Abstract
Purpose
Preterm birth presents a major challenge in perinatal care, and predicting preterm birth remains a major challenge. If preterm birth cases can be accurately predicted during pregnancy, preventive interventions and more intensive prenatal monitoring may be possible. Deep learning has the capability to extract image parameters or features related to diseases. We constructed a deep learning model to predict preterm births using transvaginal ultrasound images.
Methods
Patients who were hospitalized for threatened preterm labor or shortened cervical length were enrolled. We used images of the cervix obtained via transvaginal ultrasound examination at admission to predict cases of preterm birth. We used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformer (Vit) for the model construction. We compared the prediction performance of deep learning models with two human experts.
Results
A total of 59 patients were enrolled in the study, including 30 cases in the preterm group and 29 cases in the full-term group. Statistical analysis of clinical variables including cervical length showed no significant differences between the two groups. For accuracy, the best CNN model had the highest accuracy of 0.718 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704, followed by Vision Transformer with accuracy of 0.645 and AUC of 0.587. The accuracy of two human experts was 0.465 and 0.517, respectively.
Conclusions
Deep learning models have important implications for extraction of features that provide more accurate assessment of preterm birth than traditional visual assessment by the human eye.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Dassanayake PS, et al. Cervical phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 test for the prediction of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:57–73.
Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ, et al. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345:760–5.
Suff N, Story L, Shennan A. The prediction of preterm delivery: what is new? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;24:27–32.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–8.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–10.
Bulten W, Kartasalo K, Litjens G, et al. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge. Nat Med. 2022;28:154–63.
Son M, Miller ES. Predicting preterm birth: cervical length and fetal fibronectin. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41:445–51.
Esplin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, et al. Predictive accuracy of serial transvaginal cervical lengths and quantitative vaginal fetal fibronectin levels for spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women. JAMA. 2017;317:1047–56.
Bustamante D, Yan Y, Basij M, et al. Cervix ultrasound texture analysis to differentiate between term and preterm birth pregnancy: a machine learning approach. In: proceedings of the 2022 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS); 2022:1–4.
Fiset S, Martel A, Glanc P, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth among twin gestations using machine learning and texture analysis of cervical ultrasound images. Univ Tor Med J. 2019;96:6–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ohtaka, A., Akazawa, M. & Hashimoto, K. Deep learning algorithm for predicting preterm birth in the case of threatened preterm labor admissions using transvaginal ultrasound. J Med Ultrasonics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01394-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01394-9