No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Ability of Human Rights to Limit the State’s Power to Punish in Europe: Connecting Prison and Mental Health Policies through the Concept of “Transpolicies”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2024
Abstract
While scholars have pointed out the factors determining the impediments to and efficacy of international human rights rules, poor attention has been paid to human rights violations relating to transfers between prison and psychiatric detention. There is a lack of intersection of policy spheres in this regard that should be remedied. Our contribution aims to challenge traditional sociolegal boundaries by integrating the intersection of policy and subdisciplines that cover penal justice (prison and police stations), psychiatric institutions, and human rights.
Raising the question of human rights’ ability to limit the state’s power to punish in Europe compels us to explore different forms of “transinstitutionalization,” especially between prisons and psychiatric institutions and between prisons and immigration detention centers that present as “total institutions” (hosting populations perceived to be “deviant”), and share many similarities, including the risk of human rights violations. We forge the concept of “transpolicies” to take into account the mutual influence and the domino effects of such detention policies that are acknowledged, and both promoted and fought, by the European human rights institutions. In the empirical part, we focus on the increasing interactions between prison and mental health policies, taking Belgium as an example as it is known to raise specific human rights challenges.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation
Footnotes
The authors would like to thank Jonathan Simon for his significant feedback on a former version of this article.
References
REFERENCES
Aas, Katjan, and Bosworth, Mary, eds. The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Aizpurua, Eva, and Rogan, Mary. “Correctional Oversight Bodies’ Resources and Protections across the European Union: Are Their Hands Tied?” Criminology & Criminal Justice 22, no. 3 (2022): 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820986966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Judith, and Moncada, Alberto. “It Ought to Be a Crime: Criminalizing Human Rights Violations.” Sociological Forum 22, no. 3 (2007): 364–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, Mary, and Vannier, Marion. “Blurred Lines: Detaining Asylum Seekers in Britain and France.” Journal of Sociology 56, no. 1 (2020): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartuyvels, Yves. “L’internement de défense sociale en Belgique: Entre soin, dangerosité et sécurité.” L’information psychiatrique 93, no. 2 (2017): 93–101.Google Scholar
Cartuyvels, Yves, and Cliquennois, Gaëtan. “The Punishment of Mentally Ill Offenders in Belgium: Care as Legitimacy for Control.” Penal Field 12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.9307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartuyvels, Yves, and de Spiegeleir, Sophie. “La privation de liberté des personnes atteintes d’un trouble mental en Belgique: Un double régime.” Revue interdisciplinaire dʼétudes juridiques 88, no. 1 (2022): 78–102.Google Scholar
Casier, Ineke. “Bewoners’ agency in een gevangenis en een verzorgingsinstelling. Een comparatief etnografisch onderzoek in twee types totale sociale organisaties.” PhD diss., Free University of Brussels, 2021.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Gilles. “La sociologie carcérale: Approches et débats théoriques en France.” Déviance et Société 24, no. 3 (2000): 297–318.Google Scholar
Cliquennois, Gaëtan, and Champetier, Brice. “The Economic, Judicial and Political Influence Exerted by Private Foundations on Cases Taken by NGOs to the European Court of Human Rights: Inklings of a New Cold War?” European Law Journal 22, no. 1 (2016): 92–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliquennois, Gaëtan, and Snacken, Sonja. “European and United Nations Monitoring of Penal and Prison Policies as a Source of an Inverted Panopticon?” Crime, Law and Social Change 70, no. 1 (2018): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliquennois, Gaëtan, Snacken, Sonja, and van Zyl Smit, Dirk. “The European Human Rights System and the Right to Life Seen through Suicide Prevention in Places of Detention: Between Risk Management and Punishment.” Human Rights Law Review 22, no. 1 (2022): ngab023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliquennois, Gaëtan, and Nederlandt, Olivia. “Belgium: Structural Problems in the Field of Prison Overcrowding, Healthcare and Security Measures.” In The Evolving Protection of Prisoners’ Rights in Europe, edited by Cliquennois, Gaëtan, 146–65. London: Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colette-Basecqz, Nathalie, and Nederlandt, Olivia. “L’arrêt pilote W.D. c. Belgique sonne-t-il le glas de la détention des internés dans les annexes psychiatriques des prisons?” Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 2018, no. 113 (2018): 213–39.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 2nd General Report on the CPT’s Activities (covering the period 1 January to 31 December 1991) (includes some substantive issues pursued by the CPT during visits: police custody and imprisonment). Doc. CPT/Inf (92)3. Strasbourg: CPT, 1992.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 3rd General Report on the CPT’s Activities (covering the period 1 January to 31 December 1992) (includes a section on health care services in prisons). Doc. CPT/Inf (93)12. Strasbourg: CPT, 1993a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Health Care Services in Prisons Extract from the 3rd General Report of the CPT, Published in 1993. Doc. CPT/Inf (93)12-part. Strasbourg: CPT, 1993b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) en Belgique du 14 au 23 novembre 1993. Doc. CPT/Inf (94) 15. Strasbourg/Bruxelles: CPT, 1994.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 8th General Report on the CPT’s Activities (covering the period 1 January to 31 December 1997) (includes a section on involuntary placement in psychiatric establishments). Doc. CPT/Inf (98)12. Strasbourg: CPT, 1998a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) en Belgique du 31 août au 12 septembre 1997. Doc. CPT/Inf (98) 11. Strasbourg: CPT, 1998b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 11th General Report on the CPT’s Activities (covering the period 1 January to 31 December 2000) (includes a section on some recent developments concerning CPT Standards in respect of imprisonment). Doc. CPT/Inf (2001) 16. Strasbourg: CPT, 2001.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 25 novembre au 7 décembre 2001. Doc. CPT/inf (2002) 25. Strasbourg: CPT, 2002.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 16th General Report on the CPT’s Activities (covering the period 1 August 2005 to 31 July 2006) (includes a section on means of restraint in psychiatric establishments for adults). Doc. CPT/Inf (2006) 35. Strasbourg: CPT, 2006a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 18 au 27 avril 2005. Doc. CPT/Inf (2006) 15. Strasbourg: CPT, 2006b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). CPT Standards. Doc. CPT/Inf/E (2002) 1 – Rev. 2010. §§43–44. Strasbourg: CPT, 2010a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 28 septembre au 7 octobre 2009. Doc. CPT/Inf (2010) 24. Strasbourg: CPT, 2010b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 21st General Report on the CPT’s Activities (1 August 2010–31 July 2011) (includes sections on access to a lawyer and on solitary confinement of prisoners). Doc. CPT/Inf (2011) 28. Strasbourg: CPT, 2011a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Réponse du Gouvernement de la Belgique au rapport du Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) relatif à sa visite en Belgique du 28 septembre au 7 octobre 2009. Doc. CPT/Inf (2011) 7. Strasbourg: CPT, 2011b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 23 au 27 avril 2012. Doc. CTP/Inf (2012) 36. Strasbourg: CPT, 2012.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 25th General Report of the CPT’s activities (1 January to 31 December 2015) (includes a section on the situation of life-sentenced prisoners). Doc. CPT/Inf (2016) 10. Strasbourg: CPT, 2016a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 24 septembre au 4 octobre 2013. Doc. CPT/Inf (2016) 13. Strasbourg: CPT, 2016b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). 26th General Report on the CPT’s Activities (1 January to 31 December 2016) (includes a section on remand detention). Doc. CPT/Inf (2017) 5. Strasbourg: CPT, 2017a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Means of Restraint in Psychiatric Establishments for Adults (Revised CPT Standards). Doc. CPT/Inf (2017) 6. Strasbourg: CPT, 2017b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 27 mars au 6 avril 2017. Doc. CPT/Inf (2018) 8. Strasbourg: CPT, 2018a.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Réponse du Gouvernement de la Belgique au rapport du Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique du 27 mars au 6 avril 2017. Doc. CPT/Inf (2018) 23. Strasbourg: CPT, 2018b.Google Scholar
