Skip to main content
Log in

Early Mathematics Instruction and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mathematical understanding in early childhood lays the foundation for children’s later academic achievement, yet little is known about individual differences in U.S. early childhood educators’ mathematics instruction in preschool classrooms. The present study explored the range of intentional mathematics instruction occurring in early childhood programs and the relations between early childhood educators’ number-related talk and efficacy beliefs. One hour of video recordings of classroom mathematics instruction (84 videos total) were transcribed and coded from a sample of 20 lead early childhood educators teaching 3- to 5-year-old children. The results revealed significant variability across the type of mathematical content taught by educators, with a strong focus on activities with numerical content. Educators’ use of advanced numerical talk similarly varied, with some exploratory support for the hypothesis that teachers with higher self-efficacy beliefs at the beginning of the school year used more advanced number talk throughout the school year during classroom mathematics instruction. Our results suggest that educators’ mathematics instruction in early childhood varies widely, and those with lower self-efficacy for teaching may benefit from additional professional development and support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Research data that support the findings of this study are not available due to privacy restrictions.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the MyTeachingPartner – Mathematics/Science research team at the University of Virginia, particularly Jessica Vick Whittaker and Mable Kinzie, for generously providing the data used in this study for secondary analyses. We thank Emily Blumenthal, Laura Chobivul, and Eva Gelernt for their assistance in transcribing and verifying video recordings. We also thank Isabella Santiago and Ausha Smith for their assistance in coding the format of mathematics activities and the members of the Sarnecka Lab at the University of California, Irvine for their feedback on a presentation of the partial results of this study.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a U.S. National Science Foundation Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Graduate Research Fellowship to Nicole R. Scalise (Grant No. DGE 1322106). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: NRS, GBR; Formal analysis and investigation: NRS, KP, MA; Writing – original draft preparation: NRS; Writing – reviewing and editing: NRS, KP, MA, GBR; Supervision: GBR.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole R. Scalise.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained prior to data collection from the ethics committee of the University of Virginia. The secondary data analyses conducted in the present study were approved under a collaborative, multisite agreement between the University of Maryland and the University of Virginia. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participating teachers and parent/guardians of participating children.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scalise, N.R., Pak, K., Arrington, M. et al. Early Mathematics Instruction and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Early Childhood Educ J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01657-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01657-1

Keywords

Navigation