Abstract
Qualitative analytical methods are important in many academic fields, including informatics. Although qualitative content analysis (QCA) is used for text, a coding method for a solo researcher has rarely been discussed. This work suggests a systematic QCA process for single coding based on the inductive-dominant approach. We developed a single coding method with a practical example based on an 11-step process: (1) decide research questions and purposes, (2) collect texts for analysis, (3) determine the unit of analysis, (4) engage in partial inductive coding of the target texts, (5) analyze frequent words found in the text, (6) use these frequent words and inductive coding to create a temporary coding schema, (7) collaborate with multiple experts or researchers to verify the temporary coding schema, (8) code the entire text based on the coding schema, (9) after a certain period, re-code the text based on the coding schema to calculate the intra-rater reliability, (10) confirm the final version of the coding schema, and (11) develop categories through code abstraction. Our process is suitable for a single researcher and for analyzing various text types qualitatively from a specific and consistent perspective. This study provides an exploratory foundation for examining the single coding process.
Funding source: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20H04479
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Dr. Michael M. Widdersheim (Assistant Professor, School of Library and Information Management, Emporia State University) for his valuable input and assistance in wording choices and proofreading.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 20H04479).
References
Armat, M. R., A. Assarroudi, M. Rad, H. Sharifi, and A. Heydari. 2018. “Inductive and Deductive: Ambiguous Labels in Qualitative Content Analysis.” The Qualitative Report 23 (1): 219–21. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2872.Search in Google Scholar
Barbour, R. S. 2001. “Checklists for Improving Rigour in Qualitative Research: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog?” BMJ 322 (7294): 1115–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.Search in Google Scholar
Belotto, M. 2018. “Data Analysis Methods for Qualitative Research: Managing the Challenges of Coding, Interrater Reliability, and Thematic Analysis.” The Qualitative Report 23 (11): 2622–33. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3492.Search in Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M. 2016. “How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis.” NursingPlus Open 2: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.Search in Google Scholar
Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bidoki, M., M. R. Moosavi, and M. Fakhrahmad. 2020. “A Semantic Approach to Extractive Multi-Document Summarization: Applying Sentence Expansion for Tuning of Conceptual Densities.” Information Processing and Management 57 (6): 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102341.Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, E. H., L. A. Curry, and K. J. Devers. 2007. “Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory.” Health Services Research 42 (4): 1758–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, J. 1993. “Methodological Issues and Practices in Qualitative Research.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 63 (4): 431–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/602620.Search in Google Scholar
Burla, L., B. Knierim, J. Barth, K. Liewald, M. Duetz, and T. Abel. 2008. “From Text to Codings: Intercoder Reliability Assessment in Qualitative Content Analysis.” Nursing Research 57 (2): 113–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. “Coding In-Depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3): 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475.Search in Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Dempsey, P. R. 2018. “How LIS Scholars Conceptualize Rigor in Qualitative Data.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 18 (2): 363–90. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2018.0020.Search in Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. 1989. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.Search in Google Scholar
Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness.” SAGE Open 4 (1): 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633.Search in Google Scholar
Flick, U. 2007. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verl.Search in Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1965. “Discovery of Substantive Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitative Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 8 (6): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426500800602.Search in Google Scholar
Graneheim, U. H., B.-M. Lindgren, and B. Lundman. 2017. “Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper.” Nurse Education Today 56: 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.Search in Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2005. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., 191–215. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Hagen, L. 2018. “Content Analysis of E-Petitions with Topic Modeling: How to Train and Evaluate LDA Models?” Information Processing and Management 54 (6): 1292–307.10.1016/j.ipm.2018.05.006Search in Google Scholar
Hemmler, V. L., A. W. Kenney, S. D. Langley, C. M. Callahan, E. J. Gubbins, and S. Holder. 2020. “Beyond a Coefficient: An Interactive Process for Achieving Inter-Rater Consistency in Qualitative Coding.” Qualitative Research 22 (2): 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120976072.Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.Search in Google Scholar
Janesick, V. J. 2003. “The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design: Minuets, Improvisations, and Crystallization.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 2nd ed., 46–79. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Kracauer, S. 1952. “The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16 (4, Special issue on international communications research): 631–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/266427.Search in Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446288719Search in Google Scholar
