Abstract
This paper shows how otherness, having a negative representation potential, is covered in media discourse with a focus on the first day of the Russia–Ukraine war. In this article, I specifically investigate the representation of otherness that weaves the web of relations within the “us versus them” narrative espoused most strongly by Teun A. Van Dijk (1992. Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society 3. 87–118, 2002. Discourse and racism. In David Goldberg & John Solomos (eds.), The Blackwell companion to racial and ethnic studies, 145–159. Oxford: Blackwell) and further developed within the premises of a proximisation theory (e.g., Cap 2013. Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; Chilton 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge). This framework concerns the positive self-representation of Ukraine and its performance contrasted with Russia’s negative other-presentation. Following this account, otherness serves as means of legitimising media actions as preventive measures taken to inform society about the past, create the present state of the world through assertions (Dunmire 2011. Projecting the future through political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; Searle 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press) which endorse media credibility and predict future outcomes with respect to the horror of the unfolding war. This study argues that the representation of otherness takes place at the proximisation level of certain lexico-grammatical choices that are used strategically by media to cover the narrative of a “permanent military standby” and the “immediacy of otherness”.
-
Competing interest: There is no conflict of interests.
References
Balibar, Etienne. 2005. Difference, otherness, exclusion. Parallax 11(1). 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353464052000321074.Search in Google Scholar
Bar-On, Dan. 2008. The others within us: Constructing Jewish–Israeli identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk 26. 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2006.027.Search in Google Scholar
Betts, Richard. 2003. Striking first: A history of thankfully lost opportunities. Ethics and International Affairs 17(1). 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2003.tb00414.x.Search in Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik, Irene Bloemraad & Els de Graauw. 2015a. Migrants, minorities and the media: Information, representations and participation in the public sphere. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1(6). 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2014.1002197.Search in Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik, Hannah Stonebraker, Nisar Hasher & Rana Abdelhamid. 2015b. Media portrayals of minorities: Muslims in British newspaper headlines, 2001–2012. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41. 942–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2014.1002200.Search in Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1921. The mind of primitive man. New York: The Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Lorraine, Joanne Brown & Barry Richards. 2015. Media representations of Islam and international Muslim student well-being. International Journal of Educational Research 69. 50–58.10.1016/j.ijer.2014.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Buchowski, Michał. 2004. Zrozumieć innego. Antropologia racjonalności. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Search in Google Scholar
Burszta, Wojciech. 1998. Antropologia kultury. Tematy, teorie, interpretacje. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S–ka.Search in Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert & Wolfgang Dressler. [1972] 1981. [Einführung in die Textlinguistik.] Translated into English by Wolfgang Dressler. Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.10.1515/9783111349305Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in political discourse: A cross – disciplinary perspective on the modern US war rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2010. Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.232Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The language of fear. Communicating fear in public discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1Search in Google Scholar
Carrera, Sergio & Meltem Ineli-Ciger. 2023. EU Responses to the large-scale refugee displacement from Ukraine: An analysis on the temporary protection directive and its implications for the future EU asylum policy. Italy: European University Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Castaneda, Laura & Shannon Campbell. 2006. News and sexuality: Media portraits of diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452233062Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2010. From mind to grammar: Coordinate systems, prepositions, constructions. In Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, 499–514. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845703Search in Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie & Norman Fairclough. 2010. Critical discourse analysis in organizational studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies 47(6). 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x.Search in Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2010. Legitimation through differentiation: Discursive construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an oppponent to military action. In Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.36.07choSearch in Google Scholar
Chruszczewski, Piotr P. 2007. On the notion of communicational grammar in political linguistics. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 3. 145–155.10.2478/v10016-007-0010-ySearch in Google Scholar
Chruszczewski, Piotr P. 2011. Językoznawstwo antropologiczne. Zadania i metody. Wrocław: Oddział Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Search in Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan, Bertie Kaal & Isa Maks. 2010. Mapping world view in political texts using discourse space theory: Metaphor as an analytical tool. Paper presented at RaAM 8 conference, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1–8 July.Search in Google Scholar
Cottle, Simon. 2006. Mediatized conflict. Berkshire: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar
Cruz, Consuelo. 2000. Identity and persuasion: How nations remember their pasts and make their future. World Politics 52. 275–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887100016555.Search in Google Scholar
Dines, Gail & Jean M. Humez. 2003. Gender, race, and class in the media: A text–reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2011. Projecting the future through political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.41Search in Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2015. The anthropology of intentions. Language in a world of others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139207706Search in Google Scholar
Duszak, Anna. 2002. Us and others: An introduction. In Anna Duszak (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.98.01dusSearch in Google Scholar
De Saint-Georges, Ingrid. 2003. Anticipatory discourses; Producing futures of action in a vocational program for long-term unemployed. Georgetown University Phd dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Ellseberg, Daniel. 1959. The Political uses of madness. Lecture by Daniel Ellsberg on the analysis of madness and the unclear motives of opponents in game and war theory. https://archive.org/details/ThePoliticalUsesOfMadness/ELS005–001/ (accessed 27 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Engesser, Sven, Nayla Fawzi & Anders Olof Larsson. 2017. Populist Online Communication. Information, Communication & Society 20(9). 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525.Search in Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the other. Columbia: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media discourse. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Filliettaz, Laurent. 2004. The construction of requests in transactional settings. A discursive approach. In Carlos Gouveia, Silvestre Carminda & Luísa Azuaga (eds.), Discourse, communication and the enterprise: Linguistic perspectives, 79–97. Lisbonne: Ulices.Search in Google Scholar
