Abstract
This paper provides data from a regional dialect of Persian, Hamedanian Persian, where a verb is grammaticalized to be used as epistemic modality marker, frequently used in interrogatives. The verb didan, objectively means ‘to see’, but subjectivized in many instances to mean ‘understand’. However, in this dialect, bini, originally the subjunctive second person singular form of the verb didan ‘to see’, is used as epistemic marker. It is used in content and polar questions, where uncertainty is a common feature. Our fieldwork data show that the verb didan is used rarely to mean ‘to see’ and it extended to mark epistemic modality, used as probability marker. This modal marker is only used in questions, which share the stance of uncertainty with epistemic markers. The various features of this grammaticalization path are discussed and an explanation based on egophoricity is provided.
References
Bavin, Edith L. 1995. The obligation modality in Western Nilotic languages. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.32.06bavSearch in Google Scholar
Beijering, Karin. 2012. Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface, vol. 106. Groningen: University of Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Bencini, Giulia. 2003. Toward a diachronic typology of yes/no question constructions with particles. In David W. Kaiser, Jonathan E. Cihlar, Amy L. Franklin & Irene Kimbara (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 39. The Main Session, 604–621. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California Dissertations. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Austin & David E. Watters. 1973. A survey of clause patterns. In Austin Hale & David E. Watters (eds.), Clause, sentence, and discourse patterns in selected languages of Nepal, Part II, 175–249. Kathmandu: SIL and Tribhuvan University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hölzl, Andreas. 2016. Towards a new typology of questions. Bavarian Working Papers in Linguistics 5. 17–28.Search in Google Scholar
Hölzl, Andreas. 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond. An ecological perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316479704Search in Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann K. S. 1961. Persian grammar. London: CUP.Search in Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1992. A grammar of contemporary Persian. Cosa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers in Association with Bibliotheca Persica.Search in Google Scholar
Mallory, J. P. & D. Q. Adams. 2006. The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht & Karl Pajusalu. 2017. Where do polar question markers come from? STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(3). 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0022.Search in Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2018. Egophoricity. An introduction. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 1–77. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.118.01sanSearch in Google Scholar
Sneddon, James N. 1996. Indonesian. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Taleghani, Azita H. 2008. Modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.128Search in Google Scholar
Taleghani, Azita H. 2010. Persian progressive tense: Serial verb construction or aspectual complex predicate? Iranian Studies 43(5). 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2010.518026.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
