Skip to main content
Log in

Spread of influence with incentives in edge-weighted graphs with emphasis on some families of graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(G=(V, E)\) be a graph that represents an underlying network. Let \(\tau \) (resp. \({\textbf{p}}\)) be an assignment of non-negative integers as thresholds (resp. incentives) to the vertices of G. The discrete time activation process with incentives corresponding to \((G, \tau , {\textbf{p}})\) is the following. First, all vertices u with \({\textbf{p}}(u)\ge \tau (u)\) are activated. Then at each time t, every vertex u gets activated if the number of previously activated neighbors of u plus \({\textbf{p}}(u)\) is at least \(\tau (v)\). The optimal target vector problem (OTV) is to find the minimum total incentives \({\sum }_{v\in V} {\textbf{p}}(v)\) that activates the whole network. We extend this model of activation with incentives, for graphs with weighted edges such that the spread of activation in the network depends on the weight of influence between any two participants. The new version is more realistic for the real world networks. We first prove that the new problem OTVW, is \(\texttt {NP}\)-complete even for the complete graphs. Two lower bounds for the minimum total incentives are presented. Next, we prove that OTVW has polynomial time solutions for (weighted) path and cycle graphs. Finally, we extend the discussed model and OTV, for bi-directed graphs with weighted edges and prove that to obtain the optimal target vector in weighted bi-directed paths and cycles has polynomial time solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No data are used in the paper.

References

  • Ackerman E, Ben-Zwi O, Wolfovitz G (2010) Combinatorial model and bounds for target set selection. Theor Comput Sci 411:4017–4022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N (2009) On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 23:1400–1415

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cordasco G, Gargano L, Rescigno AA, Vaccaro U (2015) Optimizing spread of influence in social networks via partial incentives. In: International colloquium on structural information and communication complexity, pp 119–134

  • Cordasco G, Gargano L, Rescigno AA (2019) Active influence spreading in social networks. Theor Comput Sci 764:15–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cordasco G, Gargano L, Lafond M, Narayanan L, Rescigno AA, Vaccaro U, Wu K (2020a) Whom to befriend to influence people. Theor Comput Sci 810:26–42

  • Cordasco G, Gargano L, Peters JG, Rescigno AA, Vaccaro U (2020b) Fast and frugal targeting with incentives. Theor Comput Sci 812:62–79

  • Demaine ED, Hajiaghayi M, Mahini H, Malec DL, Raghavan S, Sawant A, Zadimoghadam M (2014) How to influence people with partial incentives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, pp 937–948

  • Dreyer PA, Roberts FS (2009) Irreversible \(k\)-threshold processes: graph-theoretical threshold models of the spread of disease and of opinion. Discrete Appl Math 157:1615–1627

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ehard S, Rautenbach D (2019) On some tractable and hard instances for partial incentives and target set selection. Discrete Optim 34:100547

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Feige U, Kogan Sh (2021) Target set selection for conservative populations. Discrete Appl Math 305:119–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Flocchini P, Kralovic R, Roncato A, Ruzicka P, Santoro N (2003) On time versus size for monotone dynamic monopolies in regular topologies. J Discrete Algorithms 1:129–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Günneç D, Raghavan S, Zhang R (2020a) A branch-and-cut approach for the least cost influence problem on social networks. Networks 76:84–105

  • Günneç D, Raghavan S, Zhang R (2020b) Least-cost influence maximization on social networks. INFORMS J Comput 32:289–302

  • Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2015) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Theory Comput 11:105–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshkhah K, Soltani H, Zaker M (2012) On dynamic monopolies of graphs: the average and strict majority thresholds. Discrete Optim 9:77–83

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshkhah K, Soltani H, Zaker M (2014) Dynamic monopolies in directed graphs: spread of unilateral influence in social networks. Discrete Appl Math 171:81–89

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Melo RS, Vignatti AL, Miyazawa FK, Ota MJ (2023) Combinatorial dual bounds on the least cost influence problem. Pesquisa Operacional 43:e275468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan L, Wu K (2020) How to choose friends strategically. Theor Comput Sci 811:99–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan S, Zhang R (2021) Weighted target set selection on trees and cycles. Networks 77:587–609

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaker M (2012) On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds. Discrete Math 312:1136–1143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaker M (2013) Generalized degeneracy, dynamic monopolies and maximum degenerate subgraphs. Discrete Appl Math 161:2716–2723

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaker M (2020) On irreversible spread of influence in edge-weighted graphs. Contrib Discrete Math 15:60–72

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers of the paper for useful comments.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have equal contributions in this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manouchehr Zaker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Askari, S., Zaker, M. Spread of influence with incentives in edge-weighted graphs with emphasis on some families of graphs. J Comb Optim 47, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-024-01164-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-024-01164-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation