Abstract
The paper examines the syntax of two unaccusative verbs in Polish – ubyć.perf/ubywać.imperf ‘to disappear, to decrease’ and przybyć.perf/przybywać.imperf ‘to arrive, to increase’ – with a view to shedding light on the structure of existential unaccusatives. The two above-mentioned verbs appear in two distinct paradigms – the disappearance/motion verb and the existential one – both of which are taken to represent subtypes of existential structure. Existential verbs are treated here as monadic predicates with a single small clause complement, whose internal structure may vary, depending on the predicate. The two existential unaccusatives analysed in the paper may select two different types of small clause complement, which are different from the small clause selected by the existential być ‘to be’. Thus, Polish seems to make use of three different small clause structures in existential clauses. The paper also provides evidence that in Polish, like in English, existential unaccusatives are structurally distinct from change of state unaccusatives, and thus in the two languages there is more than one way to be structurally unaccusative. The account bears on the analysis of the genitive of negation in Polish, especially the issue of its inapplicability to existential unaccusatives versus its presence with the existential być ‘to be’.
References
Babby, Leonard. 1980. Existential sentences and negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Search in Google Scholar
Babyonyshev, Maria. 1996. Structural connections in syntax and processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2007. Phase syntax: The Polish genitive of negation. Potsdam: University of Potsdam Habilitation dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2018. Clause structure, case and agreement in Polish existential, possessive and locative sentences: A phase-based account. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54(4). 637–696.10.1515/psicl-2018-0025Search in Google Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna & Anna Prażmowska. Dative possessors with “lack”-type verbs in Polish. Die Welt der Slaven, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna & Bogdan Szymanek. 2007. Polish nominativeless contructions with dative experiencers: Form, meaning and structure. Studies in Polish Linguistics 4. 61–99.Search in Google Scholar
Borschev, Vladimir & Barbara H. Partee. 2002. The Russian genitive of negation: Theme-rheme structure or perspective structure? Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10. 105–114.Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2006. Case and agreement with genitive of quantification in Russian. In Cedrick Boeckx (ed.), Agreement systems, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.92.07bosSearch in Google Scholar
Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 591–656.Search in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2000. The unergative/unaccusative distinction in Polish. In Piotr Bański & Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.), Proceedings of GLiP-1, 35–46. Warszawa: IPIPAN.Search in Google Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2002. Unaccusativity mismatches and unaccusativity diagnostics from Derivational Morphology. In Paul Boucher & Marc Plénat (eds.), Many morphologies, 48–81. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00127.x.Search in Google Scholar
Dziwirek, Katarzyna. 1992. Polish subjects. New York, NY: Garland.Search in Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax 2(2). 101–140.10.1111/1467-9612.00017Search in Google Scholar
Francez, Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Francez, Itamar. 2010. Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials. Linguistics and Philosophy 33(1). 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9073-2.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann, Jutta M. & Nataša Milićević. 2008. The syntax of existential sentences in Serbian. In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, vol. 16, 168–184. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Harves, Stephanie. 2002. Unaccusative syntax in Russian. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 2004. The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 393–430. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402616.Search in Google Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 2008. On the relation between expletive “there” and its associate: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.117.Search in Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, Patricia. 2012. Unaccusavtivity at the interfaces. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, Patricia. 2018. Existential unaccusativity and new discourse referents. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). X.1–X.42. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.283.Search in Google Scholar
Irwin, Patricia. 2021. Discourse and unacccusativity: Quantitative effects of a structural phenomenon. In Artemis Alexiadou & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds.), The syntax of argument structure: Empirical advancements and theoretical relevance, 181–202. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110757255-007Search in Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga. 2005. Genitive case: A modal account. In Yehuda Falk (ed.), Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics 21 (IATL 21). https://www.iatl.org.il/?page_id=139 (accessed 6 September 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Khrizman, Keren. 2011. Imperfective aspect and partitive case in Russian. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Klockmann, Heidi. 2015. What are categories? Adjective-like and noun-like semi-lexical numerals in Polish. In Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), How categorical are categories? New approaches to the old questions of Noun, Verb and Adjective. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514510-008Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1992. An interpretation for the English existential construction. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California at Santa Cruz dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1997. A semantics for the English existential construction. New York, NY: Garland.Search in Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising or predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Search in Google Scholar
Myler, Neil. 2016. Building and interpreting possession sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. & Vladimir Borschev. 2004. The semantics of Russian genitive of negation: The nature and role of perspectival structure. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceedings from SALT XIV, 212–234. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v14i0.2908Search in Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara, Vladimir Borschev, Elena Paducheva, Yakov Testelets & Igor Yanovich. 2012. The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: Genitive of Negation and Genitive of Intensionality. Oslo Studies in Language 4(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.229.Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 1999. Case assignment and the complement-adjunct dichotomy: A non-configurational constraint-based approach. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena. 1992. Thematic constraints on selected constructions in English and Polish. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Search in Google Scholar
Tajsner, Przemysław. 2021. How much inversion is there in Polish existential sentences? A view from Simplest Merge and feature-free syntax. Paper presented at 50th Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań University, 16–19 September.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 2006. The subject-predicate theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 648–651. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.648.Search in Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 1989. On word order: A government-binding study of English and Polish. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Search in Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2015. Case distribution and φ-agreement with Polish Genitive of Quantification in the feature sharing theory of Agree. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(2). 315–357. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2015-0013.Search in Google Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek. 1998. The syntax of clitics: Steps towards a minimalist account. Poznań: Motivex.Search in Google Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek. 2003. Nominative-to-genitive shift and the negative copula nie ma/not is: Implications for the checking theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10. 174–199.Search in Google Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek. 2020. Genitive of negation (GoN) in Polish possessive and locative existential sentences: A testing tool for case overwriting, case projections and derivational phases. In Gréte Dalmi, Jacek Witkoś & Piotr Cegłowski (eds.), Approaches to predicative possession, 11–40. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-002Search in Google Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek, Dominika Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, Piotr Cegłowski & Paulina Łęska. 2018. The syntax of numeral noun constructions. A view from Polish. Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/b12901Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
