Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and enteral stenting for malignant gastric outlet

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Symptomatic malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) significantly reduce patients’ quality of life. Endoscopic treatment involves enteral stenting or endoscopic ultrasonography to perform gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). Aim was to compare enteral stenting with EUS-GE for endoscopic treatment of malignant GOO.

Methods

We retrospectively compared enteral stenting with EUS-GE for the treatment of malignant GOO. Patients treated at our institution were identified and a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Treatment failure was the primary outcome, while the secondary endpoints were time until treatment failure, technical and clinical success rates, and adverse event rates.

Results

Eighty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. Of whom, 44 were included in each of the two treatment groups. Treatment failure occurred significantly more frequently in the enteral stenting group (13/44) compared with the EUS-GE group (4/44; hazard ratio: 4,9; 95% CI 1.6–15.1). A Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a median time until treatment failure of 22.0 weeks (95% CI 4.6–39.4) in the enteral stenting group compared with 76.0 weeks (95% CI 55.9–96.1) in the EUS-GE group (P = .002). No difference in technical success and clinical success was detected. Technical success was achieved in 43/44 patients (97.7%) in the enteral stenting group compared with 41/44 patients (93.2%) in the EUS-GE group, while clinical success was achieved in 32/44 (72.7%) and 35/44 (79.5%) patients, respectively. Nine adverse events were observed (9/44, 10.2%). There were no differences in 30-day adverse event rate and 30-day mortality rate.

Conclusion

EUS-GE was superior to enteral stenting in the treatment of malignant GOO in terms of treatment failure and time until treatment failure in a propensity score-matched cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papanikolaou IS, Siersema PD (2022) Gastric outlet obstruction: current status and future directions. Gut Liver 16:667–675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Itoi T, Baron TH, Khashab MA, Tsuchiya T, Irani S, Dhir V, Bun Teoh AY (2017) Technical review of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy in 2017. Dig Endosc 29:495–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt C, Gerdes H, Hawkins W, Zucker E, Zhou Q, Riedel E, Jaques D, Markowitz A, Coit D, Schattner M (2009) A prospective observational study examining quality of life in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Am J Surg 198:92–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed O, Lee JH, Thompson CC, Faulx A (2021) AGA clinical practice update on the optimal management of the malignant alimentary tract obstruction: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:1780–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mussetto A, Fugazza A, Fuccio L, Triossi O, Repici A, Anderloni A (2018) Current uses and outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stents. Ann Gastroenterol 31:535–540

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Binmoeller KF, Shah JN (2012) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using novel tools designed for transluminal therapy: a porcine study. Endoscopy 44:499–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Grimm IS, Ngamruengphong S, Aguila G, El Zein M, Kalloo AN, Baron TH (2015) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 82:932–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyberg A, Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocana R, Penas I, de la Serna C, Shah J, Binmoeller K, Gaidhane M, Grimm I, Baron T, Kahaleh M (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a multicenter, international experience. Endosc Int Open 4:E276-281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan W, Tan S, Wang J, Wang C, Xu H, Zhang L, Liu L, Fan Z, Tang X (2022) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 31:159–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wannhoff A, Ruh N, Meier B, Riecken B, Caca K (2021) Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses with lumen-apposing metal stents: predictors of technical success. Surg Endosc 35:1997–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jovani M, Ichkhanian Y, Parsa N, Singh S, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Keane MG, Al Ghamdi SS, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA (2021) Assessment of the learning curve for EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for a single operator. Gastrointest Endosc 93:1088–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adler DG, Baron TH (2002) Endoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction using self-expanding metal stents: experience in 36 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 97:72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reijm AN, Zellenrath PA, van der Bogt RD, van Driel L, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ, Spaander MCW (2022) Self-expandable duodenal metal stent placement for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction over the past 20 years. Endoscopy 54:1139–1146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. van de Pavert YL, Moons LMG, Bogte A, Vleggaar FP (2023) Innovations in the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction: is this the era of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy? Curr Treat Opt Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-023-00417-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iqbal U, Khara HS, Hu Y, Kumar V, Tufail K, Confer B, Diehl DL (2020) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 9:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Wanrooij RLJ, Vanella G, Bronswijk M, de Gooyer P, Laleman W, van Malenstein H, Mandarino FV, Dell’Anna G, Fockens P, Arcidiacono PG, van der Merwe SW, Voermans RP (2022) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison. Endoscopy 54:1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH, Nieto J, Haito-Chavez Y, Grimm IS, Ismail A, Ngamruengphong S, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Alawad AS, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA (2017) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 31:2946–2952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chandan S, Khan SR, Mohan BP, Shah AR, Bilal M, Ramai D, Bhogal N, Dhindsa B, Kassab LL, Singh S, Ponnada S, Nguyen AK, McDonough S, Adler DG (2021) EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 9:E496–E504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghandour B, Bejjani M, Irani SS, Sharaiha RZ, Kowalski TE, Pleskow DK, Do-Cong Pham K, Anderloni AA, Martinez-Moreno B, Khara HS, D’Souza LS, Lajin M, Paranandi B, Subtil JC, Fabbri C, Weber T, Barthet M, Khashab MA (2022) Classification, outcomes, and management of misdeployed stents during EUS-guided gastroenterostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 95:80–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Wannhoff.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Nadine Seitz, Benjamin Meier, Karel Caca, and Andreas Wannhoff have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seitz, N., Meier, B., Caca, K. et al. Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and enteral stenting for malignant gastric outlet. Surg Endosc 38, 2078–2085 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10745-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10745-7

Keywords

Navigation