Abstract
During presidential campaigns, party members often operate Facebook pages or groups concurrently with the official communications of their respective political parties. However, there is limited evidence regarding the true motivations of these partisans, and how their efforts supplement the online strategies of the parties. Our study is based on interviews conducted with party members who ran Facebook pages to support a candidate during the 2022 French presidential campaign. It sheds light on how they managed their Facebook pages, often autonomously, to serve as supplementary tools to their grassroots tactics and ultimately to bring the campaign closer to the voters. This finding highlights the emergence of a hybrid model of online campaign organization, the partisan-managed campaigning model, which challenges both the traditional top-down model, in which the campaign is managed by the central party, and the more recent citizen-initiated campaign model.
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0106).
References
Asselin, C. (2023). Facebook les chiffres essentiels en 2023 en France et dans le monde [Facebook, essential figures for 2023 in France and worldwide]. Digimind.com. https://blog.digimind.com/fr/agences/facebook-chiffres-essentiels#demographieFRSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. (2016). Voter databases, micro-targeting, and data protection law: can political parties campaign in Europe as they do in North America?. International Data Privacy Law, 6(4), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw02110.1093/idpl/ipw021Search in Google Scholar
Braconnier, C., Coulmont, B., & Dormagen, J. (2017). Toujours pas de chrysanthèmes pour les variables lourdes de la participation électorale: Chute de la participation et augmentation des inégalités électorales au printemps 2017 [The heavy variables are still alive and kicking. The drop in voter turnout and the increase in electoral disparities in spring 2017]. Revue française de science politique, 67, 1023–1040. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.676.102310.3917/rfsp.676.1023Search in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: party decline or party renewal?. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016121664673110.1177/1940161216646731Search in Google Scholar
Deseriis M. (2020). Digital movement parties: A comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei. Information, Communication & Society, 23(12), 1770–1786. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.163137510.1080/1369118X.2019.1631375Search in Google Scholar
Dobber, T., Ó Fathaigh, R., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. (2019). The regulation of online political micro-targeting in Europe (2019). Internet Policy Review, 8(4), online. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.144010.14763/2019.4.1440Search in Google Scholar
Dommett, K., Barclay, A., & Gibson, R. (2023). Just what is data-driven campaigning? A systematic review. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.216679410.1080/1369118X.2023.2166794Search in Google Scholar
Dommett, K., Kefford, G., & Power, S. (2021). The digital ecosystem: The new politics of party organization in parliamentary democracies. Party Politics, 27(5), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406882090766710.1177/1354068820907667Search in Google Scholar
Dommett, K., Temple, L., & Seyd, P. (2021). Dynamics of intra-party organisation in the digital age: a grassroots analysis of digital adoption. Parliamentary Affairs, 74(2), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa00710.1093/pa/gsaa007Search in Google Scholar
Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732311668280210.1177/0267323116682802Search in Google Scholar
Enos, R., & Hersh, E. (2015). Party activists as campaign advertisers: The ground campaign as a principal-agent problem. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541500006410.1017/S0003055415000064Search in Google Scholar
Figeac, J., Smyrnaios, N., Salord, T., Cabanac, G., Fraisier, O., Ratinaud, P., & Seffusatti, F. (2020). Information-sharing practices on Facebook during the 2017 French presidential campaign: An “unreliable information bubble” within the extreme right. Communications, 45(s1), 648–670. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-019310.1515/commun-2019-0193Search in Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The platform party: The transformation of political organisation in the era of big data. In D. Chandler, & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects (pp. 187–198). University of Westminster Press.10.16997/book29.pSearch in Google Scholar
Gerodimos, R., & Justinussen, J. (2015). Obama’s 2012 Facebook campaign: Political communication in the age of the Like button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.98226610.1080/19331681.2014.982266Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2015). Party change, social media, and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics, 21(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406881247257510.1177/1354068812472575Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2001). Changing campaign communications: A party-centered theory of professionalized campaigning. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/10811800112917232310.1177/108118001129172323Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406880910224510.1177/1354068809102245Search in Google Scholar
Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.144527310.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273Search in Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831593Search in Google Scholar
