Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter Mouton April 2, 2024

Towards a sociolinguistics of in difference: stancetaking on others

  • Quentin Williams EMAIL logo

Abstract

This paper proposes a sociolinguistics of in difference, an inquiry-based approach to stancetaking on others. It describes how multilingual speakers in an online context orientate towards a stance-object and affiliate, align and negotiate difference through embodied performances, as part of advancing an ethics of responsibility for the other and aesthetic investments. In the analysis of such orientations, I draw on virtual interactional data to illustrate how in difference through stancetaking is entextualized in the aesthetic, embodied performance of parody, in so-called Coloured English, Kaaps and a mixture of other languages by an emerging R&B and pop group in Cape Town. I demonstrate how the group invest in embodied performances merge the material, linguistic, cultural and semiotic significance of the body to undermine fixity and categorization. But also, how push-back from YouTube commentators, influencers, reactors take up evaluative, affective and epistemic stances as they move from difference to in difference. I conclude with the argument that in order for us to take adequate account of an ethics of responsibility for the other and describing aesthetic investments in embodied performances we have to recalibrate our theoretical and methodological toolkit to understand what it means to use language with dignity, to encounter each other in spaces of dignity and to just be dignified in diversity.


Corresponding author: Quentin Williams, Centre for Multilingualism and Diversities Research (CMDR), Linguistics Department, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Private Bag x17, Bellville, 7535, South Africa, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Maggie Kubanyiova and Angela Creese for the editorial feedback on initial drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for providing critical feedback. All faults that remain are on me.

  1. Competing interests: The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

  2. Research funding: This research work was supported by National Research Foundation.

References

Bauman, Richard & Charles Leslie Briggs. 1990. Poetics of performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.19.1.59.Search in Google Scholar

Briggs, Charles Leslie & Richard Bauman. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2(2). 131–172. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131.Search in Google Scholar

Bright, William. 1966. Proceedings of the UCLA sociolinguistics conference. Mouton: The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009Search in Google Scholar

Burgess, Jean & Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online Video and participatory culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Engelbretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Collins, Patricia Hill & Sirma Bilge. 2020. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Différance. In Alan Bass (ed.), Margins of philosophy, 13. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doran, Meredith. 2004. Negotiating between Bourge and Racaille: Verlan as youth identity practice in suburban Paris. In Aneta Pavlenko & Adrian Blackledge (eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts, 93–124. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596483-006Search in Google Scholar

Glissant, Édouard. 1997. Poetics of relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.10257Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haddington, Pentti. 2004. Stance taking in news interviews. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17. 101–142.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 2019. In David Morley (ed.), Foundations of cultural studies. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 2017. In Kobena Mercer & Henry Louis Gates JR (eds.), The fateful triangle: Race, ethnicity, nation. Cambridge, Massachusetts, & London, England: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvqht03Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 2021. In Paul Gilroy & Ruth Wilson Gilmore (eds.), Selected writings on race and difference. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9781478021223Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica & Bonnie Mcelhinny. 2017. Language, capitalism, colonialism: Towards a critical history. Canada: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herzfeld, Michael. 1993. The social production of indifference. Oxford: Berg.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes-Elliot, Sophie & Erez Levon. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Linguistics 55(5). 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0020.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2015. Staging language on Corsica: Stance, improvisation, play and heteroglossia. Language in Society 44. 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404515000032.Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. Style as stance. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 171–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2018. Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA: International Journal of Masculinity Studies 13(3/4). 191–212.10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2022. Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256.Search in Google Scholar

Kockelman, Paul. 2004. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12(2). 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.127.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Yeran. 2015. Globalization of the privatized self-image: The reaction video and its attention economy on YouTube. In Larissa Hjorth & Olivia. Khoo (eds.), Routledge handbook of new media in Asia, 333–342. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315774626-34Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lempert, Michael. 2008. The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 37. 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404508080779.Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhof Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the other (translated by Richard A. Cohen). Pittsburg, USA: Duquesne University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1972/2006. Humanism of the other (N. Poller, Trans.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990. Difficult freedom: Essays on Judaism. London: Athlone.Search in Google Scholar

Malabou, Catherine. 2011. Changing difference. Cambridge, UK and Malden: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mbembe, Achille. 2021. Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonization. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McDaniel, Byrd. 2020. Popular music reaction videos: Reactivity, creator labor, and the performance of listening online. New Media & Society 23(6). 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820918549.Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, Kobena. 2017. Introduction. In Kobena Mercer (ed.), The Fateful Triangle: Race, Ethnicity, Nation (Stuart Hall), 1–30. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674982260-002Search in Google Scholar

