Brain Imaging and Behavior (2018) 13:1780–1788
The originally published version of this article contained mistakes. Figures 2 and 4 contain an incorrect subgraph, and the correct images is shown below.
Changes in two stressors at 2 weeks. Only decreases in the GR expression in CA1, the volume atrophy of CA1, and behavioral abnormalities were found in the physical stress. Immunofluorescence staining for GR in CA3. Immunofluorescence staining for GR were taken using a confocal FV1000-BX61WI microscope (Olympus, Japan), 20 × 0.40 NA objective (Olympus, Japan)
Changes in two stressors at six weeks. The decrease of GR expression in the CA3, the volume atrophy of the CA3, and further behavioral abnormalities were still found in the physical stress group, while GR expression in the CA3 and DG, the volume atrophy of the CA3 and DG, and more significant behavioral abnormalities were found in the physical stress. Immunofluorescence staining for GR were taken using a confocal FV1000-BX61WI microscope (Olympus, Japan), 20 × 0.40 NA objective (Olympus, Japan)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-018-9956-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Qin, J., Yan, J. et al. Correction: Differences of physical vs. psychological stress: evidences from glucocorticoid receptor expression, hippocampal subfields injury, and behavioral abnormalities. Brain Imaging and Behavior (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00853-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00853-2