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). Rapport au Gouvernement de Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prevention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 2 au 9 novembre 2021. Doc. CPT/Inf (2022) 22. Strasbourg: CPT, 2022.Google Scholar
Daems, Tom, and Robert, Luc, eds. Europe in Prisons: Assessing the Impact of European Institutions on National Prison Systems. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Christie. “Goffman’s Concept of the Total Institution: Criticisms and Revisions.” Human Studies 12, no. 1/2 (1989): 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devynck, Caroline. “Imprisonment and Mental Suffering: Euthanasia Requests by Prisoners.” PhD diss., Free University of Brussels, 2021.Google Scholar
Devynck, Caroline, and Scheirs, Veerle. “Internering in België.” In Straffen: Een penologisch perspectief, edited by Beyens, Kristel and Snacken, Sonja, 205–22. Antwerp: Maklu, 2017.Google Scholar
Driesen, Julie. “De interne rechtspositie van geïnterneerden. In welke mate gaat de huidige regeling omtrent de interne rechtspositie de afhankelijkheid van geïnterneerden tegen?” Masters diss., Free University of Brussels, 2021.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). “Research Report – Rights of Persons in Relation to Involuntary Placement and Treatment in Mental Healthcare Facilities.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2022.Google Scholar
Evans, Malcolm, Bicknell, Christine, and Morgan, Rod. Preventing Torture in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe and Martinus Nijhoff, 2018.Google Scholar
Farrington, Keith. “The Modern Prison as Total Institution? Public Perception versus Objective Reality.” Crime & Delinquency 38, no. 1 (1992): 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Katja. The Crimmigrant Other: Migration and Penal Power. New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Garland, David. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situations of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Double Day and Anchor, 1961.Google Scholar
Goodman, Philip, Page, Joshua, and Phelps, Michelle. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle over Criminal Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, Peter. “Rates of Imprisonment and Psychiatric Hospitalization in the United States.” Social Indicators Research 7, no. 1/4 (1980): 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Craig. “A Culture of Harm: Taming the Dynamics of Cruelty in Supermax Prisons.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 35, no. 8 (2008): 956–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard. “Rethinking the Carceral through an Institutional Lens: On Prisons and Asylums in the United States.” Penal Field 5 (2008). https://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.7561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard. “Reducing Mass Incarceration: Lessons from the Deinstitutionalization of Mental Hospitals in the 1960s.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 53–88.Google Scholar
Heimans, Henri, Vander Beken, Tom, and Schipaanboord, Els. “Eindelijk een echte nieuwe en goede wet op de internering? Deel 1: De gerechtelijke fase.” Rechtskundig Weekblad 78, no. 27 (2014): 1043–64.Google Scholar
Heimans, Henri, Vander Beken, Tom, and Schipaanboord, Els. “Eindelijk een echte nieuwe en goede wet op de internering? Deel 2: De uitvoeringsfase.” Rechtskundig Weekblad 79, no. 2 (2015): 42–62.Google Scholar
Lara-Millán, Armando. Redistributing the Poor: Jails, Hospitals, and the Crisis of Law and Fiscal Austerity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemire, Guy. “La prison, univers totalitaire: Un certain effritement.” Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique 44, no. 1 (1991): 9–25.Google Scholar
Liska, Allen, Markowitz, Fred, Whaley, Rachel, and Bellair, Paul. “Modeling the Relationship between the Criminal Justice and Mental Health Systems.” American Journal of Sociology 104, no. 6 (1999): 1744–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Mormont, Marinette. “Internés sous les verrous: punis ou soignés? Du côté de la Belgique.” Vie sociale et traitements 124, no. 4 (2014): 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niveau, Gérard, Jantzi, Camillen, and Godet, Tony. “Psychiatric Commitment: Sixty Years under the Scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Ciara, and Rogan, Mary. “Monitoring Prisons in Europe: Understanding Perspectives of People in Prison and Prison Staff.” Law & Social Inquiry 48, no. 1 (2023): 205–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2021.86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Eoin, and O’Donnell, Ian. “Coercive Confinement in the Republic of Ireland: The Waning of a Culture of Control.” Punishment & Society 9, no. 1 (2007): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Michelle. “Possibilities and Contestation in Twenty-First-Century U.S. Criminal Justice Downsizing.