Abstract
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is the causal agent of paratuberculosis (PTBC), a chronic infectious granulomatous enteritis of ruminants. The PTBC diagnosis with commercial ELISA has limitations in sensitivity and specificity, and its results depend on the state of progress of the disease. This research aimed to evaluate two different ELISAs: (a) an “in-house” ELISA with a sonicated antigen obtained from a MAP I47 strain, and (b) a commercial ELISA. In total, the evaluated sample consisted of 394 bovine serum samples from 12 farms in Argentina with high (5–9%) and low (≤ 0.05%) prevalence of PTBC. The evaluation of the new antigen (2.5 µg/mL) was against a 1:50 dilution of the M. phlei faced sera. The cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity determinations of both techniques were by ROC curve analysis. The area under the curve for the I47 ELISA was 0.9 (CI 95%, 0.93–0.97). With a cut-off point of 8.8%, the sensitivity was 84.3% and the specificity 96.6%. The agreement between both techniques was 0.7 (CI 95%, 0.6–0.8). These results indicate a high discriminative capacity to differentiate positive and negative bovine sera of MAP infection with the I47 ELISA. This result would represent an advantage to dispense with the imported kit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Collins M, Wells S, Petrini K, Collins J, Schultz R, Whitlock R (2005) Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 12:685–692. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.6.685-692.2005
Dane H, Stewart LD, Grant IR (2023) Culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: challenges, limitations and future prospects. J Appl Microbiol 134:lxac017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxac017
Diéguez FJ, González AM, Menéndez S, Vilar MJ, Sanjuán ML, Yus E, Arnaiz I (2009) Evaluation of four commercial serum ELISAs for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in dairy cows. Vet J 180:231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.004
Faruk M, Jung Y, Hur T, Lee S, Cho Y (2020) Longitudinal study of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antibody kinetics in dairy cattle using sera and milk throughout the lactation period. Vet Sci 7:81. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030081
Gilardoni L, Paolicchi F, Mundo SL (2012) Bovine paratuberculosis: a review of advantages and disadvantages of the different diagnostic tests. Rev Argent Microbiol 44:201–215
Gopi B, Vir Singh R, Kumar S, Kumar S, Chauhan A, Sonwane A, Kumar A, Bharati J, Vir Singh S (2022) Effect of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms in SLC11A1, ANKRA2, IFNG and PGLYRP1 genes on host susceptibility to Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in Indian cattle. Vet Res Commun 46:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09849-5
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Li L, Bannantine J, Campo J, Randall A, Grohn Y, Katani R, Schilling M, Radzio-Basu J, Kapur V (2017) Identification of sero-reactive antigens for the early diagnosis of Johne’s disease in cattle. PLoS ONE 12:e0184373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184373
Mckenna S, Barkema H, Keefe G, Sockett D (2006) Agreement between three ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Microbiol 114:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.12.002
Nielsen SS (2020) Immune-based diagnosis of paratuberculosis. In: Behr MA, Stevenson K, Kapur V (eds) Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control, 2nd edn. CAB International, Gloucester, pp 333–345
Nielsen SS, Toft N (2008) Ante mortem diagnosis of paratuberculosis: a review of accuracies of ELISA, interferon-gamma assay and fecal culture techniques. Vet Microbiol 129:217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.011
Paolicchi F, Zumárraga M, Giofré A, Zamorano P, Morsella C, Verna A, Cataldi A, Alito A, Romano M (2003) Application of different methods for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds in Argentina. J Vet Med 50:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00606.x
Ridge SE, Morgan IR, Sockett DC, Collins MT, Condron RJ, Skilbeck NW, Webber JJ (1991) Comparison of the Johne’s absorbed EIA and the complement-fixation test for the diagnosis of Johne’s disease in cattle Aust. Vet J 68:253–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb03230.x
Singh S, Dhakal I, Singh U, Devkota B (2018) Current diagnostic techniques of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in domestic ruminants. J Agric Forestry Univ 2018:23–34
Vasini B, Farace P, Ariel A, Cirone K, Mendez L, Morsella C, Fresia P, Iraola G, Gioffré A, Paolicchi F (2022) Phylogenetic and multiple–locus variable number tandem repeat analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from Argentina. Vet Res Commun 46:1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09983-8
Whitlock RH, Buergelt C (1996) Preclinical and clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis (including pathology). Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 12:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30410-2
Whitlock RH, Wells SJ, Sweeney RW, Van Tiem J (2000) ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne´s disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method. Vet Microbiol 77:387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00324-2
Whittington R (2020) Cultivation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. In: Behr MA, Stevenson K, Kapur V (eds) Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control, 2nd edn. CAB International, Gloucester, pp 266–304
Winterhoff C, Beyerbach M, Homuth M, Strutzberg K, Gerlach GF (2002) Establishment and evaluation of an ELISA for the detection of antibodies in milk against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 109:230–234
Acknowledgements
The authors thank to INTA Balcarce, University of Buenos Aires and CONICET. This article is presented as a partial requirement for the first author to obtain a PhD Degree at Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Funding
This study was funded by the Research Project 2019-PD-E5-I103-001 INTA and AGR 517/19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
- Conceptualization: T.S, P.F; - Methodology: T.S, M.C, M.L, V.B; - Formal analysis and investigation: T.S, G.C; - Writing - original draft preparation: T.S, P.F; - Writing - review and editing: T.S, P.F, G.C, V.B; - Funding acquisition: P.F; All authors edited, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Research with animals
This study involved a survey of producers and blood and fecal samples were taken from their animals. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by INTA Balcarce. The producers gave their consent for sampling. Sample collection was carried out by veterinarians respecting the rules and guidelines on animal welfare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tieri, S., Morsella, C., Méndez, L. et al. Comparison of two serological diagnosis tests for bovine paratuberculosis. Vet Res Commun (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10363-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10363-7