Clin Jr NPs 10(4):9–28

    Google Scholar 

  29. Furkatovna AM, Dilmurod o’g KUB (2023) New approaches to rehabilitation after ectopic pregnancy. Central Asian J Med Nat Sci 4(2):282–285

  30. Horne AW, Tong S, Moakes CA et al (2023) Combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 401(10377):655–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Whigham CA, MacDonald TM, Walker SP et al (2019) The untapped potential of placenta-enriched molecules for diagnostic and therapeutic development. Placenta 84:28–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhan H, Peng B, Ma J et al (2020) Epidermal growth factor promotes stromal cells migration and invasion via up-regulation of hyaluronate synthase 2 and hyaluronan in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 114(4):888–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cakhantara A, Prabawa A (2019) Molecular therapy for ectopic pregnancy. Bali Anat J 2(2):38–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roy A, Patra SK (2023) Lipid raft facilitated receptor organization and signaling: a functional rheostat in embryonic development, stem cell biology and cancer. Stem Cell Rev Rep 19(1):2–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma D, Yang R, Chen Y et al (2022) Identification of noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy using data-independent acquisition (DIA)proteomics: a pilot study. Sci Rep 12(1):19992

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Al Naimi A, Moore P, Brüggmann D et al (2021) Ectopic pregnancy: a single-center experience over ten years. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19(1):79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu W, Yeung Q, Chan D et al (2019) Maternal β-HCG concentrations in early IVF pregnancy: association with the embryo development stage of blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 38(5):683–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jing G, Yao J, Dang Y et al (2021) The role of β-HCG and VEGF-MEK/ERK signaling pathway in villi angiogenesis in patients with missed abortion. Placenta 103:16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sorrentino F, Vasciaveo L, De Feo V et al (2022) Interstitial pregnancy treated with mifepristone and methotrexate with high serum β-hCG level in a patient wishing to preserve fertility: time to define standardized criteria for medical/surgical therapy? Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(18):11464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration fund project (Number: 2022189).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Writing—original draft preparation: DG; writing—review and editing: DG; conceptualization: DG, ML; methodology: DW, BY; formal analysis and investigation: DG, ML, DW, BY; funding acquisition: DG; resources: DW, BY; supervision: DG, ML and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dandan Geng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for this research was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Forth Hospital of Shijiazhuang.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geng, D., Liu, M., Wu, D. et al. The relationship between serum levels of epidermal growth factor and β-human chorionic gonadotropin and the type and prognosis of ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07523-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07523-0

Keywords

Navigation