No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Quantum Computing: Bridging the National Security–Digital Sovereignty Divide
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2023
Abstract
Quantum computing research and development efforts have grown dramatically over the past decades, led in part by initiatives from governments around the world. Government quantum computing investments are often driven by national security or digital sovereignty concerns, with the language used depending on the geography involved. For example, a focus on “national security” and quantum computing is prominent in the USA, while European countries regularly focus on “digital sovereignty”. These phrases are often loosely defined and open to interpretation, and they share some common motivations and characteristics (but also have important differences). This paper identifies specific governmental entities typifying the national security/digital sovereignty perspectives, along with these organisations’ respective roles within national and international policy engagement in quantum computing. It analyses governmental structures, historical developments and cultural characteristics that contributed to this national security–digital sovereignty divide. Building on this analysis, we use the history of other technologies to illustrate how we might adapt tested policy approaches to modern political dynamics and to quantum computing specifically. We frame these policy approaches so that they do not overemphasise “digital sovereignty” or “national security”, but rather address interests shared across both concepts, with a view to facilitating international collaboration.
- Type
- Symposium on Climate, AI & Quantum: Europe’s Regulatory Horizon
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Cf T Roberson, J Leach and S Raman, “Talking about public good for the second quantum revolution: analysing quantum technology narratives in the context of national strategies” (2021) 6(2) Quantum Science and Technology 025001.
2 National Quantum Initiative Act 2018.
3 John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019.
4 European Commission, “Introduction to the Quantum Flagship” (Quantum Technology, 2020) <https://qt.eu/about-quantum-flagship/introduction-to-the-quantum-flagship/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
5 ibid.
6 A Thoss, “€650 million for quantum research in Germany” (Laser Focus World, 2018) <www.laserfocusworld.com/lasers-sources/article/16571451/650-million-for-quantum-research-in-germany/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
7 ibid.
8 É Kelly, “Germany to invest €2B in quantum technologies” (Science Business, 2021) <https://sciencebusiness.net/news/germany-invest-eu2b-quantum-technologies/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
9 ibid.
10 O Noyan, “Germany launches Europe’s first ‘revolutionary’ quantum computer” (Euractiv, 2021) <www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/germany-launches-europes-first-revolutionary-quantum-computer/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
11 ibid.
12 ibid.
13 C Goujard, “Germany unveils powerful quantum computer to keep Europe in global tech race” (Politico, 2021) <www.politico.eu/article/germany-unveils-europes-first-quantum-computer/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
14 S Felix, “French research at the heart of the Quantum Plan” (CNRS News, 2021) <https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/french-research-at-the-heart-of-the-quantum-plan/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
15 ibid.
16 A-F Pelé, “French President Details €1.8b Quantum Plan” (EE Times, 2021) <www.eetimes.eu/french-president-details-e1-8b-quantum-plan/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
17 V Booth, “Eason. Quantum computer, a sovereignty issue for France and the European Union” (Tech News Insight, 2021) <https://technewsinsight.com/eason-quantum-computer-a-sovereignty-issue-for-france-and-the-european-union/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
18 DL da Silva et al, “Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2021” (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2021) <www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/fs_2204_milex_2021_0.pdf> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
19 “About DARPA” (Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, 2023) <www.darpa.mil/about-us/about-darpa> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
20 K Featherly, “ARPANET: United States defense program” (Britannica, 2022) <www.britannica.com/topic/ARPANET> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
21 JCR Licklider, “Memorandum for Members and Affiliates of the Intergalactic Computer Network” (1963).
22 J Markoff, “Robert Taylor, Innovator Who Shaped Modern Computing, Dies at 85” (The New York Times, 2017) <www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/technology/robert-taylor-innovator-who-shaped-modern-computing-dies-at-85.html> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
23 J Pohle and T Thiel, “Digital sovereignty” (2020) 9(4) Internet Policy Review <https://policyreview.info/concepts/digital-sovereignty/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
24 E Amiot et al, “European Digital Sovereignty: Syncing values and value” (Oliver Wyman, 2020) <www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2020/october/European%20Digital%20Sovereignty.pdf> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
25 Fortune, “Global 500” (2022) <https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/2021/search/?sector=Technology> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
26 H Vaske, “European cloud project Gaia-X is stuck in the concept stage” (CIO, 2022) <www.cio.com/article/308818/european-cloud-project-gaia-x-is-stuck-in-the-concept-stage.html> (last accessed 31 August 2022); C Goujard and L Cerulus, “Inside Gaia-X: How chaos and infighting are killing Europe’s grand cloud project” (Politico, 2021) <www.politico.eu/article/chaos-and-infighting-are-killing-europes-grand-cloud-project/> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
27 Synergy Research Group, “European Cloud Providers Double in Size but Lose Market Share” (2021) <www.srgresearch.com/articles/european-cloud-providers-double-in-size-but-lose-market-share> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
28 H Wright, “Estonia, EU countries propose faster ‘European digital sovereignty’” (ERR News, 2021) <https://news.err.ee/1608127618/estonia-eu-countries-propose-faster-european-digital-sovereignty> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
29 NASA, “International Cooperation” (Nasa.gov) <www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/cooperation/index.html> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
30 National Human Genome Research Institute, “The Human Genome Project” (Genome.gov) <www.genome.gov/human-genome-project> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
31 LC Druedahl, T Minssen and WN Price, “Collaboration in times of crisis: A study on COVID-19 vaccine R&D partnerships” (2021) 39(42) Vaccine 6291.
32 C Watson, “Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever” (2022) 28 Nature Medicine 2.
33 B Maher and R Van Noorden, “How the COVID pandemic is changing global science collaborations” (Nature, 2021) <www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01570-2> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
34 JB Bump, P Friberg and D Harper, “International collaboration and Covid-19: what are we doing and where are we going?” (2021) 372 BMJ 180.
35 P Zhu and X Tan, “Evaluating the effectiveness of Hong Kong’s border restriction policy in reducing COVID-19 infections” (2022) 22 BMC Public Health 803; Z Zhu et al, “Sustainable border control policy in the COVID-19 pandemic: A math modeling study” (2021) 41 Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 102044.
36 Associated Press, “WHO: Omicron makes China’s ‘zero-COVID’ policy unsustainable” (AP News, 2022) <https://apnews.com/article/covid-health-china-pandemics-united-nations-c2b99ca8ce5f99f0d2b60aa6dcb8c2d5> (last accessed 31 August 2022).
37 C Ten Holter, P Inglesant, R Srivatava and M Jirotka, “Bridging the quantum divides: a chance to repair classic(al) mistakes?” (2022) 7(4) Quantum Science and Technology 044006.
38 A Silver, J Tollefson and E Gibney, “How US–China political tensions are affecting science” (2019) 568 Nature 443.