Foley, William. 1997. Anthropological linguistics. USA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the news. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Gough, Val & Mary Talbot. 1996. Guilt over games boys play: Coherence as a focus for examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page. In Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 214–230. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Grusin, Richard. 2004. Premedation. Criticism 46(1). 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2004.0030.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London, UK: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230299009_2Search in Google Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi & Marco Cinnirella. 2010. Media representations of British Muslims and hybridised threats to identity. Contemporary Islam 4. 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-010-0126-7.Search in Google Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi & Maya A. Yampolsky. 2011. Social representations of the holocaust and Israeli Jewish identity construction. Social Identities 17(2). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.558374.Search in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam & Richard Fitzgerald. 2008. This poll hasn’t happened yet: Temporal play in election predictions. Discourse and Communication 2(1). 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307085574.Search in Google Scholar
Kagarlitsky, Borys, Janina Puder & Stefan Schmalz. 2022. The whole world is becoming more like Russia. A conversation on deglobalization in the wake of the war in Ukraine. Berliner Journal fur Soziologie 32(3). 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00482-w.Search in Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2019. Populist digital media? Social media systems and the global populist right discourse. Project: Critical Discourse Studies and Participatory Web. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337059035_Populist_Digital_Media_Social_media_systems_and_the_global_populist_right_discourse (accessed 6 December 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Klare, Michael. 1993. Application of arms control to regional conflicts in the third world. In Joseph Rotblat (ed.), Striving for peace, security and development in the world, 107–192. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.10.1142/9789814354608_0014Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408Search in Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2022. Proximization, prosumption and salience in digital discourse: On the interface of social media communicative dynamics and the spread of populist ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies 19(2). 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1842774.Search in Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2009. On communicating otherness, meaning, and information. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203894804Search in Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2022. Language ideologies and social identities. In Svenja Völkel & Nico Nassenstein (eds.), Approaches to language and culture, 101–125. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110726626-005Search in Google Scholar
Kulikova, Lyudmila V. & Juliya I. Detinko. 2020. Discursive construction of ‘others’ in the semiotic space of political communication. In Elena N. Malyuga (ed.), Functional approach to professional discourse exploration in linguistics, 199–230. Moscow: Springer.10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_7Search in Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Technical discourse and technocratic ideology. In Michael A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.), Learning, keeping, and using language: Selected papers from the 8th AILA world congress of applied linguistics, II, 435–460. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.lkul2.31lemSearch in Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1998. Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language 5(1). 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem.Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. [1958] 1963. [Anthropologie Structurale.] Translated from the French into English by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Mannarini, Terri, Giuseppe A. Veltri & Sergio Salvatore (eds.). 2020. Media and social representation of otherness. Psycho–social–cultural implications. Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-36099-3Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Mason, David. 2000. Race and ethnicity in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McComiskey, Bruce. 2017. Post–truth rhetoric and composition. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.10.2307/j.ctt1w76tbgSearch in Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian & Benjamin Quasinowski. 2022. Conversational organisation and genre. In Svenja Völkel & Nico Nassenstein (eds.), Approaches to language and culture, 127–158. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110726626-006Search in Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 2000. Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa & Ronald Inglehart. 2019. Cultural backlash. Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108595841Search in Google Scholar
Poole, Elizabeth. 2002. Reporting Islam: Media representations of British Muslims. London: I. B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755604579Search in Google Scholar
Poole, Elizabeth. 2006. The effects of September 11 and the war in Iraq on British newspaper coverage. In Elizabeth Poole & John E. Richardson (eds.), Muslims in the news media, 89–102. London: I. B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755695652.ch-008Search in Google Scholar
Posen, Adam. 2022. The end of globalization? What Russia’s war in Ukraine means for the world economy. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2022-03-17/end-global-ization (accessed 27 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Pullen, Christopher & Margaret Cooper. 2010. LGBT identity and online new media. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855430Search in Google Scholar
Qureshi, Sajda. 2022. Digital transformation at the margins: A battle for the soul of self-sovereignty. Information Technology for Development 28(2). 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2062291.Search in Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and anti-semitism. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2004. (Mis)representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.9Search in Google Scholar
Rowinski, Paul. 2021. Post-truth, post-press, post-Europe. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-55571-9Search in Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. [1960] 1980. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Search in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1992. Anaphoric then: Aspectual, textual and epistemic meaning. Linguistics 30(4). 753–792. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.4.753.Search in Google Scholar
Scollon, Suzanne. 2001. Habitus, consciousness, agency, and the problem of intention: How we carry and are carried by political discourses. Folia Linguistica XXXV. 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.97.Search in Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Suzie W. Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203422724Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sego, Lewis P. 2000. Philistines, barbarians, aliens, et alii: Cognitive semantics in political “otherness”. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Cornelia Ilie (eds.), Language and ideology. Vol II: Descriptive cognitive approaches, 107–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.205.07segSearch in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. [1986] 1996. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Strukowska, Marta E. 2022. Front-page coverage of the first day of the Russian invasion on Ukraine in 2022. The ethnographic discourse analysis based on the Polish press reportage. Academic Journal of Modern Philology 18. 157–175.Search in Google Scholar
Taras, Vasyltsiv, Olha Levytska Taras & Olexandr Rudkovsky. 2022. Consequences of the war for the labour market of the Carpathian region of Ukraine: Priorities of stabilisation policy. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 4. 29–38.Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1992. Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society 3. 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005.Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. The study of discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process, 1–35. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. [1998] 2000. Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446217856Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2002. Discourse and racism. In David Goldberg & John Solomos (eds.), The Blackwell companion to racial and ethnic studies, 145–159. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631206163.2002.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2014. Discourse and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 32–70. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2000. Just and unjust wars. A moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl & Karin Liebhart. 2009. The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Majid KhosraviNik & Brigittte Mral. 2013. Right–wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academics.10.5040/9781472544940Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston