Abstract
Infinitival clauses are known to represent a caseless domain for the subject. Nevertheless, Russian is often cited as an exception to this property. It has a so-called “dative-infinitive construction” (DIC), in which an overt subject appears in dative case. Dative morphology also appears in certain control environments, resurfacing on a semi-predicate, which has been taken as evidence of case presence on PRO. This paper scrutinizes various types of DIC and proposes their unified analysis, relying on two theoretical tools: the framework of Distributed Morphology and the Universal Spine Hypothesis. Examining the building blocks of the infinitival clause in Russian, this paper argues against a covert-modal hypothesis. The dative case is attributed to a to-like functional head, Goal, which anchors the infinitival clause to a contextually salient point in time or a world of evaluation. Within the clausal spine, GoalP can either immediately dominate VoiceP or be immediately dominated by CP. The proposed analysis builds upon the concept of “goal-oriented directedness”, borrowed from the cognitive-functionalist literature and formalized in a generative perspective. Application of this analysis to control environments leads to a conclusion that two types of infinitival domains should be differentiated in Russian: full-fledged (GoalP-containing) CPs and bare infinitival phrases.
References
Antonyuk, Svitlana. 2020. The puzzle of Russian ditransitives. In Anna Pineda & Jaume Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 43–74. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Arregui, Ana, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Salanova. 2014. Cross-linguistic variability in imperfectivity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(2). 307–362.10.1007/s11049-013-9226-4Search in Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard. 1998. Subject control as direct predication: Evidence from Russian. In Željko Bošković, Steven Franks & William Snyder (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 6, 17–37. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard. 2009. The syntax of argument structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576584Search in Google Scholar
Bailyn, John. 2012. The syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373–415.Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2006. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197341Search in Google Scholar
Biskup, Peter. 2019. Prepositions, case and verbal prefixes: The case of Slavic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.255Search in Google Scholar
Boneh, Nora & Léa Nash. 2017. The syntax and semantics of dative DPs in Russian ditransitives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35(4). 899–953.10.1007/s11049-017-9360-5Search in Google Scholar
Borik, Olga. 2006. Aspect and reference time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291298.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Burukina, Irina. 2020. Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 1–37.10.5334/gjgl.905Search in Google Scholar
Champollion, Lucas. 2017. Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198755128.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–167. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Cipria, Alicia & Craige Roberts. 2000. Spanish imperfecto and pretérito: Truth conditions and aktionsart effects in a situation semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8(4). 297–347.10.1023/A:1011202000582Search in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1974. The second dative: A transformational approach. In Richard D. Brecht & Catherine V. Chvany (eds.), Slavic transformational syntax, 123–150. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2008. The plan’s the thing: Deconstructing futurate meanings. Linguistic Inquiry 39(2). 261–274.10.1162/ling.2008.39.2.261Search in Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2009. The semantics of the future. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203880258Search in Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar
Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. A phase-based approach to Russian free word order. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Efremov, Evgenii. 2020. Dative case with infinitives in Russian. In Angelica Hernández & Margaret Emma Butterworth (eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association: Canadian Linguistic Association. Available at: https://cla-acl.artsci.utoronto.ca/actes-2020-proceedings/.Search in Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595.10.1162/002438901753373005Search in Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2006. Russian dative subjects, case, and control. Berkeley: Ms. University of California.Search in Google Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert. 2001. Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitive construction in Russian. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert. 2007. Modality and aspect: Interaction of constructional meaning and aspectual meaning in the dative-infinitive construction in Russian. Russian Linguistics 31(3). 201–230.10.1007/s11185-007-9015-ySearch in Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195089707.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal & Per Erik Solberg. 2019. An unexpected root clause. Linguistic Inquiry 50. 649–661.10.1162/ling_a_00296Search in Google Scholar
Israeli, Alina. 2013. Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian: Taxonomy and semantics. In Irina Kor Chaine (ed.), Current studies of Slavic linguistics, 199–224. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/slcs.146.12isrSearch in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1962 [1958]. Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem [Morphological observations on Slavic declension]. In Selected writings, vol. 2, 154–183. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung. 2009. Null prepositional complementizers and the dative of obligation in Russian. In Jodi Reich, Maria Babyonyshev & Daria Kavitskaya (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 17, 64–80. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung. 2011. The syntax of the BE-possessive: Parametric variation and surface diversities. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.172Search in Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga. 2011. The actual world is abnormal: On the semantics of the bylo construction in Russian. Linguistics and Philosophy 34. 57–84.10.1007/s10988-011-9093-6Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Komar, Eric. 1999. Dative subjects in Russian revisited: Are all datives created equal? In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Herbert Coats & Cynthia Vakareliyska (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 7, 245–264. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Kondrashova, Natalia. 1994. Agreement and dative subjects in Russian. In Sergey Avrutin, Steven Franks & Ljiljana Progovac (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 2, 255–285. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8. 92–110.10.3765/salt.v8i0.2808Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2008. Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26. 877–924.10.1007/s11049-008-9054-0Search in Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2015. A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Livitz, Inna. 2012. Modal possessive constructions: Evidence from Russian. Lingua 122. 714–747.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.002Search in Google Scholar
Madariaga, Nerea. 2006. Why semi-predicative items always agree? Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14. 45–78.Search in Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Melnikova, Anna. 2020. The aspectual distribution and modal licensing in Russian infinitival constructions. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5(1). 631–642.10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4716Search in Google Scholar
Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2). 15–28.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, John & David M. Perlmutter. 1999. Case, agreement, and temporal particles in Russian infinitival clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 7(2). 219–246.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, John & David M. Perlmutter. 2000. What does it take to be a dative subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 373–416.10.1023/A:1006451714195Search in Google Scholar
Pekelis, Olga. 2019. Expletives in a null subject language and criteria for expletiveness: Evidence from Russian. Studies in Polish Linguistics 1. 189–205.10.4467/23005920SPL.19.012.10992Search in Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2006. Negative polarity items in Russian and the bagel problem. In Adam Przepiorkowski & Sue Brown (eds.), Negation in Slavic, 153–178. Bloomington: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 2013. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199292424.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2018. Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199547524.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and aspect in Slavic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291960.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa & Ana Arregui. 2012. Building involuntary states in Slavic. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A crosscategorial view of event structure, 300–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Schein, Barry. 1982. Nonfinite complements in Russian. In Alec Marantz & Tim Stowell (eds.), Papers in syntax. (MIT working papers in linguistics 4), 217–243. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1993. Dative subjects in Russian. In Jindřich Toman (ed.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 1, 129–172. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór. 2002. To be an oblique subject: Russian versus Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 691–724.10.1023/A:1020445016498Search in Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek. 2013. The PRO-wh connection in modal existential wh-constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 1163–1205.10.1007/s11049-013-9205-9Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1997 [1991]. The parameter of aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32(2). 205–253.10.7557/12.68Search in Google Scholar
Titov, Elena. 2017. The canonical order of Russian objects. Linguistic Inquiry 48(3). 427–457.10.1162/ling_a_00249Search in Google Scholar
Tsedryk, Egor. 2018. Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian: Are they really biclausal? In Wayles Browne, Miloje Despić, Naomi Enzinna, Simone Harmath-de Lemos, Robin Karlin & Draga Zec (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol. 25, 298–317. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Tsedryk, Egor. 2020. The modal side of the dative: From predicative possession to possessive modality. In Anna Pineda & Jaume Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 195–219. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139833899Search in Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Zaičkova, Iržina. 1972. Datel’nyj bespredlozhnyj v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke [Prepositionless dative in modern literary Russian]. Praha: Universita Karlova.Search in Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