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12, no. 1 (2016): 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raoult, Sacha, and Harcourt, Bernard. “The Mirror Image of Asylums and Prisons: A Study of Institutionalization Trends in France (1850–2010).” Punishment & Society 19, no. 2 (2017): 155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Lorna. Total Confinement, Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Berkeley, CA: California University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rubin, Ashley. “The Consequences of Prisoners’ Micro-Resistance.” Law & Social Inquiry 42, no. 1 (2017): 138–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliehe, Anna. “Re-discovering Goffman: Contemporary Carceral Geography, the ‘Total’ Institution and Notes on Heterotopia.” Geografiska annaler: Series B, Human Geography 98, no. 1 (2016): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simes, Jessica. Punishing Places: The Geography of Mass Imprisonment in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America. New York: New Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Snacken, Sonja. “Human Dignity and Prisoners’ Rights in Europe.” Crime and Justice 50 (2021): 301–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snacken, Sonja, and Beyens, Kristel. “Sentencing and Prison Overcrowding.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 2, no. 1 (1994): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snacken, Sonja, Casier, Ineke, Devynck, Caroline, and Humblet, Diete. “Life Imprisonment in Belgium: Current Human Rights Challenges.” In Life Imprisonment and Human Rights, edited by Dirk van Zyl Smit and Appleton, Catherine, 241–66. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
Snacken, Sonja, Devynck, Caroline, and Uzieblo, Kasia. “Dignity, Social Reintegration of Prisoners, and the New Penal Power: European Human Rights, Experiences of Belgian Prisoners, and Professional Practices.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 66, no. 9 (2022): 980–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steadman, Henry, Monahan, John, Duffee, Barbara, and Hartston, Eliot. “The Impact of State Mental Hospital Deinstitutionalization on United States Prison Populations, 1968-1978.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 75, no. 2 (1984): 474–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, Hans-Joachim, Jack Tomlin, Gerd Weithmann, Flammer, Erich, and Völlm, Birgit. “Court Sentences to Forensic-Psychiatric Treatment and Imprisonment in Germany: Types of Crimes and Changes from 1995 to 2009.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 71 (2020): 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Ameele, Ruben, Seynnaeve, Katelijne, Dheedene, Joris, and Wongsowikromo, Angretha. “Forensisch Psychiatrisch Centrum Gent binnenstebuiten.” Panopticon 36, no. 4 (2015): 385–91.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk, and Snacken, Sonja. Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Vander Beken, Tom, Heimans, Henri, and Schipaanboord, Els. “Eindelijk een echte nieuwe en goede wet op de internering? Deel 3: De reparatie.” Rechtskundig Weekblad 16 (2016): 603–19.Google Scholar
van der Valk, Sophie, Aizpurua, Eva, and Rogan, Mary. “‘[Y]ou Are Better Off Talking to a F****** Wall’: The Perceptions and Experiences of Grievance Procedures among Incarcerated People in Ireland.” Law & Society Review 56, no. 2 (2022): 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandevelde, Stijn, Veerle Soyez, Tom Vander Beken, Stefaan De Smet, Anja Boers, and Broekaert, Eric. “Mentally Ill Offenders in Prison: The Belgian Case.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34, no. 1 (2011): 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Western, Bruce, Simes, Jessica, and Bradner, Kendra. “Solitary Confinement and Institutional Harm.” Incarceration 3, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/26326663211065644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Kathryne, and Petersilia, Joan. “Keeping Track: Surveillance, Control, and the Expansion of the Carceral State.” Harvard Law Review 129, no. 5 (2016): 1318–60.Google Scholar