Kuckartz, U. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: From Kracauer’s Beginnings to Today’s Challenges.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): 12. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3370.Search in Google Scholar
Lacy, S., and D. Riffe. 1996. “Sampling Error and Selecting Intercoder Reliability Samples for Nominal Content Categories.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73 (4): 963–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300414.Search in Google Scholar
Lewinski, A. A., R. A. Anderson, A. A. Vorderstrasse, and C. M. Johnson. 2019. “Developing Methods that Facilitate Coding and Analysis of Synchronous Conversations via Virtual Environments.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 160940691984244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919842443.Search in Google Scholar
Li, W., and E. Suzuki. 2021. “Adaptive and Hybrid Context-Aware Fine-Grained Word Sense Disambiguation in Topic Modeling Based Document Representation.” Information Processing & Management 58 (4): 102592.10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102592Search in Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8Search in Google Scholar
Lindgren, B.-M., B. Lundman, and U. H. Graneheim. 2020. “Abstraction and Interpretation During the Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 108: 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632.Search in Google Scholar
Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. C. Bracken. 2002. “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.” Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.Search in Google Scholar
Mackey, A., and S. M. Gass. 2005. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. 1983. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz.Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2): 2. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13Search in Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Meškelė, D., and F. Frasincar. 2020. “ALDONAr: A Hybrid Solution for Sentence-Level Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using a Lexicalized Domain Ontology and a Regularized Neural Attention Model.” Information Processing and Management 57 (3): 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102211.Search in Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. 2013. “Study Quality in SLA: An Assessment of Designs, Analyses, and Reporting Practices in Quantitative L2 Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 (4): 655–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399.Search in Google Scholar
Prasad, B. D. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Why is it Still a Path Less Taken?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): 36. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3392.Search in Google Scholar
Qureshi, H. A., and Z. Ünlü. 2020. “Beyond the Paradigm Conflicts: A Four-Step Coding Instrument for Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920928188.Search in Google Scholar
Richards, L. 2005. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Richards, L., and J. M. Morse. 2007. Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks Calif.: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Schreier, M., C. Stamann, M. Janssen, T. Dahl, and A. Whittal. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Conceptualizations and Challenges in Research Practice—Introduction to the FQS Special Issue ‘Qualitative Content Analysis I’.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): 38. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3393.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, K. W., and D. Howell. 2008. “Clarifying Analysis and Interpretation in Grounded Theory: Using a Conditional Relationship Guide and Reflective Coding Matrix.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700201.Search in Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842Search in Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.Search in Google Scholar
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak, and E. Vetter, eds. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.10.4135/9780857024480Search in Google Scholar
Van Ewijk, A. 2018. “Persistence and Acuteness of Research Gaps in Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Content Analysis of Previous Reviews (1987–2017).” International Journal of Entrepreneurship 22 (2): 1–18. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/persistence-and-acuteness-of-research-gaps-in-entrepreneurship-education-a-systematic-content-analysis-of-previous-reviews-1987201-7160.html (accessed August 10, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Van Scoyoc, A., J. A. Harrison, and P. A. Fisher. 2017. “Beliefs and Behaviors of Pregnant Women with Addictions Awaiting Treatment Initiation.” Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 34 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0474-0.Search in Google Scholar
Vears, D. F., and L. Gillam. 2022. “Inductive Content Analysis: A Guide for Beginning Qualitative Researchers.” Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal 23 (1): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, R. P. 1985. Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, K., L. M. Given, and P. Scifleet. 2018. “Qualitative Data Analysis.” In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts, edited by K. Williamson, and G. Johanson, 2nd ed., 453–76. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00019-4Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. “Qualitative Analysis of Content.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 308–19. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., S. Yang, Y. Li, Y. Chen, J. Yao, and A. Qazi. 2020. “Does the Review Deserve More Helpfulness When its Title Resembles the Content? Locating Helpful Reviews by Text Mining.” Information Processing and Management 57 (2): 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102179.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston