Abstract
This article presents empirical findings about children’s experiences in the closed childcare institution service (CCIS) in Estonia and the assistance children receive from their own perspectives and those of parents and practitioners. The study draws on the lived experiences of 12 children/young people, four parents, and 26 practitioners working with children in need in the CCIS system through interviews conducted May–August 2022. Four main themes emerged from the data analysis: negative factors arising from the child’s development environment, inadequate early identification and inefficient networking as risk factors in aggravating the need for assistance, shortcomings in the organisation of services, suitability and unsuitability of the service. The results of this study indicate that most of the children’s problems and difficulties originated in the home environment, the family’s inability to cope, and a lack of parental ability. The ‘journey’ toward the CCIS began, in part, because timely services and support were unavailable. On the one hand, the children’s relationship – more precisely, the supporting relationship – with their child protective worker was inadequate, but on the other, it turned out that there were no suitable services available before referral to the CCIS, and the children’s and families’ difficulties were therefore not identified at an early stage. Negative experiences among families and children in need reduce their openness to assistance, which makes further intervention difficult. Systemic support, including quality of relationships, interagency collaboration, and practical support by practitioners, is the basis for improving permanence, positive navigation of difficulties, and stability as well as promoting resilience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aasma, K. (2021). Võrgustikuliikmete kogemused kinnisest lasteasutusest naasnud lapse toetamisel ringistvälja võrgustikutöö mudeli näitel [Experiences of Network Members in Supporting a Child Returning from a Closed Childcare Institution: A Case Study of a Network Collaboration Model]. [Master´s thesis]. Tallinn: Tallinn University.
Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., Charles, D. R., Longworth, S. L., McClelland, G. M., & Dulcan, M. K. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(4), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.403.
Alfandari, R. (2017). Evaluation of a national reform in the Israeli child protection practice designed to improve children’s participation in decision-making. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 54–62.
Appleton, J. V., Terlektsi, E., & Coombes, L. (2015). Implementing the strengthening families approach to child protection conferences. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 1395–1414. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct211.
Bakketeig, E., & Backe-Hansen, E. (2018). Agency and flexible support in transition from care: Learning from the experiences of a Norwegian sample of care leavers doing well. Nordic Social Work Research, 8, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1518815.
Bastiaanssen, I. L. W., Delsing, M. J. M. H., Kroes, G., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Veerman, J. W. (2014). Group care worker interventions and child problem behavior in residential youth care: Course and bidirectional associations. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.012.
Bergman, E. (2014). We can do better: Sharing responsibility to better meet the needs of dualstatus youth. Wisconsin Council on Children and Families. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566711.pdf.
Berrick, J. D., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). Children’s involvement in care order decision-making: A cross-country analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.001.
Bouma, H., López López, M., Knorth, E. J., & Grietens, H. (2018). Meaningful participation for children in the Dutch child protection system: A critical analysis of relevant provisions in policy documents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.016.
Branson, C.E., Baetz, C.L., Horwitz, S.M., & Hoagwood, K.E. (2017). Trauma-informed juvenile justice systems: A systematicreview of definitions and core components. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(6), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000255.
Child Protection Act (2014). RT I, 06.12.2014, 1. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/LasteKS.
CRC (United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child) (1989). New York: United Nations.
Cull, M. J., Rzepnicki, T. L., O´Day, K., & Epstein, R. A. (2013). Applying principles from safety science to improve child protection. Child Welfare, 92(2), 179–196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48623385.
Damman, J. L. (2014). Better practices in parent engagement: Lessons from the USA and England. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2013.765834.
Ekendahl, M., Månsson, J., & Karlsson, P. (2020). Risk and responsibilization: Resistance and compliance in Swedish treatment for youth cannabis use. Drugs: Education Prevention & Policy, 27(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2018.1544224.
Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Lösel, F., & Ttofi, M. M. (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.003. https://doi-org.ezproxy.tlu.ee/.
Goldson, B., & Muncie, J. (2012). Towards a global ‘child friendly’ juvenile justice? International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 40(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.09.004.
Gornischeff, K., & Linnas, E. (2020). Innovatsioon Seisneb koostöös –kinnise lasteasutuse jätkutoe pilootprojekti kogemus [Innovation lies in collaboration - experiences from a Pilot Project of Closed Childcare Service: Continued support]. https://sotsiaalkindlustusamet.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Ohvriabi/innovatsioon_seisneb_koostoos_klat.pdf.
Gornischeff, K., Loide, K., Gornischeff, K., Saia, K., Toros, K., & Ülviste, E. (2019). Lapsesõbraliku õigusemõistmise põhimõtete rakendamine Eesti õigussüsteemis ja alaealiste õigusrikkujate juhtumite kohtulahendite näitel [The application of the principles of child-friendly justice in the Estonian justice system based on the example of court cases involving juvenile offenders]. Acta Politica Estica, 9, 24–62.
Grace, M., Coventry, L., & Batterham, D. (2012). The role of inter-agency collaboration in joined‐up case management. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.637646.
Graham, A. (2011). Early Intervention: The Next Steps. An Independent Report to Her Majesty’s Government https://dera.ioe.ac.uk//14161/.
Green, M. J., Hindmarsh, G., Kariuki, M., Laurens, K. R., Neil, A. L., Katz, I., Chilvers, M., Harris, F., & Carr, V. J. (2020). Mental disorders in children known to child protection services during early childhood. The Medical Journal of Australia, 212(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50392.
Haight, W. L., Bidwell, L. N., Marshall, J. M., & Khatiwoda, P. (2014). Implementing the crossover youth practice model in diverse contexts: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals’ experiences of multisystem collaborations. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.001.
Holder, T. (2021). Safety assessment and family evaluation model: A systematic, change-based approach to public child welfare intervention. Child Welfare, 99(2), 99–134.
Keddell, E., & Hyslop, I. (2020). Networked decisions: Decision-making thresholds in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 50(7), 1961–1980. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz131.
Knight, A., Maple, M., Shakeshaft, A., Shakeshaft, B., & Pearce, T. (2018). Improving the evidence base for services working with youth at-risk of involvement in the criminal justice system: Developing a standardised program approach. Health Justice, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-018-0066-5.
Lee, S. Y. (2013). Psychometric tests of the risk and resiliency check-up. Youth Violence and Juvenile Delinquency, 11(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204012460875.
Lips, A. M. B., O’Neill, R. R., & Eppel, E. A. (2011). Cross-agency collaboration in New Zealand: An empirical study of information sharing practices, enablers and barriers in managing for shared social out‐comes. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.533571.
Modrowski, C.A., Mendez, L., & Kerig, P.K. (2021). Associations among trauma exposure, posttraumatic dissociation, reckless/self-destructive behavior, and adolescent offending. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 22(5), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1869655.
Morgan, S., Pullon, S., Garrett, S., & McKinlay, E. (2019). Interagency collaborative care for young people with complex needs: Front-line staff perspectives. Health and Social Care in the Community, 27(4), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12719.
Morris, K. (2012). Thinking family? The complexities for family engagement in care and protection. British Journal of Social Work, 42(5), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr116.
Nash, J. K., & Kim, J. S. (2007). Patterns of change over time in beliefs legitimizing aggression in adolescents and young adults: Risk trajectories and their relationship with serious aggression. Social Work Research, 31(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/31.4.231.
Pećnik, N., Matić, J., & Milaković, A. T. (2016). Fulfillment of the child’s participation rights in the family and the child’s psychosocial adjustment: Children’s and parents’ views. Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku, 23(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1382.
Piho, K. (2020). Placement in a closed children’s institution. Analysis of case law [Kinnisesse lasteasutusse paigutamine. Kohtupraktika analüüs]. Riigikohus, Õigusteabe- ja koolitusosakond.
Pölkki, P. L., & Vornanen, R. H. (2016). Role and success of Finnish early childhood education and care in supporting child welfare clients: Perspectives from parents and professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0746-x.
Saia, K. (2022). Interprofessional collaboration in social rehabilitation service for dually-involved children in Estonia. [Doctoral dissertation, Tallinn University]. https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/en/books/188170.
Saia, K., Liik, K., Schults, A., & Malmberg, J. (2022). Lastekaitse-, haridus, sotsiaal- ja õiguskaitsesüsteemi koostöö kinnise lasteasutuse teenuse laste hüvanguks: Kitsaskohad ja lahendused [Interacgency collaboration for the Well-Being of Children at Closed Childcare Institution: Challenges and solutions]. Tallinna Ülikool, CIRIC.
Sanders, J., Munford, R., & Liebenberg, L. (2017). Positive youth development practices and better outcomes for high risk youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 69, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.029.
Schoch, A., Aeby, G., Müller, B., Cottier, M., Seglias, L., Biesel, K., Sauthier, G., & Schnurr, S. (2020). Participation of children and parents in the Swiss child protection system in the past and present: An interdisciplinary perspective. Social Sciences, 9(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080148.
Schreiber, J. C., Fuller, T., & Paceley, M. S. (2013). Engagement in child protective services: Parent perceptions of worker skills. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.018.
Schwartz, R. G., & Chen, Y. (2020). The role of Social Work in Juvenile Justice. International experiences. Raoul Wallenberg Institute.
Sindi, I., Lehtme, R., & Toros, K. (2022). Kohaliku omavalitsuse ja tugivõrgustiku pakutav abi lapsele ja perele enne kinnise lasteasutuse teenuse (KLAT) osutamist, teenuse ajal ning pärast teenust. [Support provided for the child in need and the family prior, during and after the Closed Child Care Institution Service by the Local Government and the Network]. Tallinna Ülikool, CIRIC.
Social Insurance Board (2021). Ennetustalituse teenused 2018–2020 [Preventive Services 2018 – 202]. https://sotsiaalkindlustusamet.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/uudiskiri/0321/graafika.pdf.
Social Insurance Board (2023). Closed Child Care Institution Service https://www.sotsiaalkindlustusamet.ee/et/lapsed-pered/lastekaitse/kinnise-lasteasutuse-teenus.
Social Welfare Act (2015). RT I, 30.12.2015, 5. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/519012023004/consolide.
Statistics Estonia (2019). Rahvastikustatistika [Population statistica]. https://www.siseministeerium.ee/et/eesmark-tegevused/rahvastikutoimingud/.
Statistics Estonia (2023). Children without parental care and children needing assistance. https://andmed.stat.ee/en/stat/sotsiaalelu__sotsiaalne-kaitse__sotsiaalabi__vanemliku-hoolitsuseta-lapsed.
Surva, L., & Tamm, K., et al. (2019). Alaealiste õigusrikkumised [Juvenile Delinquency]. In A. Ahven (Ed.), Kuritegevus Eestis 2018 (pp. 21–28). Justiitsministeerium.
Tamm, K., & Salla, K. A. (2016). Laste toime pandud süütegudele reageerimise analüüs. [The analysis of reacting to the offences committed by children]. Justiitsministeerium. https://www.kriminaalpoliitika.ee/et/statistika-ja-uuringud/uuringute-andmebaas.
Tart, K., Toros, K., & Falch-Eriksen, A. (2022). Collaboration of Child Protective Services and early childhood educators: Enhancing the well–being of children in need. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01149-y.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 77–36). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Toros, K., & Lehtme, R. (2022). The case of assessment: Child participation during administrative proceedings. In A. Falch-Eriksen & K. Toros (Eds.), Professional Practice in Child Protection and the Child’s Right to Participate (pp. 47 – 62). New York: Routledge.
Toros, K., Schults, A., & Lehtme, R. (2022). Knowledge and Good Practices Related to Early Identification of Children in Need/At-Risk and Support: Literature Review. Tallinn University.
Treacy, M., & Nohilly, M. (2020). Teacher education and child protection: Complying with requirements or putting children first? Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105009.
Turliuc, M., Mairean, C., & Danila, O. (2013). A multifaceted theory: individual, family, and community resilience. A Research Review. In I. Rogobete & A. Neagoe (Eds.), Contemporary issues facing families: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 33–53). Verlag fur Kultur und Wissenshaft.
van der Put, C. E. (2020). The development of a risk and needs assessment instrument for truancy. Children & Youth Services Review, 109, 104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104721.
Walker, A. (2006). Child protection and interagency collaboration. Policy Quarterly, 2(4), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v2i4.4206.
Funding
This research was funded by the Republic of Estonia Social Insurance Board (Grant No. TAU22011A).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study was granted approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Health Development (decision number 1047).
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Toros, K., Sindi, I., Lehtme, R. et al. A Study of the Closed Childcare Institution Service in Estonia. Child Adolesc Soc Work J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-023-00951-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-023-00951-y