Morley, David (ed.). 2019. Essential essays. Durham: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Christopher. 1982. Deconstruction: Theory and practice. New York: Methuen.10.4324/9780203316139Search in Google Scholar

OH, David C. 2017. K-Pop fans react: Hybridity and the white celebrity-fan on YouTube. International Journal of Communication 11. 2270–2287.Search in Google Scholar

Palladino, Valentina. 2016, April 3. The science behind the insane popularity of “react”_videos on YouTube. Ars Technica. Available at: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/04/the-science-behind-the-insane-popularity-of-react-videos-on-youtube/.Search in Google Scholar

Peck, Amiena & Quentin Williams. 2019. Skinscapes and frictions: An analysis of Zef Hip Hop culture “Stoeka style” tattoos in South Africa. In Amiena Peck, Quentin Williams & Christopher Stroud (eds.), Making Sense of People and Place in linguistic landscapes, 91–106. London: Bloomsbury Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203088807Search in Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert. 2016. Stance as a window into the language-race connection: Evidence from African American and White speakers in Washington, DC. In Hesham Alim, James Rickford & Arnetha Ball (eds.), Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race, 203–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Rapport, Nigel. 2015. Anthropology through Levinas knowing the uniqueness of ego and the mystery of otherness. Current Anthropology 56(2). 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/680433.Search in Google Scholar

Shaikjee, Moonique & Christopher Stroud. 2017. Fanon in drag: Decoloniality in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3). 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12242.Search in Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Language in Society 47. 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404518000970.Search in Google Scholar

Sterphone, J. 2022. Negotiating the mainstream: Proximate stancetaking and far-right policy proposals in Budestag debates. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26(3). 335–361.10.1111/josl.12551Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123.Search in Google Scholar

Stokel-Walker, Chris. 2019. YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars. Croydon: Canbury Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stroud, Christopher. 2015. Dignity in diversity: Turbulent approaches to linguistic citizenship. In Keynote Address delivered to the Sociolinguistics of globalization: (De)Centering and (Re)Standardization conference. Hong-Kong, China: University of Hongkong.Search in Google Scholar

Stroud, Christopher & Quentin Williams. 2017. Multilingualism as Utopia: Fashioning non-racial selves. AILA Review 30. 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00008.str.Search in Google Scholar

Swan, Anna Lee. 2018. Transnational Identities and feeling in fandomm: Place and embodiment in K-pop fan reaction videos. Communication, Culture and Critique 11(4). 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy026.Search in Google Scholar

Toumayan, Alain. 2004. Encountering the other: The artwork and the problem of difference in Blanchot and Levinas. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Valentine, James. 1997. Pots and pans: Identification of Queer Japanese in terms of discrimination. In Anna Liva & Kira Hall (eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality, 950–114. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Walton, Shana & Alexandra Jaffe. 2011. “Stuff White people like”: Stance, class, race, and internet commentary. In Chrispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, 198–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Quentin & Christopher Stroud. 2014. Battling race: Stylizing language and the coproduction of whiteness and colouredness in a freestyle rap battle. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 24(3). 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12064.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Quentin. 2016. Youth multilingualism in South Africa’s Hip-Hop culture: A metapragmatic analysis. Sociolinguistic Studies 10(1). 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v10i1-2.27797.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Quentin. 2017. Remix multilingualism: Ethnography, Hip Hop and the Performance of marginalized voice. London: Bloomsbury Press.10.5040/9781474295420Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Quentin. 2024. Seeking linguistic justice: Multilingual activism and linguistic citizenship in post-national South Africa. In Kate Riley, Inmaculada Ma Garcia-Sanchez & Bernard Perley (eds.), Language and social justice: Global perspectives, 66–83. London: Bloomsbury Press.10.5040/9781350156272.0010Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Quentin, Amiena Peck & Christopher Stroud (eds.). 2019. Special issue title: Visceral landscapes. Sociolinguistic studies, vol. 13(1).Search in Google Scholar

Wotanis, Lindsey & Laurie McMillan. 2014. Performing gender on YouTube: How Jenna Marbles negotiates a hostile online environment. Feminist Media Studies 14(6). 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.882373.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-10
Accepted: 2024-03-15
Published Online: 2024-04-02

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2024-0090/html
Scroll to top button