Howard, P. N. (2005). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615986Search in Google Scholar
Kalsnes, B. (2016) The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116644616. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511664461610.1177/2056305116644616Search in Google Scholar
Karpf, D., Kreiss, D., Nielsen, R. K., & Powers, M. (2015). Qualitative political communication| intro-duction~ The role of qualitative methods in political communication research: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Communication 9(19), 1888–1906. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20150005Search in Google Scholar
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, U. (2013). Mastering the art of social media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.78232910.1080/1369118X.2013.782329Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, U., & Russmann, U. (2017). “Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections. In Social Media Campaigning in Europe (pp. 7–21). Routledge.10.4324/9780429196843-2Search in Google Scholar
Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Michalski, T., Gibson, R. K., & Zajac, J. M. (2021). Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 180–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.183770710.1080/19331681.2020.1837707Search in Google Scholar
Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782536.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kreiss, D. (2014). The virtues of participation without power: Campaigns, party networks, and the ends of politics. The Sociological Quarterly, 55, 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.1206810.1111/tsq.12068Search in Google Scholar
Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kruikemeier, S., Vermeer, S., Metoui, N., Dobber, T., & Zarouali, B. (2022). (Tar) getting you: The use of online political targeted messages on Facebook. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221089626. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951722108962610.1177/20539517221089626Search in Google Scholar
Kruschinski, S., & Haller, A. (2017). Restrictions on data-driven political micro-targeting in Germany. Internet Policy Review, 6(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.78010.14763/2017.4.780Search in Google Scholar
Lamot, K., Kreutz, T., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2022). “We rewrote this title”: How news headlines are remediated on Facebook and how this affects engagement. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 20563051221114827. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305122111482710.1177/20563051221114827Search in Google Scholar
Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media + Society 2(1), 2056305116633482. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511663348210.1177/2056305116633482Search in Google Scholar
Lobera, J., & Portos, M. (2021). Decentralizing electoral campaigns? New-old parties, grassroots and digital activism. Information, Communication & Society, 24(10), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.174969710.1080/1369118X.2020.1749697Search in Google Scholar
Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.125426910.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269Search in Google Scholar
Muldoon, J., & Rye, D. (2020). Conceptualising party-driven movements. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/136914812091974410.1177/1369148120919744Search in Google Scholar
Neihouser, M. (2016). Un nouvel espace médiatique. Sociologie de la blogosphere politique française [A new media space. Sociology of the French political blogosphere]. LGDJ-Lextenso.Search in Google Scholar
Neihouser, M., Figeac, J., & Le Coz, F. (2022). Faire campagne dans Facebook. Une pratique privilégiée par les extrêmes droites et les partis émergents [Campaigning on Facebook. A practice favored by the far right and new parties]. Politiques de communication, 19, 55–86. https://doi.org/10.3917/pdc.019.005510.3917/pdc.019.0055Search in Google Scholar
Penney, J. (2017). Social media and citizen participation in “official” and “unofficial” electoral promotion: A structural analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders digital campaign. Journal of Communication, 67, 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1230010.1111/jcom.12300Search in Google Scholar
Tenscher, J., Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Mykkänen, J., Walter, A. S., Findor, A., Jalali, C. & Róka, J. (2016). The professionals speak: Practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 31(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732311561221210.1177/0267323115612212Search in Google Scholar
Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital politics in Western democracies: A comparative study. JHU Press.10.1353/book.27233Search in Google Scholar
Zittel, T. (2009). Lost in technology? Political parties and the online campaigns of constituency candidates in Germany’s mixed member electoral system. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6 (3–4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1933168090304883210.1080/19331680903048832Search in Google Scholar
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Ó Fathaigh, R., Irion, K., Dobber, T., Bodó, B. & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82–96. http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.42010.18352/ulr.420Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
